Clarify that default privileges are not inherited and reorder
paragraphs. This is a follow up to a recent ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
doc patch.
Reported-by: Sanjay Minni
Diagnosed-by: AMpxBo=M35hcH1g4Vg=KRJ0-77FOJcvdrdiVF5KSOAdOG-LvKQ@mail.gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Laurenz Albe
Backpatch-through: 16
Rewrite array_in() and its subroutines so that we make only one
pass over the input text, rather than two. This requires
potentially re-pallocing the working arrays values[] and nulls[]
larger than our initial guess, but that cost will hopefully be made
up by avoiding duplicate parsing. In any case this coding seems
much clearer and more straightforward than what we had before.
This also fixes array_in() to reject non-rectangular input (that is,
different brace depths in different parts of the input) more reliably
than before, and to give a better error message when it does so.
This is analogous to the plpython and plperl fixes in 0553528e7 and
f47004add. Like those PLs, we now accept input such as '{{},{}}'
as a valid representation of an empty array, which we did not before.
Additionally, reject explicit array subscripts that are outside the
integer range (previously you just got whatever atoi() converted
them to), and make some other minor improvements in error reporting.
Although this is arguably a bug fix, it's also a behavioral change
that might trip somebody up, so no back-patch.
Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas, and Jian He. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin
for the initial report and for review/testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2794005.1683042087@sss.pgh.pa.us
It's clearly stated in the comments that ginFindParents() must keep
the pin on the index's root page that's associated with the topmost
GinBtreeStack item. However, the code path for the case that the
desired downlink has been pushed down to the next index level
ignored this proviso, and would release the pin anyway if we were
still examining the root level. That led to an assertion failure
or "buffer NNNN is not owned by resource owner" error later, when
we try to release the pin again at the end of the insertion.
This is quite hard to reproduce, since it can only happen if an
index root page split occurs concurrently with our own insertion.
Thanks to Jeff Janes for finding a test case that triggers it
often enough to allow investigation.
This has been there since the beginning of GIN, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1yCAKtv86dMrD__Ja-7KzjE=uMeKX8y__cx5W-OEWy2ow@mail.gmail.com
One of the examples on the SELECT page was missing a semicolon from
a listing which has the look and feel of being a psql session. This
adds the missing semicolon and also removes the newline between the
query and results to match the other examples nearby.
Backpatch to all supported branches to avoid backpatching issues on
this page.
Reported-by: tim.needham2@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/169965004097.225187.12941375915673151540@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: v12
Commit b7eda3e0e moved XidInMVCCSnapshot() from tqual.c into snapmgr.c,
but follow-up commit c91560def incorrectly updated this reference. We
could fix it, but as pointed out by Daniel Gustafsson, 1) the reader can
easily find the file that contains the definition of that function, e.g.
by grepping, and 2) this kind of reference is prone to going stale; so
let's just remove it.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK145VdKkPBLWS2urwhgsfidbSexwY-9zCL6xSUJH%2BBTUUg%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 00d7fb5e2e started to use REGBUF_NO_CHANGE at a few places in the
code where we register the buffer before marking it dirty but missed
updating one of the code flows in the hash index where we free the overflow
page without any live tuples on it.
Author: Amit Kapila and Hayato Kuroda
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/f045c8f7-ee24-ead6-3679-c04a43d21351@gmail.com
sendFileWithContent() previously got the content length by using
strlen(), assuming that the content given is always a string. Some
patches are under discussion to pass binary contents to a base backup
stream, where an arbitrary length needs to be given by the caller
instead.
The patch extends sendFileWithContent() to be able to handle this case,
where len < 0 can be used to indicate an arbitrary length rather than
rely on strlen() for the content length.
A comment in sendFileWithContent() mentioned the backup_label file.
However, this routine is used by more file types, like the tablespace
map, so adjust it in passing.
Author: David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2daf8adc-8db7-4204-a7f2-a7e94e2bfa4b@pgmasters.net
Currently, pg_stat_reset_shared() can use an argument to specify the
target of statistics to reset, doing nothing for NULL as it is strict.
This patch adds to pg_stat_reset_shared() the possibility to reset all
the stats types already handled in this function rather than do nothing
if the argument value given is NULL or if nothing is specified
(proisstrict is switched to false). Like previously, SLRUs are not
included in what gets reset.
