If you do ALTER COLUMN SET NOT NULL against an inheritance parent table,
it will recurse to mark all the child columns as NOT NULL as well. This
is necessary for consistency: if the column is labeled NOT NULL then
reading it should never produce nulls.
However, that didn't happen in the case where ALTER ... ADD PRIMARY KEY
marks a target column NOT NULL that wasn't before. That was questionable
from the beginning, and now Tushar Ahuja points out that it can lead to
dump/restore failures in some cases. So let's make that case recurse too.
Although this is meant to fix a bug, it's enough of a behavioral change
that I'm pretty hesitant to back-patch, especially in view of the lack
of similar field complaints. It doesn't seem to be too late to put it
into v10 though.
Michael Paquier, editorialized on slightly by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b8794d6a-38f0-9d7c-ad4b-e85adf860fc9@enterprisedb.com
ALTER USER ... SET did not support all the syntax variants of ALTER ROLE
... SET. Fix that, and to avoid further deviations of this kind, unify
many the grammar rules for ROLE/USER/GROUP commands.
Reported-by: Pavel Golub <pavel@microolap.com>
Otherwise, partitioned tables with RETURNING expressions or subject
to a WITH CHECK OPTION do not work properly.
Amit Langote, reviewed by Amit Khandekar and Etsuro Fujita. A few
comment changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/9a39df80-871e-6212-0684-f93c83be4097@lab.ntt.co.jp
The buildfarm is still showing at least three distinct behaviors for
a bad locale name in CREATE COLLATION. Although this test was helpful
for getting the error reporting code into some usable shape, it doesn't
seem worth carrying multiple expected-files in order to support the
test in perpetuity. So pull it back out.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKKotZS-wcDcofXDCH=sidiuajE+nqHn2CGjLLX78anyDmi3gQ@mail.gmail.com
DROP CASCADE doesn't currently promise to visit dependent objects in
a fixed order, so when the regression tests use it, we typically need
to suppress the details of which objects get dropped in order to have
predictable test output. Traditionally we've done that by setting
client_min_messages higher than NOTICE, but there's a better way:
we can "\set VERBOSITY terse" in psql. That suppresses the DETAIL
message with the object list, but we still get the basic notice telling
how many objects were dropped. So at least the test case can verify
that the expected number of objects were dropped.
The VERBOSITY method was already in use in a few places, but run
around and use it wherever it makes sense.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10766.1501608885@sss.pgh.pa.us
We were just printing errno, which is certainly not gonna work on
Windows. Now, it's not entirely clear from Microsoft's documentation
whether _create_locale() adheres to standard Windows error reporting
conventions, but let's assume it does and try to map the GetLastError
result to an errno. If this turns out not to work, probably the best
thing to do will be to assume the error is always ENOENT on Windows.
This is a longstanding bug, but given the lack of previous field
complaints, I'm not excited about back-patching it.
Per report from Murtuza Zabuawala.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKKotZS-wcDcofXDCH=sidiuajE+nqHn2CGjLLX78anyDmi3gQ@mail.gmail.com
Most of our collations code has special handling for the locale names
"C" and "POSIX", allowing those collations to be used whether or not
the system libraries think those locale names are valid, or indeed
whether said libraries even have any locale support. But we missed
handling things that way in CREATE COLLATION. This meant you couldn't
clone the C/POSIX collations, nor explicitly define a new collation
using those locale names, unless the libraries allow it. That's pretty
pointless, as well as being a violation of pg_newlocale_from_collation's
API specification.
The practical effect of this change is quite limited: it allows creating
such collations even on platforms that don't HAVE_LOCALE_T, and it allows
making "POSIX" collation objects on Windows, which before this would only
let you make "C" collation objects. Hence, even though this is a bug fix
IMO, it doesn't seem worth the trouble to back-patch.
In passing, suppress the DROP CASCADE detail messages at the end of the
collation regression test. I'm surprised we've never been bit by
message ordering issues there.
Per report from Murtuza Zabuawala.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKKotZS-wcDcofXDCH=sidiuajE+nqHn2CGjLLX78anyDmi3gQ@mail.gmail.com
When output of IPC::Run::run () is redirected to scalar references, in
certain circumstances the Msys perl does not correctly detect that the
end of file has been seen, making the test hang indefinitely. One such
circumstance is when the command is 'pg_ctl start', and such a change
was made in commit f13ea95f9e. The workaround, which only applies on
MSys, is to redirect the output to temporary files and then read them in
when the process has finished.
Patch by me, reviewed and tweaked by Tom Lane.
This module becomes much more useful if we allow it to be used as base
class for external projects. To achieve this, change the exported
get_new_node function into a class method instead, and use the standard
Perl idiom of accepting the class as first argument. This method works
as expected for subclasses. The standalone function is kept for
backwards compatibility, though it could be removed in pg11.
Author: Chap Flackman, based on an earlier patch from Craig Ringer
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMsr+YF8kO+4+K-_U4PtN==2FndJ+5Bn6A19XHhMiBykEwv0wA@mail.gmail.com
Various cases involving renaming of view columns are handled by having
make_viewdef pass down the view's current relation tupledesc to
get_query_def, which then takes care to use the column names from the
tupledesc for the output column names of the SELECT. For some reason
though, we'd missed teaching make_ruledef to do similarly when it is
printing an ON SELECT rule, even though this is exactly the same case.
The results from pg_get_ruledef would then be different and arguably wrong.
In particular, this breaks pre-v10 versions of pg_dump, which in some
situations would define views by means of emitting a CREATE RULE ... ON
SELECT command. Third-party tools might not be happy either.
In passing, clean up some crufty code in make_viewdef; we'd apparently
modernized the equivalent code in make_ruledef somewhere along the way,
and missed this copy.
Per report from Gilles Darold. Back-patch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ec05659a-40ff-4510-fc45-ca9d965d0838@dalibo.com
I believe this changed as a consequence of commit 54baa4813: trying to
clone the "C" collation now produces a true clone with collencoding -1,
hence the error message if it's duplicate no longer specifies an encoding.
Per buildfarm member crake, which apparently hadn't been running this
test for the last few weeks.
The order of partitions listed by \d+ is in general locale-dependent.
Rename the partitions in the test added by d363d42bb9 to force them to
be listed in a consistent order.
Previously, UNBOUNDED meant no lower bound when used in the FROM list,
and no upper bound when used in the TO list, which was OK for
single-column range partitioning, but problematic with multiple
columns. For example, an upper bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED) would not be
collocated with a lower bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED), thus making it
difficult or impossible to define contiguous multi-column range
partitions in some cases.
Fix this by using MINVALUE and MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED to
represent a partition column that is unbounded below or above
respectively. This syntax removes any ambiguity, and ensures that if
one partition's lower bound equals another partition's upper bound,
then the partitions are contiguous.
Also drop the constraint prohibiting finite values after an unbounded
column, and just document the fact that any values after MINVALUE or
MAXVALUE are ignored. Previously it was necessary to repeat UNBOUNDED
multiple times, which was needlessly verbose.
Note: Forces a post-PG 10 beta2 initdb.
Report by Amul Sul, original patch by Amit Langote with some
additional hacking by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b947mowpLdxL3jo3YLKngRjrq9+Ej4ymduQTfYR+8=YAYQ@mail.gmail.com
Normally, a JoinExpr would have empty "quals" only if it came from CROSS
JOIN syntax. However, it's possible to get to this state by specifying
NATURAL JOIN between two tables with no common column names, and there
might be other ways too. The code previously printed no ON clause if
"quals" was empty; that's right for CROSS JOIN but syntactically invalid
if it's some type of outer join. Fix by printing ON TRUE in that case.
This got broken by commit 2ffa740be, which stopped using NATURAL JOIN
syntax in ruleutils output due to its brittleness in the face of
column renamings. Back-patch to 9.3 where that commit appeared.
Per report from Tushar Ahuja.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98b283cd-6dda-5d3f-f8ac-87db8c76a3da@enterprisedb.com
Before, we always used a dummy value of 1, but that's not right when
the partitioned table being modified is inside of a WITH clause
rather than part of the main query.
Amit Langote, reported and reviewd by Etsuro Fujita, with a comment
change by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/ee12f648-8907-77b5-afc0-2980bcb0aa37@lab.ntt.co.jp
It seems pretty confusing to have tests named both largeobject and
large_object. The latter is of very recent vintage (commit ff992c074),
so get rid of it in favor of merging into the former.
Also, enable the LO comment test that was added by commit 70ad7ed4e,
since the later commit added the then-missing pg_upgrade functionality.
The large_object.sql test case is almost completely redundant with that,
but not quite: it seems like creating a user-defined LO with an OID in
the system range might be an interesting case for pg_upgrade, so let's
keep it.
Like the earlier patch, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18665.1500306372@sss.pgh.pa.us
The grammar will only accept something syntactically similar to a function
call in a function-in-FROM expression. However, there are various ways
to input something that ruleutils.c won't deparse that way, potentially
leading to a view or rule that fails dump/reload. Fix by inserting a
dummy CAST around anything that isn't going to deparse as a function
(which is one of the ways to get something like that in there in the
first place).
In HEAD, also make use of the infrastructure added by this to avoid
emitting unnecessary parentheses in CREATE INDEX deparsing. I did
not change that in back branches, thinking that people might find it
to be unexpected/unnecessary behavioral change.
In HEAD, also fix incorrect logic for when to add extra parens to
partition key expressions. Somebody apparently thought they could
get away with simpler logic than pg_get_indexdef_worker has, but
they were wrong --- a counterexample is PARTITION BY LIST ((a[1])).
Ignoring the prettyprint flag for partition expressions isn't exactly
a nice solution anyway.
This has been broken all along, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10477.1499970459@sss.pgh.pa.us
Further investigation shows that ruleutils isn't quite up to speed either
for cases where we have a domain-over-array: it needs to be prepared to
look past a CoerceToDomain at the top level of field and element
assignments, else it decompiles them incorrectly. Potentially this would
result in failure to dump/reload a rule, if it looked like the one in the
new test case. (I also added a test for EXPLAIN; that output isn't broken,
but clearly we need more test coverage here.)
Like commit b1cb32fb6, this bug is reachable in cases we already support,
so back-patch all the way.
We allow INSERT and UPDATE commands to assign to the same column more than
once, as long as the assignments are to subfields or elements rather than
the whole column. However, this failed when the target column was a domain
over array rather than plain array. Fix by teaching process_matched_tle()
to look through CoerceToDomain nodes, and add relevant test cases.
Also add a group of test cases exercising domains over array of composite.
It's doubtless accidental that CREATE DOMAIN allows this case while not
allowing straight domain over composite; but it does, so we'd better make
sure we don't break it. (I could not find any documentation mentioning
either side of that, so no doc changes.)
It's been like this for a long time, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit c46c0e5202 failed to pass the
TransitionCaptureState object to ExecARInsertTriggers() in the case
where it's using heap_multi_insert and there are indexes. Repair.
Thomas Munro, from a report by David Fetter
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170708084213.GA14720%40fetter.org
The previous logic, whilst not actually wrong, was overly complex and
involved doing two binary searches, where only one was really
necessary. This simplifies that logic and improves the comments.
One visible change is that if the new partition overlaps multiple
existing partitions, the error message now always reports the overlap
with the first existing partition (the one with the lowest
bounds). The old code would sometimes report the clash with the first
partition and sometimes with the last one.
Original patch idea from Amit Langote, substantially rewritten by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b947mowpLdxL3jo3YLKngRjrq9+Ej4ymduQTfYR+8=YAYQ@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm members hornet and sungazer have shown multiple instances of
"Failed test 'xmin of non-cascaded slot with hs feedback has changed'".
The reason seems to be that the test is checking the current xmin of the
master server's replication slot against a past xmin of the first slave
server's replication slot. Even though the latter slot is downstream of
the former, it's possible for its reported xmin to be ahead of the former's
reported xmin, because those numbers are updated whenever the respective
downstream walreceiver feels like it (see logic in WalReceiverMain).
Instrumenting this test shows that indeed the slave slot's xmin does often
advance before the master's does, especially if an autovacuum transaction
manages to occur during the relevant window. If we happen to capture such
an advanced xmin as $xmin, then the subsequent wait_slot_xmins call can
fall through before the master's xmin has advanced at all, and then if it
advances before the get_slot_xmins call, we can get the observed failure.
Yeah, that's a bit of a long chain of deduction, but it's hard to explain
any other way how the test can get past an "xmin <> '$xmin'" check only
to have the next query find that xmin does equal $xmin.
Fix by keeping separate images of the master and slave slots' xmins
and testing their has-xmin-advanced conditions independently.
Since reducing pg_ctl's reaction time in commit c61559ec3, some
slower buildfarm members have shown erratic failures in this test.
The reason turns out to be that the test assumes synchronous
replication (because it does not provide any lag time for a commit
to replicate before shutting down the servers), but it had only
enabled sync rep in one direction. The observed symptoms correspond
to failure to replicate the last committed transaction in the other
direction, which can be expected to happen if the shutdown command
is issued soon enough and we are providing no synchronous-commit
guarantees.
