When extracting an attr from a cached tuple in the syscache with
SysCacheGetAttr the isnull parameter must be checked in case the
attr cannot be NULL. For cases when this is known beforehand, a
wrapper is introduced which perform the errorhandling internally
on behalf of the caller, invoking an elog in case of a NULL attr.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AD76405E-DB45-46B6-941F-17B1EB3A9076@yesql.se
When calculating distance in brin_minmax_multi_distance_inet(), the
netmask was applied incorrectly. This results in (seemingly) incorrect
ordering of values, triggering an assert.
For builds without asserts this is mostly harmless - we may merge other
ranges, possibly resulting in slightly less efficient index. But it's
still correct and the greedy algorithm doesn't guarantee optimality
anyway.
Backpatch to 14, where minmax-multi indexes were introduced.
Reported by Dmitry Dolgov, investigation and fix by me.
Reported-by: Dmitry Dolgov
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17774-c6f3e36dd4471e67@postgresql.org
When brin_minmax_multi_union merges summaries, we may end up with just a
single range after merge_overlapping_ranges. The summaries may contain
just one range each, and they may overlap (or be exactly the same).
With a single range there's no distance to calculate, but we happen to
call build_distances anyway - which is fine, we don't calculate the
distance in this case, except that with asserts this failed due to a
check there are at least two ranges.
The assert is unnecessarily strict, so relax it a bit and bail out if
there's just a single range. The relaxed assert would be enough, but
this way we don't allocate unnecessary memory for distance.
Backpatch to 14, where minmax-multi opclasses were introduced.
Reported-by: Jaime Casanova
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzVA55qS0hgz8P3r@ahch-to
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we mostly rename shadowed local
variables to remove the warnings produced when compiling with
-Wshadow=compatible-local.
This fixes 63 warnings and leaves just 5.
Author: Justin Pryzby, David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion https://postgr.es/m/20220817145434.GC26426%40telsasoft.com
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
The primary fix here is to fix has_matching_range() so it does not
reference ranges->values[-1] when nranges == 0. Similar problems existed
in AssertCheckRanges() too. It does not look like any of these problems
could lead to a crash as the array in question is at the end of the Ranges
struct, and values[-1] is memory that belongs to other fields in the
struct. However, let's get rid of these rather unsafe coding practices.
In passing, I (David) adjusted some comments to try to make it more clear
what some of the fields are for in the Ranges struct. I had to study the
code to find out what nsorted was for as I couldn't tell from the
comments.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqJQzPitufX-jR=YUbJafpCDAKUnwgdbX_MzSc93wuvdw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where multi-range brin was added.
In a similar effort to f736e188c and 110d81728, fixup various usages of
string functions where a more appropriate function is available and more
fit for purpose.
These changes include:
1. Use cstring_to_text_with_len() instead of cstring_to_text() when
working with a StringInfoData and the length can easily be obtained.
2. Use appendStringInfoString() instead of appendStringInfo() when no
formatting is required.
3. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf("%s", ...)
4. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf(...) (with no formatting)
5. Use appendPQExpBufferChar() instead of appendPQExpBufferStr() when the
length of the string being appended is 1.
6. appendStringInfoChar() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting
is required and string is 1 char long.
7. Use appendPQExpBufferStr(b, .) instead of appendPQExpBuffer(b, "%s", .)
8. Don't use pstrdup when it's fine to just point to the string constant.
I (David) did find other cases of #8 but opted to use #4 instead as I
wasn't certain enough that applying #8 was ok (e.g in hba.c)
Author: Ranier Vilela, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2j2+RJBGhNtUz6BxabWWh2Jx16wMUMWKUjv70Ver1vg@mail.gmail.com
Since these macros just cast whatever you give them to the designated
output type, and many normal uses also cast the output type further, a
number of incorrect uses go undiscovered. The fixes in this patch
have been discovered by changing these macros to inline functions,
which is the subject of a future patch.
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8528fb7e-0aa2-6b54-85fb-0c0886dbd6ed%40enterprisedb.com
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we're targetting fixing the
warnings that -Wshadow=compatible-local produces that we can fix by moving
a variable to an inner scope to stop that variable from being shadowed by
another variable declared somewhere later in the function.
All of the warnings being fixed here are changing the scope of variables
which are being used as an iterator for a "for" loop. In each instance,
the fix happens to be changing the for loop to use the C99 type
initialization. Much of this code likely pre-dates our use of C99.
Reducing the scope of the outer scoped variable seems like the safest way
to fix these. Renaming seems more likely to risk patches using the wrong
variable. Reducing the scope is more likely to result in a compilation
failure after applying some future patch rather than introducing bugs with
it.
By my count, this takes the warning count from 129 down to 114.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrwLGBP%2BYw9vriayyf%3DXR4uPWP5jr6cQhP9au_kaDUhbA%40mail.gmail.com
When calculating distance between float4/float8 values, we need to be a
bit more careful about NaN values in order not to trigger assert. We
consider NaN values to be equal (distace 0.0) and in infinite distance
from all other values.
