Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent

We say 'OWNER TO' in the synopsis; let's use that form elsewhere.

There is a paragraph in the <note> section that refers to various
subcommands very loosely (including OWNER); I didn't think it was an
improvement to change that one.

This is a fairly inconsequential change, so no backpatch.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/69ec7b51-03e5-f523-95ce-c070ee790e70@lab.ntt.co.jp
This commit is contained in:
Alvaro Herrera 2017-10-18 13:29:16 +02:00
parent f5b7309333
commit bf54c0f05c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>OWNER</literal></term>
<term><literal>OWNER TO</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
This form changes the owner of the table, sequence, view, materialized view,