Allow partitionwise joins in more cases.

Previously, the partitionwise join technique only allowed partitionwise
join when input partitioned tables had exactly the same partition
bounds.  This commit extends the technique to some cases when the tables
have different partition bounds, by using an advanced partition-matching
algorithm introduced by this commit.  For both the input partitioned
tables, the algorithm checks whether every partition of one input
partitioned table only matches one partition of the other input
partitioned table at most, and vice versa.  In such a case the join
between the tables can be broken down into joins between the matching
partitions, so the algorithm produces the pairs of the matching
partitions, plus the partition bounds for the join relation, to allow
partitionwise join for computing the join.  Currently, the algorithm
works for list-partitioned and range-partitioned tables, but not
hash-partitioned tables.  See comments in partition_bounds_merge().

Ashutosh Bapat and Etsuro Fujita, most of regression tests by Rajkumar
Raghuwanshi, some of the tests by Mark Dilger and Amul Sul, reviewed by
Dmitry Dolgov and Amul Sul, with additional review at various points by
Ashutosh Bapat, Mark Dilger, Robert Haas, Antonin Houska, Amit Langote,
Justin Pryzby, and Tomas Vondra

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRdjQvaUEV5DJX3TW6pU5eq54NCkadtxHX2JiJG_GvbrCA@mail.gmail.com

doc/src/sgml/config.sgml

@@ -4749,9 +4749,9 @@ ANY <replaceable class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class="
         which allows a join between partitioned tables to be performed by
         joining the matching partitions.  Partitionwise join currently applies
         only when the join conditions include all the partition keys, which
-        must be of the same data type and have exactly matching sets of child
-        partitions.  Because partitionwise join planning can use significantly
-        more CPU time and memory during planning, the default is
+        must be of the same data type and have one-to-one matching sets of
+        child partitions.  Because partitionwise join planning can use
+        significantly more CPU time and memory during planning, the default is
         <literal>off</literal>.
        </para>
       </listitem>

src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c

@@ -2309,6 +2309,8 @@ _outRelOptInfo(StringInfo str, const RelOptInfo *node)
 	WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(has_eclass_joins);
 	WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(consider_partitionwise_join);
 	WRITE_BITMAPSET_FIELD(top_parent_relids);
+	WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(partbounds_merged);
+	WRITE_BITMAPSET_FIELD(all_partrels);
 	WRITE_NODE_FIELD(partitioned_child_rels);
 }
 

src/backend/optimizer/README

@@ -1106,6 +1106,33 @@ into joins between their partitions is called partitionwise join. We will use
 term "partitioned relation" for either a partitioned table or a join between
 compatibly partitioned tables.
 
+Even if the joining relations don't have exactly the same partition bounds,
+partitionwise join can still be applied by using an advanced
+partition-matching algorithm.  For both the joining relations, the algorithm
+checks wether every partition of one joining relation only matches one
+partition of the other joining relation at most.  In such a case the join
+between the joining relations can be broken down into joins between the
+matching partitions.  The join relation can then be considerd partitioned.
+The algorithm produces the pairs of the matching partitions, plus the
+partition bounds for the join relation, to allow partitionwise join for
+computing the join.  The algorithm is implemented in partition_bounds_merge().
+For an N-way join relation considered partitioned this way, not every pair of
+joining relations can use partitionwise join.  For example:
+
+	(A leftjoin B on (Pab)) innerjoin C on (Pac)
+
+where A, B, and C are partitioned tables, and A has an extra partition
+compared to B and C.  When considering partitionwise join for the join {A B},
+the extra partition of A doesn't have a matching partition on the nullable
+side, which is the case that the current implementation of partitionwise join
+can't handle.  So {A B} is not considered partitioned, and the pair of {A B}
+and C considered for the 3-way join can't use partitionwise join.  On the
+other hand, the pair of {A C} and B can use partitionwise join because {A C}
+is considered partitioned by eliminating the extra partition (see identity 1
+on outer join reordering).  Whether an N-way join can use partitionwise join
+is determined based on the first pair of joining relations that are both
+partitioned and can use partitionwise join.
+
 The partitioning properties of a partitioned relation are stored in its
 RelOptInfo.  The information about data types of partition keys are stored in
 PartitionSchemeData structure. The planner maintains a list of canonical

src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c

@@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ static void try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1,
 static SpecialJoinInfo *build_child_join_sjinfo(PlannerInfo *root,
 												SpecialJoinInfo *parent_sjinfo,
 												Relids left_relids, Relids right_relids);
+static void compute_partition_bounds(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1,
+									 RelOptInfo *rel2, RelOptInfo *joinrel,
+									 SpecialJoinInfo *parent_sjinfo,
+									 List **parts1, List **parts2);
+static void get_matching_part_pairs(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *joinrel,
+									RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
+									List **parts1, List **parts2);
 
 
 /*
@@ -1354,25 +1361,29 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
 {
 	bool		rel1_is_simple = IS_SIMPLE_REL(rel1);
 	bool		rel2_is_simple = IS_SIMPLE_REL(rel2);
-	int			nparts;
+	List	   *parts1 = NIL;
+	List	   *parts2 = NIL;
+	ListCell   *lcr1 = NULL;
+	ListCell   *lcr2 = NULL;
 	int			cnt_parts;
 
