If the number of heap blocks is not multiples of pages per range, the
summarizing produces wrong summary information for the last brin index
tuple while vacuuming.
Problem reported by Tatsuo Ishii and fixed by Amit Langote.
Discussion at "[HACKERS] BRIN INDEX value (message id :20150903.174935.1946402199422994347.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp)
Backpatched to 9.5 in which brin index was added.
In some corner cases, it is possible for the BRIN index relation to be
extended by brin_getinsertbuffer but the new page not be used
immediately for anything by its callers; when this happens, the page is
initialized and the FSM is updated (by brin_getinsertbuffer) with the
info about that page, but these actions are not WAL-logged. A later
index insert/update can use the page, but since the page is already
initialized, the initialization itself is not WAL-logged then either.
Replay of this sequence of events causes recovery to fail altogether.
There is a related corner case within brin_getinsertbuffer itself, in
which we extend the relation to put a new index tuple there, but later
find out that we cannot do so, and do not return the buffer; the page
obtained from extension is not even initialized. The resulting page is
lost forever.
To fix, shuffle the code so that initialization is not the
responsibility of brin_getinsertbuffer anymore, in normal cases;
instead, the initialization is done by its callers (brin_doinsert and
brin_doupdate) once they're certain that the page is going to be used.
When either those functions determine that the new page cannot be used,
before bailing out they initialize the page as an empty regular page,
enter it in FSM and WAL-log all this. This way, the page is usable for
future index insertions, and WAL replay doesn't find trying to insert
tuples in pages whose initialization didn't make it to the WAL. The
same strategy is used in brin_getinsertbuffer when it cannot return the
new page.
Additionally, add a new step to vacuuming so that all pages of the index
are scanned; whenever an uninitialized page is found, it is initialized
as empty and WAL-logged. This closes the hole that the relation is
extended but the system crashes before anything is WAL-logged about it.
We also take this opportunity to update the FSM, in case it has gotten
out of date.
Thanks to Heikki Linnakangas for finding the problem that kicked some
additional analysis of BRIN page assignment code.
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150723204810.GY5596@postgresql.org
For correctness of summarization results, it is critical that the
snapshot used during the summarization scan is able to see all tuples
that are live to all transactions -- including tuples inserted or
deleted by in-progress transactions. Otherwise, it would be possible
for a transaction to insert a tuple, then idle for a long time while a
concurrent transaction executes summarization of the range: this would
result in the inserted value not being considered in the summary.
Previously we were trying to use a MVCC snapshot in conjunction with
adding a "placeholder" tuple in the index: the snapshot would see all
committed tuples, and the placeholder tuple would catch insertions by
any new inserters. The hole is that prior insertions by transactions
that are still in progress by the time the MVCC snapshot was taken were
ignored.
Kevin Grittner reported this as a bogus error message during vacuum with
default transaction isolation mode set to repeatable read (because the
error report mentioned a function name not being invoked during), but
the problem is larger than that.
To fix, tweak IndexBuildHeapRangeScan to have a new mode that behaves
the way we need using SnapshotAny visibility rules. This change
simplifies the BRIN code a bit, mainly by removing large comments that
were mistaken. Instead, rely on the SnapshotAny semantics to provide
what it needs. (The business about a placeholder tuple needs to remain:
that covers the case that a transaction inserts a a tuple in a page that
summarization already scanned.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150731175700.GX2441@postgresql.org
In passing, remove a couple of unused declarations from brin.h and
reword a comment to be proper English. This part submitted by Kevin
Grittner.
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
The code was assuming that any NULL value in scan keys was due to IS
NULL or IS NOT NULL, but it turns out to be possible to get them with
other operators too, if they are used in contrived-enough ways. Easiest
way out of the problem seems to check explicitely for the IS NOT NULL
flag, instead of assuming it must be set if the IS NULL flag is not set,
when a null scan key is found; if neither flag is set, follow the lead
of other index AMs and assume that all indexable operators must be
strict, and thus the query is never satisfiable.
Also, add a comment to try and lure some future hacker into improving
analysis of scan keys in brin.
Per report from Andreas Seltenreich; diagnosis by Tom Lane.
Backpatch to 9.5.
Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20646.1437919632@sss.pgh.pa.us
This removes some info about support procedures being used, which was
obsoleted by commit db5f98ab4f, as well as add some more documentation
on how to create new opclasses using the Minmax infrastructure.
(Hopefully we can get something similar for Inclusion as well.)
In passing, fix some obsolete mentions of "mmtuples" in source code
comments.
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
This lets BRIN be used with R-Tree-like indexing strategies.
Also provided are operator classes for range types, box and inet/cidr.
The infrastructure provided here should be sufficient to create operator
classes for similar datatypes; for instance, opclasses for PostGIS
geometries should be doable, though we didn't try to implement one.
(A box/point opclass was also submitted, but we ripped it out before
commit because the handling of floating point comparisons in existing
code is inconsistent and would generate corrupt indexes.)
Author: Emre Hasegeli. Cosmetic changes by me
Review: Andreas Karlsson
Get rid of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1() macros, which are quite inappropriate
for built-in functions (possibly leftovers from testing as a loadable
module?). Also, fix gratuitous inconsistency between SQL-level and
C-level names of the minmax support functions.
Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and
block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that
need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up
recovery, etc.
There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData
chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions,
which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the
record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is
written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function.
This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig
the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to
be passed as arguments.
For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record
after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into
MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record,
but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet*
functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which
contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain
XLogRecord.
The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller,
by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now
stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after
XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also
removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise
be more bulky than the old format.
Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera,
Fujii Masao.
Besides a couple of typo fixes, per David Rowley, Thom Brown, and Amit
Langote, and mentions of BRIN in the general CREATE INDEX page again per
David, this includes silencing MSVC compiler warnings (thanks Microsoft)
and an additional variable initialization per Coverity scanner.
Reported by David Rowley: variadic macros are a problem. Get rid of
them using a trick suggested by Tom Lane: add extra parentheses where
needed. In the future we might decide we don't need the calls at all
and remove them, but it seems appropriate to keep them while this code
is still new.
Also from David Rowley: brininsert() was trying to use a variable before
initializing it. Fix by moving the brin_form_tuple call (which
initializes the variable) to within the locked section.
Reported by Peter Eisentraut: can't use "new" as a struct member name,
because C++ compilers will choke on it, as reported by cpluspluscheck.
BRIN is a new index access method intended to accelerate scans of very
large tables, without the maintenance overhead of btrees or other
traditional indexes. They work by maintaining "summary" data about
block ranges. Bitmap index scans work by reading each summary tuple and
comparing them with the query quals; all pages in the range are returned
in a lossy TID bitmap if the quals are consistent with the values in the
summary tuple, otherwise not. Normal index scans are not supported
because these indexes do not store TIDs.
As new tuples are added into the index, the summary information is
updated (if the block range in which the tuple is added is already
summarized) or not; in the latter case, a subsequent pass of VACUUM or
the brin_summarize_new_values() function will create the summary
information.
For data types with natural 1-D sort orders, the summary info consists
of the maximum and the minimum values of each indexed column within each
page range. This type of operator class we call "Minmax", and we
supply a bunch of them for most data types with B-tree opclasses.
Since the BRIN code is generalized, other approaches are possible for
things such as arrays, geometric types, ranges, etc; even for things
such as enum types we could do something different than minmax with
better results. In this commit I only include minmax.
Catalog version bumped due to new builtin catalog entries.
There's more that could be done here, but this is a good step forwards.
Loosely based on ideas from Simon Riggs; code mostly by Álvaro Herrera,
with contribution by Heikki Linnakangas.
Patch reviewed by: Amit Kapila, Heikki Linnakangas, Robert Haas.
Testing help from Jeff Janes, Erik Rijkers, Emanuel Calvo.
PS:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under
grant agreement n° 318633.
Tatsuo Ishii
Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas
Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas