Commit Graph

918 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Paquier dc2db1eac3 Remove unnecessary assertion in postmaster.c
A code path asserted that the archiver was dead, but a check made that
impossible to happen.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW=CYE1ars+2XyPTEPq0wQvru4c0dPZ=Nrn3EqNBkksvQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-throgh: 14
2021-07-15 15:00:45 +09:00
Tom Lane bc2a389efb Be more verbose when the postmaster unexpectedly quits.
Emit a LOG message when the postmaster stops because of a failure in
the startup process.  There already is a similar message if we exit
for that reason during PM_STARTUP phase, so it seems inconsistent
that there was none if the startup process fails later on.

Also emit a LOG message when the postmaster stops after a crash
because restart_after_crash is disabled.  This seems potentially
helpful in case DBAs (or developers) forget that that's set.
Also, it was the only remaining place where the postmaster would
do an abnormal exit without any comment as to why.

In passing, remove an unreachable call of ExitPostmaster(0).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/194914.1621641288@sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-05-23 10:50:21 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 354f32d01d
Unbreak EXEC_BACKEND build
Per buildfarm
2021-05-15 15:17:15 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera cafde58b33
Allow compute_query_id to be set to 'auto' and make it default
Allowing only on/off meant that all either all existing configuration
guides would become obsolete if we disabled it by default, or that we
would have to accept a performance loss in the default config if we
enabled it by default.  By allowing 'auto' as a middle ground, the
performance cost is only paid by those who enable pg_stat_statements and
similar modules.

I only edited the release notes to comment-out a paragraph that is now
factually wrong; further edits are probably needed to describe the
related change in more detail.

Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210513002623.eugftm4nk2lvvks3@nol
2021-05-15 14:13:09 -04:00
Tom Lane def5b065ff Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.
Also "make reformat-dat-files".

The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
2021-05-12 13:14:10 -04:00
Thomas Munro 8e861eaae8 Explain postmaster's treatment of SIGURG.
Add a few words of comment to explain why SIGURG doesn't follow the
dummy_handler pattern used for SIGUSR2, since that might otherwise
appear to be a bug.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4006115.1618577212%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2021-04-19 10:35:51 +12:00
Fujii Masao df9384492b Improve connection denied error message during recovery.
Previously when an archive recovery or a standby was starting and
reached the consistent recovery state but hot_standby was configured
to off, the error message when a client connectted was "the database
system is starting up", which was needless confusing and not really
all that accurate either.

This commit improves the connection denied error message during
recovery, as follows, so that the users immediately know that their
servers are configured to deny those connections.

- If hot_standby is disabled, the error message "the database system
  is not accepting connections" and the detail message "Hot standby
  mode is disabled." are output when clients connect while an archive
  recovery or a standby is running.

- If hot_standby is enabled, the error message "the database system
  is not yet accepting connections" and the detail message
  "Consistent recovery state has not been yet reached." are output
  when clients connect until the consistent recovery state is reached
  and postmaster starts accepting read only connections.

This commit doesn't change the connection denied error message of
"the database system is starting up" during normal server startup and
crash recovery. Because it's still suitable for those situations.

Author: James Coleman
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Andres Freund, David Zhang, Tom Lane, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8h5ES_B=F_zDT+Nj9XU7YEwNhKhHA2RE4CFhAQ93hfig@mail.gmail.com
2021-03-25 10:41:28 +09:00
Fujii Masao fd31214075 Fix comments in postmaster.c.
Commit 86c23a6eb2 changed the option to specify that postgres will
stop all other server processes by sending the signal SIGSTOP,
from -s to -T. But previously there were comments incorrectly
explaining that SIGSTOP behavior is set by -s option. This commit
fixes them.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210316.165141.1400441966284654043.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
2021-03-19 11:28:54 +09:00
Tomas Vondra cd91de0d17 Remove temporary files after backend crash
After a crash of a backend using temporary files, the files used to be
left behind, on the basis that it might be useful for debugging. But we
don't have any reports of anyone actually doing that, and it means the
disk usage may grow over time due to repeated backend failures (possibly
even hitting ENOSPC). So this behavior is a bit unfortunate, and fixing
it required either manual cleanup (deleting files, which is error-prone)
or restart of the instance (i.e. service disruption).

This implements automatic cleanup of temporary files, controled by a new
GUC remove_temp_files_after_crash. By default the files are removed, but
it can be disabled to restore the old behavior if needed.

Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Michael Paquier, Anastasia Lubennikova, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH503wDKdYzyq7U-QJqGn%3DGm6XmoK%2B6_6xTJ-Yn5WSvoHLY1Ww%40mail.gmail.com
2021-03-18 17:38:28 +01:00
Fujii Masao d75288fb27 Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
This commit changes WAL archiver process so that it's treated as
an auxiliary process and can use shared memory. This is an infrastructure
patch required for upcoming shared-memory based stats collector patch
series. These patch series basically need any processes including archiver
that can report the statistics to access to shared memory. Since this patch
itself is useful to simplify the code and when users monitor the status of
archiver, it's committed separately in advance.

This commit simplifies the code for WAL archiving. For example, previously
backends need to signal to archiver via postmaster when they notify
archiver that there are some WAL files to archive. On the other hand,
this commit removes that signal to postmaster and enables backends to
notify archier directly using shared latch.

Also, as the side of this change, the information about archiver process
becomes viewable at pg_stat_activity view.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Julien Rouhaud, Tomas Vondra, Arthur Zakirov, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180629.173418.190173462.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
2021-03-15 13:13:14 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas 3174d69fb9 Remove server and libpq support for old FE/BE protocol version 2.
Protocol version 3 was introduced in PostgreSQL 7.4. There shouldn't be
many clients or servers left out there without version 3 support. But as
a courtesy, I kept just enough of the old protocol support that we can
still send the "unsupported protocol version" error in v2 format, so that
old clients can display the message properly. Likewise, libpq still
understands v2 ErrorResponse messages when establishing a connection.

The impetus to do this now is that I'm working on a patch to COPY
FROM, to always prefetch some data. We cannot do that safely with the
old protocol, because it requires parsing the input one byte at a time
to detect the end-of-copy marker.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera, John Naylor
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ec25819-0a8a-d51a-17dc-4150bb3cca3b%40iki.fi
2021-03-04 10:45:55 +02:00
Thomas Munro 83709a0d5a Use SIGURG rather than SIGUSR1 for latches.
Traditionally, SIGUSR1 has been overloaded for ad-hoc signals,
procsignal.c signals and latch.c wakeups.  Move that last use over to a
new dedicated signal.  SIGURG is normally used to report out-of-band
socket data, but PostgreSQL doesn't use that facility.

The signal handler is now installed in all postmaster children by
InitializeLatchSupport().  Those wishing to disconnect from it should
call ShutdownLatchSupport().

Future patches will use this separation of signals to avoid the need for
a signal handler on some operating systems.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJjxPDpzBE0a3hyUywBvaZuC89yx3jK9RFZgfv_KHU7gg@mail.gmail.com
2021-03-01 12:44:12 +13:00
Peter Eisentraut 0e392fcc0d Use errmsg_internal for debug messages
An inconsistent set of debug-level messages was not using
errmsg_internal(), thus uselessly exposing the messages to translation
work.  Fix those.
2021-02-17 11:33:25 +01:00
Bruce Momjian ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Tom Lane 622ae4621e Fix assorted issues in backend's GSSAPI encryption support.
Unrecoverable errors detected by GSSAPI encryption can't just be
reported with elog(ERROR) or elog(FATAL), because attempting to
send the error report to the client is likely to lead to infinite
recursion or loss of protocol sync.  Instead make this code do what
the SSL encryption code has long done, which is to just report any
such failure to the server log (with elevel COMMERROR), then pretend
we've lost the connection by returning errno = ECONNRESET.

Along the way, fix confusion about whether message translation is done
by pg_GSS_error() or its callers (the latter should do it), and make
the backend version of that function work more like the frontend
version.

Avoid allocating the port->gss struct until it's needed; we surely
don't need to allocate it in the postmaster.

Improve logging of "connection authorized" messages with GSS enabled.
(As part of this, I back-patched the code changes from dc11f31a1.)

Make BackendStatusShmemSize() account for the GSS-related space that
will be allocated by CreateSharedBackendStatus().  This omission
could possibly cause out-of-shared-memory problems with very high
max_connections settings.

Remove arbitrary, pointless restriction that only GSS authentication
can be used on a GSS-encrypted connection.

Improve documentation; notably, document the fact that libpq now
prefers GSS encryption over SSL encryption if both are possible.

