Commit Graph

638 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Eisentraut d746021de1 Add construct_array_builtin, deconstruct_array_builtin
There were many calls to construct_array() and deconstruct_array() for
built-in types, for example, when dealing with system catalog columns.
These all hardcoded the type attributes necessary to pass to these
functions.

To simplify this a bit, add construct_array_builtin(),
deconstruct_array_builtin() as wrappers that centralize this hardcoded
knowledge.  This simplifies many call sites and reduces the amount of
hardcoded stuff that is spread around.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2914356f-9e5f-8c59-2995-5997fc48bcba%40enterprisedb.com
2022-07-01 11:23:15 +02:00
Tom Lane c7461fc255 Show 'AS "?column?"' explicitly when it's important.
ruleutils.c was coded to suppress the AS label for a SELECT output
expression if the column name is "?column?", which is the parser's
fallback if it can't think of something better.  This is fine, and
avoids ugly clutter, so long as (1) nothing further up in the parse
tree relies on that column name or (2) the same fallback would be
assigned when the rule or view definition is reloaded.  Unfortunately
(2) is far from certain, both because ruleutils.c might print the
expression in a different form from how it was originally written
and because FigureColname's rules might change in future releases.
So we shouldn't rely on that.

Detecting exactly whether there is any outer-level use of a SELECT
column name would be rather expensive.  This patch takes the simpler
approach of just passing down a flag indicating whether there *could*
be any outer use; for example, the output column names of a SubLink
are not referenceable, and we also do not care about the names exposed
by the right-hand side of a setop.  This is sufficient to suppress
unwanted clutter in all but one case in the regression tests.  That
seems like reasonable evidence that it won't be too much in users'
faces, while still fixing the cases we need to fix.

Per bug #17486 from Nicolas Lutic.  This issue is ancient, so
back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17486-1ad6fd786728b8af@postgresql.org
2022-05-21 14:45:58 -04:00
Tom Lane 3ab9a63cb6 Rename JsonIsPredicate.value_type, fix JSON backend/nodes/ infrastructure.
I started out with the intention to rename value_type to item_type to
avoid a collision with a typedef name that appears on some platforms.

Along the way, I noticed that the adjacent field "format" was not being
correctly handled by the backend/nodes/ infrastructure functions:
copyfuncs.c erroneously treated it as a scalar, while equalfuncs,
outfuncs, and readfuncs omitted handling it at all.  This looks like
it might be cosmetic at the moment because the field is always NULL
after parse analysis; but that's likely a bug in itself, and the code's
certainly not very future-proof.  Let's fix it while we can still do so
without forcing an initdb on beta testers.

Further study found a few other inconsistencies in the backend/nodes/
infrastructure for the recently-added JSON node types, so fix those too.

catversion bumped because of potential change in stored rules.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/526703.1652385613@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-05-13 11:40:08 -04:00
Tom Lane 23e7b38bfe Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
2022-05-12 15:17:30 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera e70813fbc4
set_deparse_plan: Reuse variable to appease Coverity
Coverity complains that dpns->outer_plan is deferenced (to obtain
->targetlist) when possibly NULL.  We can avoid this by using
dpns->outer_tlist instead, which was already obtained a few lines up.

The fact that we end up with
  dpns->inner_tlist = dpns->outer_tlist
is a bit suspicious-looking and maybe worthy of more investigation, but
I'll leave that for another day.

Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191345.qerjy3kxi3eb@alvherre.pgsql
2022-04-20 11:44:08 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera 24d2b2680a
Remove extraneous blank lines before block-closing braces
These are useless and distracting.  We wouldn't have written the code
with them to begin with, so there's no reason to keep them.

Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220411020336.GB26620@telsasoft.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/attachment/133167/0016-Extraneous-blank-lines.patch
2022-04-13 19:16:02 +02:00
Andrew Dunstan fadb48b00e PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLE
These clauses allow the user to specify how data from nested paths are
joined, allowing considerable freedom in shaping the tabular output of
JSON_TABLE.

PLAN DEFAULT allows the user to specify the global strategies when
dealing with sibling or child nested paths. The is often sufficient to
achieve the necessary goal, and is considerably simpler than the full
PLAN clause, which allows the user to specify the strategy to be used
for each named nested path.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zhihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e2cb85d-24cf-4abb-30a5-1a33715959bd@postgrespro.ru
2022-04-05 14:17:08 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 4e34747c88 JSON_TABLE
This feature allows jsonb data to be treated as a table and thus used in
a FROM clause like other tabular data. Data can be selected from the
jsonb using jsonpath expressions, and hoisted out of nested structures
in the jsonb to form multiple rows, more or less like an outer join.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zhihong Yu (whose
name I previously misspelled), Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson,
Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e2cb85d-24cf-4abb-30a5-1a33715959bd@postgrespro.ru
2022-04-04 16:03:47 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 49082c2cc3 RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR()
This patch is extracted from a larger patch that allowed setting the
default returned value from these functions to json or jsonb. That had
problems, but this piece of it is fine. For these functions only json or
jsonb can be specified in the RETURNING clause.

