Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alvaro Herrera 8c9da1441d
Make spelling of cancelled/cancellation consistent
This fixes places where words derived from cancel were not using their
common en-US ugly^H^H^H^Hspelling.

Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+Lrq+ty6yWXF5572qNQ8KwxGwG5n4fsEcCUap685nWvQ@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-26 12:38:15 +01:00
Tom Lane c04c767059 Rethink blocking annotations in detach-partition-concurrently-[34].
In 741d7f104, I tried to make the reports from canceled steps come out
after the pg_cancel_backend() steps, since that was the most common
ordering before.  However, that doesn't ensure that a canceled step
doesn't report even later, as shown in a recent failure on buildfarm
member idiacanthus.  Rather than complicating things even more with
additional annotations, let's just force the cancel's effect to be
reported first.  It's not *that* unnatural-looking.

Back-patch to v14 where these test cases appeared.

Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=idiacanthus&dt=2021-07-02%2001%3A40%3A04
2021-07-05 14:34:47 -04:00
Tom Lane a443c1b2d6 Allow non-quoted identifiers as isolation test session/step names.
For no obvious reason, isolationtester has always insisted that
session and step names be written with double quotes.  This is
fairly tedious and does little for test readability, especially
since the names that people actually choose almost always look
like normal identifiers.  Hence, let's tweak the lexer to allow
SQL-like identifiers not only double-quoted strings.

(They're SQL-like, not exactly SQL, because I didn't add any
case-folding logic.  Also there's no provision for U&"..." names,
not that anyone's likely to care.)

There is one incompatibility introduced by this change: if you write
"foo""bar" with no space, that used to be taken as two identifiers,
but now it's just one identifier with an embedded quote mark.

I converted all the src/test/isolation/ specfiles to remove
unnecessary double quotes, but stopped there because my
eyes were glazing over already.

Like 741d7f104, back-patch to all supported branches, so that this
isn't a stumbling block for back-patching isolation test changes.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/759113.1623861959@sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-06-23 18:41:39 -04:00
Tom Lane 741d7f1047 Use annotations to reduce instability of isolation-test results.
We've long contended with isolation test results that aren't entirely
stable.  Some test scripts insert long delays to try to force stable
results, which is not terribly desirable; but other erratic failure
modes remain, causing unrepeatable buildfarm failures.  I've spent a
fair amount of time trying to solve this by improving the server-side
support code, without much success: that way is fundamentally unable
to cope with diffs that stem from chance ordering of arrival of
messages from different server processes.

We can improve matters on the client side, however, by annotating
the test scripts themselves to show the desired reporting order
of events that might occur in different orders.  This patch adds
three types of annotations to deal with (a) test steps that might or
might not complete their waits before the isolationtester can see them
waiting; (b) test steps in different sessions that can legitimately
complete in either order; and (c) NOTIFY messages that might arrive
before or after the completion of a step in another session.  We might
need more annotation types later, but this seems to be enough to deal
with the instabilities we've seen in the buildfarm.  It also lets us
get rid of all the long delays that were previously used, cutting more
than a minute off the runtime of the isolation tests.

Back-patch to all supported branches, because the buildfarm
instabilities affect all the branches, and because it seems desirable
to keep isolationtester's capabilities the same across all branches
to simplify possible future back-patching of tests.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/327948.1623725828@sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-06-22 21:43:12 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera eb43bdbf51
Make detach-partition-concurrently-4 less timing sensitive
Same as 5e0b1aeb2d, for the companion test file.

This one seems lower probability (only two failures in a month of runs);
I was hardly able to reproduce a failure without a patch, so the fact
that I was also unable to reproduce one with it doesn't say anything.
We'll have to wait for further buildfarm results to see if we need any
further adjustments.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210524090712.GA3771394@rfd.leadboat.com
2021-05-25 19:44:55 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 71f4c8c6f7
ALTER TABLE ... DETACH PARTITION ... CONCURRENTLY
Allow a partition be detached from its partitioned table without
blocking concurrent queries, by running in two transactions and only
requiring ShareUpdateExclusive in the partitioned table.

Because it runs in two transactions, it cannot be used in a transaction
block.  This is the main reason to use dedicated syntax: so that users
can choose to use the original mode if they need it.  But also, it
doesn't work when a default partition exists (because an exclusive lock
would still need to be obtained on it, in order to change its partition
constraint.)

In case the second transaction is cancelled or a crash occurs, there's
ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION .. FINALIZE, which executes the final
steps.

The main trick to make this work is the addition of column
pg_inherits.inhdetachpending, initially false; can only be set true in
the first part of this command.  Once that is committed, concurrent
transactions that use a PartitionDirectory will include or ignore
partitions so marked: in optimizer they are ignored if the row is marked
committed for the snapshot; in executor they are always included.  As a
result, and because of the way PartitionDirectory caches partition
descriptors, queries that were planned before the detach will see the
rows in the detached partition and queries that are planned after the
detach, won't.

A CHECK constraint is created that duplicates the partition constraint.
This is probably not strictly necessary, and some users will prefer to
remove it afterwards, but if the partition is re-attached to a
partitioned table, the constraint needn't be rechecked.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200803234854.GA24158@alvherre.pgsql
2021-03-25 18:00:28 -03:00