Attached you'll find a (big) patch that fixes make dep and make
depend in all Makefiles where I found it to be appropriate.
It also removes the dependency in Makefile.global for NAMEDATALEN
and OIDNAMELEN by making backend/catalog/genbki.sh and bin/initdb/initdb.sh
a little smarter.
This no longer requires initdb.sh that is turned into initdb with
a sed script when installing Postgres, hence initdb.sh should be
renamed to initdb (after the patch has been applied :-) )
This patch is against the 6.3 sources, as it took a while to
complete.
Please review and apply,
Cheers,
Jeroen van Vianen
1. Remove the char2, char4, char8 and char16 types from postgresql
2. Change references of char16 to name in the regression tests.
3. Rename the char16.sql regression test to name.sql. 4. Modify
the regression test scripts and outputs to match up.
Might require new regression.{SYSTEM} files...
Darren King
#define TAPETEMP "pg_btsortXXXXXX"
to:
#define TAPETEMP "pg_btsortXXXXXXX"
For some reason, under FreeBSD, it appears that the mktemp() value needs the
extra 'X' to improve/ensure uniqueness
Patch by: wieck@sapserv.debis.de (Jan Wieck)
One of the design rules of PostgreSQL is extensibility. And
to follow this rule means (at least for me) that there should
not only be a builtin PL. Instead I would prefer a defined
interface for PL implemetations.
==========================================
What follows is a set of diffs that cleans up the usage of BLCKSZ.
As a side effect, the person compiling the code can change the
value of BLCKSZ _at_their_own_risk_. By that, I mean that I've
tried it here at 4096 and 16384 with no ill-effects. A value
of 4096 _shouldn't_ affect much as far as the kernel/file system
goes, but making it bigger than 8192 can have severe consequences
if you don't know what you're doing. 16394 worked for me, _BUT_
when I went to 32768 and did an initdb, the SCSI driver broke and
the partition that I was running under went to hell in a hand
basket. Had to reboot and do a good bit of fsck'ing to fix things up.
The patch can be safely applied though. Just leave BLCKSZ = 8192
and everything is as before. It basically only cleans up all of the
references to BLCKSZ in the code.
If this patch is applied, a comment in the config.h file though above
the BLCKSZ define with warning about monkeying around with it would
be a good idea.
Darren darrenk@insightdist.com
(Also cleans up some of the #includes in files referencing BLCKSZ.)
==========================================
Essentially, this cleans things up so that if PORTNAME isn't defined (I'm
working on getting rid of it for FreeBSD, at least, to see if its possible)
none of the PORTNAME related stuff gets passed around.
Had a little bit of -I related redundancy as well
Subject: [PATCHES] Re: [PORTS] AIX 6.1 fixes...
Here are the patches for the two things that wouldn't make it thru the AIX
compiler. The geo_ops.c change is harmless I believe. The nbtcompare.c patch
fixes me, but I don't know about any other ports. Maybe wait on that one
until Vadim decides what to do about the unsigned vs signed chars varlena
issue.
when btree used in innerscan with run-time key which value
passed by pointer.
Fix: keys ordering stuff moved to _bt_first().
Pointed by Thomas Lockhart.
index tuple (logical position within A LEVEL). bti_oid & bti_dummy
taken off from BTItemData.
2. Fix for multi-column indices (nbtsearch.c):
_bt_binsrch() - for searches on internal pages having keysize <
number of attrs we point at the last item < the scankey, not at the
first item = the scankey;
_bt_moveright() - if keysize < number of attrs we compare scankey with
_last_ item on current page to decide should we move right or
not.
Actually required by multi-column indices support.
We still don't use btree for 'A is (not) null', but
now btree keep items with NULL attrs using single rule
for placing/finding items on pages:
NULLs greater NOT_NULLs and NULL = NULL.
+ Bulkload code (nbtsort.c) support for multi-column indices
building and NULLs.
+ Fix for btendscan()->pfree(scanopaque) from Chris Dunlop.
Patches from: aoki@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Paul M. Aoki)
i gave jolly my btree bulkload code a long, long time ago but never
gave him a bunch of my bugfixes. here's a diff against the 6.0
baseline.
for some reason, this code has slowed down somewhat relative to the
insertion-build code on very small tables. don't know why -- it used
to be within about 10%. anyway, here are some (highly unscientific!)
timings on a dec 3000/300 for synthetic tables with 10k, 100k and
1000k tuples (basically, 1mb, 10mb and 100mb heaps). 'c' means
clustered (pre-sorted) inputs and 'u' means unclustered (randomly
ordered) inputs. the 10k table basically fits in the buffer pool, but
the 100k and 1000k tables don't. as you can see, insertion build is
fine if you've sorted your heaps on your index key or if your heap
fits in core, but is absolutely horrible on unordered data (yes,
that's 7.5 hours to index 100mb of data...) because of the zillions of
random i/os.
if it doesn't work for you for whatever reason, you can always turn it
back off by flipping the FastBuild flag in nbtree.c. i don't have
time to maintain it.
good luck!
baseline code:
time psql -c 'create index c10 on k10 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 8.6
time psql -c 'create index u10 on k10 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 9.1
time psql -c 'create index c100 on k100 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 59.2
time psql -c 'create index u100 on k100 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 652.4
time psql -c 'create index c1000 on k1000 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 636.1
time psql -c 'create index u1000 on k1000 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 26772.9
bulkloading code:
time psql -c 'create index c10 on k10 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 11.3
time psql -c 'create index u10 on k10 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 10.4
time psql -c 'create index c100 on k100 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 59.5
time psql -c 'create index u100 on k100 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 63.5
time psql -c 'create index c1000 on k1000 using btree (c int4_ops)' bttest
real 636.9
time psql -c 'create index u1000 on k1000 using btree (b int4_ops)' bttest
real 701.0
(old _bt_compare always returned >= 0 while comparing with P_HIKEY
on root page - it breaks root page when _bt_insertonpg tries insert
new minimal key into root page).
2. Fixed bug concerns "empty" pages: non-rightmost pages with only P_HIKEY
present on it. Such pages appear after vacuum.
Changes:
* Unique index capability works using the syntax 'create unique
index'.
* Duplicate OID's in the system tables are removed. I put
little scripts called 'duplicate_oids' and 'find_oid' in
include/catalog that help to find and remove duplicate OID's.
I also moved 'unused_oids' from backend/catalog to
include/catalog, since it has to be in the same directory
as the include files in order to work.
* The backend tries converting the name of a function or aggregate
to all lowercase if the original name given doesn't work (mostly
for compatibility with ODBC).
* You can 'SELECT NULL' to your heart's content.
* I put my _bt_updateitem fix in instead, which uses
_bt_insertonpg so that even if the new key is so big that
the page has to be split, everything still works.
* All literal references to system catalog OID's have been
replaced with references to define'd constants from the catalog
header files.
* I added a couple of node copy functions. I think this was a
preliminary attempt to get rules to work.
I found another bug in btree index. Looking at the code it seems that NULL
keys are never used to build or scan a btree index (see the explain commands
in the example). However this is not the case when a null key is retrieved
in an outer loop of a join select and used in an index scan of an inner loop.
This bug causes at least three kinds of problems:
1) the backend crashes when it tries to compare a text string with a null.
2) it is not possible to find tuples with null keys in a join.
3) null is considered equal to 0 when the datum is passed by value, see
the last query.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
My guess is that the thing had bugs, and the pfree was commented out.
The thing is probabally free'ed anyway at the end, so it was not a bad
thing.
If it does cause a bug, it will generate an error when hit, so I say
unless someone else knows, let's remove it and run the regression test.
-Bruce
> INDEXED searches in some cases DO NOT WORK.
> Although simple search expressions (i.e. with a constant value on
> the right side of an operator) work, performing a join (by putting
> a field of some other table on the right side of an operator) produces
> empty output.
> WITHOUT indices, everything works fine.
>
submitted by: "Vadim B. Mikheev" <root@ais.sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
Bruce Momjian
Vadim B. Mikheev
Marc G. Fournier
PostgreSQL Daemon
Thomas G. Lockhart
Bryan Henderson