place of time_t, as per prior discussion. The behavior does not change
on machines without a 64-bit-int type, but on machines with one, which
is most, we are rid of the bizarre boundary behavior at the edges of
the 32-bit-time_t range (1901 and 2038). The system will now treat
times over the full supported timestamp range as being in your local
time zone. It may seem a little bizarre to consider that times in
4000 BC are PST or EST, but this is surely at least as reasonable as
propagating Gregorian calendar rules back that far.
I did not modify the format of the zic timezone database files, which
means that for the moment the system will not know about daylight-savings
periods outside the range 1901-2038. Given the way the files are set up,
it's not a simple decision like 'widen to 64 bits'; we have to actually
think about the range of years that need to be supported. We should
probably inquire what the plans of the upstream zic people are before
making any decisions of our own.
In the past, we used a 'Lispy' linked list implementation: a "list" was
merely a pointer to the head node of the list. The problem with that
design is that it makes lappend() and length() linear time. This patch
fixes that problem (and others) by maintaining a count of the list
length and a pointer to the tail node along with each head node pointer.
A "list" is now a pointer to a structure containing some meta-data
about the list; the head and tail pointers in that structure refer
to ListCell structures that maintain the actual linked list of nodes.
The function names of the list API have also been changed to, I hope,
be more logically consistent. By default, the old function names are
still available; they will be disabled-by-default once the rest of
the tree has been updated to use the new API names.
and should do now that we control our own destiny for timezone handling,
but this commit gets the bulk of the picayune diffs in place.
Magnus Hagander and Tom Lane.
Didier Moens. Bug is new in 7.4, and was caused by not updating everyplace
I should've when replacing locParam markers by allParam.
Add a regression test to catch related errors in future.
rather than allowing them only in a few special cases as before. In
particular you can now pass a ROW() construct to a function that accepts
a rowtype parameter. Internal generation of RowExprs fixes a number of
corner cases that used to not work very well, such as referencing the
whole-row result of a JOIN or subquery. This represents a further step in
the work I started a month or so back to make rowtype values into
first-class citizens.
by the set operation, so that redundant sorts at higher levels can be
avoided. This was foreseen a good while back, but not done. Per request
from Karel Zak.
That particular corner case is not exactly compelling, but given 7.4's
ability to discard redundant join clauses, it is possible for the situation
to arise from queries that are not so obviously silly. Per bug report
of 6-Apr-04.
'SELECT foo()' in a SQL function returning a rowtype, to simply pass
back the results of another function returning the same rowtype.
However, that hasn't actually worked in many years. Now it works again.
same path keys and nearly equivalent costs will be considered redundant.
The exact nature of the fuzziness may get adjusted later based on current
discussions, but no one has shot a hole in the basic idea yet ...
only stable and not immutable, pred_test_simple_clause has to guard
against making invalid deductions. Add a test for immutability of
the selected test_op.
is measured in kilobytes and checked against actual physical execution
stack depth, as per my proposal of 30-Dec. This gives us a fairly
bulletproof defense against crashing due to runaway recursive functions.
so that the 'val' is computed only once, per recent discussion. The
speedup is not much when 'val' is just a simple variable, but could be
significant for larger expressions. More importantly this avoids issues
with multiple evaluations of a volatile 'val', and it allows the CASE
expression to be reverse-listed in its original form by ruleutils.c.
predicate of the form 'foo IS NOT NULL' is implied by a WHERE clause
that uses 'foo' in any strict operator or function. Per suggestion
and preliminary implementation by John Siracusa; some further hacking
by moi.
equivalent sort expressions to use was broken: you can't just look
at the relation membership, you have to actually grovel over the
individual Vars in each expression. I think this did work when it
was written, but it was broken by subsequent optimizations that made
join relations not propagate every single input variable upward.
Must find the Var that got propagated, not choose one at random.
Per bug report from Daniel O'Neill.
of which redundant clause to remove, it removes the more expensive one.
In simple scenarios the clauses will be like 'var = var' and there's
no difference, but we are now capable of considering cases where there
are sub-selects in the clauses, and it makes a BIG difference.
corner cases that could stand improvement, but it does all the basic
stuff. A byproduct is that the selectivity routines are no longer
constrained to working on simple Vars; we might in future be able to
improve the behavior for subexpressions that don't match indexes.