 	/* Guard against stack overflow due to overly deep partition hierarchy. */
 	check_stack_depth();
 
 	/* Nothing to do, if the join relation is not partitioned. */
-	if (!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(joinrel))
+	if (joinrel->part_scheme == NULL || joinrel->nparts == 0)
 		return;
 
 	/* The join relation should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */
 	Assert(joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join);
 
 	/*
-	 * Since this join relation is partitioned, all the base relations
-	 * participating in this join must be partitioned and so are all the
-	 * intermediate join relations.
+	 * We can not perform partitionwise join if either of the joining relations
+	 * is not partitioned.
 	 */
-	Assert(IS_PARTITIONED_REL(rel1) && IS_PARTITIONED_REL(rel2));
+	if (!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(rel1) || !IS_PARTITIONED_REL(rel2))
+		return;
+
 	Assert(REL_HAS_ALL_PART_PROPS(rel1) && REL_HAS_ALL_PART_PROPS(rel2));
 
 	/* The joining relations should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */
@@ -1386,35 +1397,28 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
 	Assert(joinrel->part_scheme == rel1->part_scheme &&
 		   joinrel->part_scheme == rel2->part_scheme);
 
-	/*
-	 * Since we allow partitionwise join only when the partition bounds of the
-	 * joining relations exactly match, the partition bounds of the join
-	 * should match those of the joining relations.
-	 */
-	Assert(partition_bounds_equal(joinrel->part_scheme->partnatts,
-								  joinrel->part_scheme->parttyplen,
-								  joinrel->part_scheme->parttypbyval,
-								  joinrel->boundinfo, rel1->boundinfo));
-	Assert(partition_bounds_equal(joinrel->part_scheme->partnatts,
-								  joinrel->part_scheme->parttyplen,
-								  joinrel->part_scheme->parttypbyval,
-								  joinrel->boundinfo, rel2->boundinfo));
+	Assert(!(joinrel->partbounds_merged && (joinrel->nparts <= 0)));
 
-	nparts = joinrel->nparts;
+	compute_partition_bounds(root, rel1, rel2, joinrel, parent_sjinfo,
+							 &parts1, &parts2);
+
+	if (joinrel->partbounds_merged)
+	{
+		lcr1 = list_head(parts1);
+		lcr2 = list_head(parts2);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Create child-join relations for this partitioned join, if those don't
 	 * exist. Add paths to child-joins for a pair of child relations
 	 * corresponding to the given pair of parent relations.
 	 */
-	for (cnt_parts = 0; cnt_parts < nparts; cnt_parts++)
+	for (cnt_parts = 0; cnt_parts < joinrel->nparts; cnt_parts++)
 	{
-		RelOptInfo *child_rel1 = rel1->part_rels[cnt_parts];
-		RelOptInfo *child_rel2 = rel2->part_rels[cnt_parts];
-		bool		rel1_empty = (child_rel1 == NULL ||
-								  IS_DUMMY_REL(child_rel1));
-		bool		rel2_empty = (child_rel2 == NULL ||
-								  IS_DUMMY_REL(child_rel2));
+		RelOptInfo *child_rel1;
+		RelOptInfo *child_rel2;
+		bool		rel1_empty;
+		bool		rel2_empty;
 		SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo;
 		List	   *child_restrictlist;
 		RelOptInfo *child_joinrel;
@@ -1422,6 +1426,22 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
 		AppendRelInfo **appinfos;
 		int			nappinfos;
 
+		if (joinrel->partbounds_merged)
+		{
+			child_rel1 = lfirst_node(RelOptInfo, lcr1);
+			child_rel2 = lfirst_node(RelOptInfo, lcr2);
+			lcr1 = lnext(parts1, lcr1);
+			lcr2 = lnext(parts2, lcr2);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			child_rel1 = rel1->part_rels[cnt_parts];
+			child_rel2 = rel2->part_rels[cnt_parts];
+		}
+
+		rel1_empty = (child_rel1 == NULL || IS_DUMMY_REL(child_rel1));
+		rel2_empty = (child_rel2 == NULL || IS_DUMMY_REL(child_rel2));
+
 		/*
 		 * Check for cases where we can prove that this segment of the join
 		 * returns no rows, due to one or both inputs being empty (including
@@ -1519,6 +1539,8 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
 												 child_sjinfo,
 												 child_sjinfo->jointype);
 			joinrel->part_rels[cnt_parts] = child_joinrel;
+			joinrel->all_partrels = bms_add_members(joinrel->all_partrels,
+													child_joinrel->relids);
 		}
 
 		Assert(bms_equal(child_joinrel->relids, child_joinrelids));
@@ -1570,3 +1592,190 @@ build_child_join_sjinfo(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *parent_sjinfo,
 
 	return sjinfo;
 }
+
+/*
+ * compute_partition_bounds
+ *		Compute the partition bounds for a join rel from those for inputs
+ */
+static void
+compute_partition_bounds(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1,
+						 RelOptInfo *rel2, RelOptInfo *joinrel,
+						 SpecialJoinInfo *parent_sjinfo,
+						 List **parts1, List **parts2)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If we don't have the partition bounds for the join rel yet, try to
+	 * compute those along with pairs of partitions to be joined.
+	 */
+	if (joinrel->nparts == -1)
+	{
+		PartitionScheme part_scheme = joinrel->part_scheme;
+		PartitionBoundInfo boundinfo = NULL;
+		int			nparts = 0;
+
+		Assert(joinrel->boundinfo == NULL);
+		Assert(joinrel->part_rels == NULL);
+
+		/*
+		 * See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
+		 * which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
+		 * partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
+		 * cardinal positions form the pairs.
+		 *
+		 * Note: even in cases where one or both inputs have merged bounds,
+		 * it would be possible for both the bounds to be exactly the same, but
+		 * it seems unlikely to be worth the cycles to check.
+		 */
+		if (!rel1->partbounds_merged &&
+			!rel2->partbounds_merged &&
+			rel1->nparts == rel2->nparts &&
+			partition_bounds_equal(part_scheme->partnatts,
+								   part_scheme->parttyplen,
+								   part_scheme->parttypbyval,
+								   rel1->boundinfo, rel2->boundinfo))
+		{
+			boundinfo = rel1->boundinfo;
+			nparts = rel1->nparts;
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			/* Try merging the partition bounds for inputs. */
+			boundinfo = partition_bounds_merge(part_scheme->partnatts,
+											   part_scheme->partsupfunc,
+											   part_scheme->partcollation,
+											   rel1, rel2,
+											   parent_sjinfo->jointype,
+											   parts1, parts2);
+			if (boundinfo == NULL)
+			{
+				joinrel->nparts = 0;
+				return;
+			}
+			nparts = list_length(*parts1);
+			joinrel->partbounds_merged = true;
+		}
+
+		Assert(nparts > 0);
+		joinrel->boundinfo = boundinfo;
+		joinrel->nparts = nparts;
+		joinrel->part_rels =
+			(RelOptInfo **) palloc0(sizeof(RelOptInfo *) * nparts);
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		Assert(joinrel->nparts > 0);
+		Assert(joinrel->boundinfo);
+		Assert(joinrel->part_rels);
+
+		/*
+		 * If the join rel's partbounds_merged flag is true, it means inputs
+		 * are not guaranteed to have the same partition bounds, therefore we
+		 * can't assume that the partitions at the same cardinal positions form
+		 * the pairs; let get_matching_part_pairs() generate the pairs.
+		 * Otherwise, nothing to do since we can assume that.
+		 */
+		if (joinrel->partbounds_merged)
+		{
+			get_matching_part_pairs(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
+									parts1, parts2);
+			Assert(list_length(*parts1) == joinrel->nparts);
+			Assert(list_length(*parts2) == joinrel->nparts);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * get_matching_part_pairs
+ *		Generate pairs of partitions to be joined from inputs
+ */
+static void
+get_matching_part_pairs(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *joinrel,
+						RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
+						List **parts1, List **parts2)
+{
+	bool		rel1_is_simple = IS_SIMPLE_REL(rel1);
+	bool		rel2_is_simple = IS_SIMPLE_REL(rel2);
+	int 		cnt_parts;
+
+	*parts1 = NIL;
+	*parts2 = NIL;
+
+	for (cnt_parts = 0; cnt_parts < joinrel->nparts; cnt_parts++)
+	{
+		RelOptInfo *child_joinrel = joinrel->part_rels[cnt_parts];
+		RelOptInfo *child_rel1;
+		RelOptInfo *child_rel2;
+		Relids		child_relids1;
+		Relids		child_relids2;
+
+		/*
+		 * If this segment of the join is empty, it means that this segment
+		 * was ignored when previously creating child-join paths for it in
+		 * try_partitionwise_join() as it would not contribute to the join
+		 * result, due to one or both inputs being empty; add NULL to each of
+		 * the given lists so that this segment will be ignored again in that
+		 * function.
+		 */
+		if (!child_joinrel)
+		{
+			*parts1 = lappend(*parts1, NULL);
+			*parts2 = lappend(*parts2, NULL);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Get a relids set of partition(s) involved in this join segment that
+		 * are from the rel1 side.
+		 */
+		child_relids1 = bms_intersect(child_joinrel->relids,
+									  rel1->all_partrels);
+		Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids1) == bms_num_members(rel1->relids));
+
+		/*
+		 * Get a child rel for rel1 with the relids.  Note that we should have
+		 * the child rel even if rel1 is a join rel, because in that case the
+		 * partitions specified in the relids would have matching/overlapping
+		 * boundaries, so the specified partitions should be considered as ones
+		 * to be joined when planning partitionwise joins of rel1, meaning that
+		 * the child rel would have been built by the time we get here.
+		 */
+		if (rel1_is_simple)
+		{
+			int			varno = bms_singleton_member(child_relids1);
+
+			child_rel1 = find_base_rel(root, varno);
+		}
+		else
+			child_rel1 = find_join_rel(root, child_relids1);
+		Assert(child_rel1);
+
+		/*
+		 * Get a relids set of partition(s) involved in this join segment that
+		 * are from the rel2 side.
+		 */
+		child_relids2 = bms_intersect(child_joinrel->relids,
+									  rel2->all_partrels);
+		Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids2) == bms_num_members(rel2->relids));
+
+		/*
+		 * Get a child rel for rel2 with the relids.  See above comments.
+		 */
+		if (rel2_is_simple)
+		{
+			int			varno = bms_singleton_member(child_relids2);
+
+			child_rel2 = find_base_rel(root, varno);
+		}
+		else
+			child_rel2 = find_join_rel(root, child_relids2);
+		Assert(child_rel2);
+
+		/*
+		 * The join of rel1 and rel2 is legal, so is the join of the child
+		 * rels obtained above; add them to the given lists as a join pair
+		 * producing this join segment.
+		 */
+		*parts1 = lappend(*parts1, child_rel1);
+		*parts2 = lappend(*parts2, child_rel2);
+	}
+}

src/backend/optimizer/util/inherit.c

@@ -376,6 +376,8 @@ expand_partitioned_rtentry(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *relinfo,
 		/* Create the otherrel RelOptInfo too. */
 		childrelinfo = build_simple_rel(root, childRTindex, relinfo);
 		relinfo->part_rels[i] = childrelinfo;
+		relinfo->all_partrels = bms_add_members(relinfo->all_partrels,
+												childrelinfo->relids);
 
 		/* If this child is itself partitioned, recurse */
 		if (childrel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)

src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c

@@ -249,10 +249,12 @@ build_simple_rel(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, RelOptInfo *parent)
 	rel->has_eclass_joins = false;
 	rel->consider_partitionwise_join = false;	/* might get changed later */
 	rel->part_scheme = NULL;
-	rel->nparts = 0;
+	rel->nparts = -1;
 	rel->boundinfo = NULL;
+	rel->partbounds_merged = false;
 	rel->partition_qual = NIL;
 	rel->part_rels = NULL;
+	rel->all_partrels = NULL;
 	rel->partexprs = NULL;
 	rel->nullable_partexprs = NULL;
 	rel->partitioned_child_rels = NIL;
@@ -662,10 +664,12 @@ build_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root,
 	joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join = false;	/* might get changed later */
 	joinrel->top_parent_relids = NULL;
 	joinrel->part_scheme = NULL;
-	joinrel->nparts = 0;
+	joinrel->nparts = -1;
 	joinrel->boundinfo = NULL;
+	joinrel->partbounds_merged = false;
 	joinrel->partition_qual = NIL;
 	joinrel->part_rels = NULL;
+	joinrel->all_partrels = NULL;
 	joinrel->partexprs = NULL;
 	joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL;
 	joinrel->partitioned_child_rels = NIL;
@@ -838,10 +842,12 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 	joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join = false;	/* might get changed later */
 	joinrel->top_parent_relids = NULL;
 	joinrel->part_scheme = NULL;
-	joinrel->nparts = 0;
+	joinrel->nparts = -1;
 	joinrel->boundinfo = NULL;
+	joinrel->partbounds_merged = false;
 	joinrel->partition_qual = NIL;
 	joinrel->part_rels = NULL;
+	joinrel->all_partrels = NULL;
 	joinrel->partexprs = NULL;
 	joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL;
 	joinrel->partitioned_child_rels = NIL;
@@ -1645,7 +1651,7 @@ build_joinrel_partition_info(RelOptInfo *joinrel, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 	 * of the way the query planner deduces implied equalities and reorders
 	 * the joins.  Please see optimizer/README for details.
 	 */
-	if (!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(outer_rel) || !IS_PARTITIONED_REL(inner_rel) ||
+	if (outer_rel->part_scheme == NULL || inner_rel->part_scheme == NULL ||
 		!outer_rel->consider_partitionwise_join ||
 		!inner_rel->consider_partitionwise_join ||
 		outer_rel->part_scheme != inner_rel->part_scheme ||
@@ -1658,24 +1664,6 @@ build_joinrel_partition_info(RelOptInfo *joinrel, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 
 	part_scheme = outer_rel->part_scheme;
 
-	Assert(REL_HAS_ALL_PART_PROPS(outer_rel) &&
-		   REL_HAS_ALL_PART_PROPS(inner_rel));
-
-	/*
-	 * For now, our partition matching algorithm can match partitions only
-	 * when the partition bounds of the joining relations are exactly same.
-	 * So, bail out otherwise.
-	 */
-	if (outer_rel->nparts != inner_rel->nparts ||
-		!partition_bounds_equal(part_scheme->partnatts,
-								part_scheme->parttyplen,
-								part_scheme->parttypbyval,
-								outer_rel->boundinfo, inner_rel->boundinfo))
-	{
-		Assert(!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(joinrel));
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * This function will be called only once for each joinrel, hence it
 	 * should not have partitioning fields filled yet.
@@ -1685,18 +1673,15 @@ build_joinrel_partition_info(RelOptInfo *joinrel, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 		   !joinrel->boundinfo);
 
 	/*
-	 * Join relation is partitioned using the same partitioning scheme as the
-	 * joining relations and has same bounds.
+	 * If the join relation is partitioned, it uses the same partitioning
+	 * scheme as the joining relations.
+	 *
+	 * Note: we calculate the partition bounds, number of partitions, and
+	 * child-join relations of the join relation in try_partitionwise_join().
 	 */
 	joinrel->part_scheme = part_scheme;
-	joinrel->boundinfo = outer_rel->boundinfo;
-	joinrel->nparts = outer_rel->nparts;
 	set_joinrel_partition_key_exprs(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype);
 
-	/* part_rels[] will be filled later, but allocate it now */
-	joinrel->part_rels =
-		(RelOptInfo **) palloc0(sizeof(RelOptInfo *) * joinrel->nparts);
-
 	/*
 	 * Set the consider_partitionwise_join flag.
 	 */

src/include/nodes/pathnodes.h

@@ -597,8 +597,10 @@ typedef struct PartitionSchemeData *PartitionScheme;
  *		part_scheme - Partitioning scheme of the relation
  *		nparts - Number of partitions
  *		boundinfo - Partition bounds
+ *		partbounds_merged - true if partition bounds are merged ones
  *		partition_qual - Partition constraint if not the root
  *		part_rels - RelOptInfos for each partition
+ *		all_partrels - Relids set of all partition relids
  *		partexprs, nullable_partexprs - Partition key expressions
  *		partitioned_child_rels - RT indexes of unpruned partitions of
  *								 this relation that are partitioned tables
@@ -735,11 +737,16 @@ typedef struct RelOptInfo
 
 	/* used for partitioned relations: */
 	PartitionScheme part_scheme;	/* Partitioning scheme */
-	int			nparts;			/* Number of partitions */
+	int			nparts;			/* Number of partitions; -1 if not yet set;
+								 * in case of a join relation 0 means it's
+								 * considered unpartitioned */
 	struct PartitionBoundInfoData *boundinfo;	/* Partition bounds */
+	bool		partbounds_merged;	/* True if partition bounds were created
+									 * by partition_bounds_merge() */
 	List	   *partition_qual; /* Partition constraint, if not the root */
 	struct RelOptInfo **part_rels;	/* Array of RelOptInfos of partitions,
 									 * stored in the same order as bounds */
+	Relids		all_partrels;	/* Relids set of all partition relids */
 	List	  **partexprs;		/* Non-nullable partition key expressions */
 	List	  **nullable_partexprs; /* Nullable partition key expressions */
 	List	   *partitioned_child_rels; /* List of RT indexes */

src/include/partitioning/partbounds.h

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include "nodes/pg_list.h"
 #include "partitioning/partdefs.h"
 #include "utils/relcache.h"
+struct RelOptInfo;				/* avoid including pathnodes.h here */
 
 
 /*
@@ -87,6 +88,14 @@ extern bool partition_bounds_equal(int partnatts, int16 *parttyplen,
 								   PartitionBoundInfo b2);
 extern PartitionBoundInfo partition_bounds_copy(PartitionBoundInfo src,
 												PartitionKey key);
+extern PartitionBoundInfo partition_bounds_merge(int partnatts,
+												 FmgrInfo *partsupfunc,
+												 Oid *partcollation,
+												 struct RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
+												 struct RelOptInfo *inner_rel,
+												 JoinType jointype,
+												 List **outer_parts,
+												 List **inner_parts);
 extern bool partitions_are_ordered(PartitionBoundInfo boundinfo, int nparts);
 extern void check_new_partition_bound(char *relname, Relation parent,
 									  PartitionBoundSpec *spec);

src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql

@@ -445,11 +445,638 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_n t1 JOIN prt2_n t2 ON (t1.c = t2.c) JOI
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_n t1 FULL JOIN prt1 t2 ON (t1.c = t2.c);
 
