Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.

In 020235a575 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.

It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before 020235a575.

Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
This commit is contained in:
Andres Freund 2015-10-05 11:53:43 +02:00
parent 3d8987fc21
commit eeb0b78302
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
},
-1, 100000000, 2000000000
-1, 100000, 2000000000
},
{
{