Extracted from an original patch from Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-31 15:45:24 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 606948b058 SQL JSON functions
This Patch introduces three SQL standard JSON functions:

JSON() (incorrectly mentioned in my commit message for f4fb45d15c)
JSON_SCALAR()
JSON_SERIALIZE()

JSON() produces json values from text, bytea, json or jsonb values, and
has facilitites for handling duplicate keys.
JSON_SCALAR() produces a json value from any scalar sql value, including
json and jsonb.
JSON_SERIALIZE() produces text or bytea from input which containis or
represents json or jsonb;

For the most part these functions don't add any significant new
capabilities, but they will be of use to users wanting standard
compliant JSON handling.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-30 16:30:37 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 1a36bc9dba SQL/JSON query functions
This introduces the SQL/JSON functions for querying JSON data using
jsonpath expressions. The functions are:

JSON_EXISTS()
JSON_QUERY()
JSON_VALUE()

All of these functions only operate on jsonb. The workaround for now is
to cast the argument to jsonb.

JSON_EXISTS() tests if the jsonpath expression applied to the jsonb
value yields any values. JSON_VALUE() must return a single value, and an
error occurs if it tries to return multiple values. JSON_QUERY() must
return a json object or array, and there are various WRAPPER options for
handling scalar or multi-value results. Both these functions have
options for handling EMPTY and ERROR conditions.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-29 16:57:13 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 33a377608f IS JSON predicate
This patch intrdocuces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates
on text and bytea values representing JSON as well as on the json and
jsonb types. Each test has an IS and IS NOT variant. The tests are:

IS JSON [VALUE]
IS JSON ARRAY
IS JSON OBJECT
IS JSON SCALAR
IS JSON  WITH | WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS

These are mostly self-explanatory, but note that IS JSON WITHOUT UNIQUE
KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true, and IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS is
true whenever IS JSON is true except it IS JSON OBJECT is true and there
are duplicate keys (which is never the case when applied to jsonb values).

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-28 15:37:08 -04:00
Tom Lane d22646922d Add public ruleutils.c entry point to deparse a Query.
This has no in-core callers but will be wanted by extensions.
It's just a thin wrapper around get_query_def, so it adds little code.

Also, fix get_from_clause_item() to force insertion of an alias
for a SUBQUERY RTE item.  This is irrelevant to existing uses because
RTE_SUBQUERY items made by the parser always have aliases already.
However, if one tried to use pg_get_querydef() to inspect a post-rewrite
Query, it could be an issue.  In any case, get_from_clause_item already
contained logic to force alias insertion for VALUES items, so the lack
of the same for SUBQUERY is a pretty clear oversight.

In passing, replace duplicated code for selection of pretty-print
options with a common macro.

Julien Rouhaud, reviewed by Pavel Stehule, Gilles Darold, and myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210627041138.zklczwmu3ms4ufnk@nol
2022-03-28 11:19:37 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 7103ebb7aa
Add support for MERGE SQL command
MERGE performs actions that modify rows in the target table using a
source table or query. MERGE provides a single SQL statement that can
conditionally INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE rows -- a task that would otherwise
require multiple PL statements.  For example,

MERGE INTO target AS t
USING source AS s
ON t.tid = s.sid
WHEN MATCHED AND t.balance > s.delta THEN
  UPDATE SET balance = t.balance - s.delta
WHEN MATCHED THEN
  DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED AND s.delta > 0 THEN
  INSERT VALUES (s.sid, s.delta)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
  DO NOTHING;

MERGE works with regular tables, partitioned tables and inheritance
hierarchies, including column and row security enforcement, as well as
support for row and statement triggers and transition tables therein.

MERGE is optimized for OLTP and is parameterizable, though also useful
for large scale ETL/ELT. MERGE is not intended to be used in preference
to existing single SQL commands for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE since there
is some overhead.  MERGE can be used from PL/pgSQL.

MERGE does not support targetting updatable views or foreign tables, and
RETURNING clauses are not allowed either.  These limitations are likely
fixable with sufficient effort.  Rewrite rules are also not supported,
but it's not clear that we'd want to support them.

