Fix comment related to concurrent index swapping in index.c

A comment about switching indisvalid of the new and old indexes swapped
in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY got this backwards.

Issue introduced by 5dc92b8, the original commit of REINDEX
CONCURRENTLY.

Author: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200318143340.GA46897@nol
Backpatch-through: 12
This commit is contained in:
Michael Paquier 2020-03-19 09:51:40 +09:00
parent 21b1cb6a78
commit fdaa16aecf

View File

@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ index_concurrently_swap(Oid newIndexId, Oid oldIndexId, const char *oldName)
newIndexForm->indisclustered = oldIndexForm->indisclustered;
/*
* Mark the old index as valid, and the new index as invalid similarly
* Mark the new index as valid, and the old index as invalid similarly
* to what index_set_state_flags() does.
*/
newIndexForm->indisvalid = true;