replorigin_drop() misunderstood the API for condition variables: it
had ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep and ConditionVariableCancelSleep
inside its test-and-sleep loop, rather than outside the loop as
intended. The net effect is a narrow race-condition window wherein,
if the process using a replication slot releases it immediately after
replorigin_drop() releases the ReplicationOriginLock, replorigin_drop()
would get into the condition variable's wait list too late and then
wait indefinitely for a signal that won't come.
Because there's a different CV for each replication slot, we can't
just move the ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep call to above the
test-and-sleep loop. What we can do, in the wake of commit 13db3b936,
is drop the ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep call entirely. This fix
depends on that commit because (at least in principle) the slot matching
the target replication origin might move around, so that once in a blue
moon successive loop iterations might involve different CVs. We can now
cope with such a scenario, at the cost of an extra trip through the
retry loop.
(There are ways we could fix this bug without depending on that commit,
but they're all a lot more complicated than this way.)
While at it, upgrade the rather skimpy comments in this function.
Back-patch to v10 where this code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19947.1515455433@sss.pgh.pa.us
The original coding here insisted that callers manually cancel any prepared
sleep for one condition variable before starting a sleep on another one.
While that's not a huge burden today, it seems like a gotcha that will bite
us in future if the use of condition variables increases; anything we can
do to make the use of this API simpler and more robust is attractive.
Hence, allow these functions to automatically switch their attention to
a different CV when required. This is safe for the same reason it was OK
for commit aced5a92b to let a broadcast operation cancel any prepared CV
sleep: whenever we return to the other test-and-sleep loop, we will
automatically re-prepare that CV, paying at most an extra test of that
loop's exit condition.
Back-patch to v10 where condition variables were introduced. Ordinarily
we would probably not back-patch a change like this, but since it does not
invalidate any coding pattern that was legal before, it seems safe enough.
Furthermore, there's an open bug in replorigin_drop() for which the
simplest fix requires this. Even if we chose to fix that in some more
complicated way, the hazard would remain that we might back-patch some
other bug fix that requires this behavior.
Patch by me, reviewed by Thomas Munro.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2437.1515368316@sss.pgh.pa.us
There are plans to extend the syntax for ANALYZE, so we need to break
the link between VacuumStmt and AnalyzeStmt. But apart from that, the
syntax above is undocumented and, if discovered by users, might give
the impression that the VERBOSE option for VACUUM differs from the
verbose option from ANALYZE, which it does not.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier and Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/D3FC73E2-9B1A-4DB4-8180-55F57D116B4E@amazon.com
Added:
- variable now might contain integer, double, boolean and null values
- functions ln, exp
- logical AND/OR/NOT
- bitwise AND/OR/NOT/XOR
- bit right/left shift
- comparison operators
- IS [NOT] (NULL|TRUE|FALSE)
- conditional choice (in form of when/case/then)
New operations and functions allow to implement more complicated test scenario.
Author: Fabien Coelho with minor editorization by me
Reviewed-By: Pavel Stehule, Jeevan Ladhe, me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/alpine.DEB.2.10.1604030742390.31618@sto
Previously an inaccurate but harmless error was generated when running
--check on a live server before reporting the servers as compatible.
The fix is to split error reporting and exit control in the exec_prog()
API.
Reported-by: Daniel Westermann
Backpatch-through: 10
Previously, although the initial state of a proclist_node is expected
to be next == prev == 0, proclist_delete_offset would reset nodes to
next == prev == INVALID_PGPROCNO when removing them from a list.
This is the same state that a node in a singleton list has, so that
it's impossible to distinguish not-in-a-list from in-a-list. Change
proclist_delete_offset to reset removed nodes to next == prev == 0,
making it possible to distinguish those cases, and then add Asserts
to the list add and delete functions that the supplied node isn't
or is in a list at entry. Also tighten assertions about the node
being in the particular list (not some other one) where it is possible
to check that in O(1) time.
In ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep, since we don't expect the process's
cvWaitLink to already be in a list, remove the more-or-less-useless
proclist_contains check; we'd rather have proclist_push_tail's new
assertion fire if that happens.
Improve various comments related to proclists, too.
