Fix parallel amvacuumcleanup safety bug.

Commit b4af70cb inverted the return value of the function
parallel_processing_is_safe(), but missed the amvacuumcleanup test.
Index AMs that don't support parallel cleanup at all were affected.

The practical consequences of this bug were not very serious.  Hash
indexes are affected, but since they just return the number of blocks
during hashvacuumcleanup anyway, it can't have had much impact.

Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoA-Em+aeVPmBbL_s1V-ghsJQSxYL-i3JP8nTfPiD1wjKw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where commit b4af70cb appears.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Geoghegan 2021-11-02 19:52:11 -07:00
parent 24f9e49e43
commit c59278a1aa

View File

@ -4116,7 +4116,7 @@ parallel_processing_is_safe(Relation indrel, LVShared *lvshared)
/* Skip, if the index does not support parallel cleanup */
if (((vacoptions & VACUUM_OPTION_PARALLEL_CLEANUP) == 0) &&
((vacoptions & VACUUM_OPTION_PARALLEL_COND_CLEANUP) == 0))
return true;
return false;
/*
* Skip, if the index supports parallel cleanup conditionally, but we