Bad things happen if the DBA issues "pg_ctl stop -m fast" before
autoprewarm finishes loading its list of blocks to prewarm.
The current worker process successfully terminates early, but
(if this wasn't the last database with blocks to prewarm) the
leader process will just try to launch another worker for the
next database. Since the postmaster is now in PM_WAIT_BACKENDS
state, it ignores the launch request, and the leader just sits
until it's killed manually.
This is mostly the fault of our half-baked design for launching
background workers, but a proper fix for that is likely to be
too invasive to be back-patchable. To ameliorate the situation,
fix apw_load_buffers() to check whether SIGTERM has arrived
just before trying to launch another worker. That leaves us with
only a very narrow window in each worker launch where SIGTERM
could occur between the launch request and successful worker start.
Another issue is that if the leader process does manage to exit,
it unconditionally rewrites autoprewarm.blocks with only the
blocks currently in shared buffers, thus forgetting any blocks
that we hadn't reached yet while prewarming. This seems quite
unhelpful, since the next database start will then not have the
expected prewarming benefit. Fix it to not modify the file if
we shut down before the initial load attempt is complete.
Per bug #16785 from John Thompson. Back-patch to v11 where
the autoprewarm code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16785-c0207d8c67fb5f25@postgresql.org
While prepare_sort_from_pathkeys has to be concerned about matching up
a volatile expression to the proper tlist entry, we don't need to do
that in find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel becausee such a sort will
have to be postponed anyway.
Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8cK3g5CfLC4w7bs%3DhC0mSksZC%3DH5M8LSchj5e5OxpTAg%40mail.gmail.com
While we do allow SRFs in ORDER BY, scan/join processing should not
consider such cases - such sorts should only happen via final Sort atop
a ProjectSet. So make sure we don't try adding such sorts below Gather
Merge, just like we do for expressions that are volatile and/or not
parallel safe.
Backpatch to PostgreSQL 13, where this code was introduced as part of
the Incremental Sort patch.
Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8cK3g5CfLC4w7bs=hC0mSksZC=H5M8LSchj5e5OxpTAg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/295524.1606246314%40sss.pgh.pa.us
The jsonb || jsonb operator arbitrarily rejected certain combinations
of scalar and non-scalar inputs, while being willing to concatenate
other combinations. This was of course quite undocumented. Rather
than trying to document it, let's just remove the restriction,
creating a uniform rule that unless we are handling an object-to-object
concatenation, non-array inputs are converted to one-element arrays,
resulting in an array-to-array concatenation. (This does not change
the behavior for any case that didn't throw an error before.)
Per complaint from Joel Jacobson. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/163099.1608312033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit ebb7ae839d ensured we ignore pathkeys with volatile expressions
when considering adding a sort below a Gather Merge. Turns out we need
to care about parallel safety of the pathkeys too, otherwise we might
try sorting e.g. on results of a correlated subquery (as demonstrated
by a report from Luis Roberto).
Initial investigation by Tom Lane, patch by James Coleman. Backpatch
to 13, where the code was instroduced (as part of Incremental Sort).
Reported-by: Luis Roberto
Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/622580997.37108180.1604080457319.JavaMail.zimbra%40siscobra.com.br
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8cK3g5CfLC4w7bs=hC0mSksZC=H5M8LSchj5e5OxpTAg@mail.gmail.com
generate_useful_gather_paths used to skip unsorted paths (without any
pathkeys), but that is unnecessary - the later code actually can handle
such paths just fine by adding a Sort node. This is clearly a thinko,
preventing construction of useful plans.
Backpatch to 13, where Incremental Sort was introduced.
Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8cK3g5CfLC4w7bs=hC0mSksZC=H5M8LSchj5e5OxpTAg@mail.gmail.com
The separate "cd" command before invoking psql made sense (or at least
I thought so) when it was added in commit ed1939332. But 4e3a61635
removed the supporting text that explained when to use it, making it
just confusing. So drop it.
Also switch from four-dot to three-dot filler for the unsupplied
part of the path, since at least one person has read the four-dot
filler as a typo for "../..". And fix these/those inconsistency.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/160837647714.673.5195186835607800484@wrigleys.postgresql.org
A narrow reading of the C standard says that memcpy(x,x,n) is undefined,
although it's hard to envision an implementation that would really
misbehave. However, analysis tools such as valgrind might whine about
this; accordingly, let's band-aid relmapper.c to not do it.
See also 5b630501e, d3f4e8a8a, ad7b48ea0, and other similar fixes.
Apparently, none of those folk tried valgrinding initdb? This has been
like this for long enough that I'm surprised it hasn't been reported
before.
Back-patch, just in case anybody wants to use a back branch on a platform
that complains about this; we back-patched those earlier fixes too.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/161790.1608310142@sss.pgh.pa.us
It was not clear how COPY TO behaved with partitioning/inheritance
because the paragraphs were so far apart. Also reword to simplify.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201203211723.GR24052@telsasoft.com
Author: Justin Pryzby
Backpatch-through: 10
array_get_element and array_get_slice qualify as leakproof, since
they will silently return NULL for bogus subscripts. But
array_set_element and array_set_slice throw errors for such cases,
making them clearly not leakproof. contain_leaked_vars was evidently
written with only the former case in mind, as it gave the wrong answer
for assignment SubscriptingRefs (nee ArrayRefs).
This would be a live security bug, were it not that assignment
SubscriptingRefs can only occur in INSERT and UPDATE target lists,
while we only care about leakproofness for qual expressions; so the
wrong answer can't occur in practice. Still, that's a rather shaky
answer for a security-related question; and maybe in future somebody
will want to ask about leakproofness of a tlist. So it seems wise to
fix and even back-patch this correction.
(We would need some change here anyway for the upcoming
generic-subscripting patch, since extensions might make different
tradeoffs about whether to throw errors. Commit 558d77f20 attempted
to lay groundwork for that by asking check_functions_in_node whether a
SubscriptingRef contains leaky functions; but that idea fails now that
the implementation methods of a SubscriptingRef are not SQL-visible
functions that could be marked leakproof or not.)
Back-patch to 9.6. While 9.5 has the same issue, the code's a bit
different. It seems quite unlikely that we'd introduce any actual bug
in the short time 9.5 has left to live, so the work/risk/reward balance
isn't attractive for changing 9.5.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3143742.1607368115@sss.pgh.pa.us
The SQL standard says that redundant unique constraints are disallowed,
but we long ago decided that throwing an error would be too
user-unfriendly, so we just drop redundant ones. The docs weren't very
clear about that though, as this behavior was only explained for PRIMARY
KEY vs UNIQUE, not UNIQUE vs UNIQUE.
While here, I couldn't resist doing some copy-editing and markup-fixing
on the adjacent text about INCLUDE options.
Per bug #16767 from Matthias vd Meent.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16767-1714a2056ca516d0@postgresql.org
The following routines are called within pgcrypto when handling digests
but there were no checks for failures:
- EVP_MD_CTX_size (can fail with -1 as of 3.0.0)
- EVP_MD_CTX_block_size (can fail with -1 as of 3.0.0)
- EVP_DigestInit_ex
- EVP_DigestUpdate
- EVP_DigestFinal_ex
A set of elog(ERROR) is added by this commit to detect such failures,
that should never happen except in the event of a processing failure
internal to OpenSSL.
Note that it would be possible to use ERR_reason_error_string() to get
more context about such errors, but these refer mainly to the internals
of OpenSSL, so it is not really obvious how useful that would be. This
is left out for simplicity.
Per report from Coverity. Thanks to Tom Lane for the discussion.
Backpatch-through: 9.5
clang only uses the 'i1' type for scalar booleans, not for pointers to
booleans (as the pointer might be pointing into a larger memory
allocation). Therefore a pointer-to-bool needs to the "storage" boolean.
There's no known case of wrong code generation due to this, but it seems quite
possible that it could cause problems (see e.g. 72559438f9).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201207212142.wz5tnbk2jsaqzogb@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-, where jit support was added
Until recently 'native' was implicitly included via 'orcjit', but a change
included in LLVM 11 (not yet released) removed a number of such indirect
component references.
Reported-By: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reported-By: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201201064949.mex6kvi2kygby3ni@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-, where jit support was added
pg_rewind looks at the control file to check what timeline a server is on.
But promotion doesn't immediately write a checkpoint, it merely writes
an end-of-recovery WAL record. If pg_rewind runs immediately after
promotion, before the checkpoint has completed, it will think think that
the server is still on the earlier timeline. We ran into this issue a long
time ago already, see commit 484a848a73.
It's a bit bogus that pg_rewind doesn't determine the timeline correctly
until the end-of-recovery checkpoint has completed. We probably should
fix that. But for now work around it by waiting for the checkpoint
to complete before running pg_rewind, like we did in commit 484a848a73.
In the passing, tidy up the new test a little bit. Rerder the INSERTs so
that the comments make more sense, remove a spurious CHECKPOINT call after
pg_rewind has already run, and add --debug option, so that if this fails
again, we'll have more data.
Per buildfarm failure at https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=rorqual&dt=2020-12-06%2018%3A32%3A19&stg=pg_rewind-check.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1713707e-e318-761c-d287-5b6a4aa807e8@iki.fi
Commit 4be058fe9 forgot that the append_rel_list would already be
populated at the time we remove useless result RTEs, and it might contain
PlaceHolderVars that need to be adjusted like the ones in the main parse
tree. This could lead to "no relation entry for relid N" failures later
on, when the planner tries to do something with an unadjusted PHV.
Per report from Tom Ellis. Back-patch to v12 where the bug came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201205173056.GF30712@cloudinit-builder
Buildfarm has been failing sporadically on the new test. I was able to
reproduce this by adding a random 0-10 s delay in the walreceiver, just
before it connects to the primary. There's a race condition where node_3
is promoted before it has fully caught up with node_1, leading to diverged
timelines. When node_1 is later reconfigured as standby following node_3,
it fails to catch up:
LOG: primary server contains no more WAL on requested timeline 1
LOG: new timeline 2 forked off current database system timeline 1 before current recovery point 0/30000A0
That's the situation where you'd need to use pg_rewind, but in this case
it happens already when we are just setting up the actual pg_rewind
scenario we want to test, so change the test so that it waits until
node_3 is connected and fully caught up before promoting it, so that you
get a clean, controlled failover.
Also rewrite some of the comments, for clarity. The existing comments
detailed what each step in the test did, but didn't give a good overview
of the situation the steps were trying to create.
For reasons I don't understand, the test setup had to be written slightly
differently in 9.6 and 9.5 than in later versions. The 9.5/9.6 version
needed node 1 to be reinitialized from backup, whereas in later versions
it could be shut down and reconfigured to be a standby. But even 9.5 should
support "clean switchover", where primary makes sure that pending WAL is
replicated to standby on shutdown. It would be nice to figure out what's
going on there, but that's independent of pg_rewind and the scenario that
this test tests.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b0a3b95b-82d2-6089-6892-40570f8c5e60%40iki.fi
In a few places, the long-version options were listed before the
single-letter ones in the command summary of a few commands. This
didn't match other commands, and didn't match the option ordering later
in the same reference page.
Backpatch-through: 9.5
If the target is a standby server, its WAL doesn't end at the last
checkpoint record, but at minRecoveryPoint. We must scan all the
WAL from the last common checkpoint all the way up to minRecoveryPoint
for modified pages, and also consider that portion when determining
whether the server needs rewinding.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Ian Barwick and me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABvVfJU-LDWvoz4-Yow3Ay5LZYTuPD7eSjjE4kGyNZpXC6FrVQ%40mail.gmail.com
As it stood, expandTableLikeClause() re-did the same relation_openrv
call that transformTableLikeClause() had done. However there are
scenarios where this would not find the same table as expected.
We hold lock on the LIKE source table, so it can't be renamed or
dropped, but another table could appear before it in the search path.
This explains the odd behavior reported in bug #16758 when cloning a
table as a temp table of the same name. This case worked as expected
before commit 502898192 introduced the need to open the source table
twice, so we should fix it.
To make really sure we get the same table, let's re-open it by OID not
name. That requires adding an OID field to struct TableLikeClause,
which is a little nervous-making from an ABI standpoint, but as long
as it's at the end I don't think there's any serious risk.
Per bug #16758 from Marc Boeren. Like the previous patch,
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16758-840e84a6cfab276d@postgresql.org
When committing a transaction that dropped a relation, we previously
truncated only the first segment file to free up disk space (the one
that won't be unlinked until the next checkpoint).
Truncate higher numbered segments too, even though we unlink them on
commit. This frees the disk space immediately, even if other backends
have open file descriptors and might take a long time to get around to
handling shared invalidation events and closing them. Also extend the
same behavior to the first segment, in recovery.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Bug: #16663
Reported-by: Denis Patron <denis.patron@previnet.it>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16663-fe97ccf9932fc800%40postgresql.org
For debugging purposes, Path nodes are supposed to have outfuncs
support, but this was overlooked in the original incremental sort patch.
While at it, clean up a couple other minor oversights, as well as
bizarre choice of return type for create_incremental_sort_path().
(All the existing callers just cast it to "Path *" immediately, so
they don't care, but some future caller might care.)
outfuncs.c fix by Zhijie Hou, the rest by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/324c4d81d8134117972a5b1f6cdf9560@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
Because regular CREATE INDEX commands are independent, and there's no
logical data dependency, it's not immediately obvious that transactions
held by concurrent index builds on one table will block the second phase
of concurrent index creation on an unrelated table, so document this
caveat.
Backpatch this all the way back. In branch master, mention that only
some indexes are involved.
Author: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe994=PUrn8CJZ4UEo_S-FfRr_3ogERyhtdgHAb2WG_Ufg@mail.gmail.com
Checking for DocBook being installed was valuable when we were on the
OpenSP docs toolchain, because that was rather hard to get installed
fully. Nowadays, as long as you have xmllint and xsltproc installed,
you're good, because those programs will fetch the DocBook files off
the net at need. Moreover, testing this at configure time means that
a network access may well occur whether or not you have any interest
in building the docs later. That can be slow (typically 2 or 3
seconds, though much higher delays have been reported), and it seems
not very nice to be doing an off-machine access without warning, too.
Hence, drop the PGAC_CHECK_DOCBOOK probe, and adjust related
documentation. Without that macro, there's not much left of
config/docbook.m4 at all, so I just removed it.
Back-patch to v11, where we started to use xmllint in the
PGAC_CHECK_DOCBOOK probe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E2EE6B76-2D96-408A-B961-CAE47D1A86F0@yesql.se
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A55A7FC9-FA60-47FE-98B5-139CDC57CE6E@gmail.com
This can't work if there's no postmaster, and indeed the code got an
assertion failure trying. There should be a check on IsUnderPostmaster
gating the use of parallelism, as the planner has for ordinary
parallel queries.
Commit 40d964ec9 got this right, so follow its model of checking
IsUnderPostmaster at the same place where we check for
max_parallel_maintenance_workers == 0. In general, new code
implementing parallel utility operations should do the same.
Report and patch by Yulin Pei, cosmetically adjusted by me.
Back-patch to v11 where this code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/HK0PR01MB22747D839F77142D7E76A45DF4F50@HK0PR01MB2274.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
If a PlaceHolderVar is to be evaluated at a join relation, but
its value is only needed there and not at higher levels, we neglected
to update the joinrel's direct_lateral_relids to include the PHV's
source rel. This causes problems because join_is_legal() then won't
allow joining the joinrel to the PHV's source rel at all, leading
to "failed to build any N-way joins" planner failures.
Per report from Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to 9.5
where the problem originated.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87blfgqa4t.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu
Through my misreading of what the existing code actually did,
commits 85c54287a et al. broke psql's behavior for the case where
"\c connstring" provides a password in the connstring. We should
use that password in such a case, but as of 85c54287a we ignored it
(and instead, prompted for a password).
Commit 94929f1cf fixed that in HEAD, but since I thought it was
cleaning up a longstanding misbehavior and not one I'd just created,
I didn't back-patch it.
Hence, back-patch the portions of 94929f1cf having to do with
password management. In addition to fixing the introduced bug,
this means that "\c -reuse-previous=on connstring" will allow
re-use of an existing connection's password if the connstring
doesn't change user/host/port. That didn't happen before, but
it seems like a bug fix, and anyway I'm loath to have significant
differences in this code across versions.
Also fix an error with the same root cause about whether or not to
override a connstring's setting of client_encoding. As of 85c54287a
we always did so; restore the previous behavior of overriding only
when stdin/stdout are a terminal and there's no environment setting
of PGCLIENTENCODING. (I find that definition a bit surprising, but
right now doesn't seem like the time to revisit it.)
Per bug #16746 from Krzysztof Gradek. As with the previous patch,
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16746-44b30e2edf4335d4@postgresql.org
The documentation omitted the critical tidbit that a keyword-array entry
is simply ignored if its corresponding value-array entry is NULL or an
empty string; it will *not* override any previously-obtained value for
the parameter. (See conninfo_array_parse().) I'd supposed that would
force the setting back to default, which is what led me into bug #16746;
but it doesn't.
While here, I couldn't resist the temptation to do some copy-editing,
both in the description of PQconnectdbParams() and in the section
about connection URI syntax.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/931505.1606618746@sss.pgh.pa.us
Buildfarm member topminnow failed when the test script attempted this
before the syslogger would have created the file. Back-patch to v12,
which introduced the test.
Commit 566372b3d fixed some race conditions involving concurrent
SimpleLruTruncate calls, but it introduced new ones in async.c.
A newly-listening backend could attempt to read Notify SLRU pages that
were in process of being truncated, possibly causing an error. Also,
the QUEUE_TAIL pointer could become set to a value that's not equal to
the queue position of any backend. While that's fairly harmless in
v13 and up (thanks to commit 51004c717), in older branches it resulted
in near-permanent disabling of the queue truncation logic, so that
continued use of NOTIFY led to queue-fill warnings and eventual
inability to send any more notifies. (A server restart is enough to
make that go away, but it's still pretty unpleasant.)
The core of the problem is confusion about whether QUEUE_TAIL
represents the "logical" tail of the queue (i.e., the oldest
still-interesting data) or the "physical" tail (the oldest data we've
not yet truncated away). To fix, split that into two variables.
QUEUE_TAIL regains its definition as the logical tail, and we
introduce a new variable to track the oldest un-truncated page.
Per report from Mikael Gustavsson. Like the previous patch,
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1b8561412e8a4f038d7a491c8b922788@smhi.se
Previously pg_stat_progress_cluster view reported the current block
number in heap scan as the number of heap blocks scanned (i.e.,
heap_blks_scanned). This reported number could be incorrect when
synchronize_seqscans is enabled, because it allowed the heap scan to
start at block in middle. This could result in wraparounds in the
heap_blks_scanned column when the heap scan wrapped around.
This commit fixes the bug by calculating the number of blocks from
the block that the heap scan starts at to the current block in scan,
and reporting that number in the heap_blks_scanned column.
Also, in pg_stat_progress_cluster view, previously heap_blks_scanned
could not reach heap_blks_total at the end of heap scan phase
if the last pages scanned were empty. This commit fixes the bug by
manually updating heap_blks_scanned to the same value as
heap_blks_total when the heap scan phase finishes.
Back-patch to v12 where pg_stat_progress_cluster view was introduced.
Reported-by: Matthias van de Meent
Author: Matthias van de Meent
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WjCBWSGkVfYag001Rc4+-nNLDpWM7QbyD6yPvuhKs-gYQ@mail.gmail.com
Historically, psql has truncated the text of a column's default
expression at 128 characters. This is unlike any other behavior
in describe.c, and it's become particularly confusing now that
the limit is only applied to the expression proper and not to
the "generated always as (...) stored" text that may get wrapped
around it.
Excavation in our git history suggests that the original motivation
for this limit was not really to limit the display width (as I'd long
supposed), but to make it safe to use a fixed-width output buffer to
store the result. That implementation restriction is long gone of
course, but the limit remained. Let's just get rid of it.
While here, rearrange the logic about when to free the output string
so that it's not so dependent on unstated assumptions about the
possible values of attidentity and attgenerated.
Per bug #16743 from David Turon. Back-patch to v12 where GENERATED
came in. (Arguably we could take it back further, but I'm hesitant
to change the behavior of long-stable branches for this.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16743-7b1bacc4af76e7ad@postgresql.org
Previously this code assumed that all IndexScan nodes supported
mark/restore, which is not true since it depends on optional index AM
support functions. This could lead to errors about missing support
functions in rare edge cases of mergejoins with no sort keys, where an
unordered non-btree index scan was placed on the inner path without a
protecting Materialize node. (Normally, the fact that merge join
requires ordered input would avoid this error.)
Backpatch all the way since this bug is ancient.
Per report from Eugen Konkov on irc.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87o8jn50be.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
We previously put the -isysroot switch only into CPPFLAGS, theorizing
that it was only needed to find the right copies of include files.
However, it seems that we also need to use it while linking programs,
to find the right stub ".tbd" files for libraries. We got away
without that up to now, but apparently that was mostly luck. It may
also be that failures are only observed when the Xcode version is
noticeably out of sync with the host macOS version; the case that's
prompting action right now is that builds fail when using latest Xcode
(12.2) on macOS Catalina, even though it's fine on Big Sur.
Hence, add -isysroot to LDFLAGS as well. (It seems that the more
common practice is to put it in CFLAGS, whence it'd be included at
both compile and link steps. However, we can't mess with CFLAGS in
the platform template file without confusing configure's logic for
choosing default CFLAGS.)
Back-patch of 49407dc32 into all supported branches.
Report and patch by James Hilliard (some cosmetic mods by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201120003314.20560-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com
Commit 502898192 was too careless about the order of execution of the
additional ALTER TABLE operations generated by expandTableLikeClause.
It just stuck them all at the end, which seems okay for most purposes.
But it falls down in the case where LIKE is importing a primary key
or unique index and the outer CREATE TABLE includes a FOREIGN KEY
constraint that needs to depend on that index. Weird as that is,
it used to work, so we ought to keep it working.
To fix, make parse_utilcmd.c insert LIKE clauses between index-creation
and FK-creation commands in the transformed list of commands, and change
utility.c so that the commands generated by expandTableLikeClause are
executed immediately not at the end. One could imagine scenarios where
this wouldn't work either; but currently expandTableLikeClause only
makes column default expressions, CHECK constraints, and indexes, and
this ordering seems fine for those.
Per bug #16730 from Sofoklis Papasofokli. Like the previous patch,
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16730-b902f7e6e0276b30@postgresql.org