The idea to use NULL or no argument to control if all the shared stats
already covered by this function should be reset has been proposed by
Andres Freund.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Atsushi Torikoshi
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier, Bharath Rupireddy,
Matthias van de Meent
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4291a55137ddda77cf7cc5f46e846daf@oss.nttdata.com
Three queries did not consider partitioned indexes and tables, and
surrounding comments have not been updated in a while.
Like 4b9fbd6be4, this is only cosmetic currently as no such relkinds
exist at this stage of the regression tests, but running these queries
on existing clusters could lead to incorrect results.
Author: Jian He, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxGsB1ciahkNDccyxhw-Pfp_-_y+Wx+1BOdRyVVxKojAbg@mail.gmail.com
It seems that a PHV evaluated/needed at or below the self join should not have
a problem if we remove the self join. But this requires further investigation.
For now, we just do not remove self joins if the rel to be removed is laterally
referenced by PHVs.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-ns73VF9gi37q61G3dS6Xuos+HtryMaBh37WQn=BsaJw@mail.gmail.com
Author: Richard Guo
We don't want existing slots in the old cluster to get invalidated during
the upgrade. During an upgrade, we set this variable to -1 via the command
line in an attempt to prevent such invalidations, but users have ways to
override it. This patch ensures the value is not overridden by the user.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20231027.115759.2206827438943188717.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
We can simplify FieldSelect on a whole-row Var into a plain Var
for the selected field. However, we should copy the whole-row Var's
varnullingrels when we do so, because the new Var is clearly nullable
by exactly the same rels as the original. Failure to do this led to
errors like "wrong varnullingrels (b) (expected (b 3)) for Var 2/2".
Richard Guo, per bug #18184 from Marian Krucina. Back-patch to
v16 where varnullingrels was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18184-5868dd258782058e@postgresql.org
When casting an interval to a time, the original code suffered from
64-bit integer overflow for inputs with a sufficiently large negative
"time" field, leading to bogus results.
Fix by rewriting the algorithm in a simpler form, that more obviously
cannot overflow. While at it, improve the test coverage to include
negative interval inputs.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXoUKHkcuq4q63hkiPsKZJd0kZWzgKtU%2BNT0aU4wbf_Pw%40mail.gmail.com
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if the UPDATE is turned into a
cross-partition DELETE then INSERT, do not attempt to invoke AFTER
UPDATE ROW triggers, or any of the other post-update actions in
ExecUpdateEpilogue().
For consistency with a plain UPDATE command, such triggers should not
be fired (and typically fail anyway), and similarly, other post-update
actions, such as WCO/RLS checks should not be executed, and might also
lead to unexpected failures.
Therefore, as with ExecUpdate(), make ExecMergeMatched() return
immediately if ExecUpdateAct() reports that a cross-partition update
was done, to be sure that no further processing is done for that
tuple.
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWjBgagyNZs02vgDF0DvASYj-iHTFtXG2-nP3orZhmtcw%40mail.gmail.com
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return INT64_MIN.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Patch be me. Thanks to Jian He for initial investigation, and Laurenz
Albe and Tom Lane for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUNK-AZSD0jVdgkk0N%3DNcAXBWeAEX-QU9AnJPensikmdQ%40mail.gmail.com
When the hash table is in use, ResoureOwnerSort() moves any elements
from the small fixed-size array to the hash table, and sorts it. When
the hash table is not in use, it sorts the elements in the small
fixed-size array directly. However, ResourceOwnerSort() and
ResourceOwnerReleaseAll() had different idea on when the hash table is
in use: ResourceOwnerSort() checked owner->nhash != 0, and
ResourceOwnerReleaseAll() checked owner->hash != NULL. If the hash
table was allocated but was currently empty, you hit an assertion
failure.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/be58d565-9e95-d417-4e47-f6bd408dea4b@gmail.com
Commit b0e96f3119 introduced a bunch of recursive functions, but
failed to make them check for stack depth. This can cause the backend
to crash when operating on inheritance hierarchies several thousands
deep. Protect the code by adding the missing stack depth checks.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b2ac2392-9727-5f76-e890-721ac80c1615@gmail.com
When we decide that we don't want to track execution time of a
specific planner or ProcessUtility call, we still have to increment
the nesting depth, or we'll make the wrong determination of whether
we are at top level when considering nested statements. (PREPARE
and EXECUTE are exceptions, for reasons explained in the code.)
Counting planner nesting depth separately from executor nesting depth
was a mistake: it causes us to make the wrong determination of whether
we are at top level when considering nested statements that get
executed during planning (as a result of constant-folding of
functions, for example). Merge those counters into one.
