join. This is needed to avoid improper evaluation of expressions that
should be nulled out, as in Victor Wagner's bug report of 4/27/01.
Pretty ugly solution, but no time to do anything better for 7.1.1.
being ratified as yet. This is certainly no longer true, it wasn't
even true in Q2/1998 when I did a little research for Date's book.
SQL/PSM had been published on 1996-12-15 as ISO/IEC 9075:4. So you
might want to update that section.
Frank Wegmann
1) [ODBC] Psqlodbc and Centura: here it is a patch
posted by Matteo Cavalleli
2) [ODBC] pgsqODBC binding parameters II
posted by Ludek Finstrle
3) Invalid Page Fault in PSQLODBC.DLL
personal mail from Johann Zuschlag
Hiroki Kataoka kataoka@interwiz.koganei.tokyo.jp
adjustments. Note that many tables are being abused with *really* long
description columns. Should probably shrink those columns to be more
concise, and move some of the info to follow-on reference notes.
\keep (keep current paragraph together). This fixes most troubles with
reference pages marked up with <refentry> tags.
Use on reference.rtf, generated by "make reference.rtf".
function arguments in join queries: copy the tuples into
TransactionCommandContext so they don't get recycled too soon. This is
horrid, but not any worse than 7.0 or before, which also leaked such
tuples until end of query. A proper fix will require allowing tuple
datums to be physically stored inside larger tuple datums, which opens
up a bunch of issues that can't realistically be solved for 7.1.1.
functions of join or subselect aliases. It'd be awfully nice if this
code knew for sure whether it was dealing with 'x.f' or 'f(x)' syntax;
maybe we can fix that in a future cycle.
or view that's been dropped and then recreated with the same name (but,
perhaps, different columns). Eventually we'd like to support this but
for now all we can do is fail cleanly, rather than possibly coredumping
if we proceed using the obsolete rule.
to specific base or join RelOptInfo nodes during planning. This preserves
the more-intuitive behavior of 7.0.* --- if you write an expensive clause
(such as a sub-select) last, it should get evaluated last. Someday we
ought to try to have some intelligence about the order of evaluation of
WHERE clauses, but for now we should not override what the user wrote.
Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian
Tatsuo Ishii
Philip Warner
Peter Eisentraut
Hiroshi Inoue
Thomas G. Lockhart