Per report from Mikael Gustavsson.  Back-patch to v12 where
this code was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e5b0b6ed05764324a2f3fe7acfc766d5@smhi.se
2020-12-28 17:44:17 -05:00
Bruce Momjian 3187ef7c46 Revert "Add key management system" (978f869b99) & later commits
The patch needs test cases, reorganization, and cfbot testing.
Technically reverts commits 5c31afc49d..e35b2bad1a (exclusive/inclusive)
and 08db7c63f3..ccbe34139b.

Reported-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1ktAAG-0002V2-VB@gemulon.postgresql.org
2020-12-27 21:37:42 -05:00
Bruce Momjian 978f869b99 Add key management system
This adds a key management system that stores (currently) two data
encryption keys of length 128, 192, or 256 bits.  The data keys are
AES256 encrypted using a key encryption key, and validated via GCM
cipher mode.  A command to obtain the key encryption key must be
specified at initdb time, and will be run at every database server
start.  New parameters allow a file descriptor open to the terminal to
be passed.  pg_upgrade support has also been added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k7q5o6Nc_AaX6BcYM9yqTbC6_pnH-6nSD=54Zp6NBQTCQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201202213814.GG20285@momjian.us

Author: Masahiko Sawada, me, Stephen Frost
2020-12-25 10:19:44 -05:00
Tom Lane 7519bd16d1 Fix race condition between shutdown and unstarted background workers.
If a database shutdown (smart or fast) is commanded between the time
some process decides to request a new background worker and the time
that the postmaster can launch that worker, then nothing happens
because the postmaster won't launch any bgworkers once it's exited
PM_RUN state.  This is fine ... unless the requesting process is
waiting for that worker to finish (or even for it to start); in that
case the requestor is stuck, and only manual intervention will get us
to the point of being able to shut down.

To fix, cancel pending requests for workers when the postmaster sends
shutdown (SIGTERM) signals, and similarly cancel any new requests that
arrive after that point.  (We can optimize things slightly by only
doing the cancellation for workers that have waiters.)  To fit within
the existing bgworker APIs, the "cancel" is made to look like the
worker was started and immediately stopped, causing deregistration of
the bgworker entry.  Waiting processes would have to deal with
premature worker exit anyway, so this should introduce no bugs that
weren't there before.  We do have a side effect that registration
records for restartable bgworkers might disappear when theoretically
they should have remained in place; but since we're shutting down,
that shouldn't matter.

Back-patch to v10.  There might be value in putting this into 9.6
as well, but the management of bgworkers is a bit different there
(notably see 8ff518699) and I'm not convinced it's worth the effort
to validate the patch for that branch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/661570.1608673226@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-12-24 17:00:43 -05:00
Tom Lane 7e784d1dc1 Improve client error messages for immediate-stop situations.
Up to now, if the DBA issued "pg_ctl stop -m immediate", the message
sent to clients was the same as for a crash-and-restart situation.
This is confusing, not least because the message claims that the
database will soon be up again, something we have no business
predicting.

Improve things so that we can generate distinct messages for the two
cases (and also recognize an ad-hoc SIGQUIT, should somebody try that).
To do that, add a field to pmsignal.c's shared memory data structure
that the postmaster sets just before broadcasting SIGQUIT to its
children.  No interlocking seems to be necessary; the intervening
signal-sending and signal-receipt should sufficiently serialize accesses
to the field.  Hence, this isn't any riskier than the existing usages
of pmsignal.c.

We might in future extend this idea to improve other
postmaster-to-children signal scenarios, although none of them
currently seem to be as badly overloaded as SIGQUIT.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/559291.1608587013@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-12-24 12:58:32 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut eb93f3a0b6 Convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport() where appropriate
User-visible log messages should go through ereport(), so they are
subject to translation.  Many remaining elog(LOG) calls are really
debugging calls.

Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/92d6f545-5102-65d8-3c87-489f71ea0a37%40enterprisedb.com
2020-12-04 14:25:23 +01:00
Magnus Hagander 3f16cb505d Fix out of date comment 2020-11-10 13:15:44 +01:00
Magnus Hagander d2e4bf688e Remove -o option to postmaster
This option was declared obsolete many years ago.

Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEyOE=9CQwZm2j=vwP5+6OLCSoxn9pBjK8gyRdkTzMfqtQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-11-10 13:15:01 +01:00
Tom Lane 44fc6e259b Centralize setup of SIGQUIT handling for postmaster child processes.
We decided that the policy established in commit 7634bd4f6 for
the bgwriter, checkpointer, walwriter, and walreceiver processes,
namely that they should accept SIGQUIT at all times, really ought
to apply uniformly to all postmaster children.  Therefore, get
rid of the duplicative and inconsistent per-process code for
establishing that signal handler and removing SIGQUIT from BlockSig.
Instead, make InitPostmasterChild do it.

The handler set up by InitPostmasterChild is SignalHandlerForCrashExit,
which just summarily does _exit(2).  In interactive backends, we
almost immediately replace that with quickdie, since we would prefer
to try to tell the client that we're dying.  However, this patch is
changing the behavior of autovacuum (both launcher and workers), as
well as walsenders.  Those processes formerly also used quickdie,
but AFAICS that was just mindless copy-and-paste: they don't have
any interactive client that's likely to benefit from being told this.

The stats collector continues to be an outlier, in that it thinks
SIGQUIT means normal exit.  That should probably be changed for
consistency, but there's another patch set where that's being
dealt with, so I didn't do so here.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/644875.1599933441@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-09-16 16:04:36 -04:00
Tom Lane 10095ca634 Log a message when resorting to SIGKILL during shutdown/crash recovery.
Currently, no useful trace is left in the logs when the postmaster
is forced to use SIGKILL to shut down children that failed to respond
to SIGQUIT.  Some questions were raised about how often that scenario
happens in the buildfarm, so let's add a LOG-level message showing
that it happened.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-09-11 12:24:46 -04:00
Tom Lane 6693a96b32 Don't run atexit callbacks during signal exits from ProcessStartupPacket.
Although 58c6feccf fixed the case for SIGQUIT, we were still calling
proc_exit() from signal handlers for SIGTERM and timeout failures in
ProcessStartupPacket.  Fortunately, at the point where that code runs,
we haven't yet connected to shared memory in any meaningful way, so
there is nothing we need to undo in shared memory.  This means it
should be safe to use _exit(1) here, ie, not run any atexit handlers
but also inform the postmaster that it's not a crash exit.

To make sure nobody breaks the "nothing to undo" expectation, add
a cross-check that no on-shmem-exit or before-shmem-exit handlers
have been registered yet when we finish using these signal handlers.

This change is simple enough that maybe it could be back-patched,
but I won't risk that right now.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-09-11 12:20:16 -04:00
Tom Lane 58c6feccfa Use _exit(2) for SIGQUIT during ProcessStartupPacket, too.
Bring the signal handling for startup-packet collection into line
with the policy established in commits bedadc732 and 8e19a8264,
namely don't risk running atexit callbacks when handling SIGQUIT.

Ideally, we'd not do so for SIGTERM or timeout interrupts either,
but that change seems a bit too risky for the back branches.
For now, just improve the comments in this area to describe the risk.

Also relocate where BackendInitialize re-disables these interrupts,
to minimize the code span where they're active.  This doesn't buy
a whole lot of safety, but it can't hurt.

In passing, rename startup_die() to remove confusion about whether
it is for the startup process.

Like the previous commits, back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-09-10 12:06:37 -04:00
Tom Lane 0038f94387 Fix postmaster's behavior during smart shutdown.
Up to now, upon receipt of a SIGTERM ("smart shutdown" command), the
postmaster has immediately killed all "optional" background processes,
and subsequently refused to launch new ones while it's waiting for
foreground client processes to exit.  No doubt this seemed like an OK
policy at some point; but it's a pretty bad one now, because it makes
for a seriously degraded environment for the remaining clients:

* Parallel queries are killed, and new ones fail to launch. (And our
parallel-query infrastructure utterly fails to deal with the case
in a reasonable way --- it just hangs waiting for workers that are
not going to arrive.  There is more work needed in that area IMO.)

* Autovacuum ceases to function.  We can tolerate that for awhile,
but if bulk-update queries continue to run in the surviving client
sessions, there's eventually going to be a mess.  In the worst case
the system could reach a forced shutdown to prevent XID wraparound.

* The bgwriter and walwriter are also stopped immediately, likely
resulting in performance degradation.

Hence, let's rearrange things so that the only immediate change in
behavior is refusing to let in new normal connections.  Once the last
normal connection is gone, shut everything down as though we'd received
a "fast" shutdown.  To implement this, remove the PM_WAIT_BACKUP and
PM_WAIT_READONLY states, instead staying in PM_RUN or PM_HOT_STANDBY
while normal connections remain.  A subsidiary state variable tracks
whether or not we're letting in new connections in those states.

This also allows having just one copy of the logic for killing child
processes in smart and fast shutdown modes.  I moved that logic into
PostmasterStateMachine() by inventing a new state PM_STOP_BACKENDS.

Back-patch to 9.6 where parallel query was added.  In principle
this'd be a good idea in 9.5 as well, but the risk/reward ratio
is not as good there, since lack of autovacuum is not a problem
during typical uses of smart shutdown.

Per report from Bharath Rupireddy.

Patch by me, reviewed by Thomas Munro

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXAZ5vKxT9P7P89D87i3MDO9bfS+_bjMHgnWJs8uwUOOw@mail.gmail.com
2020-08-14 13:26:57 -04:00
Tom Lane 3546cf8a7a Improve comments for postmaster.c's BackendList.
This had gotten a little disjointed over time, and some of the grammar
was sloppy.  Rewrite for more clarity.

In passing, re-pgindent some recently added comments.

No code changes.
2020-08-12 11:54:16 -04:00
Thomas Munro 3347c982ba Use a long lived WaitEventSet for WaitLatch().
Create LatchWaitSet at backend startup time, and use it to implement
WaitLatch().  This avoids repeated epoll/kqueue setup and teardown
system calls.

Reorder SubPostmasterMain() slightly so that we restore the postmaster
pipe and Windows signal emulation before we reach InitPostmasterChild(),
to make this work in EXEC_BACKEND builds.

Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJAC4Oqao%3DqforhNey20J8CiG2R%3DoBPqvfR0vOJrFysGw%40mail.gmail.com
2020-07-30 17:40:00 +12:00
Fujii Masao b5310e4ff6 Remove non-fast promotion.
When fast promotion was supported in 9.3, non-fast promotion became
undocumented feature and it's basically not available for ordinary users.
However we decided not to remove non-fast promotion at that moment,
to leave it for a release or two for debugging purpose or as an emergency
method because fast promotion might have some issues, and then to
remove it later. Now, several versions were released since that decision
and there is no longer reason to keep supporting non-fast promotion.
Therefore this commit removes non-fast promotion.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Hamid Akhtar, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/76066434-648f-f567-437b-54853b43398f@oss.nttdata.com
2020-07-29 21:24:26 +09:00
Andres Freund 5e7bbb5286 code: replace 'master' with 'primary' where appropriate.
Also changed "in the primary" to "on the primary", and added a few
"the" before "primary".

Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200615182235.x7lch5n6kcjq4aue@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-07-08 12:57:23 -07:00
Peter Eisentraut 0fd2a79a63 Spelling adjustments 2020-06-07 15:06:51 +02:00
Tom Lane 5cbfce562f Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v13.
Includes some manual cleanup of places that pgindent messed up,
most of which weren't per project style anyway.

Notably, it seems some people didn't absorb the style rules of
commit c9d297751, because there were a bunch of new occurrences
of function calls with a newline just after the left paren, all
with faulty expectations about how the rest of the call would get
indented.
2020-05-14 13:06:50 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 17cc133f01
Dial back -Wimplicit-fallthrough to level 3
The additional pain from level 4 is excessive for the gain.

Also revert all the source annotation changes to their original
wordings, to avoid back-patching pain.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31166.1589378554@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-05-13 15:31:14 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera 3e9744465d
Add -Wimplicit-fallthrough to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
Use it at level 4, a bit more restrictive than the default level, and
tweak our commanding comments to FALLTHROUGH.

(However, leave zic.c alone, since it's external code; to avoid the
warnings that would appear there, change CFLAGS for that file in the
Makefile.)

Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200412081825.qyo5vwwco3fv4gdo@nol
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/E1fDenm-0000C8-IJ@gemulon.postgresql.org
2020-05-12 16:07:30 -04:00
Stephen Frost b68a560f8e Fix GSS client to non-GSS server connection
If the client is compiled with GSSAPI support and tries to start up GSS
with the server, but the server is not compiled with GSSAPI support, we
would mistakenly end up falling through to call ProcessStartupPacket
with secure_done = true, but the client might then try to perform SSL,
which the backend wouldn't understand and we'd end up failing the
connection with:

FATAL:  unsupported frontend protocol 1234.5679: server supports 2.0 to 3.0

Fix by arranging to track ssl_done independently from gss_done, instead
of trying to use the same boolean for both.

Author: Andrew Gierth
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h82kzwqn.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Backpatch: 12-, where GSSAPI encryption was added.
2020-05-02 11:39:26 -04:00
Andres Freund fc3f4453a2 Recompute stack base in forked postmaster children.
This is for the benefit of running postgres under the rr
debugger. When using rr signal handlers running while a syscall is
active use an alternative stack. As e.g. bgworkers are started from
within signal handlers, the forked backend then has a different stack
base than postmaster. Previously that subsequently lead to those
processes triggering spurious "stack depth limit exceeded" errors.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200327182217.ubrrl32lyfhxfwk5@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-04-05 18:23:30 -07:00
Andrew Dunstan 896fcdb230 Provide a TLS init hook
The default hook function sets the default password callback function.
In order to allow preloaded libraries to have an opportunity to override
the default, TLS initialization if now delayed slightly until after
shared preloaded libraries have been loaded.

A test module is provided which contains a trivial example that decodes
an obfuscated password for an SSL certificate.

Author: Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed By: Andreas Karlsson, Asaba Takanori
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/04116472-818b-5859-1d74-3d995aab2252@2ndQuadrant.com
2020-03-25 17:13:17 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 8e8a0becb3 Unify several ways to tracking backend type
Add a new global variable MyBackendType that uses the same BackendType
enum that was previously only used by the stats collector.  That way
several duplicate ways of checking what type a particular process is
can be simplified.  Since it's no longer just for stats, move to
miscinit.c and rename existing functions to match the expanded
purpose.

Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c65e5196-4f04-4ead-9353-6088c19615a3@2ndquadrant.com
2020-03-13 14:01:10 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut bf68b79e50 Refactor ps_status.c API
The init_ps_display() arguments were mostly lies by now, so to match
typical usage, just use one argument and let the caller assemble it
from multiple sources if necessary.  The only user of the additional
arguments is BackendInitialize(), which was already doing string
assembly on the caller side anyway.

Remove the second argument of set_ps_display() ("force") and just
handle that in init_ps_display() internally.

BackendInitialize() also used to set the initial status as
"authentication", but that was very far from where authentication
actually happened.  So now it's set to "initializing" and then
"authentication" just before the actual call to
ClientAuthentication().

Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c65e5196-4f04-4ead-9353-6088c19615a3@2ndquadrant.com
2020-03-11 16:38:31 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut 864934131e Refer to bug report address by symbol rather than hardcoding
Use the PACKAGE_BUGREPORT macro that is created by Autoconf for
referring to the bug reporting address rather than hardcoding it
everywhere.  This makes it easier to change the address and it reduces
translation work.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8d389c5f-7fb5-8e48-9a4a-68cec44786fa%402ndquadrant.com
2020-02-28 13:12:21 +01:00
Tom Lane 3d475515a1 Account explicitly for long-lived FDs that are allocated outside fd.c.
The comments in fd.c have long claimed that all file allocations should
go through that module, but in reality that's not always practical.
fd.c doesn't supply APIs for invoking some FD-producing syscalls like
pipe() or epoll_create(); and the APIs it does supply for non-virtual
FDs are mostly insistent on releasing those FDs at transaction end;
and in some cases the actual open() call is in code that can't be made
to use fd.c, such as libpq.

This has led to a situation where, in a modern server, there are likely
to be seven or so long-lived FDs per backend process that are not known
to fd.c.  Since NUM_RESERVED_FDS is only 10, that meant we had *very*
few spare FDs if max_files_per_process is >= the system ulimit and
fd.c had opened all the files it thought it safely could.  The
contrib/postgres_fdw regression test, in particular, could easily be
made to fall over by running it under a restrictive ulimit.

To improve matters, invent functions Acquire/Reserve/ReleaseExternalFD
that allow outside callers to tell fd.c that they have or want to allocate
a FD that's not directly managed by fd.c.  Add calls to track all the
fixed FDs in a standard backend session, so that we are honestly
guaranteeing that NUM_RESERVED_FDS FDs remain unused below the EMFILE
limit in a backend's idle state.  The coding rules for these functions say
that there's no need to call them in code that just allocates one FD over
a fairly short interval; we can dip into NUM_RESERVED_FDS for such cases.
That means that there aren't all that many places where we need to worry.
But postgres_fdw and dblink must use this facility to account for
long-lived FDs consumed by libpq connections.  There may be other places
where it's worth doing such accounting, too, but this seems like enough
to solve the immediate problem.

Internally to fd.c, "external" FDs are limited to max_safe_fds/3 FDs.
(Callers can choose to ignore this limit, but of course it's unwise
to do so except for fixed file allocations.)  I also reduced the limit
on "allocated" files to max_safe_fds/3 FDs (it had been max_safe_fds/2).
Conceivably a smarter rule could be used here --- but in practice,
on reasonable systems, max_safe_fds should be large enough that this
isn't much of an issue, so KISS for now.  To avoid possible regression
in the number of external or allocated files that can be opened,
increase FD_MINFREE and the lower limit on max_files_per_process a
little bit; we now insist that the effective "ulimit -n" be at least 64.

This seems like pretty clearly a bug fix, but in view of the lack of
field complaints, I'll refrain from risking a back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1izCmM-0005pV-Co@gemulon.postgresql.org
2020-02-24 17:28:33 -05:00
Michael Paquier 10a525230f Fix some memory leaks and improve restricted token handling on Windows
The leaks have been detected by a Coverity run on Windows.  No backpatch
is done as the leaks are minor.

While on it, make restricted token creation more consistent in its error
handling by logging an error instead of a warning if missing
advapi32.dll, which was missing in the NT4 days.  Any modern platform
should have this DLL around.  Now, if the library is not there, an error
is still reported back to the caller, and nothing is done do there is no
behavior change done in this commit.

Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQApa9MG0foPkgPX87fipk=vhnF2Xfg+CfUyR08h4R7Mywg@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-27 11:02:05 +09:00
Bruce Momjian 7559d8ebfa Update copyrights for 2020
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2020-01-01 12:21:45 -05:00
Tom Lane 7bf40ea0d0 Avoid using SplitIdentifierString to parse ListenAddresses, too.
This gets rid of our former behavior of forcibly downcasing
the postmaster's hostname list and truncating the elements to
NAMEDATALEN.  In principle, DNS hostnames are case-insensitive
so the first behavior should be harmless, and server hostnames
are seldom long enough for the second behavior to be an issue.
But it's still dubious, and an easy fix is available: just use
SplitGUCList instead.

AFAICT, all other SplitIdentifierString calls in the backend are
OK: either the items actually are SQL identifiers, or they are
keywords that are short and case-insensitive.

Per thinking about bug #16106.  While this has been wrong for
a very long time, the lack of field complaints means there's
little reason to back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16106-7d319e4295d08e70@postgresql.org
2019-11-13 13:51:58 -05:00
Tom Lane 9abb2bfc04 In the postmaster, rely on the signal infrastructure to block signals.
POSIX sigaction(2) can be told to block a set of signals while a
signal handler executes.  Make use of that instead of manually
blocking and unblocking signals in the postmaster's signal handlers.
This should save a few cycles, and it also prevents recursive
invocation of signal handlers when many signals arrive in close
succession.  We have seen buildfarm failures that seem to be due to
postmaster stack overflow caused by such recursion (exacerbated by
a Linux PPC64 kernel bug).

This doesn't change anything about the way that it works on Windows.
Somebody might consider adjusting port/win32/signal.c to let it work
similarly, but I'm not in a position to do that.

For the moment, just apply to HEAD.  Possibly we should consider
back-patching this, but it'd be good to let it age awhile first.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14878.1570820201@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-10-13 15:48:26 -04:00
Tom Lane 3887e9455f Check for too many postmaster children before spawning a bgworker.
The postmaster's code path for spawning a bgworker neglected to check
whether we already have the max number of live child processes.  That's
a bit hard to hit, since it would necessarily be a transient condition;
but if we do, AssignPostmasterChildSlot() fails causing a postmaster
crash, as seen in a report from Bhargav Kamineni.

To fix, invoke canAcceptConnections() in the bgworker code path, as we
do in the other code paths that spawn children.  Since we don't want
the same pmState tests in this case, add a child-process-type parameter
to canAcceptConnections() so that it can know what to do.

