Commit Graph

594 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Etsuro Fujita ffbb7e65a8 Fix handling of pending inserts in nodeModifyTable.c.
Commit b663a4136, which allowed FDWs to INSERT rows in bulk, added to
nodeModifyTable.c code to flush pending inserts to the foreign-table
result relation(s) before completing processing of the ModifyTable node,
but the code failed to take into account the case where the INSERT query
has modifying CTEs, leading to incorrect results.

Also, that commit failed to flush pending inserts before firing BEFORE
ROW triggers so that rows are visible to such triggers.

In that commit we scanned through EState's
es_tuple_routing_result_relations or es_opened_result_relations list to
find the foreign-table result relations to which pending inserts are
flushed, but that would be inefficient in some cases.  So to fix, 1) add
a List member to EState to record the insert-pending result relations,
and 2) modify nodeModifyTable.c so that it adds the foreign-table result
relation to the list in ExecInsert() if appropriate, and flushes pending
inserts properly using the list where needed.

While here, fix a copy-and-pasteo in a comment in ExecBatchInsert(),
which was added by that commit.

Back-patch to v14 where that commit appeared.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16qutyCmyJJzgQOhfBq%3DNoGDqTB6O0QBZTihrbqre%2BoxA%40mail.gmail.com
2022-11-25 17:45:00 +09:00
Tom Lane c35ba141de Future-proof the recursion inside ExecShutdownNode().
The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they
take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer.  Somebody figured
they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing
ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one
argument.  Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far.
However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to
forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code
likely won't be far behind.  So spend the extra few lines of code
to do it honestly with a separate walker function.

In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's
useless return value.  I left that as-is in back branches though,
to forestall complaints about ABI breakage.

Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical
importance before our stable branches are all out of service.
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known
platform, however.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-09-19 12:16:07 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 7103ebb7aa
Add support for MERGE SQL command
MERGE performs actions that modify rows in the target table using a
source table or query. MERGE provides a single SQL statement that can
conditionally INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE rows -- a task that would otherwise
require multiple PL statements.  For example,

MERGE INTO target AS t
USING source AS s
ON t.tid = s.sid
WHEN MATCHED AND t.balance > s.delta THEN
  UPDATE SET balance = t.balance - s.delta
WHEN MATCHED THEN
  DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED AND s.delta > 0 THEN
  INSERT VALUES (s.sid, s.delta)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
  DO NOTHING;

MERGE works with regular tables, partitioned tables and inheritance
hierarchies, including column and row security enforcement, as well as
support for row and statement triggers and transition tables therein.

MERGE is optimized for OLTP and is parameterizable, though also useful
for large scale ETL/ELT. MERGE is not intended to be used in preference
to existing single SQL commands for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE since there
is some overhead.  MERGE can be used from PL/pgSQL.

MERGE does not support targetting updatable views or foreign tables, and
RETURNING clauses are not allowed either.  These limitations are likely
fixable with sufficient effort.  Rewrite rules are also not supported,
but it's not clear that we'd want to support them.

Author: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkJdBuxj9PO=2QaO9-3h3xGbQPZ34kJH=HukRekwM-GZg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201231134736.GA25392@alvherre.pgsql
2022-03-28 16:47:48 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera ba9a7e3921
Enforce foreign key correctly during cross-partition updates
When an update on a partitioned table referenced in foreign key
constraints causes a row to move from one partition to another,
the fact that the move is implemented as a delete followed by an insert
on the target partition causes the foreign key triggers to have
surprising behavior.  For example, a given foreign key's delete trigger
which implements the ON DELETE CASCADE clause of that key will delete
any referencing rows when triggered for that internal DELETE, although
it should not, because the referenced row is simply being moved from one
partition of the referenced root partitioned table into another, not
being deleted from it.

This commit teaches trigger.c to skip queuing such delete trigger events
on the leaf partitions in favor of an UPDATE event fired on the root
target relation.  Doing so is sensible because both the old and the new
tuple "logically" belong to the root relation.

The after trigger event queuing interface now allows passing the source
and the target partitions of a particular cross-partition update when
registering the update event for the root partitioned table.  Along with
the two ctids of the old and the new tuple, the after trigger event now
also stores the OIDs of those partitions. The tuples fetched from the
source and the target partitions are converted into the root table
format, if necessary, before they are passed to the trigger function.

The implementation currently has a limitation that only the foreign keys
pointing into the query's target relation are considered, not those of
its sub-partitioned partitions.  That seems like a reasonable
limitation, because it sounds rare to have distinct foreign keys
pointing to sub-partitioned partitions instead of to the root table.

This misbehavior stems from commit f56f8f8da6 (which added support for
foreign keys to reference partitioned tables) not paying sufficient
attention to commit 2f17844104 (which had introduced cross-partition
updates a year earlier).  Even though the former commit goes back to
Postgres 12, we're not backpatching this fix at this time for fear of
destabilizing things too much, and because there are a few ABI breaks in
it that we'd have to work around in older branches.  It also depends on
commit f4566345cf, which had its own share of backpatchability issues
as well.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Eduard Català <eduard.catala@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFvkBCmfwkQX_yBqv2Wz8ugUGiBDxum8=WvVbfU1TXaNg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAL54xNZsLwEM1XCk5yW9EqaRzsZYHuWsHQkA2L5MOSKXAwviCQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-20 18:43:40 +01:00
Bruce Momjian 27b77ecf9f Update copyright for 2022
Backpatch-through: 10
2022-01-07 19:04:57 -05:00
Tom Lane def5b065ff Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.
Also "make reformat-dat-files".

