Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they
flow past the right margin.
By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are
within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding
left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the
continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin,
then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin,
if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of
the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations
unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column
limit.
This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers.
Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized
lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Patch by David Rowley. Backpatch to 9.5, as some of the calls were new in
9.5, and keeping the code in sync with master makes future backpatching
easier.
After removal, the next_sibling pointer of a node was sometimes incorrectly
left to point to another node in the heap, which meant that a node was
sometimes linked twice into the heap. Surprisingly that didn't cause any
crashes in my testing, but it was clearly wrong and could easily segfault
in other scenarios.
Also always keep the prev_or_parent pointer as NULL on the root node. That
was not a correctness issue AFAICS, but let's be tidy.
Add a debugging function, to dump the contents of a pairing heap as a
string. It's #ifdef'd out, as it's not used for anything in any normal
code, but it was highly useful in debugging this. Let's keep it handy for
further reference.
This performs slightly better, uses less memory, and needs slightly less
code in GiST, than the Red-Black tree previously used.
Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan
Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas