>
> * Add REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, like CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
>
> This is difficult because you must upgrade to an exclusive table lock
> to replace the existing index file. CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not
> have this complication. This would allow index compaction without
> downtime.
discussions.
<
<
< ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<
<
< Developers who have claimed items are:
< --------------------------------------
< * Alvaro is Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
< * Andrew is Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
< * Bruce is Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> of EnterpriseDB
< * Christopher is Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> of
< Family Health Network
< * D'Arcy is D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> of The Cain Gang Ltd.
< * David is David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
< * Fabien is Fabien Coelho <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
< * Gavin is Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> of Alcove Systems Engineering
< * Greg is Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
< * Jan is Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> of Afilias, Inc.
< * Joe is Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
< * Karel is Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
< * Magnus is Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
< * Marc is Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> of PostgreSQL, Inc.
< * Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
< * Michael is Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> of Credativ
< * Neil is Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
< * Oleg is Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
< * Pavel is Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com>
< * Peter is Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
< * Philip is Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> of Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.
< * Rod is Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
< * Simon is Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
< * Stephan is Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
< * Tatsuo is Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> of SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
< * Teodor is Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
< * Tom is Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> of Red Hat
< * Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
> * -Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
<
< This is possible now by creating an operator class with reversed sort
< operators. One complexity is that NULLs would then appear at the start
< of the result set, and this might affect certain sort types, like
< merge join.
<
< * Improve the MONEY data type
> * -Make 64-bit version of the MONEY data type
> * Add locale-aware MONEY type, and support multiple currencies
< Change the MONEY data type to use DECIMAL internally, with special
< locale-aware output formatting.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg01107.php
>
> * Make consistent use of long/short command options --- pg_ctl needs
> long ones, pg_config doesn't have short ones, postgres doesn't have
> enough long ones, etc.
> o Consider parsing the -c string into individual queries so each
> is run in its own transaction
>
> o Consider disallowing multiple queries in PQexec() as an
> additional barrier to SQL injection attacks
< * Allow inherited tables to inherit index, UNIQUE constraint, and primary
< key, foreign key
< * UNIQUE INDEX on base column not honored on INSERTs/UPDATEs from
< inherited table: INSERT INTO inherit_table (unique_index_col) VALUES
< (dup) should fail
<
< The main difficulty with this item is the problem of creating an index
< that can span more than one table.
<
< * Allow SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on inherited tables
> * Inheritance
>
> o Allow inherited tables to inherit indexes, UNIQUE constraints,
> and primary/foreign keys
> o Honor UNIQUE INDEX on base column in INSERTs/UPDATEs
> on inherited table, e.g. INSERT INTO inherit_table
> (unique_index_col) VALUES (dup) should fail
>
> The main difficulty with this item is the problem of
> creating an index that can span multiple tables.
>
> o Allow SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on inherited tables
>
>
>
< * Move some /contrib modules out to their own project sites
<
< Particularly, move GPL-licensed /contrib/userlock and
< /contrib/dbmirror/clean_pending.pl.
<
>
> * Embedded server (not wanted)
>
> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
> server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> to run in the same process address space as the client application
> would add too much complexity and failure cases.