One of the upsert related tests is unstable (sometimes even hanging
until isolationtester's step timeout is reached). Based on preliminary
analysis that might be a problem outside of just that test, but not
really related to EPQ and triggers. Disable for now, to get the
buildfarm greener again.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191004222437.45qmglpto43pd3jb@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.6-, just like c884119950.
As evidenced by bug #16036 this area is woefully under-tested. Add
fairly extensive tests for the combination.
Backpatch back to 9.6 - before that isolationtester was not capable
enough. While we don't backpatch tests all the time, future fixes to
trigger.c would potentially look different enough in 12+ from the
earlier branches that introducing bugs during backpatching is more
likely than normal. Also, it's just a crucial and undertested area of
the code.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16036-28184c90d952fb7f@postgresql.org
Backpatch: 9.6-, the earliest these tests work
First, make sure that the .exe name is quoted when trying to get the
version number. Also, don't quote the lib name for using in the project
files if it's already been quoted. This second change applies to all
libraries, not just OpenSSL.
This has clearly been broken forever, so backpatch to all live branches.
Commit 5ac0d9360 failed to entirely fix bitshiftright's habit of
leaving one-bits in the pad space that should be all zeroes,
because in a moment of sheer brain fade I'd concluded that only
the code path used for not-a-multiple-of-8 shift distances needed
to be fixed. Of course, a multiple-of-8 shift distance can also
cause the problem, so we need to forcibly zero the extra bits
in both cases.
Per bug #16037 from Alexander Lakhin. As before, back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16037-1d1ebca564db54f4@postgresql.org
Encoding conversion uses the very simplistic rule that the output
can't be more than 4X longer than the input, and palloc's a buffer
of that size. This results in failure to convert any string longer
than 1/4 GB, which is becoming an annoying limitation.
As a band-aid to improve matters, allow the allocated output buffer
size to exceed 1GB. We still insist that the final result fit into
MaxAllocSize (1GB), though. Perhaps it'd be safe to relax that
restriction, but it'd require close analysis of all callers, which
is daunting (not least because external modules might call these
functions). For the moment, this should allow a 2X to 4X improvement
in the longest string we can convert, which is a useful gain in
return for quite a simple patch.
Also, once we have successfully converted a long string, repalloc
the output down to the actual string length, returning the excess
to the malloc pool. This seems worth doing since we can usually
expect to give back several MB if we take this path at all.
This still leaves much to be desired, most notably that the assumption
that MAX_CONVERSION_GROWTH == 4 is very fragile, and yet we have no
guard code verifying that the output buffer isn't overrun. Fixing
that would require significant changes in the encoding conversion
APIs, so it'll have to wait for some other day.
The present patch seems safely back-patchable, so patch all supported
branches.
Alvaro Herrera and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190816181418.GA898@alvherre.pgsql
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3614.1569359690@sss.pgh.pa.us
Up to now, if you resized a large (>8K) palloc chunk down to a smaller
size, aset.c made no attempt to return any space to the malloc pool.
That's unpleasant if a really large allocation is resized to a
significantly smaller size. I think no such cases existed when this
code was designed, and I'm not sure whether they're common even yet,
but an upcoming fix to encoding conversion will certainly create such
cases. Therefore, fix AllocSetRealloc so that it gives realloc()
a chance to do something with the block. This doesn't noticeably
increase complexity, we mostly just have to change the order in which
the cases are considered.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190816181418.GA898@alvherre.pgsql
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3614.1569359690@sss.pgh.pa.us
query_tree_walker and query_tree_mutator were skipping the
windowClause of the query, without regard for the fact that the
startOffset and endOffset in a WindowClause node are expression trees
that need to be processed. This was an oversight in commit ec4be2ee6
from 2010 which added the expression fields; the main symptom is that
function parameters in window frame clauses don't work in inlined
functions.
Fix (as conservatively as possible since this needs to not break
existing out-of-tree callers) and add tests.
Backpatch all the way, since this has been broken since 9.0.
Per report from Alastair McKinley; fix by me with kibitzing and review
from Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DB6PR0202MB2904E7FDDA9D81504D1E8C68E3800@DB6PR0202MB2904.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
cbc55da has reworked the order of some actions at the end of archive
recovery. Unfortunately this overlooked the fact that the startup
process needs to remove RECOVERYXLOG (for temporary WAL segment newly
recovered from archives) and RECOVERYHISTORY (for temporary history
file) at this step, leaving the files around even after recovery ended.
Backpatch to 9.5, like the previous commit.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBO_eDQub6zojFnWtnmutRBWvYf7=cW4Hsqj+U_R26w3Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.5
In the course of 5567d12ce0, 356687bd8 and 317ffdfeaa, I changed
BuildTupleHashTable[Ext]'s call to ExecBuildGroupingEqual to not pass
in the parent node, but NULL. Which in turn prevents the tuple
equality comparator from being JIT compiled. While that fixes
bug #15486, it is not actually necessary after all of the above commits,
as we don't re-build the comparator when using the new
BuildTupleHashTableExt() interface (as the content of the hashtable
are reset, but the TupleHashTable itself is not).
Therefore re-allow jit compilation for callers that use
BuildTupleHashTableExt with a separate context for "metadata" and
content.
As in the previous commit, there's ongoing work to make this easier to
test to prevent such regressions in the future, but that
infrastructure is not going to be backpatchable.
The performance impact of not JIT compiling hashtable equality
comparators can be substantial e.g. for aggregation queries that
aggregate a lot of input rows to few output rows (when there are a lot
of output groups, there will be fewer comparisons).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190927072053.njf6prdl3vb7y7qb@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11, just as 5567d12ce0
Windows does not enforce key file permissions checks in libpq, and psql
can produce CRLF line endings on Windows.
Backpatch to Release 12 (CRLF) and Release 11 (permissions check)
This test already knew that, to get stable test output, it had to hide
"loops" counts in EXPLAIN ANALYZE results. But that's not nearly enough:
if we get a smaller number of workers than we planned for, then the
"Workers Launched" number will change, and so will all the rows and loops
counts up to the Gather node. This has resulted in repeated failures in
the buildfarm, so adjust the test to filter out all these counts.
(Really, we wouldn't bother with EXPLAIN ANALYZE at all here, except
that currently the only way to verify that executor-time pruning has
happened is to look for '(never executed)' annotations. Those are
stable and needn't be filtered out.)
Back-patch to v11 where the test was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11952.1569536725@sss.pgh.pa.us
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were covering the corresponding code. However, it is better if the
added tests serve their actual purpose.
Reported-by: Paul A Jungwirth
Author: Paul A Jungwirth
Reviewed-by: Mahendra Singh
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyV=Us-5XfMC25bNp-uWSj39XgHHmGE9Rh2cQKMegSj52g@mail.gmail.com
In-core relation options can use a custom lock mode since 47167b7, that
has lowered the lock available for some autovacuum parameters. However
it forgot to consider custom relation options. This causes failures
with ALTER TABLE SET when changing a custom relation option, as its lock
is not defined. The existing APIs to define a custom reloption does not
allow to define a custom lock mode, so enforce its initialization to
AccessExclusiveMode which should be safe enough in all cases. An
upcoming patch will extend the existing APIs to allow a custom lock mode
to be defined.
The problem can be reproduced with bloom indexes, so add a test there.
Reported-by: Nikolay Sharplov
Analyzed-by: Thomas Munro, Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190920013831.GD1844@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.6
The array <@ and @> operators do not worry about duplicates: if every
member of array X matches some element of array Y, then X is contained
in Y, even if several members of X get matched to the same Y member.
This was not explicitly stated in the docs though, so improve matters.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/156614120484.1310.310161642239149585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
The entry for commit f24649976 claimed that citext_pattern_ops could be
used for LIKE index searches, but in fact it cannot. That patch only
created the opclass and some related operators, without doing anything
to teach the planner about how to use it. The opclass is basically
useless in this unfinished state, which is why nothing was added to the
main documentation about it, and really we shouldn't have said anything
in the release notes either. So remove the entry.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKqncch4eBt2c8ddNVxzcVh3fFhdk54QoDMzpKgpqor4gA-wcQ@mail.gmail.com
If the bitstring length is not a multiple of 8, we'd shift the
rightmost bits into the pad space, which must be zeroes --- bit_cmp,
for one, depends on that. This'd lead to the result failing to
compare equal to what it should compare equal to, as reported in
bug #16013 from Daryl Waycott.