Patch by me, reviewed by Thomas Munro. This isn't back-patchable, since
there could theoretically be inlined copies of proclist_delete_offset in
third-party modules. But it's only improving debuggability anyway.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0NWKehYw7NDoUSf8juuKOPRnCyY3vuaSvhrEWsOTAa3w@mail.gmail.com
In commit 561885db0, as part of normalizing RemovePgTempFiles's error
handling, I removed its behavior of silently ignoring ENOENT failures
during directory opens. Thomas Munro points out that this is a bad idea at
the top level, because we don't create pgsql_tmp directories until needed.
Thus this coding could produce LOG messages in perfectly normal situations,
which isn't what I intended. Restore the suppression of ENOENT logging,
but only at top level --- it would still be unexpected for a nested temp
directory to disappear between seeing it in the parent directory and
opening it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2y06SehAkTnd5sU_eVqdv5P-=Srt1y5vYNQk6yVDVaPw@mail.gmail.com
25fff40798 introduced
default monitoring roles. Apply these corrections:
* Allow access to pg_stat_get_wal_senders()
by role pg_read_all_stats
* Correct comment in pg_stat_get_wal_receiver()
to show it is no longer superuser-only.
Author: Feike Steenbergen
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Apply to HEAD, then later backpatch to 10
In the wake of commit aced5a92b, the semantics of these results are
a bit squishy: we can tell whether we signaled some other process(es),
but we do not know which ones were real waiters versus mere sentinels
for ConditionVariableBroadcast operations. It does not help much that
ConditionVariableBroadcast will attempt to pass on the signal to the
next real waiter, because (a) there might not be one, and (b) that will
only happen awhile later, anyway. So these results could overstate how
much effect the calls really had.
However, no existing caller of either function pays any attention to its
result value, so it seems reasonable to just define that as a required
property of a correct algorithm. To encourage correctness and save some
tiny number of cycles, change both functions to return void.
Patch by me, per an observation by Thomas Munro. No back-patch, since
if any third parties happen to be using these functions, they might not
appreciate an API break in a minor release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0NWKehYw7NDoUSf8juuKOPRnCyY3vuaSvhrEWsOTAa3w@mail.gmail.com
In the admittedly-very-unlikely case that AddWaitEventToSet fails,
ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep would error out after already having
set cv_sleep_target, which is probably bad, and after having already
set cv_wait_event_set, which is very bad. Transaction abort might or
might not clean up cv_sleep_target properly; but there is nothing
that would be aware that the WaitEventSet wasn't fully constructed,
so that all future condition variable sleeps would be broken.
We can easily guard against these hazards with slight restructuring.
Back-patch to v10 where condition_variable.c was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0NWKehYw7NDoUSf8juuKOPRnCyY3vuaSvhrEWsOTAa3w@mail.gmail.com
The original implementation of ConditionVariableBroadcast was, per its
self-description, "the dumbest way possible". Thomas Munro found out
it was a bit too dumb. An awakened process may immediately re-queue
itself, if the specific condition it's waiting for is not yet satisfied.
If this happens before ConditionVariableBroadcast is able to see the wait
queue as empty, then ConditionVariableBroadcast will re-awaken the same
process, repeating the cycle. Given unlucky timing this back-and-forth
can repeat indefinitely; loops lasting thousands of seconds have been
seen in testing.
To fix, add our own process to the end of the wait queue to serve as a
sentinel, and exit the broadcast loop once our process is not there
anymore. There are various special considerations described in the
comments, the principal disadvantage being that wakers can no longer
be sure whether they awakened a real waiter or just a sentinel. But in
practice nobody pays attention to the result of ConditionVariableSignal
or ConditionVariableBroadcast anyway, so that problem seems hypothetical.
Back-patch to v10 where condition_variable.c was introduced.
Tom Lane and Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0NWKehYw7NDoUSf8juuKOPRnCyY3vuaSvhrEWsOTAa3w@mail.gmail.com
At present, we always raise an ERROR if the partition constraint
is violated, but a pending patch for UPDATE tuple routing will
consider instead moving the tuple to the correct partition.
Refactor to make that simpler.
Amit Khandekar, reviewed by Amit Langote, David Rowley, and me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9cue54GbEzfV-61nyGpijvjZgCcghvLsB0_nL8Nm8HzCA@mail.gmail.com
Logical decoding's reorderbuffer.c may spill transaction files to disk
when transactions are large. These are supposed to be removed when they
become "too old" by xid; but file removal requires the boundary LSNs of
the transaction to be known. The final_lsn is only set when we see the
commit or abort record for the transaction, but nothing sets the value
for transactions that crash, so the removal code misbehaves -- in
assertion-enabled builds, it crashes by a failed assertion.