Author: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkJdBuxj9PO=2QaO9-3h3xGbQPZ34kJH=HukRekwM-GZg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201231134736.GA25392@alvherre.pgsql
2022-03-28 16:47:48 +02:00
Tom Lane cc7401d5ca Fix up compiler warnings/errors from f4fb45d15.
Per early buildfarm returns.
2022-03-27 18:32:40 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan f4fb45d15c SQL/JSON constructors
This patch introduces the SQL/JSON standard constructors for JSON:

JSON()
JSON_ARRAY()
JSON_ARRAYAGG()
JSON_OBJECT()
JSON_OBJECTAGG()

For the most part these functions provide facilities that mimic
existing json/jsonb functions. However, they also offer some useful
additional functionality. In addition to text input, the JSON() function
accepts bytea input, which it will decode and constuct a json value from.
The other functions provide useful options for handling duplicate keys
and null values.

This series of patches will be followed by a consolidated documentation
patch.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-27 17:03:34 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan f79b803dcc Common SQL/JSON clauses
This introduces some of the building blocks used by the SQL/JSON
constructor and query functions. Specifically, it provides node
executor and grammar support for the FORMAT JSON [ENCODING foo]
clause, and values decorated with it, and for the RETURNING clause.

The following SQL/JSON patches will leverage these.

Nikita Glukhov (who probably deserves an award for perseverance).

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-27 17:03:33 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 1460fc5942 Revert "Common SQL/JSON clauses"
This reverts commit 865fe4d5df.

This has caused issues with a significant number of buildfarm members
2022-03-22 19:56:14 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan 865fe4d5df Common SQL/JSON clauses
This introduces some of the building blocks used by the SQL/JSON
constructor and query functions. Specifically, it provides node
executor and grammar support for the FORMAT JSON [ENCODING foo]
clause, and values decorated with it, and for the RETURNING clause.

The following SQL/JSON patches will leverage these.

Nikita Glukhov (who probably deserves an award for perseverance).

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup. Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu and
Himanshu Upadhyaya.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-22 17:32:54 -04:00
Tom Lane 2591ee8ec4 Fix assorted missing logic for GroupingFunc nodes.
The planner needs to treat GroupingFunc like Aggref for many purposes,
in particular with respect to processing of the argument expressions,
which are not to be evaluated at runtime.  A few places hadn't gotten
that memo, notably including subselect.c's processing of outer-level
aggregates.  This resulted in assertion failures or wrong plans for
cases in which a GROUPING() construct references an outer aggregation
level.

Also fix missing special cases for GroupingFunc in cost_qual_eval
(resulting in wrong cost estimates for GROUPING(), although it's
not clear that that would affect plan shapes in practice) and in
ruleutils.c (resulting in excess parentheses in pretty-print mode).

Per bug #17088 from Yaoguang Chen.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Richard Guo, Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17088-e33882b387de7f5c@postgresql.org
2022-03-21 17:44:29 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 94aa7cc5f7 Add UNIQUE null treatment option
The SQL standard has been ambiguous about whether null values in
unique constraints should be considered equal or not.  Different
implementations have different behaviors.  In the SQL:202x draft, this
has been formalized by making this implementation-defined and adding
an option on unique constraint definitions UNIQUE [ NULLS [NOT]
DISTINCT ] to choose a behavior explicitly.

This patch adds this option to PostgreSQL.  The default behavior
remains UNIQUE NULLS DISTINCT.  Making this happen in the btree code
is pretty easy; most of the patch is just to carry the flag around to
all the places that need it.

The CREATE UNIQUE INDEX syntax extension is not from the standard,
it's my own invention.

I named all the internal flags, catalog columns, etc. in the negative
("nulls not distinct") so that the default PostgreSQL behavior is the
default if the flag is false.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/84e5ee1b-387e-9a54-c326-9082674bde78@enterprisedb.com
2022-02-03 11:48:21 +01:00
Tom Lane 43c2175121 Fix ruleutils.c's dumping of whole-row Vars in more contexts.
Commit 7745bc352 intended to ensure that whole-row Vars would be
printed with "::type" decoration in all contexts where plain
"var.*" notation would result in star-expansion, notably in
ROW() and VALUES() constructs.  However, it missed the case of
INSERT with a single-row VALUES, as reported by Timur Khanjanov.

Nosing around ruleutils.c, I found a second oversight: the
code for RowCompareExpr generates ROW() notation without benefit
of an actual RowExpr, and naturally it wasn't in sync :-(.
(The code for FieldStore also does this, but we don't expect that
to generate strictly parsable SQL anyway, so I left it alone.)

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/efaba6f9-4190-56be-8ff2-7a1674f9194f@intrans.baku.az
2022-01-13 17:49:46 -05:00
Tom Lane 6867f963e3 Make pg_get_expr() more bulletproof.
Since this function is defined to accept pg_node_tree values, it could
get applied to any nodetree that can appear in a cataloged pg_node_tree
column.  Some such cases can't be supported --- for example, its API
doesn't allow providing referents for more than one relation --- but
we should try to throw a user-facing error rather than an internal
error when encountering such a case.

