2-Oct-98 or TODO.detail/cnfify) to decide whether we want to reduce
WHERE clause to CNF form, DNF form, or neither. This is a HUGE win.
The heuristic conditions could probably still use a little tweaking to
make sure we don't pick CNF when DNF would be better, or vice versa,
but the risk of exponential explosion in cnfify() is gone. I was able
to run ten-thousand-AND-subclause queries through the planner in a
reasonable amount of time.
conditions. There are some pretty bogus heuristics in prepqual.c that
try to decide whether to output CNF or DNF format; they need to be replaced,
likely. Right now the code is probably too willing to choose DNF form,
which might hurt performance in some cases that used to work OK.
But at least we have a foundation to build on.
in or_normalize, remove detection of duplicate subexpressions (since it's
highly unlikely to be worth the amount of time it takes), and introduce
a dnfify() entry point so that unintelligible backwards logic in UNION
processing can be eliminated. This is just an intermediate step ---
next thing is to look at not forcing the qual into CNF form when it would
be better off in DNF form.
space consumption in pull_args, and avoid doing the full CNF transform on
operands of operator clauses, where it's really not particularly helpful.
This answers the TODO item about large numbers of OR clauses, at least
partially. I was able to do a ten-thousand-OR-clause query with about
20Mb memory consumption ... it took an obscenely long time, but it worked...
Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier