Here's a couple more small fixes that I've made to make my runtime
checker happy with the code. More along the lines of those that
I sent in the past, ie, a pointer to an array != the name of
an array. The last patch is that I mailed about yesterday -- I got
two replies of "do it", so it's done. As far as I can tell, however,
the function in question is never called by pg95, so either way
it can't hurt...
From: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@va.pubnix.com>
|
|This patch fixes a backend crash that happens sometimes when you try to
|join on a field that contains NULL in some rows. Postgres tries to
|compute a hash value of the field you're joining on, but when the field
|is NULL, the pointer it thinks is pointing to the data is really just
|pointing to random memory. This forces the hash value of NULL to be 0.
|
|It seems that nothing matches NULL on joins, even other NULL's (with or
|without this patch). Is that what's supposed to happen?
|
CLUSTER command couldn't rename correctly the new created heap relation.
The table base name resulted in some "temp_XXXX" instead of the correct
base name.
Submitted by: Dirk Koeser <koeser@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
Postgres is not able to cluster a relation on which an rtree index is
defined. Postmaster gives the following error message:
Too Large Allocation Request("!(0 < (size) && (size) <= (0xfffffff)):size=0
[0x0]", File:"/export/home/postgres/src/backend/utils/mmgr/mcxt.c", Line: 220)
!(0 <(size) && (size) <= (0xfffffff)) (0) [No such file or directory]
Submitted by: Dirk Koeser <koeser@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
pg_dump and load to 2.0. I haven't gotten any feedback on whether
people want it, so I am submitting it for others to decide. I would
recommend an install in 1.02.1.
I had said that the 2.0 pg_dump could dump a 1.02.1 database, but I was
wrong. The copy is actually performed by the backend, and the 2.0
database will not be able to read 1.02.1 databases because of the new
system columns.
This patch does several things. It copies nulls out as \N, so they can
be distinguished from '' strings. It fixes a problem where backslashes
in the input stream were not output as double-backslashes. Without this
patch, backslashes copied out were deleted upon input, or interpreted as
special characters. Third, input is now terminated by backslash-period.
This can not be part of a normal input stream.
I tested this by creating a database with all sorts of nulls, backslash,
and period fields and dumped the database and reloaded into a new
database and compared them.
Submitted by: Bruce
and found out that one of the patches is a show stopper for
compiling under a strict ansi package.
Please make sure the following fix makes it into the 1.02.1
release...
Thanks.
-Kurt
directory. The code that looks for the pg_hba file doesn't use it, though,
so the postmaster uses the wrong pg_hba file. Also, when the postmaster
looks in one directory and the user thinks it is looking in another
directory, the error messages don't give enough information to solve the
problem. I extended the error message for this.
Submitted by: Bryan Henderson <bryanh@giraffe.netgate.net>
Here's a small patch that my run-time checker whines about
incessantly. The justification for the patch is along the
lines of passing a NULL is allowed if you have an
arguement that is a *POINTER* to something, but if
the arguement is an array reference, it's not really
a "pointer", so it can't be NULL.
If you question this, I refer you to
<URL:http://www.va.pubnix.com/staff/djm/lore/arrays-are-not-pointers>
Anyways, here's the patch:
-Kurt
Submitted by: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@va.pubnix.com>
This patch forces postgres95 to assume any floating-point value is a
float8. It removes the requirement that you cast all floating-point
constants to float8.
We can remove alot of casts in the regression test after we are sure
this works.
If I have missed anything, would someone let me know. I have tested
inserts of floating-point values into float8 fields, and it worked well.
Casting the number to float4 showed the same precision loss as previous
uncast values showed.
Submitted by: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
There is a support routine in the standard 4.4BSD C library
called "err()". There is also a utility routine in
.../src/backend/bootstrap/bootstrap.c
with the same name.
Here's a patch that renames the pg95 routine to something a little
more sane. As a bonus, one more bit of system-specific code leaves
the system...
Submitted by: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@va.pubnix.com>
I've enclosed two patches. The first affects Solaris compilability. The
bug stems from netdb.h (where MAXHOSTNAMELEN is defined on a stock
system). If the user has installed the header files from BIND 4.9.x,
there will be no definition of MAXHOSTNAMELEN. The patch will, if all
else fails, try to include <arpa/nameser.h> and set MAXHOSTNAMELEN to
MAXDNAME, which is 256 (just like MAXHOSTNAMELEN on a stock system).
The second patch adds aliases for "ISNULL" to "IS NULL" and likewise for
"NOTNULL" to "IS NOT NULL". I have not removed the postgres specific
ISNULL and NOTNULL. I noticed this on the TODO list, and figured it would
be easy to remove.
