From b91cfaa34f44386786c64bbf80d296b84ecc811e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Freund Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:25:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are initialized. Once the counter goes negative we ended up with spinlocks that errored out on first use (due to check in tas_sema). Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5- --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c index d0c431b97d..f44e5e2b37 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ SpinlockSemaInit(void) void s_init_lock_sema(volatile slock_t *lock, bool nested) { - static int counter = 0; + static uint32 counter = 0; *lock = ((++counter) % NUM_SPINLOCK_SEMAPHORES) + 1; }