To fix, modify the final_lsn of transactions that don't have a value
set, to the LSN of the very latest change in the transaction. This
causes the spilled files to be removed appropriately.
Author: Atsushi Torikoshi
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI, Craig Ringer, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/54e4e488-186b-a056-6628-50628e4e4ebc@lab.ntt.co.jp
It seems we can't easily work around the lack of
X509_get_signature_nid(), so revert the previous attempts and just
disable the tls-server-end-point feature if we don't have it.
Generalize is_partition_attr to has_partition_attrs and make it
accessible from outside tablecmds.c. Change map_partition_varattnos
to clarify that it can be used for mapping between any two relations
in a partitioning hierarchy, not just parent -> child.
Amit Khandekar, reviewed by Amit Langote, David Rowley, and me.
Some comment changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fWfxgKC+PfJZF3hkgAcNOy-LpfPxVYitDEXKHjeieWQQ@mail.gmail.com
Instead of having ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting return multiple out
parameters, have it return a pointer to a structure containing all of
those different things. Also, provide and use a cleanup function,
ExecCleanupTupleRouting, instead of cleaning up all of the resources
allocated by ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting individually.
Amit Khandekar, reviewed by Amit Langote, David Rowley, and me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fWfxgKC+PfJZF3hkgAcNOy-LpfPxVYitDEXKHjeieWQQ@mail.gmail.com
This adds a second standard channel binding type for SCRAM. It is
mainly intended for third-party clients that cannot implement
tls-unique, for example JDBC.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Instead of using our standard macro for this calculation, this code
did it itself ... and got it wrong, leading to incorrect display of
the null bitmap in some cases. Noted and fixed by Maksim Milyutin.
In passing, remove a uselessly duplicative error check.
Errors were introduced in commit d6061f83a; back-patch to 9.6
where that came in.
Maksim Milyutin, reviewed by Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ec295792-a69f-350f-6287-25a20e8f31d5@gmail.com
As things stand now, channel binding data is fetched from OpenSSL and
saved into the SCRAM exchange context for any SSL connection attempted
for a SCRAM authentication, resulting in data fetched but not used if no
channel binding is used or if a different channel binding type is used
than what the data is here for.
Refactor the code in such a way that binding data is fetched from the
SSL stack only when a specific channel binding is used for both the
frontend and the backend. In order to achieve that, save the libpq
connection context directly in the SCRAM exchange state, and add a
dependency to SSL in the low-level SCRAM routines.
This makes the interface in charge of initializing the SCRAM context
cleaner as all its data comes from either PGconn* (for frontend) or
Port* (for the backend).
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Some versions of Windows don't define LDAPS_PORT.
Also, Windows' ldap_sslinit() is documented to use LDAPS even if you
said secure=0 when the port number happens to be 636 or 3269. Let's
avoid using the port number to imply that you want LDAPS, so that
connection strings have the same meaning on Windows and Unix.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D23B7GV4AUz3MYH1TKpTv030VHxD2Sn%2BLYWDv8d-qWxww%40mail.gmail.com
- Remove unnecessary #include mistakenly added in execnodes.h.
- Fix mistake in comment in choose_next_subplan_for_leader.
- Adjust row estimates in cost_append for a possibly-different
parallel divisor.
- Clamp row estimates in cost_append after operations that may
not produce integers.
Amit Kapila, with cosmetic adjustments by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+qcbeai3coPpRW=GFCzFeLUsuY4T-AKHqMjxpEGZBPQg@mail.gmail.com
TupleDescCopy needs to have the same effects as CreateTupleDescCopy in
that, since it doesn't copy constraints, it should clear the per-attribute
fields associated with them. Oversight in commit cc5f81366.
Since TupleDescCopy has already established the presumption that it
can just flat-copy the entire attribute array in one go, propagate
that approach into CreateTupleDescCopy and CreateTupleDescCopyConstr.
(I'm suspicious that this would lead to valgrind complaints if we
had any trailing padding in the struct, but we do not, and anyway
fixing that seems like a job for a separate commit.)
Add some better comments.
Thomas Munro, reviewed by Vik Fearing, some additional hacking by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0NvOGZ8B6GbQyQe2C_c2m3LKJ9w=8OMBaYRLgZ_Gw6Nw@mail.gmail.com
Upcoming versions of glibc will contain copy_file_range(2), a wrapper
around a new linux syscall for in-kernel copying of data ranges. This
conflicts with pg_rewinds function of the same name.