In passing, get rid of the PGSS_HANDLED_UTILITY macro in favor of
explicitly listing statement types. It seems somewhat coincidental
that PREPARE and EXECUTE are handled alike in each of the places where
that was used: the reasoning tends to be different for each one.
Thus, the macro seems as likely to encourage future bugs as prevent
them, since it's quite unclear whether any future statement type that
might need special-casing here would also need the same choices at
each spot.
Sergei Kornilov, Julien Rouhaud, and Tom Lane, per bug #17552 from
Maxim Boguk. This is pretty clearly a bug fix, but it's also a
behavioral change that might surprise somebody, so no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17552-213b534c56ab5d02@postgresql.org
When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429, we argued
against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right
decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that.
However, we failed to realize that the message bytes could still be
given to the kernel for transmitting when this can be made without
blocking. That's what pqPipelineFlush() does, and it is done for every
single other message type sent by libpq, so do that.
(When the socket is in blocking mode this may indeed block, but that's
what all the other libpq message-sending routines do, too.)
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202106252352.5ca4byasfun5%40alvherre.pgsql
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTxZRevRWkKodE-SnJk1Yfm4eKT+8E4Cyq3MJ9YKTnNew@mail.gmail.com
This buys back some of the performance loss that we otherwise saw from the
previous commit.
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Hayato Kuroda, Álvaro Herrera, Zhihong Yu
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d746cead-a1ef-7efe-fb47-933311e876a3%40iki.fi
Instead of having a separate array/hash for each resource kind, use a
single array and hash to hold all kinds of resources. This makes it
possible to introduce new resource "kinds" without having to modify
the ResourceOwnerData struct. In particular, this makes it possible
for extensions to register custom resource kinds.
The old approach was to have a small array of resources of each kind,
and if it fills up, switch to a hash table. The new approach also uses
an array and a hash, but now the array and the hash are used at the
same time. The array is used to hold the recently added resources, and
when it fills up, they are moved to the hash. This keeps the access to
recent entries fast, even when there are a lot of long-held resources.
All the resource-specific ResourceOwnerEnlarge*(),
ResourceOwnerRemember*(), and ResourceOwnerForget*() functions have
been replaced with three generic functions that take resource kind as
argument. For convenience, we still define resource-specific wrapper
macros around the generic functions with the old names, but they are
now defined in the source files that use those resource kinds.
The release callback no longer needs to call ResourceOwnerForget on
the resource being released. ResourceOwnerRelease unregisters the
resource from the owner before calling the callback. That needed some
changes in bufmgr.c and some other files, where releasing the
resources previously always called ResourceOwnerForget.
Each resource kind specifies a release priority, and
ResourceOwnerReleaseAll releases the resources in priority order. To
make that possible, we have to restrict what you can do between
phases. After calling ResourceOwnerRelease(), you are no longer
allowed to remember any more resources in it or to forget any
previously remembered resources by calling ResourceOwnerForget. There
was one case where that was done previously. At subtransaction commit,
AtEOSubXact_Inval() would handle the invalidation messages and call
RelationFlushRelation(), which temporarily increased the reference
count on the relation being flushed. We now switch to the parent
subtransaction's resource owner before calling AtEOSubXact_Inval(), so
that there is a valid ResourceOwner to temporarily hold that relcache
reference.
Other end-of-xact routines make similar calls to AtEOXact_Inval()
between release phases, but I didn't see any regression test failures
from those, so I'm not sure if they could reach a codepath that needs
remembering extra resources.
There were two exceptions to how the resource leak WARNINGs on commit
were printed previously: llvmjit silently released the context without
printing the warning, and a leaked buffer io triggered a PANIC. Now
everything prints a WARNING, including those cases.
Add tests in src/test/modules/test_resowner.
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Hayato Kuroda, Álvaro Herrera, Zhihong Yu
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cbfabeb0-cd3c-e951-a572-19b365ed314d%40iki.fi
These are functions where a lot of things happen between the
ResourceOwnerEnlarge and ResourceOwnerRemember calls. It's important
that there are no unrelated ResourceOwnerRemember calls in the code in
between, otherwise the reserved entry might be used up by the
intervening ResourceOwnerRemember and not be available at the intended
ResourceOwnerRemember call anymore. I don't see any bugs here, but the
longer the code path between the calls is, the harder it is to verify.