Fix that, and add a bit more paranoid state checking at the bottom
of the script.
Michael Paquier and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/908.1498965681@sss.pgh.pa.us
By default, Perl's split() function drops trailing empty fields,
which is not what we want here. Oversight in commit fb093e4cb.
We'd managed to miss it thus far thanks to the very limited usage
of this function.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14837.1499029831@sss.pgh.pa.us
The original coding here was very confusing, because it named the
two servers it set up "master" and "slave" even though it swapped
their replication roles multiple times. At any given point in the
script it was very unobvious whether "$node_master" actually referred
to the server named "master" or the other one. Instead, pick arbitrary
names for the two servers --- I used "london" and "paris" --- and
distinguish those permanent names from the nonce references $cur_master
and $cur_slave. Add logging to help distinguish which is which at
any given point. Also, use distinct data and transaction names to
make all the prepared transactions easily distinguishable in the
postmaster logs. (There was one place where we intentionally tested
that the server could cope with re-use of a transaction name, but
it seems like one place is sufficient for that purpose.)
Also, add checks at the end to make sure that all the transactions
that were supposed to be committed did survive.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28238.1499010855@sss.pgh.pa.us
Add an optional "expected" argument to override the default assumption
that we're waiting for the query to return "t". This allows replacing
a handwritten polling loop in recovery/t/007_sync_rep.pl with use of
poll_query_until(); AFAICS that's the only remaining ad-hoc polling
loop in our TAP tests.
Change poll_query_until() to probe ten times per second not once per
second. Like some similar changes I've been making recently, the
one-second interval seems to be rooted in ancient traditions rather
than the actual likely wait duration on modern machines. I'd consider
reducing it further if there were a convenient way to spawn just one
psql for the whole loop rather than one per probe attempt.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12486.1498938782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Several callers of PostgresNode::poll_query_until() neglected to check
for failure; I do not think that's optional. Also, rewrite one place
that had reinvented poll_query_until() for no very good reason.
The point of this loop is to insert 1000 rows into the test table
and consume 1000 XIDs. I can't see any good reason why it's useful
to launch 1000 psqls and 1000 backend processes to accomplish that.
Pushing the looping into a plpgsql DO block shaves about 10 seconds
off the runtime of the src/test/recovery TAP tests on my machine;
that's over 10% of the runtime of that test suite.
It is, in fact, sufficiently more efficient that we now demonstrably
need wait_slot_xmins() afterwards, or the slaves' xmins may not have
moved yet.
We now disallow having triggers with both transition tables and ON
INSERT OR UPDATE (which was a PG extension to the spec anyway),
because in this case it's not at all clear how the transition tables
should work for an INSERT ... ON CONFLICT query. Separate ON INSERT
and ON UPDATE triggers with transition tables are allowed, and the
transition tables for these reflect only the inserted and only the
updated tuples respectively.
Patch by Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D11KHQ0JmETJQihSvhZB5mUZL2xrqHeXbCeLhDiqQ39%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
check_agg_arguments_walker threw an error upon seeing a SRF or window
function, but that is too aggressive: if the function is within a
sub-select then it's perfectly fine. I broke the SRF case in commit
0436f6bde by copying the logic for window functions ... but that was
broken too, and had been since commit eaccfded9.
Repair both cases in HEAD, and the window function case back to 9.3.
9.2 gets this right.
By default, wal_retrieve_retry_interval is five seconds, which is far
more than is needed in any of our TAP tests, leaving the test cases
just twiddling their thumbs for significant stretches. Moreover,
because it's so large, we get basically no testing of the retry-before-
master-is-ready code path. Hence, make PostgresNode::init set up
wal_retrieve_retry_interval = '500ms' as part of its customization of
test clusters' postgresql.conf. This shaves quite a few seconds off
the runtime of the recovery TAP tests.
Back-patch into 9.6. We have wal_retrieve_retry_interval in 9.5,
but the test infrastructure isn't there.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31624.1498500416@sss.pgh.pa.us
Remove hard-wired sleep(2) delays in 001_stream_rep.pl in favor of using
poll_query_until to check for the desired state to appear. In addition,
add such a wait before the last test in the script, as it's possible
to demonstrate failures there after upcoming improvements in pg_ctl.
(We might end up adding polling before each of the get_slot_xmins calls in
this script, but I feel no great need to do that until shown necessary.)
In passing, clarify the description strings for some of the test cases.