The full semantics are:
[ expression IS NULL ]
[ expression IS NOT NULL ]
--Jason
Submitted by: Jason Wright <jason@oozoo.vnet.net>
Previously Postgres95 wouldn't accept 'order by' clauses with fields
referred to as '<table>.<field>', e.g.:
select t1.field1, t2.field2 from table1 t1, table2 t2
order by t2.field2;
This syntax is required by the ODBC SQL spec.
Submitted by: Dan McGuirk <mcguirk@indirect.com>
While a normal SELECT statement can contain a GROUP BY clause, a cursor
declaration cannot. This was not the case in PG-1.0. Was there a good
reason why this was changed? Are cursors being phased out? Is there any way
to get data with just a SELECT (and without a DECLARE CURSOR ...)?
The patch below seems to fix things. If anyone can see a problem with it,
please let me know. Thanks.
Submitted by: David Smith <dasmith@perseus.tufts.edu>
Someone asked me if the bpchar type could be extended to do
case-insensitive regular expression searches.
Submitted by: "Alistair G. Crooks" <azcb0@juts.ccc.amdahl.com>
Originally, I thought the problem was caused by a function that gets
called as a normal function where we want to return a value, and as a
signal handler where we need to have it accept a parameter (the signal
number) and it returns nothing, I was going to case the function name in
the signal call as (void (*)(int)).
Looking at all the source, it turns out this function only gets used as
a signal handler, so I set an int parameter and return void.
I have removed the Linux defines because they are not needed. BSD let
this sloppiness slide. Linux gave a compile error.
Submitted by: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
In postgres95/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs, lines 1188 and 1189,
local_node->relname is taken to point to a NameType, while its
defined as a pointer to char. Both the casting to Name and the
call of namestrcpy should, IMHO, be changed appropriately (first
patch).
As far as I could see from the Linux signal header file,
a signal handler is declared as
typedef void (*__sighandler_t)(int);
Few changes to postgres95/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c seem
appropriate to comply with this.
Finally, postgres95/src/bin/pg_version/pg_version.c defines
a function GetDataHome (by default, returning an integer)
and returns NULL in the function, which isn't an integer...
Submitted by: ernst.molitor@uni-bonn.de
> INDEXED searches in some cases DO NOT WORK.
> Although simple search expressions (i.e. with a constant value on
> the right side of an operator) work, performing a join (by putting
> a field of some other table on the right side of an operator) produces
> empty output.
> WITHOUT indices, everything works fine.
>
submitted by: "Vadim B. Mikheev" <root@ais.sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
- src/backend/tcop/*
- cosmetic changes to OPENLINK patches
- src/backend/storage/*
- more changes, mostly cosmetic
- src/backend/ports/*
- merge in patches for aix and i386_solaris
The updating of array fields is broken in Postgres95-1.01, An array can
be only replaced with a new array but not have some elements modified.
This is caused by two bugs in the parser and in the array utilities.
Furthermore it is not possible to update array with a base type of
variable length.
- submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
I have written some patches which add support for NULLs to Postgres95.
In fact support for NULLs was already present in postgres, but it had been
disabled because not completely debugged, I believe. My patches simply add
some checks here and there. To enable the new code you must add -DNULL_PATCH
to CFLAGS in Makefile.global. After recompiling you can do things like:
insert into a (x, y) values (1, NULL);
update a set x = NULL where x = 0;
You can't still use a "where x=NULL" clause, you must use ISNULL instead.
This could probably be an easy fix to do.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
Select queries with an isnull or notnull clause, like "select * where
somefield isnull", crash the backend if the table has at least one index.
If the indices are deleted the queries work again. Also the explain
command fail in the same way.
The is caused by a bug in subroutine of the optimizer which doesn't check
null values in the clauses.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
This is a patch to prevent an endless loop occuring in the Postgres backend
when a 'warning' error condition generates another warning error contition
in the handler code.
Submitted by: Chris Dunlop, <chris@onthe.net.au>
It is not possible to define attributes as arrays of date or time, the
type _time and _date are not defined.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
The type _char16 (array of char16) is incorrectly defined as array of name
and values longer than 16 chars are stored as names and not truncated to 16
bytes as they should be.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
varchar.diff
------------
This patch was necessary for the OpenLink Postgres Database Agent.
I think this fixes a bug anyway.
The following query demonstrates this bug:
create table foo (bar varchar);
insert into foo values (''); -- no problem
select * from foo where bar = ''; -- fails
causes segmentation fault.
Thanks to: Salvador Ortiz Garcia, Robert Patrick, Paul 'Shag' Walmsley,
and James Cooper for finding and fixing the problem.
Marc G. Fournier