Previously, we encoded both NULL and the first byte at the base address
as 0. That confusion led to the assertion in commit e07d4ddc, which
failed when min_dynamic_shared_memory was used. Give them distinct
encodings, by switching to 1-based offsets for non-NULL pointers. Also
improve macro hygiene in passing (missing/misplaced parentheses), and
remove open-coded access to the raw offset value from freepage.c/h.
Although e07d4ddc was back-patched to 10, the only code that actually
makes use of relptr at the base address arrived in 84b1c63a, so no need
to back-patch further than 14 for now.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220519193839.GT19626%40telsasoft.com
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
This is intended as infrastructure for a full-fledged allocator for
dynamic shared memory. The interface looks a bit like a real
allocator, but only supports allocating and freeing memory in
multiples of the 4kB page size. Further, to free memory, you must
know the size of the span you wish to free, in pages. While these are
make it unsuitable as an allocator in and of itself, it still serves
as very useful scaffolding for a full-fledged allocator.
Robert Haas and Thomas Munro. This code is mostly the same as my 2014
submission, but Thomas fixed quite a few bugs and made some changes to
the interface.
Discussion: CA+TgmobkeWptGwiNa+SGFWsTLzTzD-CeLz0KcE-y6LFgoUus4A@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: CAEepm=1z5WLuNoJ80PaCvz6EtG9dN0j-KuHcHtU6QEfcPP5-qA@mail.gmail.com
Bruce Momjian
Thomas Munro
Tom Lane
Robert Haas