--- partitionwise join can not be applied if only one of joining tables has
--- default partition
-ALTER TABLE prt2 DETACH PARTITION prt2_p3;
-ALTER TABLE prt2 ATTACH PARTITION prt2_p3 FOR VALUES FROM (500) TO (600);
-ANALYZE prt2;
+
+--
+-- Test advanced partition-matching algorithm for partitioned join
+--
+
+-- Tests for range-partitioned tables
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p1 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (200);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p2 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p3 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (300) TO (400);
+CREATE INDEX prt1_adv_a_idx ON prt1_adv (a);
+INSERT INTO prt1_adv SELECT i, i % 25, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 399) i;
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE (b);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p1 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (150);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p2 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p3 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (350) TO (500);
+CREATE INDEX prt2_adv_b_idx ON prt2_adv (b);
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv_p1 SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 149) i;
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv_p2 SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(200, 299) i;
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv_p3 SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(350, 499) i;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM (SELECT 175 phv, * FROM prt1_adv WHERE prt1_adv.b = 0) t1 FULL JOIN (SELECT 425 phv, * FROM prt2_adv WHERE prt2_adv.a = 0) t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.phv = t1.a OR t2.phv = t2.b ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM (SELECT 175 phv, * FROM prt1_adv WHERE prt1_adv.b = 0) t1 FULL JOIN (SELECT 425 phv, * FROM prt2_adv WHERE prt2_adv.a = 0) t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.phv = t1.a OR t2.phv = t2.b ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- Test cases where one side has an extra partition
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_extra PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (500) TO (MAXVALUE);
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(500, 599) i;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- left join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.b, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM prt2_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt1_adv t2 ON (t1.b = t2.a) WHERE t1.a = 0 ORDER BY t1.b, t2.a;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt2_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt1_adv t2 WHERE t1.b = t2.a) AND t1.a = 0 ORDER BY t1.b;
+
+-- full join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM (SELECT 175 phv, * FROM prt1_adv WHERE prt1_adv.b = 0) t1 FULL JOIN (SELECT 425 phv, * FROM prt2_adv WHERE prt2_adv.a = 0) t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.phv = t1.a OR t2.phv = t2.b ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- 3-way join where not every pair of relations can do partitioned join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.b, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM prt2_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt1_adv t2 ON (t1.b = t2.a) INNER JOIN prt1_adv t3 ON (t1.b = t3.a) WHERE t1.a = 0 ORDER BY t1.b, t2.a, t3.a;
+SELECT t1.b, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM prt2_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt1_adv t2 ON (t1.b = t2.a) INNER JOIN prt1_adv t3 ON (t1.b = t3.a) WHERE t1.a = 0 ORDER BY t1.b, t2.a, t3.a;
+
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv_extra;
+
+-- Test cases where a partition on one side matches multiple partitions on
+-- the other side; we currently can't do partitioned join in such cases
+ALTER TABLE prt2_adv DETACH PARTITION prt2_adv_p3;
+-- Split prt2_adv_p3 into two partitions so that prt1_adv_p3 matches both
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p3_1 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (350) TO (375);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p3_2 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (375) TO (500);
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(350, 499) i;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM (SELECT 175 phv, * FROM prt1_adv WHERE prt1_adv.b = 0) t1 FULL JOIN (SELECT 425 phv, * FROM prt2_adv WHERE prt2_adv.a = 0) t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.phv = t1.a OR t2.phv = t2.b ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv_p3_1;
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv_p3_2;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- Test default partitions
+ALTER TABLE prt1_adv DETACH PARTITION prt1_adv_p1;
+-- Change prt1_adv_p1 to the default partition
+ALTER TABLE prt1_adv ATTACH PARTITION prt1_adv_p1 DEFAULT;
+ALTER TABLE prt1_adv DETACH PARTITION prt1_adv_p3;
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+-- We can do partitioned join even if only one of relations has the default
+-- partition
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+-- Restore prt1_adv_p3
+ALTER TABLE prt1_adv ATTACH PARTITION prt1_adv_p3 FOR VALUES FROM (300) TO (400);
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+-- Restore prt2_adv_p3
+ALTER TABLE prt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION prt2_adv_p3 FOR VALUES FROM (350) TO (500);
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- Partitioned join can't be applied because the default partition of prt1_adv
+-- matches prt2_adv_p1 and prt2_adv_p3
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+ALTER TABLE prt2_adv DETACH PARTITION prt2_adv_p3;
+-- Change prt2_adv_p3 to the default partition
+ALTER TABLE prt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION prt2_adv_p3 DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+-- Partitioned join can't be applied because the default partition of prt1_adv
+-- matches prt2_adv_p1 and prt2_adv_p3
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+DROP TABLE prt1_adv_p3;
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv_p3;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE prt3_adv (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
+CREATE TABLE prt3_adv_p1 PARTITION OF prt3_adv FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE prt3_adv_p2 PARTITION OF prt3_adv FOR VALUES FROM (300) TO (400);
+CREATE INDEX prt3_adv_a_idx ON prt3_adv (a);
+INSERT INTO prt3_adv SELECT i, i % 25, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(200, 399) i;
+ANALYZE prt3_adv;
+
+-- 3-way join to test the default partition of a join relation
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) LEFT JOIN prt3_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b, t3.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM prt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) LEFT JOIN prt3_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b, t3.a;
+
+DROP TABLE prt1_adv;
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv;
+DROP TABLE prt3_adv;
+
+-- Test interaction of partitioned join with partition pruning
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p1 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (200);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p2 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_p3 PARTITION OF prt1_adv FOR VALUES FROM (300) TO (400);
+CREATE INDEX prt1_adv_a_idx ON prt1_adv (a);
+INSERT INTO prt1_adv SELECT i, i % 25, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 399) i;
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE (b);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p1 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (200);
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_p2 PARTITION OF prt2_adv FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (400);
+CREATE INDEX prt2_adv_b_idx ON prt2_adv (b);
+INSERT INTO prt2_adv SELECT i % 25, i, to_char(i, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 399) i;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
 
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
-SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1 t1, prt2 t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.a < 300 AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.a < 300 AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+DROP TABLE prt1_adv_p3;
+CREATE TABLE prt1_adv_default PARTITION OF prt1_adv DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE prt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE prt2_adv_default PARTITION OF prt2_adv DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE prt2_adv;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.a >= 100 AND t1.a < 300 AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.a >= 100 AND t1.a < 300 AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b;
+
+DROP TABLE prt1_adv;
+DROP TABLE prt2_adv;
+
+
+-- Tests for list-partitioned tables
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0001', '0003');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p3 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0008', '0009');
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9);
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0002', '0003');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p3 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0007', '0009');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+-- Test cases where one side has an extra partition
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_extra PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0000');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv_extra VALUES (0, 0, '0000');
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt2_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt1_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt2_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt1_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_extra;
+
+-- Test cases where a partition on one side matches multiple partitions on
+-- the other side; we currently can't do partitioned join in such cases
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv DETACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2;
+-- Split plt2_adv_p2 into two partitions so that plt1_adv_p2 matches both
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2_1 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2_2 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0006');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (4, 6);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p2_1;
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p2_2;
+-- Restore plt2_adv_p2
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2 FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+
+-- Test NULL partitions
+ALTER TABLE plt1_adv DETACH PARTITION plt1_adv_p1;
+-- Change plt1_adv_p1 to the NULL partition
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p1_null PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL, '0001', '0003');
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 3);
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv DETACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p3;
+-- Change plt2_adv_p3 to the NULL partition
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p3_null PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL, '0007', '0009');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (7, 9);
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- semi join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- anti join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.* FROM plt1_adv t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM plt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv_p1_null;
+-- Restore plt1_adv_p1
+ALTER TABLE plt1_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt1_adv_p1 FOR VALUES IN ('0001', '0003');
+-- Add to plt1_adv the extra NULL partition containing only NULL values as the
+-- key values
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_extra PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL);
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p3_null;
+-- Restore plt2_adv_p3
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p3 FOR VALUES IN ('0007', '0009');
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join; currently we can't do partitioned join if there are no matched
+-- partitions on the nullable side
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+-- Add to plt2_adv the extra NULL partition containing only NULL values as the
+-- key values
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_extra PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL);
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- inner join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- left join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- full join
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 FULL JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.b, 0) < 10 AND coalesce(t2.b, 0) < 10 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.a;
+
+-- 3-way join to test the NULL partition of a join relation
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) LEFT JOIN plt1_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a AND t1.c = t3.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) LEFT JOIN plt1_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a AND t1.c = t3.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv_extra;
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_extra;
+
+-- Test default partitions
+ALTER TABLE plt1_adv DETACH PARTITION plt1_adv_p1;
+-- Change plt1_adv_p1 to the default partition
+ALTER TABLE plt1_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt1_adv_p1 DEFAULT;
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv_p3;
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p3;
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- We can do partitioned join even if only one of relations has the default
+-- partition
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv DETACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2;
+-- Change plt2_adv_p2 to contain '0005' in addition to '0004' and '0006' as
+-- the key values
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2_ext PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0005', '0006');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (4, 5, 6);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- Partitioned join can't be applied because the default partition of plt1_adv
+-- matches plt2_adv_p1 and plt2_adv_p2_ext
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv DETACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2_ext;
+-- Change plt2_adv_p2_ext to the default partition
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2_ext DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+-- Partitioned join can't be applied because the default partition of plt1_adv
+-- matches plt2_adv_p1 and plt2_adv_p2_ext
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p2_ext;
+-- Restore plt2_adv_p2
+ALTER TABLE plt2_adv ATTACH PARTITION plt2_adv_p2 FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt3_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt3_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0007', '0009');
+INSERT INTO plt3_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (4, 6, 7, 9);
+ANALYZE plt3_adv;
+
+-- 3-way join to test the default partition of a join relation
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) LEFT JOIN plt3_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a AND t1.c = t3.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) LEFT JOIN plt3_adv t3 ON (t1.a = t3.a AND t1.c = t3.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+-- Test cases where one side has the default partition while the other side
+-- has the NULL partition
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p1;
+-- Add the NULL partition to plt2_adv
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p1_null PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL, '0001', '0003');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 3);
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv_p1_null;
+-- Add the NULL partition that contains only NULL values as the key values
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p1_null PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL);
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv;
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv;
+DROP TABLE plt3_adv;
+
+-- Test interaction of partitioned join with partition pruning
