Sequences were left out of the list of relation kinds that
verify_heapam knew how to check, though it is fairly trivial to allow
them. Doing that, and while at it, updating pg_amcheck to include
sequences in relations matched by table and relation patterns.
Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/81ad4757-92c1-4aa3-7bee-f609544837e3%40enterprisedb.com
Using --quiet in combination with --no-strict-names didn't work as
documented, a warning message was still emitted. Since the --quiet
flag was working in an unconventional way to other utilities, fix
by removing the functionality instead.
Backpatch through 14 where pg_amcheck was introduced.
Bug: 17148
Reported-by: Chen Jiaoqian <chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17148-b5087318e2b04fc6@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
The previous arrangement was just one big list, and the internal order
was not all consistent either. Now arrange the options by group and
sort them, the way it's already done in the --help output and one
other reference pages. Also fix some ordering in the --help output.
This will install amcheck in the database if not present. The default
schema is for the extension is pg_catalog, but this can be overridden by
providing a value for the option.
Mark Dilger, slightly editorialized by me.
(rather divergent)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bdc0f7c2-09e3-ee57-8471-569dfb509234@dunslane.net
Comment fixes are applied on HEAD, and documentation improvements are
applied on back-branches where needed.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408164008.GJ6592@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Peter Eisentraut
Daniel Gustafsson
David Rowley
Andrew Dunstan
Michael Paquier
Robert Haas