Per gripes from Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZhTQ6_w1vwOhqTQI@paquier.xyz
Along the way, also clean up a handful of typos in 3311ea86ed and
ea7b4e9a2a, found by Alexander Lakhin, and a couple of stylistic
snafus noted by Daniel Westermann and Daniel Gustafsson.
Coverity complained about not freeing some memory associated with
incrementally parsing backup manifests. To fix that, provide and use a new
shutdown function for the JsonManifestParseIncrementalState object, in
line with a suggestion from Tom Lane.
While analysing the problem, I noticed a buglet in freeing memory for
incremental json lexers. To fix that remove a bogus condition on
freeing the memory allocated for them.
This adds the infrastructure for using the new non-recursive JSON parser
in processing manifests. It's important that callers make sure that the
last piece of json handed to the incremental manifest parser contains
the entire last few lines of the manifest, including the checksum.
Author: Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed-By: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7b0a51d6-0d9d-7366-3a1a-f74397a02f55@dunslane.net
Allocate memory for the error message inside memory owned by the
JsonLexContext and move responsibility away from the caller for
freeing it. This means that we can partially revert b44669b2ca
as this is now safe to use in FRONTEND code. The motivation for
this comes from the OAuth and incremental JSON patchsets but it
also adds value on its own.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+mWdTd6ujtyF7MsvXvk7ToLRVG_tYAcaGbQLvf=N4KrQw@mail.gmail.com
Before this patch, if you took a full backup on server A and then
tried to use the backup manifest to take an incremental backup on
server B, it wouldn't know that the manifest was from a different
server and so the incremental backup operation could potentially
complete without error. When you later tried to run pg_combinebackup,
you'd find out that your incremental backup was and always had been
invalid. That's poor timing, because nobody likes finding out about
backup problems only at restore time.
With this patch, you'll get an error when trying to take the (invalid)
incremental backup, which seems a lot nicer.
Amul Sul, revised by me. Review by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYLZzbSAMM3cAjV4Y+iCRZn-bR9H2+Mdz7NdaJFU1Zb5w@mail.gmail.com
This makes it possible for the code to be easily reused by other
client-side tools, and/or by the server.
Patch by me. Review of this patch in particular by at least Peter
Eisentraut; reviewers for the patch series in general include Dilip
Kumar, Andres Fruend, David Steele, Álvaro Herrera, and Jakub Wartak.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ6UGZVnSy5iak6s6+AXu_DewXovDjhLs3-su6nmU_x_g@mail.gmail.com
Andrew Dunstan
Daniel Gustafsson
Robert Haas
Bruce Momjian