pghackers proposal of 8-Nov. All the existing cross-type comparison
operators (int2/int4/int8 and float4/float8) have appropriate support.
The original proposal of storing the right-hand-side datatype as part of
the primary key for pg_amop and pg_amproc got modified a bit in the event;
it is easier to store zero as the 'default' case and only store a nonzero
when the operator is actually cross-type. Along the way, remove the
long-since-defunct bigbox_ops operator class.
Remove the 'strategy map' code, which was a large amount of mechanism
that no longer had any use except reverse-mapping from procedure OID to
strategy number. Passing the strategy number to the index AM in the
first place is simpler and faster.
This is a preliminary step in planned support for cross-datatype index
operations. I'm committing it now since the ScanKeyEntryInitialize()
API change touches quite a lot of files, and I want to commit those
changes before the tree drifts under me.
regression=# select 1 from tenk1 ta cross join tenk1 tb for update;
ERROR: no relation entry for relid 3
7.3 said "SELECT FOR UPDATE cannot be applied to a join", which was better
but still wrong, considering that 7.2 took the query just fine. Fix by
making transformForUpdate() ignore JOIN and other special RTE types,
rather than trying to mark them FOR UPDATE. The actual error message now
only appears if you explicitly name the join in FOR UPDATE.
process the command as though it were issued by the object owner.
This prevents creating weird scenarios in which the same privileges
may appear to flow from different sources, and ensures that a superuser
can in fact revoke all privileges if he wants to. In particular this
means that the regression tests work when run by a superuser other than
the original bootstrap userid. Per report from Larry Rosenman.
behavior of malloc and realloc when request size is 0. Fix escape
sequence recognizer so that only valid 3-digit octal sequences are
treated as escape sequences ... isdigit() is not a correct test.
rule split the query into one INSERT and one UPDATE where the UPDATE
then hit's the just created row without modifying the key fields again.
In this special case, the new key slipped in totally unchecked.
Jan
offered for completion only when the input-so-far is at least 'pg_'.
This seems to be the best compromise behavior emerging from yesterday's
discussion. While at it, refactor code to eliminate repetitive use of
nearly identical queries, which was exceedingly tedious to maintain.
Also const-ify code more thoroughly in hopes of moving constant data into
text segment, and remove unnecessary length limit on queries.
Tom Lane
Jan Wieck
Bruce Momjian
Michael Meskes
Peter Eisentraut
Dave Cramer