composite types, because TupleTableSlots aren't Datums and can't be
stored in Const nodes. We can remove this restriction if we ever
adopt a cleaner runtime representation for whole-tuple results, but
at the moment it's broken. Per example from Thomas Hallgren.
IN (sub-SELECT) constructs. We must force a clauseless join of the
sub-select member relations, but it wasn't happening because the code
thought it would be able to use the join clause arising from the IN.
that it's good to join where there are join clauses rather than where there
are not. Also enable it to generate bushy plans at need, so that it doesn't
fail in the presence of multiple IN clauses containing sub-joins. These
changes appear to improve the behavior enough that we can substantially reduce
the default pool size and generations count, thereby decreasing the runtime,
and yet get as good or better plans as we were getting in 7.4. Consequently,
adjust the default GEQO parameters. I also modified the way geqo_effort is
used so that it affects both population size and number of generations;
it's now useful as a single control to adjust the GEQO runtime-vs-plan-quality
tradeoff. Bump geqo_threshold to 12, since even with these changes GEQO
seems to be slower than the regular planner at 11 relations.
default value for geqo_effort is supposed to be 40, not 1. The actual
'genetic' component of the GEQO algorithm has been practically disabled
since 7.1 because of this mistake. Improve documentation while at it.
check instead of hardwiring assumptions that only certain plan node types
can appear at the places where we are testing. This was always a pretty
fragile assumption, and it turns out to be broken in 7.4 for certain cases
involving IN-subselect tests that need type coercion.
Also, modify code that builds finished Plan tree so that node types that
don't do projection always copy their input node's targetlist, rather than
having the tlist passed in from the caller. The old method makes it too
easy to write broken code that thinks it can modify the tlist when it
cannot.
for sure...). Rather than relying on the query context of a rangetable
entry to identify what permissions it wants checked, store a full AclMode
mask in each RTE, and check exactly those bits. This allows an RTE
specifying, say, INSERT privilege on a view to be copied into a derived
UPDATE query without changing meaning. Per recent discussion thread.
initdb forced due to change of stored rule representation.
variables, not just simple variables. This was foreseen in the original
coding of this routine, but not implemented until now. Responds to
performance gripe from Laurent Perez.
'simple' references another view that is not simple. Must recheck
conditions after performing recursive pullup. Per example from
Laurent Perez, 9-Jan-04.
predicate tester. It can now deal with commuted clauses (for
instance, 4 < x implies x > 3), subclauses more complicated than
a simple Var (for example, upper(x) = 't' implies upper(x) > 'a'),
and <> operators (for example, x < 3 implies x <> 4). Still
only understands operators associated with btree opclasses, though.
Inspired by example from Martin Hampl.
pointer type when it is not necessary to do so.
For future reference, casting NULL to a pointer type is only necessary
when (a) invoking a function AND either (b) the function has no prototype
OR (c) the function is a varargs function.
regular qpqual ('filter condition'), add special-purpose code to
nodeIndexscan.c to recheck them. This ends being almost no net addition
of code, because the removal of planner code balances out the extra
executor code, but it is significantly more efficient when a lossy
operator is involved in an OR indexscan. The old implementation had
to recheck the entire indexqual in such cases.
with index qual clauses in the Path representation. This saves a little
work during createplan and (probably more importantly) allows reuse of
cached selectivity estimates during indexscan planning. Also fix latent
bug: wrong plan would have been generated for a 'special operator' used
in a nestloop-inner-indexscan join qual, because the special operator
would not have gotten into the list of quals to recheck. This bug is
only latent because at present the special-operator code could never
trigger on a join qual, but sooner or later someone will want to do it.
join conditions in which each OR subclause includes a constraint on
the same relation. This implements the other useful side-effect of
conversion to CNF format, without its unpleasant side-effects. As
per pghackers discussion of a few weeks ago.
teaching the latter to accept either RestrictInfo nodes or bare
clause expressions; and cache the selectivity result in the RestrictInfo
node when possible. This extends the caching behavior of approx_selectivity
to many more contexts, and should reduce duplicate selectivity
calculations.
first time generate an OR indexscan for a two-column index when the WHERE
condition is like 'col1 = foo AND (col2 = bar OR col2 = baz)' --- before,
the OR had to be on the first column of the index or we'd not notice the
possibility of using it. Some progress towards extracting OR indexscans
from subclauses of an OR that references multiple relations, too, although
this code is #ifdef'd out because it needs more work.
fields: now they are valid whenever the clause is a binary opclause,
not only when it is a potential join clause (there is a new boolean
field canjoin to signal the latter condition). This lets us avoid
recomputing the relid sets over and over while examining indexes.
Still more work to do to make this as useful as it could be, because
there are places that could use the info but don't have access to the
RestrictInfo node.
just look for common clauses that can be pulled out of ORs. Per recent
discussion, extracting common clauses seems to be the only really useful
effect of normalization, and if we do it explicitly then we can avoid
cluttering the qual with partially-redundant duplicated expressions, which
was an unpleasant side-effect of the old approach.
about whether it is applied before or after eval_const_expressions().
I believe there were some corner cases where the system would fail to
recognize that a partial index is applicable because of the previous
inconsistency. Store normal rather than 'implicit AND' representations
of constraints and index predicates in the catalogs.
initdb forced due to representation change of constraints/predicates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/*
* relation_byte_size
* Estimate the storage space in bytes for a given number of tuples
* of a given width (size in bytes).
*/
static double
relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width)
{
return tuples * (MAXALIGN(width) + MAXALIGN(sizeof(HeapTupleData)));
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't this be HeapTupleHeaderData and not HeapTupleData ?
(Of course, from a costing perspective these shouldn't be very different but ...)
Sailesh Krishnamurthy
where a joinclause is redundant with a restriction clause. Original coding
believed this was impossible and didn't need to be checked for, but that
was a thinko ...
a join in its subselect. In this situation we *must* build a bushy
plan because there are no valid left-sided or right-sided join trees.
Accordingly, hoary sanity check needs an update. Per report from
Alessandro Depase.
planning to modify them itself. Otherwise we end up with shared RTE
substructure, which breaks inheritance_planner because the rte->inh
flag needs to be independent in each copied subquery. Per bug report
from Chris Piker.
and hash bucket-size estimation. Issue has been there awhile but is more
critical in 7.4 because it affects varchar columns. Per report from
Greg Stark.
Vars created to fill subplan args lists. This is an ancient error, going
back at least to 7.0, but is more easily triggered in 7.4 than before
because we no longer compare varlevelsup when deciding whether a Param
slot can be re-used. Fixes bug reported by Klint Gore.
the hashclauses field of the parent HashJoin. This avoids problems with
duplicated links to SubPlans in hash clauses, as per report from
Andrew Holm-Hansen.
pghackers proposal of 8-Nov. All the existing cross-type comparison
operators (int2/int4/int8 and float4/float8) have appropriate support.
The original proposal of storing the right-hand-side datatype as part of
the primary key for pg_amop and pg_amproc got modified a bit in the event;
it is easier to store zero as the 'default' case and only store a nonzero
when the operator is actually cross-type. Along the way, remove the
long-since-defunct bigbox_ops operator class.
Remove the 'strategy map' code, which was a large amount of mechanism
that no longer had any use except reverse-mapping from procedure OID to
strategy number. Passing the strategy number to the index AM in the
first place is simpler and faster.
This is a preliminary step in planned support for cross-datatype index
operations. I'm committing it now since the ScanKeyEntryInitialize()
API change touches quite a lot of files, and I want to commit those
changes before the tree drifts under me.
regression=# select 1 from tenk1 ta cross join tenk1 tb for update;
ERROR: no relation entry for relid 3
7.3 said "SELECT FOR UPDATE cannot be applied to a join", which was better
but still wrong, considering that 7.2 took the query just fine. Fix by
making transformForUpdate() ignore JOIN and other special RTE types,
rather than trying to mark them FOR UPDATE. The actual error message now
only appears if you explicitly name the join in FOR UPDATE.
sequence every time it's called is bogus --- it interferes with user
control over the seed, and actually decreases randomness overall
(because a seed based on time(NULL) is pretty predictable). If you really
want a reproducible result from geqo, do 'set seed = 0' before planning
a query.
be anything yielding an array of the proper kind, not only sub-ARRAY[]
constructs; do subscript checking at runtime not parse time. Also,
adjust array_cat to make array || array comply with the SQL99 spec.
Joe Conway
datatype by array_eq and array_cmp; use this to solve problems with memory
leaks in array indexing support. The parser's equality_oper and ordering_oper
routines also use the cache. Change the operator search algorithms to look
for appropriate btree or hash index opclasses, instead of assuming operators
named '<' or '=' have the right semantics. (ORDER BY ASC/DESC now also look
at opclasses, instead of assuming '<' and '>' are the right things.) Add
several more index opclasses so that there is no regression in functionality
for base datatypes. initdb forced due to catalog additions.
target columns in INSERT and UPDATE targetlists. Don't rely on resname
to be accurate in ruleutils, either. This fixes bug reported by
Donald Fraser, in which renaming a column referenced in a rule did not
work very well.
Tom Lane
Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian
PostgreSQL Daemon
Peter Eisentraut