Therefore rename pg_rewinds version. As our version isn't a generic
copying facility we decided to choose a rewind specific function name.
Per buildfarm animal caiman and subsequent discussion with Tom Lane.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180103033425.w7jkljth3e26sduc@alap3.anarazel.dehttps://postgr.es/m/31122.1514951044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.5-, where pg_rewind was introduced
Commit 614350a3 allowed for an different builds of OpenSSL libraries on
Windows, but ignored the fact that the alternative builds don't have
config-specific libraries. This patch fixes the Solution file to ask for
the correct libraries.
per offline discussions with Leonardo Cecchi and Marco Nenciarini,
Backpatch to all live branches.
XactLockTableWait assumed that its xid argument has already added itself
to the lock table. That assumption led to another assumption that if
locking the xid has succeeded but the xid is reported as still in
progress, then the input xid must have been a subtransaction.
These assumptions hold true for the original uses of this code in
locking related to on-disk tuples, but they break down in logical
replication slot snapshot building -- in particular, when a standby
snapshot logged contains an xid that's already in ProcArray but not yet
in the lock table. This leads to assertion failures that can be
reproduced all the way back to 9.4, when logical decoding was
introduced.
To fix, change SubTransGetParent to SubTransGetTopmostTransaction which
has a slightly different API: it returns the argument Xid if there is no
parent, and it goes all the way to the top instead of moving up the
levels one by one. Also, to avoid busy-waiting, add a 1ms sleep to give
the other process time to register itself in the lock table.
For consistency, change ConditionalXactLockTableWait the same way.
Author: Petr Jelínek
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1B3E32D8-FCF4-40B4-AEF9-5C0E3AC57969@postgrespro.ru
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik
Diagnosed-by: Stas Kelvich, Petr Jelínek
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Robert Haas
Correct ExecParallelHashTuplePrealloc's estimate of whether the
space_allowed limit is exceeded. Be more consistent about tuples that
are exactly HASH_CHUNK_THRESHOLD in size (they're "small", not "large").
Neither of these things explain the current buildfarm unhappiness, but
they're still bugs.
Thomas Munro, per gripe by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=34PDuR69kfYVhmZPgMdy8pSA-MYbpesEN1SR+2oj3Y+w@mail.gmail.com
Add some infrastructure (mostly macros) to make it easier to write
typical cases for constant-expression simplification. Add simplification
processing for ArrayRef, RowExpr, and ScalarArrayOpExpr node types,
which formerly went unsimplified even if all their inputs were constants.
Also teach it to simplify FieldSelect from a composite constant.
Make use of the new infrastructure to reduce the amount of code needed
for the existing ArrayExpr and ArrayCoerceExpr cases.
One existing test case changes output as a result of the fact that
RowExpr can now be folded to a constant. All the new code is exercised
by existing test cases according to gcov, so I feel no need to add
additional tests.
Tom Lane, reviewed by Dmitry Dolgov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3be3b82c-e29c-b674-2163-bf47d98817b1@iki.fi
While ldaptls=1 provides an RFC 4513 conforming way to do LDAP
authentication with TLS encryption, there was an earlier de facto
standard way to do LDAP over SSL called LDAPS. Even though it's not
enshrined in a standard, it's still widely used and sometimes required
by organizations' network policies. There seems to be no reason not to
support it when available in the client library. Therefore, add support
when using OpenLDAP 2.4+ or Windows. It can be configured with
ldapscheme=ldaps or ldapurl=ldaps://...
Add tests for both ways of requesting LDAPS and a test for the
pre-existing ldaptls=1. Modify the 001_auth.pl test for "diagnostic
messages", which was previously relying on the server rejecting
ldaptls=1.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=1s+pA-LZUjQ-9GQz0Z4rX_eK=DFXAF1nBQ+ROPimuOYQ@mail.gmail.com
Previously aggregate transition values for hash and other forms of
aggregation (i.e. sort and no group by) were represented
differently. Hash based aggregation used a grouping set indexed array
pointing to an array of transition values, whereas other forms of
aggregation used one flattened array with the index being computed out
of grouping set and transition offsets.
That made upcoming changes hard, so represent both as grouping set
indexed array of per-group data.