The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
2021-05-12 13:14:10 -04:00
Etsuro Fujita a363bc6da9 Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE for async-capable nodes.
EXPLAIN ANALYZE for an async-capable ForeignScan node associated with
postgres_fdw is done just by using instrumentation for ExecProcNode()
called from the node's callbacks, causing the following problems:

1) If the remote table to scan is empty, the node is incorrectly
   considered as "never executed" by the command even if the node is
   executed, as ExecProcNode() isn't called from the node's callbacks at
   all in that case.
2) The command fails to collect timings for things other than
   ExecProcNode() done in the node, such as creating a cursor for the
   node's remote query.

To fix these problems, add instrumentation for async-capable nodes, and
modify postgres_fdw accordingly.

My oversight in commit 27e1f1456.

While at it, update a comment for the AsyncRequest struct in execnodes.h
and the documentation for the ForeignAsyncRequest API in fdwhandler.sgml
to match the code in ExecAsyncAppendResponse() in nodeAppend.c, and fix
typos in comments in nodeAppend.c.

Per report from Andrey Lepikhov, though I didn't use his patch.

Reviewed-by: Andrey Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2eb662bb-105d-fc20-7412-2f027cc3ca72%40postgrespro.ru
2021-05-12 14:00:00 +09:00
Michael Paquier 9b5558e7ad Fix come comments in execMain.c
1375422 has refactored this area of the executor code, and some comments
went out-of-sync.

Author: Yukun Wang
Reviewed-by: Amul Sul
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB60033394FCAEF79B98F078F5B4459@OS0PR01MB6003.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2021-04-24 15:07:04 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut 544b28088f doc: Improve hyphenation consistency 2021-04-21 08:14:43 +02:00
Bruce Momjian 9660834dd8 adjust query id feature to use pg_stat_activity.query_id
Previously, it was pg_stat_activity.queryid to match the
pg_stat_statements queryid column.  This is an adjustment to patch
4f0b0966c8.  This also adjusts some of the internal function calls to
match.  Catversion bumped.

Reported-by: Álvaro Herrera, Julien Rouhaud

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408032704.GA7498@alvherre.pgsql
2021-04-20 12:22:26 -04:00
Tom Lane 1111b2668d Undo decision to allow pg_proc.prosrc to be NULL.
Commit e717a9a18 changed the longstanding rule that prosrc is NOT NULL
because when a SQL-language function is written in SQL-standard style,
we don't currently have anything useful to put there.  This seems a poor
decision though, as it could easily have negative impacts on external
PLs (opening them to crashes they didn't use to have, for instance).
SQL-function-related code can just as easily test "is prosqlbody not
null" as "is prosrc null", so there's no real gain there either.
Hence, revert the NOT NULL marking removal and adjust related logic.

For now, we just put an empty string into prosrc for SQL-standard
functions.  Maybe we'll have a better idea later, although the
history of things like pg_attrdef.adsrc suggests that it's not
easy to maintain a string equivalent of a node tree.

This also adds an assertion that queryDesc->sourceText != NULL
to standard_ExecutorStart.  We'd been silently relying on that
for awhile, so let's make it less silent.

Also fix some overlooked documentation and test cases.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2197698.1617984583@sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-04-15 17:17:20 -04:00
Bruce Momjian 4f0b0966c8 Make use of in-core query id added by commit 5fd9dfa5f5
Use the in-core query id computation for pg_stat_activity,
log_line_prefix, and EXPLAIN VERBOSE.

Similar to other fields in pg_stat_activity, only the queryid from the
top level statements are exposed, and if the backends status isn't
active then the queryid from the last executed statements is displayed.

Add a %Q placeholder to include the queryid in log_line_prefix, which
will also only expose top level statements.

For EXPLAIN VERBOSE, if a query identifier has been computed, either by
enabling compute_query_id or using a third-party module, display it.

Bump catalog version.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210407125726.tkvjdbw76hxnpwfi@nol

Author: Julien Rouhaud

Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Nitin Jadhav, Zhihong Yu
2021-04-07 14:04:06 -04:00
Tom Lane a1115fa078 Postpone some more stuff out of ExecInitModifyTable.
Delay creation of the projections for INSERT and UPDATE tuples
until they're needed.  This saves a pretty fair amount of work
when only some of the partitions are actually touched.

The logic associated with identifying junk columns in UPDATE/DELETE
is moved to another loop, allowing removal of one loop over the
target relations; but it didn't actually change at all.

Extracted from a larger patch, which seemed to me to be too messy
to push in one commit.

Amit Langote, reviewed at different times by Heikki Linnakangas and
myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG7ZruBmmih3wPsBZ4s0H2EhywrnXEduckY5Hr3fWzPWA@mail.gmail.com
2021-04-06 18:13:17 -04:00
Tom Lane c5b7ba4e67 Postpone some stuff out of ExecInitModifyTable.
Arrange to do some things on-demand, rather than immediately during
executor startup, because there's a fair chance of never having to do
them at all:

* Don't open result relations' indexes until needed.

* Don't initialize partition tuple routing, nor the child-to-root
tuple conversion map, until needed.

This wins in UPDATEs on partitioned tables when only some of the
partitions will actually receive updates; with larger partition
counts the savings is quite noticeable.  Also, we can remove some
sketchy heuristics in ExecInitModifyTable about whether to set up
tuple routing.

Also, remove execPartition.c's private hash table tracking which
partitions were already opened by the ModifyTable node.  Instead
use the hash added to ModifyTable itself by commit 86dc90056.

To allow lazy computation of the conversion maps, we now set
ri_RootResultRelInfo in all child ResultRelInfos.  We formerly set it
only in some, not terribly well-defined, cases.  This has user-visible
side effects in that now more error messages refer to the root
relation instead of some partition (and provide error data in the
root's column order, too).  It looks to me like this is a strict
improvement in consistency, so I don't have a problem with the
output changes visible in this commit.

Extracted from a larger patch, which seemed to me to be too messy
to push in one commit.

Amit Langote, reviewed at different times by Heikki Linnakangas and
myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG7ZruBmmih3wPsBZ4s0H2EhywrnXEduckY5Hr3fWzPWA@mail.gmail.com
2021-04-06 15:57:11 -04:00
Tom Lane 091e22b2e6 Clean up treatment of missing default and CHECK-constraint records.
Andrew Gierth reported that it's possible to crash the backend if no
pg_attrdef record is found to match an attribute that has atthasdef set.
AttrDefaultFetch warns about this situation, but then leaves behind
a relation tupdesc that has null "adbin" pointer(s), which most places
don't guard against.

We considered promoting the warning to an error, but throwing errors
during relcache load is pretty drastic: it effectively locks one out
of using the relation at all.  What seems better is to leave the
load-time behavior as a warning, but then throw an error in any code
path that wants to use a default and can't find it.  This confines
the error to a subset of INSERT/UPDATE operations on the table, and
in particular will at least allow a pg_dump to succeed.

Also, we should fix AttrDefaultFetch to not leave any null pointers
in the tupdesc, because that just creates an untested bug hazard.

While at it, apply the same philosophy of "warn at load, throw error
only upon use of the known-missing info" to CHECK constraints.
CheckConstraintFetch is very nearly the same logic as AttrDefaultFetch,
but for reasons lost in the mists of time, it was throwing ERROR for
the same cases that AttrDefaultFetch treats as WARNING.  Make the two
functions more nearly alike.

In passing, get rid of potentially-O(N^2) loops in equalTupleDesc
by making AttrDefaultFetch sort the entries after fetching them,
so that equalTupleDesc can assume that entries in two equal tupdescs
must be in matching order.  (CheckConstraintFetch already was sorting
CHECK constraints, but equalTupleDesc hadn't been told about it.)

There's some argument for back-patching this, but with such a small
number of field reports, I'm content to fix it in HEAD.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87pmzaq4gx.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
2021-04-06 10:34:39 -04:00
Tom Lane 86dc90056d Rework planning and execution of UPDATE and DELETE.
This patch makes two closely related sets of changes:

1. For UPDATE, the subplan of the ModifyTable node now only delivers
the new values of the changed columns (i.e., the expressions computed
in the query's SET clause) plus row identity information such as CTID.
ModifyTable must re-fetch the original tuple to merge in the old
values of any unchanged columns.  The core advantage of this is that
the changed columns are uniform across all tables of an inherited or
partitioned target relation, whereas the other columns might not be.
A secondary advantage, when the UPDATE involves joins, is that less
data needs to pass through the plan tree.  The disadvantage of course
is an extra fetch of each tuple to be updated.  However, that seems to
be very nearly free in context; even worst-case tests don't show it to
add more than a couple percent to the total query cost.  At some point
it might be interesting to combine the re-fetch with the tuple access
that ModifyTable must do anyway to mark the old tuple dead; but that
would require a good deal of refactoring and it seems it wouldn't buy
all that much, so this patch doesn't attempt it.

2. For inherited UPDATE/DELETE, instead of generating a separate
subplan for each target relation, we now generate a single subplan
that is just exactly like a SELECT's plan, then stick ModifyTable
on top of that.  To let ModifyTable know which target relation a
given incoming row refers to, a tableoid junk column is added to
the row identity information.  This gets rid of the horrid hack
that was inheritance_planner(), eliminating O(N^2) planning cost
and memory consumption in cases where there were many unprunable
target relations.

Point 2 of course requires point 1, so that there is a uniform
definition of the non-junk columns to be returned by the subplan.
We can't insist on uniform definition of the row identity junk
columns however, if we want to keep the ability to have both
plain and foreign tables in a partitioning hierarchy.  Since
it wouldn't scale very far to have every child table have its
own row identity column, this patch includes provisions to merge
similar row identity columns into one column of the subplan result.
In particular, we can merge the whole-row Vars typically used as
row identity by FDWs into one column by pretending they are type
RECORD.  (It's still okay for the actual composite Datums to be
labeled with the table's rowtype OID, though.)