In support of this, extend expression_tree_walker/mutator to be sure
they'll work on any such node tree (which basically means adding
support for relpartbound node types).  That allows us to run pull_varnos
and check for the case of multiple relations before we start processing
the tree.  The alternative of changing the low-level error thrown for an
out-of-range varno isn't appealing, because that could mask actual bugs
in other usages of ruleutils.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This is basically cosmetic, so no
back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211219205422.GT17618@telsasoft.com
2022-01-09 12:43:09 -05:00
Bruce Momjian 27b77ecf9f Update copyright for 2022
Backpatch-through: 10
2022-01-07 19:04:57 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut d6f96ed94e Allow specifying column list for foreign key ON DELETE SET actions
Extend the foreign key ON DELETE actions SET NULL and SET DEFAULT by
allowing the specification of a column list, like

    CREATE TABLE posts (
        ...
        FOREIGN KEY (tenant_id, author_id) REFERENCES users ON DELETE SET NULL (author_id)
    );

If a column list is specified, only those columns are set to
null/default, instead of all the columns in the foreign-key
constraint.

This is useful for multitenant or sharded schemas, where the tenant or
shard ID is included in the primary key of all tables but shouldn't be
set to null.

Author: Paul Martinez <paulmtz@google.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACqFVBZQyMYJV=njbSMxf+rbDHpx=W=B7AEaMKn8dWn9OZJY7w@mail.gmail.com
2021-12-08 11:13:57 +01:00
Tom Lane a8d8445a7b Fix display of SQL-standard function's arguments in INSERT/SELECT.
If a SQL-standard function body contains an INSERT ... SELECT statement,
any function parameters referenced within the SELECT were always printed
in $N style, rather than using the parameter name if any.  While not
strictly incorrect, this wasn't the intention, and it's inconsistent
with the way that such parameters would be printed in any other kind
of statement.

The cause is that the recursion to get_query_def from
get_insert_query_def neglected to pass down the context->namespaces
list, passing constant NIL instead.  This is a very ancient oversight,
but AFAICT it had no visible consequences before commit e717a9a18
added an outermost namespace with function parameters.  We don't allow
INSERT ... SELECT as a sub-query, except in a top-level WITH clause,
where it couldn't contain any outer references that might need to access
upper namespaces.  So although that's arguably a bug, I don't see any
point in changing it before v14.

In passing, harden the code added to get_parameter by e717a9a18 so that
it won't crash if a PARAM_EXTERN Param appears in an unexpected place.

Per report from Erki Eessaar.  Code fix by me, regression test case
by Masahiko Sawada.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268347BED344848555167FAFE949@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
2021-11-17 11:31:31 -05:00
Tom Lane 39ae0ef856 Fix EXPLAIN of SEARCH BREADTH FIRST queries some more.
Commit 3f50b8263 had an oversight: formerly, to deparse expressions
attached to a plan node, it was only necessary to update the
deparse_namespace ancestors list alongside calling set_deparse_plan.
Now it's necessary to update the ancestors list *first*, because
set_deparse_plan consults it, and one call site got that wrong.

This error was masked in most cases because explain.c uses just one
List object for the ancestors list, updating it in-place as the plan
is scanned, so that we accidentally had the right List assigned to
dpns->ancestors before it was needed.  It would fail only if a
WorkTableScan node were the first one that we tried to deparse a
subexpression of.

Per report from Markus Winand.  Like the previous patch,
back-patch to v14.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/648B0505-AA57-42C2-A2DA-E551DE46FA15@winand.at
2021-10-11 11:56:52 -04:00
Tom Lane 3f50b82639 Fix EXPLAIN to handle SEARCH BREADTH FIRST queries.
The rewriter transformation for SEARCH BREADTH FIRST produces a
FieldSelect on a Var of type RECORD, where the Var references the
recursive union's worktable output.  EXPLAIN VERBOSE failed to handle
this case, because it only expected such Vars to appear in CteScans
not WorkTableScans.  Fix that, and add some test cases exercising
EXPLAIN on SEARCH and CYCLE queries.

In principle this oversight is an old bug, but it seems that the
case is unreachable without SEARCH BREADTH FIRST, because the
parser fails when attempting to create such a reference manually.
So for today I'll just patch HEAD/v14.  Someday we might find that
the code portion of this patch needs to be back-patched further.

