Fix another instance of unsafe coding for shm_toc_lookup failure.

One or another author of commit 5bcf389ec seems to have thought that
computing an offset from a NULL pointer would yield another NULL pointer.
There may possibly be architectures where that works, but common machines
don't work like that.  Per a quick code review of places calling
shm_toc_lookup and not using noError = false.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2018-02-02 18:32:05 -05:00
parent 957ff087c8
commit d59ff4ab31
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -2582,9 +2582,13 @@ ExecHashInitializeWorker(HashState *node, ParallelWorkerContext *pwcxt)
{
SharedHashInfo *shared_info;
/* might not be there ... */
shared_info = (SharedHashInfo *)
shm_toc_lookup(pwcxt->toc, node->ps.plan->plan_node_id, true);
node->hinstrument = &shared_info->hinstrument[ParallelWorkerNumber];
if (shared_info)
node->hinstrument = &shared_info->hinstrument[ParallelWorkerNumber];
else
node->hinstrument = NULL;
}
/*