In bufmgr.c, there is a function similar to ResourceOwnerEnlarge,
ReservePrivateRefCountEntry(), to ensure that the private refcount
array has enough space. The ReservePrivateRefCountEntry() calls were
made at different places than the ResourceOwnerEnlargeBuffers()
calls. Move the ResourceOwnerEnlargeBuffers() and
ReservePrivateRefCountEntry() calls together for consistency.
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Hayato Kuroda, Álvaro Herrera, Zhihong Yu
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cbfabeb0-cd3c-e951-a572-19b365ed314d%40iki.fi
`openssl` is an optional dependency in the meson build as it may not be
installed in an environment even if SSL libraries are around. The meson
scripts assume that, but the SSL tests thought that it was a hard
dependency, causing a meson installation to fail if `openssl` could not
be found. Like similar tests that depend on external commands, and to
be consistent with ./configure for the SSL tests, this commit makes the
command existence optional in the tests.
Author: Tristan Partin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CWSX6P5OUUM5.N7B74KQ06ZP6@neon.tech
Backpatch-through: 16
false_positive_rate is a parameter that can be set with the bloom
opclass in BRIN, and setting it to a value of exactly 0.25 would trigger
an assertion in the first INSERT done on the index with value set.
The assertion changed here relied on BLOOM_{MIN|MAX}_FALSE_POSITIVE_RATE
that are somewhat arbitrary values, and specifying an out-of-range value
would also trigger a failure when defining such an index. So, as-is,
the assertion was just doubling on the min-max check of the reloption.
This is now enlarged to check that it is a correct percentage value,
instead, based on a suggestion by Tom Lane.
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Shihao Zhong
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17969-a6c54de48026d694@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
I added it by mistake in commit 7103ebb7aa. To clean up, struct
MergeAction needs to be moved to primnodes.h from parsenodes.h. (This
forces us to also move OverridingKind to primnodes.h).
Having to add parsenodes.h to bootstrap.h as fallout is a bit
surprising, since nothing nominally needs it there. However, per
comments in bootscanner.l, it is needed so that YYSTYPE can be declared.
I think this only started with commit dac048f71e, but I didn't
actually verify that.
In passing, stop including parsenodes.h in tcopprot.h. Nothing needs it
there.
Per discussion on a patch by Ashutosh Bapat.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202311071106.6y7b2ascqjlz@alvherre.pgsql
f0efa5aec introduced the concept of "read-only" StringInfos which makes
use of an existing, possibly not NUL terminated, buffer.
Here we adjust two places that make use of StringInfos to receive data
to avoid using appendBinaryStringInfo() in cases where a NUL termination
character is not required. This saves a possible palloc() and saves
having to needlessly memcpy() from one buffer to another.
Here we adjust two places which were using appendBinaryStringInfo().
Neither of these cases seem particularly performance-critical. In the
case of XLogWalRcvProcessMsg(), the appendBinaryStringInfo() was only
appending 24 bytes. The change made here does mean that we can get rid
of the incoming_message global variable and make that local instead.
The apply_spooled_messages() case applies in logical decoding when
applying (possibly large) changes which have been serialized to a file.
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoxYUDHwqPf-ShvchsERf1RzmkGoLwg63JNvHCkDCuyKQ@mail.gmail.com
array_set_element() and related functions allow an array to be
enlarged by assigning to subscripts outside the current array bounds.
While these places were careful to check that the new bounds are
allowable, they neglected to consider the risk of integer overflow
in computing the new bounds. In edge cases, we could compute new
bounds that are invalid but get past the subsequent checks,
allowing bad things to happen. Memory stomps that are potentially
exploitable for arbitrary code execution are possible, and so is
disclosure of server memory.
To fix, perform the hazardous computations using overflow-detecting
arithmetic routines, which fortunately exist in all still-supported
branches.
The test cases added for this generate (after patching) errors that
mention the value of MaxArraySize, which is platform-dependent.
Rather than introduce multiple expected-files, use psql's VERBOSITY
parameter to suppress the printing of the message text. v11 psql
lacks that parameter, so omit the tests in that branch.
Our thanks to Pedro Gallegos for reporting this problem.
Security: CVE-2023-5869
Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane
Daniel Gustafsson
Etsuro Fujita
Amit Kapila
Michael Paquier
Alexander Korotkov
Peter Eisentraut
Dean Rasheed
David Rowley
Heikki Linnakangas
Alvaro Herrera