Nov 2002: when constant-expression simplification removes all the
aggregate function calls from a query, that doesn't mean we can act as
though there never were any aggregates. Per bug report from Gabor Szucs.
Make btree index creation and initial validation of foreign-key constraints
use maintenance_work_mem rather than work_mem as their memory limit.
Add some code to guc.c to allow these variables to be referenced by their
old names in SHOW and SET commands, for backwards compatibility.
composite types, because TupleTableSlots aren't Datums and can't be
stored in Const nodes. We can remove this restriction if we ever
adopt a cleaner runtime representation for whole-tuple results, but
at the moment it's broken. Per example from Thomas Hallgren.
IN (sub-SELECT) constructs. We must force a clauseless join of the
sub-select member relations, but it wasn't happening because the code
thought it would be able to use the join clause arising from the IN.
that it's good to join where there are join clauses rather than where there
are not. Also enable it to generate bushy plans at need, so that it doesn't
fail in the presence of multiple IN clauses containing sub-joins. These
changes appear to improve the behavior enough that we can substantially reduce
the default pool size and generations count, thereby decreasing the runtime,
and yet get as good or better plans as we were getting in 7.4. Consequently,
adjust the default GEQO parameters. I also modified the way geqo_effort is
used so that it affects both population size and number of generations;
it's now useful as a single control to adjust the GEQO runtime-vs-plan-quality
tradeoff. Bump geqo_threshold to 12, since even with these changes GEQO
seems to be slower than the regular planner at 11 relations.
default value for geqo_effort is supposed to be 40, not 1. The actual
'genetic' component of the GEQO algorithm has been practically disabled
since 7.1 because of this mistake. Improve documentation while at it.
check instead of hardwiring assumptions that only certain plan node types
can appear at the places where we are testing. This was always a pretty
fragile assumption, and it turns out to be broken in 7.4 for certain cases
involving IN-subselect tests that need type coercion.
Also, modify code that builds finished Plan tree so that node types that
don't do projection always copy their input node's targetlist, rather than
having the tlist passed in from the caller. The old method makes it too
easy to write broken code that thinks it can modify the tlist when it
cannot.
for sure...). Rather than relying on the query context of a rangetable
entry to identify what permissions it wants checked, store a full AclMode
mask in each RTE, and check exactly those bits. This allows an RTE
specifying, say, INSERT privilege on a view to be copied into a derived
UPDATE query without changing meaning. Per recent discussion thread.
initdb forced due to change of stored rule representation.
variables, not just simple variables. This was foreseen in the original
coding of this routine, but not implemented until now. Responds to
performance gripe from Laurent Perez.
'simple' references another view that is not simple. Must recheck
conditions after performing recursive pullup. Per example from
Laurent Perez, 9-Jan-04.
predicate tester. It can now deal with commuted clauses (for
instance, 4 < x implies x > 3), subclauses more complicated than
a simple Var (for example, upper(x) = 't' implies upper(x) > 'a'),
and <> operators (for example, x < 3 implies x <> 4). Still
only understands operators associated with btree opclasses, though.
Inspired by example from Martin Hampl.
pointer type when it is not necessary to do so.
For future reference, casting NULL to a pointer type is only necessary
when (a) invoking a function AND either (b) the function has no prototype
OR (c) the function is a varargs function.
regular qpqual ('filter condition'), add special-purpose code to
nodeIndexscan.c to recheck them. This ends being almost no net addition
of code, because the removal of planner code balances out the extra
executor code, but it is significantly more efficient when a lossy
operator is involved in an OR indexscan. The old implementation had
to recheck the entire indexqual in such cases.
with index qual clauses in the Path representation. This saves a little
work during createplan and (probably more importantly) allows reuse of
cached selectivity estimates during indexscan planning. Also fix latent
bug: wrong plan would have been generated for a 'special operator' used
in a nestloop-inner-indexscan join qual, because the special operator
would not have gotten into the list of quals to recheck. This bug is
only latent because at present the special-operator code could never
trigger on a join qual, but sooner or later someone will want to do it.
Tom Lane
Neil Conway