Per report from Atsushi Torikoshi.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bafa66ad529e11860339565c9e7c166@oss.nttdata.com
2021-09-16 10:45:42 -04:00
Tom Lane e3ec3c00d8 Remove arbitrary 64K-or-so limit on rangetable size.
Up to now the size of a query's rangetable has been limited by the
constants INNER_VAR et al, which mustn't be equal to any real
rangetable index.  65000 doubtless seemed like enough for anybody,
and it still is orders of magnitude larger than the number of joins
we can realistically handle.  However, we need a rangetable entry
for each child partition that is (or might be) processed by a query.
Queries with a few thousand partitions are getting more realistic,
so that the day when that limit becomes a problem is in sight,
even if it's not here yet.  Hence, let's raise the limit.

Rather than just increase the values of INNER_VAR et al, this patch
adopts the approach of making them small negative values, so that
rangetables could theoretically become as long as INT_MAX.

The bulk of the patch is concerned with changing Var.varno and some
related variables from "Index" (unsigned int) to plain "int".  This
is basically cosmetic, with little actual effect other than to help
debuggers print their values nicely.  As such, I've only bothered
with changing places that could actually see INNER_VAR et al, which
the parser and most of the planner don't.  We do have to be careful
in places that are performing less/greater comparisons on varnos,
but there are very few such places, other than the IS_SPECIAL_VARNO
macro itself.

A notable side effect of this patch is that while it used to be
possible to add INNER_VAR et al to a Bitmapset, that will now
draw an error.  I don't see any likelihood that it wouldn't be a
bug to include these fake varnos in a bitmapset of real varnos,
so I think this is all to the good.

Although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, I don't think a catversion
bump is required, since stored rules would never contain Vars
with these fake varnos.

Andrey Lepikhov and Tom Lane, after a suggestion by Peter Eisentraut

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43c7f2f5-1e27-27aa-8c65-c91859d15190@postgrespro.ru
2021-09-15 14:11:21 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 639a86e36a Remove Value node struct
The Value node struct is a weird construct.  It is its own node type,
but most of the time, it actually has a node type of Integer, Float,
String, or BitString.  As a consequence, the struct name and the node
type don't match most of the time, and so it has to be treated
specially a lot.  There doesn't seem to be any value in the special
construct.  There is very little code that wants to accept all Value
variants but nothing else (and even if it did, this doesn't provide
any convenient way to check it), and most code wants either just one
particular node type (usually String), or it accepts a broader set of
node types besides just Value.

This change removes the Value struct and node type and replaces them
by separate Integer, Float, String, and BitString node types that are
proper node types and structs of their own and behave mostly like
normal node types.

Also, this removes the T_Null node tag, which was previously also a
possible variant of Value but wasn't actually used outside of the
Value contained in A_Const.  Replace that by an isnull field in
A_Const.

Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ba6bc5b-3f95-04f2-2419-f8ddb4c046fb@enterprisedb.com
2021-09-09 08:36:53 +02:00
Michael Paquier fd0625c7a9 Clean up some code using "(expr) ? true : false"
All the code paths simplified here were already using a boolean or used
an expression that led to zero or one, making the extra bits
unnecessary.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier, Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210428182936.GE27406@telsasoft.com
2021-09-08 09:44:04 +09:00
Tomas Vondra 13380e1476 Don't print extra parens around expressions in extended stats
The code printing expressions for extended statistics doubled the
parens, producing results like ((a+1)), which is unnecessary and not
consistent with how we print expressions elsewhere.

Fixed by tweaking the code to produce just a single set of parens.

Reported by Mark Dilger, fix by me. Backpatch to 14, where support for
extended statistics on expressions was added.

Reported-by: Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210122040101.GF27167%40telsasoft.com
2021-09-01 00:43:22 +02:00
Tom Lane 589be6f6c7 Fix missed lock acquisition while inlining new-style SQL functions.
When starting to use a query parsetree loaded from the catalogs,
we must begin by applying AcquireRewriteLocks(), to obtain the same
relation locks that the parser would have gotten if the query were
entered interactively, and to do some other cleanup such as dealing
with later-dropped columns.  New-style SQL functions are just as
subject to this rule as other stored parsetrees; however, of the
places dealing with such functions, only init_sql_fcache had gotten
the memo.  In particular, if we successfully inlined a new-style
set-returning SQL function that contained any relation references,
we'd either get an assertion failure or attempt to use those
relation(s) sans locks.

I also added AcquireRewriteLocks calls to fmgr_sql_validator and
print_function_sqlbody.  Desultory experiments didn't demonstrate any
failures in those, but I suspect that I just didn't try hard enough.
Certainly we don't expect nearby code paths to operate without locks.