There is more that can be done to file down residual inefficiencies
in this patch, but it seems to be committable now.

FDW authors should note several API changes:

* The argument list for AddForeignUpdateTargets() has changed, and so
has the method it must use for adding junk columns to the query.  Call
add_row_identity_var() instead of manipulating the parse tree directly.
You might want to reconsider exactly what you're adding, too.

* PlanDirectModify() must now work a little harder to find the
ForeignScan plan node; if the foreign table is part of a partitioning
hierarchy then the ForeignScan might not be the direct child of
ModifyTable.  See postgres_fdw for sample code.

* To check whether a relation is a target relation, it's no
longer sufficient to compare its relid to root->parse->resultRelation.
Instead, check it against all_result_relids or leaf_result_relids,
as appropriate.

Amit Langote and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHpHdqdDn48yCEhynnniahH78rwcrv1rEX65-fsZGBOLQ@mail.gmail.com
2021-03-31 11:52:37 -04:00
Michael Paquier a1999a01bb Sanitize the term "combo CID" in code comments
Combo CIDs were referred in the code comments using different terms
across various places of the code, so unify a bit the term used with
what is currently in use in some of the READMEs.

Author: "Hou, Zhijie"
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1d42865c91404f46af4562532fdbea31@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
2021-03-25 16:08:03 +09:00
Amit Kapila 26acb54a13 Revert "Enable parallel SELECT for "INSERT INTO ... SELECT ..."."
To allow inserts in parallel-mode this feature has to ensure that all the
constraints, triggers, etc. are parallel-safe for the partition hierarchy
which is costly and we need to find a better way to do that. Additionally,
we could have used existing cached information in some cases like indexes,
domains, etc. to determine the parallel-safety.

List of commits reverted, in reverse chronological order:

ed62d3737c Doc: Update description for parallel insert reloption.
c8f78b6161 Add a new GUC and a reloption to enable inserts in parallel-mode.
c5be48f092 Improve FK trigger parallel-safety check added by 05c8482f7f.
e2cda3c20a Fix use of relcache TriggerDesc field introduced by commit 05c8482f7f.
e4e87a32cc Fix valgrind issue in commit 05c8482f7f.
05c8482f7f Enable parallel SELECT for "INSERT INTO ... SELECT ...".

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1lMiB9-0001c3-SY@gemulon.postgresql.org
2021-03-24 11:29:15 +05:30
Amit Kapila 05c8482f7f Enable parallel SELECT for "INSERT INTO ... SELECT ...".
Parallel SELECT can't be utilized for INSERT in the following cases:
- INSERT statement uses the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause
- Target table has a parallel-unsafe: trigger, index expression or
  predicate, column default expression or check constraint
- Target table has a parallel-unsafe domain constraint on any column
- Target table is a partitioned table with a parallel-unsafe partition key
  expression or support function

The planner is updated to perform additional parallel-safety checks for
the cases listed above, for determining whether it is safe to run INSERT
in parallel-mode with an underlying parallel SELECT. The planner will
consider using parallel SELECT for "INSERT INTO ... SELECT ...", provided
nothing unsafe is found from the additional parallel-safety checks, or
from the existing parallel-safety checks for SELECT.

While checking parallel-safety, we need to check it for all the partitions
on the table which can be costly especially when we decide not to use a
parallel plan. So, in a separate patch, we will introduce a GUC and or a
reloption to enable/disable parallelism for Insert statements.

Prior to entering parallel-mode for the execution of INSERT with parallel
SELECT, a TransactionId is acquired and assigned to the current
transaction state. This is necessary to prevent the INSERT from attempting
to assign the TransactionId whilst in parallel-mode, which is not allowed.
This approach has a disadvantage in that if the underlying SELECT does not
return any rows, then the TransactionId is not used, however that
shouldn't happen in practice in many cases.

Author: Greg Nancarrow, Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Hou Zhijie, Takayuki Tsunakawa, Antonin Houska, Bharath Rupireddy, Dilip Kumar, Vignesh C, Zhihong Yu, Amit Kapila
Tested-by: Tang, Haiying
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-cXnB5cnMKqWEp2E2z7Mvcd04iLVmV=qpFJrR3AcrTS3g@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fAdj=nDKMsRhQzndm-O13NY4dL6xGcEvdX5Xvbbi0V7g@mail.gmail.com
2021-03-10 07:38:58 +05:30
Heikki Linnakangas 6214e2b228 Fix permission checks on constraint violation errors on partitions.
If a cross-partition UPDATE violates a constraint on the target partition,
and the columns in the new partition are in different physical order than
in the parent, the error message can reveal columns that the user does not
have SELECT permission on. A similar bug was fixed earlier in commit
804b6b6db4.

The cause of the bug is that the callers of the
ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() function got confused when constructing
the list of modified columns. If the tuple was routed from a parent, we
converted the tuple to the parent's format, but the list of modified
columns was grabbed directly from the child's RTE entry.

ExecUpdateLockMode() had a similar issue. That lead to confusion on which
columns are key columns, leading to wrong tuple lock being taken on tables
referenced by foreign keys, when a row is updated with INSERT ON CONFLICT
UPDATE. A new isolation test is added for that corner case.

