From f757d89e88e83eb93498fd161d2c24977ef28a3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:19:54 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation for pgbench tpcb-like.

We choose a random value for delta, not balance.  Back-patch to 9.6 where
the mistake arrived.

Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904081752210.5867@lancre
---
 doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
index 865be44947..08161c9331 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ pgbench <optional> <replaceable>options</replaceable> </optional> <replaceable>d
   <para>
    The default built-in transaction script (also invoked with <option>-b tpcb-like</option>)
    issues seven commands per transaction over randomly chosen <literal>aid</literal>,
-   <literal>tid</literal>, <literal>bid</literal> and <literal>balance</literal>.
+   <literal>tid</literal>, <literal>bid</literal> and <literal>delta</literal>.
    The scenario is inspired by the TPC-B benchmark, but is not actually TPC-B,
    hence the name.
   </para>