As a nice side-effect this also makes aggregation slightly faster,
because computing offsets with `transno + (setno * numTrans)` turns
out not to be that cheap (too big for x86 lea for example).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171128003121.nmxbm2ounxzb6n2t@alap3.anarazel.de
The previous coding relied (without any documentation) on the data[]
member of HashMemoryChunkData being at a MAXALIGN'ed offset. If it
was not, the tuples would not be maxaligned either, leading to failures
on alignment-picky machines. While there seems to be no live bug on any
platform we support, this is clearly pretty fragile: any addition to or
rearrangement of the fields in HashMemoryChunkData could break it.
Let's remove the hazard by getting rid of the data[] member and instead
using pointer arithmetic with an explicitly maxalign'ed offset.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14483.1514938129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Multiple sessions doing CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY simultaneously are
supposed to be able to work in parallel, as evidenced by fixes in commit
c3d09b3bd2 specifically to support this case. In reality, one of the
sessions would be aborted by a misterious "deadlock detected" error.
Jeff Janes diagnosed that this is because of leftover snapshots used for
system catalog scans -- this was broken by 8aa3e47510 keeping track of
(registering) the catalog snapshot. To fix the deadlocks, it's enough
to de-register that snapshot prior to waiting.
Backpatch to 9.4, which introduced MVCC catalog scans.
Include an isolationtester spec that 8 out of 10 times reproduces the
deadlock with the unpatched code for me (Álvaro).
Author: Jeff Janes
Diagnosed-by: Jeff Janes
Reported-by: Jeremy Finzel
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMa1XUhHjCv8Qkx0WOr1Mpm_R4qxN26EibwCrj0Oor2YBUFUTg%40mail.gmail.com
The original idea was that we could use an isNull-style bool array
directly as a GinNullCategory array. However, the existing code already
acknowledges that that doesn't really work, because of the possibility
that bool as currently defined can have arbitrary bit patterns for true
values. So it has to loop through the nullFlags array to set each bool
value to an acceptable value. But if we are looping through the whole
array anyway, we might as well build a proper GinNullCategory array
instead and abandon the type casting. That makes the code much safer in
case bool is ever changed to something else.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
In a race case, EXPLAIN ANALYZE could fail to display correct nbatch
and size information. Refactor so that participants report only on
batches they worked on rather than trying to report on all of them,
and teach explain.c to consider the HashInstrumentation object from
all participants instead of picking the first one it can find. This
should fix an occasional build farm failure in the "join" regression
test.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30219.1514428346%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Otherwise, the test fails with "Timed out while waiting for standby to
catch up". This happened rarely, perhaps only when autovacuum wrote WAL
between our choosing the recovery target and choosing the LSN to await.
Commit b26f7fa6ae fixed one case of this.
Fix two more. Back-patch to 9.6, which introduced the affected test.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180101055227.GA2952815@rfd.leadboat.com
plpgsql's five different loop control statements contained three distinct
implementations of the same (or what ought to be the same, at least)
logic for handling return/exit/continue result codes from their child
statements. At best, that's trouble waiting to happen, and there seems
no very good reason for the coding to be so different. Refactor so that
all the common logic is expressed in a single macro.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26314.1514670401@sss.pgh.pa.us
I noticed that our code coverage report showed considerable deficiency
in test coverage for PL/pgSQL control statements. Notably, both
exec_stmt_block and most of the loop control statements had very poor
coverage of handling of return/exit/continue result codes from their
child statements; and exec_stmt_fori was seriously lacking in feature
coverage, having no test that exercised its BY or REVERSE features,
nor verification that its overflow defenses work.
Now that we have some infrastructure for plpgsql-specific test scripts,
the natural thing to do is make a new script rather than further extend
plpgsql.sql. So I created a new script plpgsql_control.sql with the
charter to test plpgsql control structures, and moved a few existing
tests there because they fell entirely under that charter. I then
added new test cases that exercise the bits of code complained of above.
Of the five kinds of loop statements, only exec_stmt_while's result code
handling is fully exercised by these tests. That would be a deficiency
as things stand, but a follow-on commit will merge the loop statements'
result code handling into one implementation. So testing each usage of
that implementation separately seems redundant.
In passing, also add a couple test cases to plpgsql.sql to more fully
exercise plpgsql's code related to expanded arrays --- I had thought
that area was sufficiently covered already, but the coverage report
showed a couple of un-executed code paths.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26314.1514670401@sss.pgh.pa.us
Tom Lane
Robert Haas
Teodor Sigaev
Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs
Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut
Andres Freund
Andrew Dunstan
Noah Misch