Back-patch to 9.5.  In principle the same hazard exists in 9.4, but the
code is enough different that this patch wouldn't quite fix it there.
Given the tiny usage of bgworkers in that branch it doesn't seem worth
creating a variant patch for it.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18733.1570382257@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-10-07 12:39:09 -04:00
Tom Lane 9a86f03b4e Rearrange postmaster's startup sequence for better syslogger results.
This is a second try at what commit 57431a911 tried to do, namely,
launch the syslogger before we open postmaster sockets so that our
messages about the sockets end up in the syslogger files.  That
commit fell foul of a bunch of subtle issues caused by trying to
launch a postmaster child process before creating shared memory.
Rather than messing with that interaction, let's postpone opening
the sockets till after we launch the syslogger.

This would not have been terribly safe before commit 7de19fbc0,
because we relied on socket opening to detect whether any competing
postmasters were using the same port number.  But now that we choose
IPC keys without regard to the port number, there's no interaction
to worry about.

Also delay creation of the external PID file (if requested) till after
the sockets are open, since external code could plausibly be relying
on that ordering of events.  And postpone most of the work of
RemovePgTempFiles() so that that potentially-slow processing still
happens after we make the external PID file.  We have to be a bit
careful about that last though: as noted in the discussion subsequent to
bug #15804, EXEC_BACKEND builds still have to clear the parameter-file
temp dir before launching the syslogger.

Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review/testing.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15804-3721117bf40fb654@postgresql.org
2019-09-11 11:43:01 -04:00
Tom Lane 7de19fbc0b Use data directory inode number, not port, to select SysV resource keys.
This approach provides a much tighter binding between a data directory
and the associated SysV shared memory block (and SysV or named-POSIX
semaphores, if we're using those).  Key collisions are still possible,
but only between data directories stored on different filesystems,
so the situation should be negligible in practice.  More importantly,
restarting the postmaster with a different port number no longer
risks failing to identify a relevant shared memory block, even when
postmaster.pid has been removed.  A standalone backend is likewise
much more certain to detect conflicting leftover backends.

(In the longer term, we might now think about deprecating the port as
a cluster-wide value, so that one postmaster could support sockets
with varying port numbers.  But that's for another day.)

The hazards fixed here apply only on Unix systems; our Windows code
paths already use identifiers derived from the data directory path
name rather than the port.

src/test/recovery/t/017_shm.pl, which intends to test key-collision
cases, has been substantially rewritten since it can no longer use
two postmasters with identical port numbers to trigger the case.
Instead, use Perl's IPC::SharedMem module to create a conflicting
shmem segment directly.  The test script will be skipped if that
module is not available.  (This means that some older buildfarm
members won't run it, but I don't think that that results in any
meaningful coverage loss.)

Patch by me; thanks to Noah Misch and Peter Eisentraut for discussion
and review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16908.1557521200@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-09-05 13:31:46 -04:00
Tom Lane ee32782395 Fix postmaster state machine to handle dead_end child crashes better.
A report from Alvaro Herrera shows that if we're in PM_STARTUP
state, and we spawn a dead_end child to reject some incoming
connection request, and that child dies with an unexpected exit
code, the postmaster does not respond well.  We correctly send
SIGQUIT to the startup process, but then:

* if the startup process exits with nonzero exit code, as expected,
we thought that that indicated a crash and aborted startup.

* if the startup process exits with zero exit code, which is possible
due to the inherent race condition, we'd advance to PM_RUN state
which is fine --- but the code forgot that AbortStartTime would be
nonzero in this situation.  We'd either die on the Asserts saying
that it was zero, or perhaps misbehave later on.  (A quick look
suggests that the only misbehavior might be busy-waiting due to
DetermineSleepTime doing the wrong thing.)

To fix the first point, adjust the state-machine logic to recognize
that a nonzero exit code is expected after sending SIGQUIT, and have
it transition to a state where we can restart the startup process.
To fix the second point, change the Asserts to clear the variable
rather than just claiming it should be clear already.

Perhaps we could improve this further by not treating a crash of
a dead_end child as a reason for panic'ing the database.  However,
since those child processes are connected to shared memory, that
seems a bit risky.  There are few good reasons for a dead_end child
to report failure anyway (the cause of this in Alvaro's report is
quite unclear).  On balance, therefore, a minimal fix seems best.

This is an oversight in commit 45811be94.  While that was back-patched,
I'm hesitant to back-patch this change.  The lack of reasons for a
dead_end child to fail suggests that the case should be very rare in
the field, which squares with the lack of reports; so it seems like
this might not be worth the risk of introducing new issues.  In any
case we can let it bake awhile in HEAD before considering a back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190615160950.GA31378@alvherre.pgsql
2019-08-26 15:59:44 -04:00