On the same logic of it-ought-to-have-the-same-effects-as-the-old-code,
call pg_rewrite_query() in fmgr_sql_validator, too.  It's possible
that neither code path there needs to bother with rewriting, but
doing the analysis to prove that is beyond my goals for today.

Per bug #17161 from Alexander Lakhin.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17161-048a1cdff8422800@postgresql.org
2021-08-31 12:02:36 -04:00
Tom Lane 48c5c90682 Use the "pg_temp" schema alias in EXPLAIN and related output.
This patch causes EXPLAIN output to refer to objects that are in
the current session's temp schema with the "pg_temp" schema alias
rather than that schema's actual name.  This is useful for our own
testing purposes since it will stabilize EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
for such cases, allowing us to use that in regression tests.
It should be less confusing for end users too.

Since ruleutils.c needs to change behavior for this, the change
also leaks into a few other users of ruleutils.c, for example
pg_get_viewdef().  AFAICS that won't cause any problems.
We did find that aggressively trying to change this behavior
across-the-board would cause issues, but as long as "pg_temp"
only appears within generated SQL text, I think it'll be fine.

Along the way, make get_namespace_name_or_temp conform to the
same API as get_namespace_name, ie that it returns a palloc'd
string or NULL.  The current behavior hasn't caused any bugs
since no callers attempt to pfree the result, but if it gets
more widespread usage that could become a problem.

Amul Sul, reviewed and extended by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b97W=QaGmag9AhWNbmx3uEYsNkXWL+OVW1_E1D3BtgWvtw@mail.gmail.com
2021-07-27 12:03:16 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 2b00db4fb0 Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
Instead of castNode(…, lfoo(…))

Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87eecahraj.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2021-07-19 08:20:24 +02:00
Tom Lane e56bce5d43 Reconsider the handling of procedure OUT parameters.
Commit 2453ea142 redefined pg_proc.proargtypes to include the types of
OUT parameters, for procedures only.  While that had some advantages
for implementing the SQL-spec behavior of DROP PROCEDURE, it was pretty
disastrous from a number of other perspectives.  Notably, since the
primary key of pg_proc is name + proargtypes, this made it possible to
have multiple procedures with identical names + input arguments and
differing output argument types.  That would make it impossible to call
any one of the procedures by writing just NULL (or "?", or any other
data-type-free notation) for the output argument(s).  The change also
seems likely to cause grave confusion for client applications that
examine pg_proc and expect the traditional definition of proargtypes.

Hence, revert the definition of proargtypes to what it was, and
undo a number of complications that had been added to support that.

To support the SQL-spec behavior of DROP PROCEDURE, when there are
no argmode markers in the command's parameter list, we perform the
lookup both ways (that is, matching against both proargtypes and
proallargtypes), succeeding if we get just one unique match.
In principle this could result in ambiguous-function failures
that would not happen when using only one of the two rules.
However, overloading of procedure names is thought to be a pretty
rare usage, so this shouldn't cause many problems in practice.
Postgres-specific code such as pg_dump can defend against any
possibility of such failures by being careful to specify argmodes
for all procedure arguments.

This also fixes a few other bugs in the area of CALL statements
with named parameters, and improves the documentation a little.

catversion bump forced because the representation of procedures
with OUT arguments changes.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3742981.1621533210@sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-06-10 17:11:36 -04:00
Tom Lane def5b065ff Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.
Also "make reformat-dat-files".

The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
2021-05-12 13:14:10 -04:00
Tomas Vondra 8d4b311d24 Make pg_get_statisticsobjdef_expressions return NULL
The usual behavior for functions in ruleutils.c is to return NULL when
the object does not exist. pg_get_statisticsobjdef_expressions raised an
error instead, so correct that.

Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210505210947.GA27406%40telsasoft.com
2021-05-07 14:34:16 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut e717a9a18b SQL-standard function body
This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE
statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the
SQL standard and is portable to other implementations.

Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax,
this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body
unquoted, either as a single statement:

    CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer
        LANGUAGE SQL
        RETURN a + b;

or as a block

    CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer)
    LANGUAGE SQL
    BEGIN ATOMIC
      INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a);
      INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b);
    END;

The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as
expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody.  So at run time,
no further parsing is required.

However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because
there is no more parse analysis done at call time.

Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully
tracked.

A new RETURN statement is introduced.  This can only be used inside
function bodies.  Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT
statement.

psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body
boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees
semicolons that are inside a function body.

Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:47:55 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut a2da77cdb4 Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric
The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to
date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was
implemented long before the numeric type existed).  This can lead to
imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be
preferrable.  Changing the return type of an existing function is a
bit risky, so instead we do the following:  We implement a new set of
functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing
date_part functions.  They work the same way internally but use
numeric instead of float8.  The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the
parser to these new extract functions.  That way, dumps of views
etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work
unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions.

Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the
original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in
40c24bfef9.

The following minor changes of behavior result from the new
implementation:

- The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract"
  instead of "date_part".

- Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as
  HOUR.  It was previously mapped internally to extract from
  timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for
  timestamp.

- Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional
  values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the
  value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just
  '1').

Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:20:42 +02:00
Tom Lane 86dc90056d Rework planning and execution of UPDATE and DELETE.
This patch makes two closely related sets of changes:

1. For UPDATE, the subplan of the ModifyTable node now only delivers
the new values of the changed columns (i.e., the expressions computed
in the query's SET clause) plus row identity information such as CTID.
ModifyTable must re-fetch the original tuple to merge in the old
values of any unchanged columns.  The core advantage of this is that
the changed columns are uniform across all tables of an inherited or
partitioned target relation, whereas the other columns might not be.
A secondary advantage, when the UPDATE involves joins, is that less
data needs to pass through the plan tree.  The disadvantage of course
is an extra fetch of each tuple to be updated.  However, that seems to
be very nearly free in context; even worst-case tests don't show it to
add more than a couple percent to the total query cost.  At some point
it might be interesting to combine the re-fetch with the tuple access
that ModifyTable must do anyway to mark the old tuple dead; but that
would require a good deal of refactoring and it seems it wouldn't buy
all that much, so this patch doesn't attempt it.

2. For inherited UPDATE/DELETE, instead of generating a separate
subplan for each target relation, we now generate a single subplan
that is just exactly like a SELECT's plan, then stick ModifyTable
on top of that.  To let ModifyTable know which target relation a
given incoming row refers to, a tableoid junk column is added to
the row identity information.  This gets rid of the horrid hack
that was inheritance_planner(), eliminating O(N^2) planning cost
and memory consumption in cases where there were many unprunable
target relations.

Point 2 of course requires point 1, so that there is a uniform
definition of the non-junk columns to be returned by the subplan.
We can't insist on uniform definition of the row identity junk
columns however, if we want to keep the ability to have both
plain and foreign tables in a partitioning hierarchy.  Since
it wouldn't scale very far to have every child table have its
own row identity column, this patch includes provisions to merge
similar row identity columns into one column of the subplan result.
In particular, we can merge the whole-row Vars typically used as
row identity by FDWs into one column by pretending they are type
RECORD.  (It's still okay for the actual composite Datums to be
labeled with the table's rowtype OID, though.)

There is more that can be done to file down residual inefficiencies
in this patch, but it seems to be committable now.

FDW authors should note several API changes:

* The argument list for AddForeignUpdateTargets() has changed, and so
has the method it must use for adding junk columns to the query.  Call
add_row_identity_var() instead of manipulating the parse tree directly.
You might want to reconsider exactly what you're adding, too.

* PlanDirectModify() must now work a little harder to find the
ForeignScan plan node; if the foreign table is part of a partitioning
hierarchy then the ForeignScan might not be the direct child of
ModifyTable.  See postgres_fdw for sample code.

* To check whether a relation is a target relation, it's no
longer sufficient to compare its relid to root->parse->resultRelation.
Instead, check it against all_result_relids or leaf_result_relids,
as appropriate.

Amit Langote and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHpHdqdDn48yCEhynnniahH78rwcrv1rEX65-fsZGBOLQ@mail.gmail.com
2021-03-31 11:52:37 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 055fee7eb4 Allow an alias to be attached to a JOIN ... USING
This allows something like

    SELECT ... FROM t1 JOIN t2 USING (a, b, c) AS x

where x has the columns a, b, c and unlike a regular alias it does not
hide the range variables of the tables being joined t1 and t2.

Per SQL:2016 feature F404 "Range variable for common column names".

Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/454638cf-d563-ab76-a585-2564428062af@2ndquadrant.com
2021-03-31 17:10:50 +02:00
Tomas Vondra a4d75c86bf Extended statistics on expressions
Allow defining extended statistics on expressions, not just just on
simple column references.  With this commit, expressions are supported
by all existing extended statistics kinds, improving the same types of
estimates. A simple example may look like this:

  CREATE TABLE t (a int);
  CREATE STATISTICS s ON mod(a,10), mod(a,20) FROM t;
  ANALYZE t;

The collected statistics are useful e.g. to estimate queries with those
expressions in WHERE or GROUP BY clauses:

  SELECT * FROM t WHERE mod(a,10) = 0 AND mod(a,20) = 0;

  SELECT 1 FROM t GROUP BY mod(a,10), mod(a,20);

This introduces new internal statistics kind 'e' (expressions) which is
built automatically when the statistics object definition includes any
expressions. This represents single-expression statistics, as if there
was an expression index (but without the index maintenance overhead).
The statistics is stored in pg_statistics_ext_data as an array of
composite types, which is possible thanks to 79f6a942bd.

