with expression_tree_walker-based code. The former failed to cope with
expressions containing SubLinks, and the latter returned TRUE for both
SubLinks and Aggrefs (cut-and-paste bug?). There is a lot more scope for
using expression_tree_walker in this module, but I'll restrain myself
until the 6.6 split occurs from touching not-demonstrably-broken code.
is parse_aggs.c. This fixes its failure to cope with (at least) CaseExpr
and ArrayRef nodes, which is the reason why both of these fail in 6.5:
select coalesce(f1,0) from int4_tbl group by f1;
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
select sentence.words[0] from sentence group by sentence.words[0];
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
The array case still fails, but at least it's not parse_agg's fault
anymore ... considering that we now support CASE officially, I think
it's important to fix the first example ...
will gradually replace all of the boilerplate tree-walk-recursion code that
currently exists in O(N) slightly different forms in N subroutines.
I've had it with adding missing cases to these subroutines...
August 1994 draft standard.
Use the ecpg support libraries to write the CLI interface?
Date and Darwen claim that CLI is a more modern and flexible approach...
special hack to ensure it would close its output file even after failure
due to elog(ERROR) partway through the copy. This is now unnecessary
because fd.c takes care of cleaning up open files at transaction abort;
worse, after fd.c closed the file copy.c would try to do so *again* at
the start of the next COPY command. This would result in havoc in most
implementations of stdio library.
tlist and qual are NULL. It ought to handle these the same as the cases
where tlist contains only constant expressions, ie, be willing to generate
a Result-node plan. This did not use to matter, but it does now because
union_planner will flatten the tlist when aggregates are present. Thus,
'select count(1) from table' now causes query_planner to be given a null
tlist, and to duplicate 6.4's behavior we need it to give back a Result
plan rather than refusing the query. 6.4 was arguably doing the Wrong
Thing for this query, but I'm not going to open a semantics issue right
before 6.5 release ... can revisit that problem later.
Bruce Momjian
Michael Meskes
Tom Lane
Thomas G. Lockhart
Peter Mount
Tatsuo Ishii