Michael Paquier and Craig Ringer, pursuant to a complaint from me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8962.1498425057@sss.pgh.pa.us
The comparison with the target rows on the subscriber side was done with
datumIsEqual(), which can have false negatives. For instance, it didn't
work reliably for text columns. So use the equality operator provided
by the type cache instead.
Also add more user documentation about replica identity requirements.
Reported-by: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
It's essential that initdb.c's setup_depend() scan each system catalog
that could contain objects that need to have "p" (pin) entries in pg_depend
or pg_shdepend. Forgetting to add that, either when a catalog is first
invented or when it first acquires DATA() entries, is an obvious bug
hazard. We can detect such omissions at reasonable cost by probing every
OID-containing system catalog to see whether the lowest-numbered OID in it
is pinned. If so, the catalog must have been properly accounted for in
setup_depend(). If the lowest OID is above FirstNormalObjectId then the
catalog must have been empty at the end of initdb, so it doesn't matter.
There are a small number of catalogs whose first entry is made later in
initdb than setup_depend(), resulting in nonempty expected output of the
test, but these can be manually inspected to see that they are OK. Any
future mistake of this ilk will manifest as a new entry in the test's
output.
Since pg_conversion is already in the test's output, add it to the set of
catalogs scanned by setup_depend(). That has no effect today (hence, no
catversion bump here) but it will protect us if we ever do add pin-worthy
conversions.
This test is very much like the catalog sanity checks embodied in
opr_sanity.sql and type_sanity.sql, but testing pg_depend doesn't seem to
fit naturally into either of those scripts' charters. Hence, invent a new
test script misc_sanity.sql, which can be a home for this as well as tests
on any other catalogs we might want in future.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8068.1498155068@sss.pgh.pa.us
I misplaced the IF NOT EXISTS clause in commit 7b504eb282, before the
word STATISTICS. Put it where it belongs.
Patch written independently by Amit Langote and myself. I adopted his
submitted test case with a slight edit also.
Reported-by: Bruno Wolff III
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170621004237.GB8337@wolff.to
Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they
flow past the right margin.
By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are
within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding
left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the
continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin,
then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin,
if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of
the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations
unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column
limit.
This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers.
Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized
lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak.
The main changes visible in this commit are:
* Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations.
* No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts,
sizeof, or offsetof.
* No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as
well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers.
* Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely.
* Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed
with no space separating them from the code.
* Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels.
* Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less
than the expected column 33.
On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef
names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to
put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in
indent itself.
There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment
indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted
to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without
one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the
changes as much as practical.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Currently, there are no built-in functions that are SECURITY DEFINER.
But we just found an instance where one was mistakenly marked that way,
so it seems prudent to add a test about it. If we ever grow some
functions that are intentionally SECURITY DEFINER, we can alter the
expected output of this test, or adjust the query to filter out functions
for which it's okay.
Per suggestion from Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYXg7McY33+jbWmG=rS-HNUur0S6W8Q8kVNFf7epFimVA@mail.gmail.com
David Rowley found that the "use the smallest per-column selectivity"
heuristic applied in some cases by get_foreign_key_join_selectivity()
was badly off if the FK columns are independent, producing estimates
much worse than we got before that code was added in 9.6.
One case where that heuristic was used was for LEFT and FULL outer joins
with the referenced rel on the outside of the join. But we should not
really need to special-case those here. eqjoinsel() never has had such a
special case; the correction is applied by calc_joinrel_size_estimate()
instead. Let's just estimate such cases like inner joins and rely on that
later adjustment. (I think there was something of a thinko here, in that
the comments seem to be thinking about the selectivity as defined for
semi/anti joins; but that shouldn't apply to left/full joins.) Add a
regression test exercising such a case to show that this is sane in
at least some cases.
The other case where we used that heuristic was for SEMI/ANTI outer joins,
either if the referenced rel was on the outside, or if it was on the inside
but was part of a join within the RHS. In either case, the FK doesn't give
us a lot of traction towards estimating the selectivity. To ensure that
we don't have regressions from what happened before 9.6, let's punt by
ignoring the FK in such cases and applying the traditional selectivity
calculation. (We might be able to improve on that later, but for now
I just want to be sure it's not worse than 9.5.)
Report and patch by David Rowley, simplified a bit by me. Back-patch
to 9.6 where this code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8NO8oCDcxrteohG6O72uU1saEVT9qX=R8pENr5QWerXw@mail.gmail.com
Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut
Robert Haas
Andrew Dunstan
Alvaro Herrera
Dean Rasheed
Andrew Gierth