Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Paquier de2aca2885 Expand regression tests of pg_stat_statements for utility queries
This commit adds more coverage for utility statements so as it is
possible to track down all the effects of query normalization done for
all the queries that use either Const or A_Const nodes, which are the
nodes where normalization makes the most sense as they apply to
constants (well, most of the time, really).

This set of queries is extracted from an analysis done while looking at
full dumps of the regression database when applying different levels of
normalization to either Const or A_Const nodes for utilities, as of a
minimal set of these, for:
- All relkinds (CREATE, ALTER, DROP)
- Policies
- Cursors
- Triggers
- Types
- Rules
- Statistics
- CALL
- Transaction statements (isolation level, options)
- EXPLAIN
- COPY

Note that pg_stat_statements is not switched yet to show any
normalization for utilities, still it improves the default coverage of
the query jumbling code (not by as much as enabling query jumbling on
the main regression test suite, though):
- queryjumblefuncs.funcs.c: 36.8% => 48.5%
- queryjumblefuncs.switch.c: 33.2% => 43.1%

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y+MRdEq9W9XVa2AB@paquier.xyz
2023-02-20 10:16:51 +09:00
Michael Paquier e8dbdb15db Refactor tests of pg_stat_statements for planning, utility and level tracking
pg_stat_statements.sql acts as the main file for all the core tests of
the module, but things have become complicated to follow over the years
as some of the sub-scenarios tested in this file rely on assumptions
that come from completely different areas of it, like a GUC setup or a
relation created previously.  For example, row tracking for CTAS/COPY
was looking at the number of plans, which was not necessary, or level
tracking was mixed with checks on planner counts.

This commit refactors the tests of pg_stat_statements, by moving test
cases out of pg_stat_statements.sql into their own file, as of:
- Planning-related tests in planning.sql, for [re]plan counts and
top-level handling.  These depend on pg_stat_statements.track_planning.
- Utilities in utility.sql (pg_stat_statements.track_utility), that
includes now the tests for:
-- Row tracking for CTAS, CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW, COPY.
-- Basic utility statements.
-- SET statements.
- Tracking level, depending on pg_stat_statements.track.  This part has
been looking at scenarios with DO blocks, PL functions and SQL
functions.

pg_stat_statements.sql (still named the same for now) still includes
some checks for role-level tracking and WAL generation metrics, that
ought to become independent in the long term for clarity.

While on it, this switches the order of the attributes when querying
pg_stat_statements, the query field becoming last.  This makes much
easier the tracking of changes related to normalization, as queries are
the only variable-length attributes queried (unaligned mode would be one
extra choice, but that reduces the checks on the other fields).

Test scenarios and their results match exactly with what was happening
before this commit in terms of calls, number of plans, number of rows,
cached data or level tracking, so this has no effect on the coverage in
terms of what is produced by the reports in the table
pg_stat_statements.  A follow-up patch will extend more the tests of
pg_stat_statements around utilities, so this split creates a foundation
for this purpose, without complicating more pg_stat_statements.sql.

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y+MRdEq9W9XVa2AB@paquier.xyz
2023-02-20 09:28:29 +09:00