This is, if memory serves, not the first such bug in the bitstring
functions. In hopes of making it the last one, do a bit more work
than minimally necessary to fix the bug:
* Add assertion checks to bit_out() and varbit_out() to complain if
they are given incorrectly-padded input. This will improve the
odds that manual testing of any new patch finds problems.
* Encapsulate the padding-related logic in macros to make it
easier to use.
Also, remove unnecessary padding logic from bit_or() and bitxor().
Somebody had already noted that we need not re-pad the result of
bit_and() since the inputs are required to be the same length,
but failed to extrapolate that to the other two.
Also, move a comment block that once was near the head of varbit.c
(but people kept putting other stuff in front of it), to put it in
the header block.
Note for the release notes: if anyone has inconsistent data as a
result of saving the output of bitshiftright() in a table, it's
possible to fix it with something like
UPDATE mytab SET bitcol = ~(~bitcol) WHERE bitcol != ~(~bitcol);
This has been broken since day one, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16013-c2765b6996aacae9@postgresql.org
DST law changes in Fiji and Norfolk Island. Historical corrections
for Alberta, Austria, Belgium, British Columbia, Cambodia, Hong Kong,
Indiana (Perry County), Kaliningrad, Kentucky, Michigan, Norfolk
Island, South Korea, and Turkey.
This commit improves subject in two ways:
* It removes ugliness of 02f90879e7, which stores distance values and null
flags in two separate arrays after GISTSearchItem struct. Instead we pack
both distance value and null flag in IndexOrderByDistance struct. Alignment
overhead should be negligible, because we typically deal with at most few
"col op const" expressions in ORDER BY clause.
* It fixes handling of "col op NULL" expression in KNN-SP-GiST. Now, these
expression are not passed to support functions, which can't deal with them.
Instead, NULL result is implicitly assumed. It future we may decide to
teach support functions to deal with NULL arguments, but current solution is
bugfix suitable for backpatch.
Reported-by: Nikita Glukhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/826f57ee-afc7-8977-c44c-6111d18b02ec%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Nikita Glukhov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
It's important users be able to know (without looking at the source code)
that running DDL or DDL-like commands can interrupt autovacuum which can
lead to a lot of dead tuples and hence slower database operations.
Reported-by: James Coleman
Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe-XYyNwML1=f=gnd0qWg46PnvD=BDrCZ5-L94B887XVxQ@mail.gmail.com
1. Commit 7086be6e3 should have documented the limitation that the direct
modification is disabled when WCO constraints are present, but didn't,
which is definitely my fault. Update the documentation (Postgres 9.6
onwards).
2. Commit fc22b6623 should have documented the limitation that the direct
modification is disabled when generated columns are defined, but
didn't. Update the documentation (Postgres 12 onwards).
Author: Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14AYCPunLb6TRz1CQsW5Le01Z2ox8LSOKH0P-cOVDcQRA%40mail.gmail.com
PostgreSQL has been unusable when built with xlc 13 and newer, which are
incompatible with our use of __fetch_and_add(). Back-patch to 9.5,
which introduced pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32().
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190831071157.GA3251746@rfd.leadboat.com
Most WAL records are ignored in early SnapBuild snapshot build phases.
But it's critical to process some of them, so that later messages have
the correct transaction state after the snapshot is completely built; in
particular, XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT messages are critical in order for
sub-transactions to be correctly assigned to their parent transactions,
or at least one assert misbehaves, as reported by Ildar Musin.
Diagnosed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAONYFtOv+Er1p3WAuwUsy1zsCFrSYvpHLhapC_fMD-zNaRWxYg@mail.gmail.com
Lack of parens in the definitions could cause a statement using these
macros to have unexpected semantics. In current code no bug is
apparent, but best to fix the definitions to avoid problems down the
line.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19795.1568400476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Include newitemoff in rmgr desc output for nbtree page split records.
In passing, correct an obsolete comment that claimed that newitemoff is
only logged for _L variant nbtree page split WAL records.
Both issues were oversights in commit 2c03216d83, which revamped the
WAL format.
Author: Peter Geoghegan
Backpatch: 9.5-, where the WAL format was revamped.
Since WITH CHECK OPTION was introduced, ExecInitModifyTable has
initialized WCO expressions with the wrong plan node as parent -- that is,
it passed its input subplan not the ModifyTable node itself. Up to now
we thought this was harmless, but bug #16006 from Vinay Banakar shows it's
not: if the input node is a SubqueryScan then ExecInitWholeRowVar can get
confused into doing the wrong thing. (The fact that ExecInitWholeRowVar
contains such logic is certainly a horrid kluge that doesn't deserve to
live, but figuring out another way to do that is a task for some other day.)
Andres had already noticed the wrong-parent mistake and fixed it in commit
148e632c0, but not being aware of any user-visible consequences, he quite
reasonably didn't back-patch. This patch is simply a back-patch of
148e632c0, plus addition of a test case based on bug #16006. I also added
the test case to v12/HEAD, even though the bug is already fixed there.
Back-patch to all supported branches. 9.4 lacks RLS policies so the
new test case doesn't work there, but I'm pretty sure a test could be
devised based on using a whole-row Var in a plain WITH CHECK OPTION
condition. (I lack the cycles to do so myself, though.)
Andres Freund and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16006-99290d2e4642cbd5@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181205225213.hiwa3kgoxeybqcqv@alap3.anarazel.de
The example used to explain 'Looping Through Query Results' uses
pseudo-materialized views. Replace it with a more up-to-date example
which does the same thing with actual materialized views, which have
been available since PostgreSQL 9.3.
In the passing, change '%' as format specifier instead of '%s' as is used
in other examples in plpgsql.sgml.
Reported-by: Ian Barwick
Author: Ian Barwick
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9a70d393-7904-4918-c97c-649f6d114b6a@2ndquadrant.com
Depending on the system used, t/*.pl may not be expanded into a list of
tests which can be consumed by prove when attempting to run TAP tests on
a given path. Fix that by using glob() directly in the script, to make
sure that a complete list of tests is provided. This has not proved to
be an issue with MSVC as the list was properly expanded, but it is on
Linux with perl's system().
This is extracted from a larger patch.
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6628.1567958876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Back-patch relevant parts of these commits:
30717637c Fix isolationtester race condition for notices sent before blocking
ebd499282 Don't drop NOTICE messages in isolation tests
a28e10e82 Indicate session name in isolationtester notices
This ensures that older versions of the isolationtester will handle
NOTICE/WARNING messages the same way as HEAD and v12 do. While this
isn't fixing any critical problem right now, it seems like a prudent
change to prevent surprises (like we had yesterday...) with
back-patches of future isolation test changes.
Back-patch as far as 9.6. Due to the significant changes we made in
isolationtester in 9.6, back-patching isolation tests further than
that is going to be risky anyway; besides, this patch doesn't apply
cleanly before that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1i7IqC-0000Uc-5H@gemulon.postgresql.org
Don't just assume that the next port is free; it might not be, or
if we're really unlucky it might even be out of the TCP range.
Do it honestly with two get_free_port() calls instead.
This is surely a pretty low-probability problem, but I think it
explains a buildfarm failure seen today, so let's fix it.
Back-patch to v11 where this script was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25124.1568052346@sss.pgh.pa.us
Modern versions of msys2 have changed the treatment of "cmd /c" so that
the runtime will try to convert the switch to a native file path. This
patch adds a setting to inhibit that behaviour.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3227042f-cfcc-745a-57dd-fb8c471f8ddf@2ndQuadrant.com
Backpatch to all live branches.
Some of these are quite old, but that doesn't make them not bugs.
We'd rather report a failure via elog than SIGSEGV.
While at it, uniformly spell the error check as !RelationIsValid(rel)
rather than a bare rel == NULL test. The machine code is the same
but it seems better to be consistent.
Coverity complained about this today, not sure why, because the
mistake is in fact old.
In order to implement NULL LAST semantic GiST previously assumed distance to
the NULL value to be Inf. However, our distance functions can return Inf and
NaN for non-null values. In such cases, NULL LAST semantic appears to be
broken. This commit fixes that by introducing separate array of null flags for
distances.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Previously plain float comparison was used in GiST pairing heap. Such
comparison doesn't provide proper ordering for value sets containing Inf and Nan
values. This commit fixes that by usage of float8_cmp_internal(). Note, there
is remaining problem with NULL distances, which are represented as Inf in
pairing heap. It would be fixes in subsequent commit.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
The old code didn't differentiate between a read error and a
concurrent truncation. fread reports both of these by returning 0;
you have to use feof() or ferror() to distinguish between them,
which this code did not do.
It might be a better idea to use read() rather than fread() here,
so that we can display a less-generic error message, but I'm not
sure that would qualify as a back-patchable bug fix, so just do
this much for now.
Jeevan Chalke, reviewed by Jeevan Ladhe and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobG4ywMzL5oQq2a8YKp8x2p3p1LOMMcGqpS7aekT9+ETA@mail.gmail.com
The logic ending progress reporting for a backend entry introduced by
b6fb647 causes callers of pgstat_progress_end_command() to do some extra
work when track_activities is enabled as the process fields are reset in
the backend entry even if no command were started for reporting.
This resets the fields only if a command is registered for progress
reporting, and only if track_activities is enabled.
Author: Masahiho Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCry_vJ0E-m5oxJXGL3pnos-xYGCzF95rK5Bbi3Uf-rpA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Since the addition of fsync requests in bc34223 to make base backup data
consistent on disk once pg_basebackup finishes, each tablespace tar file
is individually flushed once completed, with an additional flush of the
parent directory when the base backup finishes. While holding a
connection to the server, a fsync request taking a long time may cause a
failure of the base backup, which is annoying for any integration. A
recent example of breakage can involve tcp_user_timeout, but
wal_sender_timeout can cause similar problems.
While reviewing the code, there was a second issue causing too many
fsync requests to be done for the same WAL data. As recursive fsyncs
are done at the end of the backup for both the plain and tar formats
from the base target directory where everything is written, it is fine
to disable fsyncs when fetching or streaming WAL.
Reported-by: Ryohei Takahashi
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ryohei Takahashi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSBPR01MB4550DAE2F8C9502894A45AAB82BE0@OSBPR01MB4550.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 10
The leak happens in str_tolower, str_toupper and str_initcap, which are
used in several places including their equivalent SQL-level functions,
and can only be triggered when using an ICU-provided collation when
converting the input string.
b615920 fixed a similar leak. Backpatch down 10 where ICU collations
have been introduced.
Author: Konstantin Knizhnik
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/94c0ad0a-cbc2-e4a3-7829-2bdeaf9146db@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 10
After an unexpected connection loss and successful reconnection,
psql neglected to resynchronize its internal state about the server,
such as server version. Ordinarily we'd be reconnecting to the same
server and so this isn't really necessary, but there are scenarios
where we do need to update --- one example is where we have a list
of possible connection targets and they're not all alike.
Define "resynchronize" as including connection_warnings(), so that
this case acts the same as \connect. This seems useful; for example,
if the server version did change, the user might wish to know that.
An attuned user might also notice that the new connection isn't
SSL-encrypted, for example, though this approach isn't especially
in-your-face about such changes. Although this part is a behavioral
change, it only affects interactive sessions, so it should not break
any applications.
Also, in do_connect, make sure that we desynchronize correctly when
abandoning an old connection in non-interactive mode.
These problems evidently are the result of people patching only one
of the two places where psql deals with connection changes, so insert
some cross-referencing comments in hopes of forestalling future bugs
of the same ilk.
Lastly, in Windows builds, issue codepage mismatch warnings only at
startup, not during reconnections. psql's codepage can't change
during a reconnect, so complaining about it again seems like useless
noise.
Peter Billen and Tom Lane. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMTXbE8e6U=EBQfNSe01Ej17CBStGiudMAGSOPaw-ALxM-5jXg@mail.gmail.com
Andres Freund
Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane
Andrew Gierth
Michael Paquier
Amit Kapila
Alexander Korotkov
Alvaro Herrera
Etsuro Fujita
Noah Misch
Peter Geoghegan
Peter Eisentraut
Robert Haas