CREATE STATISTICS allows building statistics on a single expression, in
which case in which case it's not possible to specify statistics kinds.

A new system view pg_stats_ext_exprs can be used to display expression
statistics, similarly to pg_stats and pg_stats_ext views.

ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE now treats indexes the same way it
treats indexes, i.e. it drops and recreates the statistics. This means
all statistics are reset, and we no longer try to preserve at least the
functional dependencies. This should not be a major issue in practice,
as the functional dependencies actually rely on per-column statistics,
which were always reset anyway.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Dean Rasheed, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad7891d2-e90c-b446-9fe2-7419143847d7%40enterprisedb.com
2021-03-27 00:01:11 +01:00
Tomas Vondra be45be9c33 Implement GROUP BY DISTINCT
With grouping sets, it's possible that some of the grouping sets are
duplicate.  This is especially common with CUBE and ROLLUP clauses. For
example GROUP BY CUBE (a,b), CUBE (b,c) is equivalent to

  GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (
    (a, b, c),
    (a, b, c),
    (a, b, c),
    (a, b),
    (a, b),
    (a, b),
    (a),
    (a),
    (a),
    (c, a),
    (c, a),
    (c, a),
    (c),
    (b, c),
    (b),
    ()
  )

Some of the grouping sets are calculated multiple times, which is mostly
unnecessary.  This commit implements a new GROUP BY DISTINCT feature, as
defined in the SQL standard, which eliminates the duplicate sets.

Author: Vik Fearing
Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers, Georgios Kokolatos, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bf3805a8-d7d1-ae61-fece-761b7ff41ecc@postgresfriends.org
2021-03-18 18:22:18 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut f4adc41c4f Enhanced cycle mark values
Per SQL:202x draft, in the CYCLE clause of a recursive query, the
cycle mark values can be of type boolean and can be omitted, in which
case they default to TRUE and FALSE.

Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com
2021-02-27 08:13:24 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut 3696a600e2 SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
This adds the SQL standard feature that adds the SEARCH and CYCLE
clauses to recursive queries to be able to do produce breadth- or
depth-first search orders and detect cycles.  These clauses can be
rewritten into queries using existing syntax, and that is what this
patch does in the rewriter.

Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com
2021-02-01 14:32:51 +01:00
Tom Lane 07d46fceb4 Fix broken ruleutils support for function TRANSFORM clauses.
I chanced to notice that this dumped core due to a faulty Assert.
To add insult to injury, the output has been misformatted since v11.
Obviously we need some regression testing here.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d1cc628c-3953-4209-957b-29427acc38c8@www.fastmail.com
2021-01-25 13:03:43 -05:00
Tom Lane a6cf3df4eb Add bytea equivalents of ltrim() and rtrim().
We had bytea btrim() already, but for some reason not the other two.

Joel Jacobson

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d10cd5cd-a901-42f1-b832-763ac6f7ff3a@www.fastmail.com
2021-01-18 15:11:32 -05:00
Bruce Momjian ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Tom Lane b3817f5f77 Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.
Invent a new flag bit HASH_STRINGS to specify C-string hashing, which
was formerly the default; and add assertions insisting that exactly
one of the bits HASH_STRINGS, HASH_BLOBS, and HASH_FUNCTION be set.
This is in hopes of preventing recurrences of the type of oversight
fixed in commit a1b8aa1e4 (i.e., mistakenly omitting HASH_BLOBS).

Also, when HASH_STRINGS is specified, insist that the keysize be
more than 8 bytes.  This is a heuristic, but it should catch
accidental use of HASH_STRINGS for integer or pointer keys.
(Nearly all existing use-cases set the keysize to NAMEDATALEN or
more, so there's little reason to think this restriction should
be problematic.)

Tweak hash_create() to insist that the HASH_ELEM flag be set, and
remove the defaults it had for keysize and entrysize.  Since those
defaults were undocumented and basically useless, no callers
omitted HASH_ELEM anyway.

Also, remove memset's zeroing the HASHCTL parameter struct from
those callers that had one.  This has never been really necessary,
and while it wasn't a bad coding convention it was confusing that
some callers did it and some did not.  We might as well save a few
cycles by standardizing on "not".

Also improve the documentation for hash_create().

In passing, improve reinit.c's usage of a hash table by storing
the key as a binary Oid rather than a string; and, since that's
a temporary hash table, allocate it in CurrentMemoryContext for
neatness.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/590625.1607878171@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-12-15 11:38:53 -05:00