From f8f20203c2a4352491535f971b51802a8218bcd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Gustafsson Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:30:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Rephrase comments to make them clearer The use of "we" when referring to the active backend might be misunderstood, so rephrase to make it clearer who is performing the actions discussed in the comment. Author: Junwang Zhao Reviewed-by: Erikjan Rijkers Reviewed-by: Robert Treat Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3LRSMqkvjiURiJoSi4aGWORpiXUmUfQQK5PaD6WfPzu3w@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/access/transam/xact.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c index ce1417b8f0..50f092d7eb 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c @@ -3140,7 +3140,7 @@ CommitTransactionCommand(void) break; /* - * We were just issued a SAVEPOINT inside a transaction block. + * The user issued a SAVEPOINT inside a transaction block. * Start a subtransaction. (DefineSavepoint already did * PushTransaction, so as to have someplace to put the SUBBEGIN * state.) @@ -3151,7 +3151,7 @@ CommitTransactionCommand(void) break; /* - * We were issued a RELEASE command, so we end the current + * The user issued a RELEASE command, so we end the current * subtransaction and return to the parent transaction. The parent * might be ended too, so repeat till we find an INPROGRESS * transaction or subtransaction. @@ -3168,7 +3168,7 @@ CommitTransactionCommand(void) break; /* - * We were issued a COMMIT, so we end the current subtransaction + * The user issued a COMMIT, so we end the current subtransaction * hierarchy and perform final commit. We do this by rolling up * any subtransactions into their parent, which leads to O(N^2) * operations with respect to resource owners - this isn't that