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0001');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0002');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p3 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0003');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p4 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL, '0004', '0005');
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0001', '0002');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN (NULL);
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p3 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0003');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p4 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0005');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(1, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv VALUES (-1, -1, NULL);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IN ('0003', '0004', '0005') AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IN ('0003', '0004', '0005') AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IS NULL AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IS NULL AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_default PARTITION OF plt1_adv DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_default PARTITION OF plt2_adv DEFAULT;
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IN ('0003', '0004', '0005') AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IN ('0003', '0004', '0005') AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IS NULL AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c FROM plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE t1.c IS NULL AND t1.b < 10 ORDER BY t1.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv;
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv;
+
+-- Test the process_outer_partition() code path
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0000', '0001', '0002');
+CREATE TABLE plt1_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt1_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0003', '0004');
+INSERT INTO plt1_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 5, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(0, 24) i;
+ANALYZE plt1_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0002');
+CREATE TABLE plt2_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt2_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0003', '0004');
+INSERT INTO plt2_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 5, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(0, 24) i WHERE i % 5 IN (2, 3, 4);
+ANALYZE plt2_adv;
+
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv (a int, b int, c text) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv_p1 PARTITION OF plt3_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0001');
+CREATE TABLE plt3_adv_p2 PARTITION OF plt3_adv FOR VALUES IN ('0003', '0004');
+INSERT INTO plt3_adv SELECT i, i, to_char(i % 5, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(0, 24) i WHERE i % 5 IN (1, 3, 4);
+ANALYZE plt3_adv;
+
+-- This tests that when merging partitions from plt1_adv and plt2_adv in
+-- merge_list_bounds(), process_outer_partition() returns an already-assigned
+-- merged partition when re-called with plt1_adv_p1 for the second list value
+-- '0001' of that partitin
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM (plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.c = t2.c)) FULL JOIN plt3_adv t3 ON (t1.c = t3.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.a, 0) % 5 != 3 AND coalesce(t1.a, 0) % 5 != 4 ORDER BY t1.c, t1.a, t2.a, t3.a;
+SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.a, t2.c, t3.a, t3.c FROM (plt1_adv t1 LEFT JOIN plt2_adv t2 ON (t1.c = t2.c)) FULL JOIN plt3_adv t3 ON (t1.c = t3.c) WHERE coalesce(t1.a, 0) % 5 != 3 AND coalesce(t1.a, 0) % 5 != 4 ORDER BY t1.c, t1.a, t2.a, t3.a;
+
+DROP TABLE plt1_adv;
+DROP TABLE plt2_adv;
+DROP TABLE plt3_adv;
+
+
+-- Tests for multi-level partitioned tables
+CREATE TABLE alpha (a double precision, b int, c text) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_neg PARTITION OF alpha FOR VALUES FROM ('-Infinity') TO (0) PARTITION BY RANGE (b);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_pos PARTITION OF alpha FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (10.0) PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_neg_p1 PARTITION OF alpha_neg FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (200);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_neg_p2 PARTITION OF alpha_neg FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_neg_p3 PARTITION OF alpha_neg FOR VALUES FROM (300) TO (400);
+CREATE TABLE alpha_pos_p1 PARTITION OF alpha_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0001', '0003');
+CREATE TABLE alpha_pos_p2 PARTITION OF alpha_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+CREATE TABLE alpha_pos_p3 PARTITION OF alpha_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0008', '0009');
+INSERT INTO alpha_neg SELECT -1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 399) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9);
+INSERT INTO alpha_pos SELECT  1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 399) i WHERE i % 10 IN (1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9);
+ANALYZE alpha;
+
+CREATE TABLE beta (a double precision, b int, c text) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
+CREATE TABLE beta_neg PARTITION OF beta FOR VALUES FROM (-10.0) TO (0) PARTITION BY RANGE (b);
+CREATE TABLE beta_pos PARTITION OF beta FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO ('Infinity') PARTITION BY LIST (c);
+CREATE TABLE beta_neg_p1 PARTITION OF beta_neg FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (150);
+CREATE TABLE beta_neg_p2 PARTITION OF beta_neg FOR VALUES FROM (200) TO (300);
+CREATE TABLE beta_neg_p3 PARTITION OF beta_neg FOR VALUES FROM (350) TO (500);
+CREATE TABLE beta_pos_p1 PARTITION OF beta_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0002', '0003');
+CREATE TABLE beta_pos_p2 PARTITION OF beta_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0004', '0006');
+CREATE TABLE beta_pos_p3 PARTITION OF beta_pos FOR VALUES IN ('0007', '0009');
+INSERT INTO beta_neg SELECT -1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 149) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+INSERT INTO beta_neg SELECT -1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(200, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+INSERT INTO beta_neg SELECT -1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(350, 499) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+INSERT INTO beta_pos SELECT  1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(100, 149) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+INSERT INTO beta_pos SELECT  1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(200, 299) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+INSERT INTO beta_pos SELECT  1.0, i, to_char(i % 10, 'FM0000') FROM generate_series(350, 499) i WHERE i % 10 IN (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9);
+ANALYZE beta;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.b = t2.b) WHERE t1.b >= 125 AND t1.b < 225 ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b;
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.b = t2.b) WHERE t1.b >= 125 AND t1.b < 225 ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE ((t1.b >= 100 AND t1.b < 110) OR (t1.b >= 200 AND t1.b < 210)) AND ((t2.b >= 100 AND t2.b < 110) OR (t2.b >= 200 AND t2.b < 210)) AND t1.c IN ('0004', '0009') ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b, t2.b;
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE ((t1.b >= 100 AND t1.b < 110) OR (t1.b >= 200 AND t1.b < 210)) AND ((t2.b >= 100 AND t2.b < 110) OR (t2.b >= 200 AND t2.b < 210)) AND t1.c IN ('0004', '0009') ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b, t2.b;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.b = t2.b AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE ((t1.b >= 100 AND t1.b < 110) OR (t1.b >= 200 AND t1.b < 210)) AND ((t2.b >= 100 AND t2.b < 110) OR (t2.b >= 200 AND t2.b < 210)) AND t1.c IN ('0004', '0009') ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b;
+SELECT t1.*, t2.* FROM alpha t1 INNER JOIN beta t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.b = t2.b AND t1.c = t2.c) WHERE ((t1.b >= 100 AND t1.b < 110) OR (t1.b >= 200 AND t1.b < 210)) AND ((t2.b >= 100 AND t2.b < 110) OR (t2.b >= 200 AND t2.b < 210)) AND t1.c IN ('0004', '0009') ORDER BY t1.a, t1.b;