With this patch, the ri_RangeTableIndex field is no longer set for
partitions that don't have an entry in the range table. Previously, it was
set to the RTE entry of the parent relation, but that was confusing.

NOTE: This modifies the ResultRelInfo struct, replacing the
ri_PartitionRoot field with ri_RootResultRelInfo. That's a bit risky to
backpatch, because it breaks any extensions accessing the field. The
change that ri_RangeTableIndex is not set for partitions could potentially
break extensions, too. The ResultRelInfos are visible to FDWs at least,
and this patch required small changes to postgres_fdw. Nevertheless, this
seem like the least bad option. I don't think these fields widely used in
extensions; I don't think there are FDWs out there that uses the FDW
"direct update" API, other than postgres_fdw. If there is, you will get a
compilation error, so hopefully it is caught quickly.

Backpatch to 11, where support for both cross-partition UPDATEs, and unique
indexes on partitioned tables, were added.

Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
Security: CVE-2021-3393
2021-02-08 11:01:51 +02:00
Peter Geoghegan 9dc718bdf2 Pass down "logically unchanged index" hint.
Add an executor aminsert() hint mechanism that informs index AMs that
the incoming index tuple (the tuple that accompanies the hint) is not
being inserted by execution of an SQL statement that logically modifies
any of the index's key columns.

The hint is received by indexes when an UPDATE takes place that does not
apply an optimization like heapam's HOT (though only for indexes where
all key columns are logically unchanged).  Any index tuple that receives
the hint on insert is expected to be a duplicate of at least one
existing older version that is needed for the same logical row.  Related
versions will typically be stored on the same index page, at least
within index AMs that apply the hint.

Recognizing the difference between MVCC version churn duplicates and
true logical row duplicates at the index AM level can help with cleanup
of garbage index tuples.  Cleanup can intelligently target tuples that
are likely to be garbage, without wasting too many cycles on less
promising tuples/pages (index pages with little or no version churn).

This is infrastructure for an upcoming commit that will teach nbtree to
perform bottom-up index deletion.  No index AM actually applies the hint
just yet.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=CEKFa74EScx_hFVshCOn6AA5T-ajFASTdzipdkLTNQQ@mail.gmail.com
2021-01-13 08:11:00 -08:00
Bruce Momjian ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Heikki Linnakangas 22b73d3cb0 Fix initialization of es_result_relations in EvalPlanQualStart().
Thinko in commit 1375422c78. EvalPlanQualStart() was mistakenly
resetting the parent EState's es_result_relations, when it should
initialize the field in the child EPQ EState it just created.

That was clearly wrong, but it didn't cause any ill effects, because
es_result_relations is currently not used after the ExecInit* phase.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqFEuq8AAAmxXsTDVZ1r38cHbfYuiPQx_%3DYyKe2DC-6q4A%40mail.gmail.com
2020-10-23 09:30:08 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas fb5883da86 Remove PartitionRoutingInfo struct.
The extra indirection neeeded to access its members via its enclosing
ResultRelInfo seems pointless. Move all the fields from
PartitionRoutingInfo to ResultRelInfo.

Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqFViT47Zbr_ASBejiK7iDG8%3DQ1swQ-tjM6caRPQ67pT%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
2020-10-19 14:42:55 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas 6973533650 Revise child-to-root tuple conversion map management.
Store the tuple conversion map to convert a tuple from a child table's
format to the root format in a new ri_ChildToRootMap field in
ResultRelInfo. It is initialized if transition tuple capture for FOR
STATEMENT triggers or INSERT tuple routing on a partitioned table is
needed. Previously, ModifyTable kept the maps in the per-subplan
ModifyTableState->mt_per_subplan_tupconv_maps array, or when tuple
routing was used, in
ResultRelInfo->ri_Partitioninfo->pi_PartitionToRootMap. The new field
replaces both of those.

Now that the child-to-root tuple conversion map is always available in
ResultRelInfo (when needed), remove the TransitionCaptureState.tcs_map
field. The callers of Exec*Trigger() functions no longer need to set or
save it, which is much less confusing and bug-prone. Also, as a future
optimization, this will allow us to delay creating the map for a given
result relation until the relation is actually processed during
execution.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqHtCWLdK-LO%3DNEsvOdHx%2B7yv4mE_zYK0i3BH7dXb-wxog%40mail.gmail.com
2020-10-19 14:42:55 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas a04daa97a4 Remove es_result_relation_info from EState.
Maintaining 'es_result_relation_info' correctly at all times has become
cumbersome, especially with partitioning where each partition gets its
own result relation info. Having to set and reset it across arbitrary
operations has caused bugs in the past.

This changes all the places that used 'es_result_relation_info', to
receive the currently active ResultRelInfo via function parameters
instead.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com
2020-10-14 11:41:40 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas 1375422c78 Create ResultRelInfos later in InitPlan, index them by RT index.
Instead of allocating all the ResultRelInfos upfront in one big array,
allocate them in ExecInitModifyTable(). es_result_relations is now an
array of ResultRelInfo pointers, rather than an array of structs, and it
is indexed by the RT index.

This simplifies things: we get rid of the separate concept of a "result
rel index", and don't need to set it in setrefs.c anymore. This also
allows follow-up optimizations (not included in this commit yet) to skip
initializing ResultRelInfos for target relations that were not needed at
runtime, and removal of the es_result_relation_info pointer.

The EState arrays of regular result rels and root result rels are merged
into one array. Similarly, the resultRelations and rootResultRelations
lists in PlannedStmt are merged into one. It's not actually clear to me
why they were kept separate in the first place, but now that the
es_result_relations array is indexed by RT index, it certainly seems
pointless.

The PlannedStmt->resultRelations list is now only needed for
ExecRelationIsTargetRelation(). One visible effect of this change is that
ExecRelationIsTargetRelation() will now return 'true' also for the
partition root, if a partitioned table is updated. That seems like a good
thing, although the function isn't used in core code, and I don't see any
reason for an FDW to call it on a partition root.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com
2020-10-13 12:57:02 +03:00
Tom Lane 2000b6c10a Don't fetch partition check expression during InitResultRelInfo.
Since there is only one place that actually needs the partition check
expression, namely ExecPartitionCheck, it's better to fetch it from
the relcache there.  In this way we will never fetch it at all if
the query never has use for it, and we still fetch it just once when
we do need it.

The reason for taking an interest in this is that if the relcache
doesn't already have the check expression cached, fetching it
requires obtaining AccessShareLock on the partition root.  That
means that operations that look like they should only touch the
partition itself will also take a lock on the root.  In particular
we observed that TRUNCATE on a partition may take a lock on the
partition's root, contributing to a deadlock situation in parallel
pg_restore.

As written, this patch does have a small cost, which is that we
are microscopically reducing efficiency for the case where a partition
has an empty check expression.  ExecPartitionCheck will be called,
and will go through the motions of setting up and checking an empty
qual, where before it would not have been called at all.  We could
avoid that by adding a separate boolean flag to track whether there
is a partition expression to test.  However, this case only arises
for a default partition with no siblings, which surely is not an
interesting case in practice.  Hence adding complexity for it
does not seem like a good trade-off.

Amit Langote, per a suggestion by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/VI1PR03MB31670CA1BD9625C3A8C5DD05EB230@VI1PR03MB3167.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
2020-09-16 14:28:18 -04:00
Amit Kapila 33753ac9d7 Add object names to partition integrity violations.
All errors of SQLSTATE class 23 should include the name of an object
associated with the error in separate fields of the error report message.
We do this so that applications need not try to extract them from the
possibly-localized human-readable text of the message.

Reported-by: Chris Bandy
Author: Chris Bandy
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0aa113a3-3c7f-db48-bcd8-f9290b2269ae@gmail.com
2020-03-23 08:09:15 +05:30
Alvaro Herrera 2f9661311b
Represent command completion tags as structs
The backend was using strings to represent command tags and doing string
comparisons in multiple places, but that's slow and unhelpful.  Create a
new command list with a supporting structure to use instead; this is
stored in a tag-list-file that can be tailored to specific purposes with
a caller-definable C macro, similar to what we do for WAL resource
managers.  The first first such uses are a new CommandTag enum and a
CommandTagBehavior struct.

Replace numerous occurrences of char *completionTag with a
QueryCompletion struct so that the code no longer stores information
about completed queries in a cstring.  Only at the last moment, in
EndCommand(), does this get converted to a string.

EventTriggerCacheItem no longer holds an array of palloc’d tag strings
in sorted order, but rather just a Bitmapset over the CommandTags.

Author: Mark Dilger, with unsolicited help from Álvaro Herrera
Reviewed-by: John Naylor, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/981A9DB4-3F0C-4DA5-88AD-CB9CFF4D6CAD@enterprisedb.com
2020-03-02 18:19:51 -03:00
Tom Lane 01d9676a53 Fix dangling pointer in EvalPlanQual machinery.
EvalPlanQualStart() supposed that it could re-use the relsubs_rowmark
and relsubs_done arrays from a prior instantiation.  But since they are
allocated in the es_query_cxt of the recheckestate, that's just wrong;
EvalPlanQualEnd() will blow away that storage.  Therefore we were using
storage that could have been reallocated to something else, causing all
sorts of havoc.

I think this was modeled on the old code's handling of es_epqTupleSlot,
but since the code was anyway clearing the arrays at re-use, there's
clearly no expectation of importing any outside state.  So it's just
a dubious savings of a couple of pallocs, which is negligible compared
to setting up a new planstate tree.  Therefore, just allocate the
arrays always.  (I moved the allocations slightly for readability.)

In principle this bug could cause a problem whenever EPQ rechecks are
needed in more than one target table of a ModifyTable plan node.
In practice it seems not quite so easy to trigger as that; I couldn't
readily duplicate a crash with a partitioned target table, for instance.
That's probably down to incidental choices about when to free or
reallocate stuff.  The added isolation test case does seem to reliably
show an assertion failure, though.

Per report from Oleksii Kliukin.  Back-patch to v12 where the bug was
introduced (evidently by commit 3fb307bc4).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/EEF05F66-2871-4786-992B-5F45C92FEE2E@hintbits.com
2020-01-28 17:26:37 -05:00
Amit Kapila 05f18c6b6b Added relation name in error messages for constraint checks.
This gives more information to the user about the error and it makes such
messages consistent with the other similar messages in the code.

Reported-by: Simon Riggs
Author: Mahendra Singh and Simon Riggs
Reviewed-by: Beena Emerson and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+j+7YUvQvGxTrCiw77R23enMJ7DFmyA3buR+fa2pKs4XhA@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-28 07:48:10 +05:30
Dean Rasheed d751ba5235 Make rewriter prevent auto-updates on views with conditional INSTEAD rules.
A view with conditional INSTEAD rules and no unconditional INSTEAD
rules or INSTEAD OF triggers is not auto-updatable. Previously we
relied on a check in the executor to catch this, but that's
problematic since the planner may fail to properly handle such a query
and thus return a particularly unhelpful error to the user, before
reaching the executor check.

Instead, trap this in the rewriter and report the correct error there.
Doing so also allows us to include more useful error detail than the
executor check can provide. This doesn't change the existing behaviour
of updatable views; it merely ensures that useful error messages are
reported when a view isn't updatable.

Per report from Pengzhou Tang, though not adopting that suggested fix.
Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAG4reAQn+4xB6xHJqWdtE0ve_WqJkdyCV4P=trYr4Kn8_3_PEA@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-14 09:52:21 +00:00
Bruce Momjian 7559d8ebfa Update copyrights for 2020
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2020-01-01 12:21:45 -05:00
Michael Paquier e1551f96e6 Refactor attribute mappings used in logical tuple conversion
Tuple conversion support in tupconvert.c is able to convert rowtypes
between two relations, inner and outer, which are logically equivalent
but have a different ordering or even dropped columns (used mainly for
inheritance tree and partitions).  This makes use of attribute mappings,
which are simple arrays made of AttrNumber elements with a length
matching the number of attributes of the outer relation.  The length of
the attribute mapping has been treated as completely independent of the
mapping itself until now, making it easy to pass down an incorrect
mapping length.

This commit refactors the code related to attribute mappings and moves
it into an independent facility called attmap.c, extracted from
tupconvert.c.  This merges the attribute mapping with its length,
avoiding to try to guess what is the length of a mapping to use as this
is computed once, when the map is built.

This will avoid mistakes like what has been fixed in dc816e58, which has
used an incorrect mapping length by matching it with the number of
attributes of an inner relation (a child partition) instead of an outer
relation (a partitioned table).

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191121042556.GD153437@paquier.xyz
2019-12-18 16:23:02 +09:00
Thomas Munro 76cbfcdf3a Always call ExecShutdownNode() if appropriate.
Call ExecShutdownNode() after ExecutePlan()'s loop, rather than at each
break.  We had forgotten to do that in one case.  The omission caused
intermittent "temporary file leak" warnings from multi-batch parallel
hash joins with a LIMIT clause.

Back-patch to 11.  Though the problem exists in theory in earlier
parallel query releases, nothing really depended on it.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191111.212418.2222262873417235945.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
2019-11-16 10:11:30 +13:00
Tom Lane d812257809 Fix bogus sizeof calculations.
Noted by Coverity.  Typo in 27cc7cd2b, so back-patch to v12
as that was.
2019-09-15 11:51:57 -04:00
Andres Freund 27cc7cd2bc Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve efficiency.
In ad0bda5d24 I changed the EvalPlanQual machinery to store
substitution tuples in slot, instead of using plain HeapTuples. The
main motivation for that was that using HeapTuples will be inefficient
for future tableams.  But it turns out that that conversion was buggy
for non-locking rowmarks - the wrong tuple descriptor was used to
create the slot.

As a secondary issue 5db6df0c0 changed ExecLockRows() to begin EPQ
earlier, to allow to fetch the locked rows directly into the EPQ
slots, instead of having to copy tuples around. Unfortunately, as Tom
complained, that forces some expensive initialization to happen
earlier.

As a third issue, the test coverage for EPQ was clearly insufficient.

Fixing the first issue is unfortunately not trivial: Non-locked row
marks were fetched at the start of EPQ, and we don't have the type
information for the rowmarks available at that point. While we could
change that, it's not easy. It might be worthwhile to change that at
some point, but to fix this bug, it seems better to delay fetching
non-locking rowmarks when they're actually needed, rather than
eagerly. They're referenced at most once, and in cases where EPQ
fails, might never be referenced. Fetching them when needed also
increases locality a bit.

To be able to fetch rowmarks during execution, rather than
initialization, we need to be able to access the active EPQState, as
that contains necessary data. To do so move EPQ related data from
EState to EPQState, and, only for EStates creates as part of EPQ,
reference the associated EPQState from EState.

To fix the second issue, change EPQ initialization to allow use of
EvalPlanQualSlot() to be used before EvalPlanQualBegin() (but
obviously still requiring EvalPlanQualInit() to have been done).

As these changes made struct EState harder to understand, e.g. by
adding multiple EStates, significantly reorder the members, and add a
lot more comments.

Also add a few more EPQ tests, including one that fails for the first
issue above. More is needed.

Reported-By: yi huang
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion:
    https://postgr.es/m/CAHU7rYZo_C4ULsAx_LAj8az9zqgrD8WDd4hTegDTMM1LMqrBsg@mail.gmail.com
    https://postgr.es/m/24530.1562686693@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 12-, where the EPQ changes were introduced
2019-09-09 05:14:11 -07:00
Alvaro Herrera fe66125974 Remove 'msg' parameter from convert_tuples_by_name
The message was included as a parameter when this function was added in
dcb2bda9b7, but I don't think it has ever served any useful purpose.
Let's stop spreading it pointlessly.

Reviewed by Amit Langote and Peter Eisentraut.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190806224728.GA17233@alvherre.pgsql
2019-09-03 14:47:29 -04:00
Tom Lane 3c926587b5 Remove EState.es_range_table_array.
Now that list_nth is O(1), there's no good reason to maintain a
separate array of RTE pointers rather than indexing into
estate->es_range_table.  Deleting the array doesn't save all that
much either; but just on cleanliness grounds, it's better not to
have duplicate representations of the identical information.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14960.1565384592@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-08-12 11:58:35 -04:00
David Rowley 1e6a759838 Use appendBinaryStringInfo in more places where the length is known
When we already know the length that we're going to append, then it
makes sense to use appendBinaryStringInfo instead of
appendStringInfoString so that the append can be performed with a simple
memcpy() using a known length rather than having to first perform a
strlen() call to obtain the length.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8+FRAM1s5+mAa3isajeEoAaicJ=4e0WzrH3tAusbbiMQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-07-23 00:14:11 +12:00
Thomas Munro f5825853e3 Pass QueryEnvironment down to EvalPlanQual's EState.
Otherwise the executor can't see trigger transition tables during
EPQ evaluation.  Fixes bug #15900 and almost certainly also #15720.
Back-patch to 10, where trigger transition tables landed.

Author: Alex Aktsipetrov
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15900-bc482754fe8d7415%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15720-38c2b29e5d720187%40postgresql.org
2019-07-10 10:15:32 +12:00
Michael Paquier 3412030205 Fix more typos and inconsistencies in the tree
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a5419ea-1452-a4e6-72ff-545b1a5a8076@gmail.com
2019-06-17 16:13:16 +09:00
Amit Kapila 9679345f3c Fix typos.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7208de98-add8-8537-91c0-f8b089e2928c@gmail.com
2019-05-26 18:28:18 +05:30
Andres Freund 73b8c3bd28 tableam: Rename wrapper functions to match callback names.
Some of the wrapper functions didn't match the callback names. Many of
them due to staying "consistent" with historic naming of the wrapped
functionality. We decided that for most cases it's more important to
be for tableam to be consistent going forward, than with the past.

The one exception is beginscan/endscan/...  because it'd have looked
odd to have systable_beginscan/endscan/... with a different naming
scheme, and changing the systable_* APIs would have caused way too
much churn (including breaking a lot of external users).

Author: Ashwin Agrawal, with some small additions by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeiugyrXZfX7n0ORCa4L-m834dzmaE8eFdbNR6PMpetU4Ww@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-23 16:32:36 -07:00
Tom Lane 8255c7a5ee Phase 2 pgindent run for v12.
Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent.  This formats
multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with
additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match
where the first line's left parenthesis is.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-22 13:04:48 -04:00
Tom Lane be76af171c Initial pgindent run for v12.
This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent.
I thought it would be good to commit this separately,
so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-22 12:55:34 -04:00
Tom Lane a8cb8f1246 Fix EvalPlanQualStart to handle partitioned result rels correctly.
The es_root_result_relations array needs to be shallow-copied in the
same way as the main es_result_relations array, else EPQ rechecks on
partitioned result relations fail, as seen in bug #15677 from
Norbert Benkocs.

Amit Langote, isolation test case added by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15677-0bf089579b4cd02d@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19321.1554567786@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-04-08 12:20:22 -04:00
Andres Freund 86b85044e8 tableam: Add table_multi_insert() and revamp/speed-up COPY FROM buffering.
This adds table_multi_insert(), and converts COPY FROM, the only user
of heap_multi_insert, to it.

A simple conversion of COPY FROM use slots would have yielded a
slowdown when inserting into a partitioned table for some
workloads. Different partitions might need different slots (both slot
types and their descriptors), and dropping / creating slots when
there's constant partition changes is measurable.

Thus instead revamp the COPY FROM buffering for partitioned tables to
allow to buffer inserts into multiple tables, flushing only when
limits are reached across all partition buffers. By only dropping
slots when there've been inserts into too many different partitions,
the aforementioned overhead is gone. By allowing larger batches, even
when there are frequent partition changes, we actuall speed such cases
up significantly.

By using slots COPY of very narrow rows into unlogged / temporary
might slow down very slightly (due to the indirect function calls).

Author: David Rowley, Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi
Discussion:
    https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
    https://postgr.es/m/20190327054923.t3epfuewxfqdt22e@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-04-04 16:28:18 -07:00
Peter Eisentraut fc22b6623b Generated columns
This is an SQL-standard feature that allows creating columns that are
computed from expressions rather than assigned, similar to a view or
materialized view but on a column basis.

This implements one kind of generated column: stored (computed on
write).  Another kind, virtual (computed on read), is planned for the
future, and some room is left for it.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b151f851-4019-bdb1-699e-ebab07d2f40a@2ndquadrant.com
2019-03-30 08:15:57 +01:00