On builds without asserts, this issue is mostly harmless - the ranges
may be merged in less efficient order, but the index is still correct.
Per report from Andreas Seltenreich. Backpatch to 14, where this new
BRIN opclass was introduced.
Reported-by: Andreas Seltenreich
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87r1bw9ukm.fsf@credativ.de
This tidies up some questionable coding which made use of
DatumGetPointer() for Datums being passed into functions where the
parameter is expected to be a cstring. We saw no compiler warnings with
the old code as the Pointer type used in DatumGetPointer() happens to
be a char * rather than a void *. However, that's no excuse and we should
be using the correct macro for the job.
Here we also make use of OutputFunctionCall() rather than using
FunctionCall1() directly to call the type's output function.
OutputFunctionCall() is the standard way to do this. It casts the
returned value to a cstring for us.
In passing get rid of a duplicate call to strlen(). Most compilers will
likely optimize away the 2nd call, but there may be some that won't. In
any case, this just aligns the code to some other nearby code that already
does this.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq1D=ehZ8hey8Hz67N+_Zth0GHO5wiVCfv1YcGPMXJq0A@mail.gmail.com
Fix a few places that were using appendStringInfo() when they should have
been using appendStringInfoString(). Also some cases of
appendPQExpBuffer() that would have been better suited to use
appendPQExpBufferChar(), and finally, some places that used
appendPQExpBuffer() when appendPQExpBufferStr() would have suited better.
There are no bugs are being fixed here. The aim is just to make the code
use the most optimal function for the job.
All the code being changed here is new to PG14. It makes sense to fix
these before we branch for PG15. There are a few other places that we
could fix, but those cases are older code so fixing those seems less
worthwhile as it may cause unnecessary back-patching pain in the future.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716732158B1C4142C6FE375943D9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
When calling sort_expanded_ranges() we need to remember the return
value, because the function sorts and also deduplicates the ranges. So
the number of ranges may decrease. brin_minmax_multi_union failed to do
that, which resulted in crashes due to bogus ranges (equal minval/maxval
but not marked as compacted).
Reported-by: Jaime Casanova
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210404052550.GA4376%40ahch-to
The BRIN minmax-multi consistent function incorrectly assumed it can
lookup an operator, and then swap the arguments to get the commutator.
For example <(a,b) would be called as <(b,a) to get >(a,b). This works
when the arguments are of the same type, but with cross-type opclasses
this fails. We can't swap <(float4,float8) arguments, for example.
Fixed by passing arguments in the right order.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5jLZFLCxyxfT%3DMfK5mtPfSzHA1rVLowR-j4RRsFVvKm7A%40mail.gmail.com
The distance calculation ignored the mask, unlike the inet comparator,
which resulted in negative distance in some cases. Fixed by applying the
mask in brin_minmax_multi_distance_inet. I've considered simply calling
inetmi() to calculate the delta, but that does not consider mask either.
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1a0a7b9d-9bda-e3a2-7fa4-88f15042a051%40enterprisedb.com
The distance calculation for interval type was treating months as having
31 days, which is inconsistent with the interval comparator (using 30
days). Due to this it was possible to get negative distance (b-a) when
(a<b), trigerring an assert.
Fixed by adopting the same logic as interval_cmp_value.
Reported-by: Jaime Casanova
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5jKH0Xhneau2mNftNPtTy-BVgQfXc8zQkEvRvBHfeUThQ%40mail.gmail.com
The deserialization failed to ensure correct alignment, as it assumed it
can simply point into the serialized value. The serialization however
ignores alignment and copies just the significant bytes in order to make
the result as small as possible. This caused failures on systems that
are sensitive to mialigned addresses, like sparc, or with address
sanitizer enabled.
Fixed by copying the serialized data to ensure proper alignment. While
at it, fix an issue with serialization on big endian machines, using the
same store_att_byval/fetch_att trick as extended statistics.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/0c8c3304-d3dd-5e29-d5ac-b50589a23c8c%40enterprisedb.com
Adds BRIN opclasses similar to the existing minmax, except that instead
of summarizing the page range into a single [min,max] range, the summary
consists of multiple ranges and/or points, allowing gaps. This allows
more efficient handling of data with poor correlation to physical
location within the table and/or outlier values, for which the regular
minmax opclassed tend to work poorly.
It's possible to specify the number of values kept for each page range,
either as a single point or an interval boundary.
CREATE TABLE t (a int);
CREATE INDEX ON t
USING brin (a int4_minmax_multi_ops(values_per_range=16));
When building the summary, the values are combined into intervals with
the goal to minimize the "covering" (sum of interval lengths), using a
support procedure computing distance between two values.
Bump catversion, due to various catalog changes.
Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sokolov Yura <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c1138ead-7668-f0e1-0638-c3be3237e812@2ndquadrant.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5d78b774-7e9c-c94e-12cf-fef51cc89b1a%402ndquadrant.com
Daniel Gustafsson
Tomas Vondra
Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian
David Rowley
Peter Geoghegan
Tom Lane
Michael Paquier