Coverity complained about the for(;;) loop, because it never actually
iterated. It was used just to be able to use "break" to exit it early. I
agree with Coverity, that's a bit confusing, so refactor the code to
use if-else instead.
While we're at it, use a local variable to hold the "current" node. That's
shorter and clearer than referring to "iter->last_visited" all the time.
While we don't need multiple iterators at the moment, the interface is
nicer and less dangerous this way.
Aleksander Alekseev, with some changes by me.
Bruce Momjian
Heikki Linnakangas