As I suspected, some machines have even more low-order-bit
inaccuracy than the ones I tested. Tweak new test so that
(hopefully) it will pass everywhere. Per buildfarm.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4173840.1673290336@sss.pgh.pa.us
We aren't using this anymore in the wake of commit 09d517773,
so delete it. We can always revert this if some future use
emerges, but I think our standards for test quality are now
high enough that that will never happen.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4173840.1673290336@sss.pgh.pa.us
We had some pretty ad-hoc and inefficient code here. To make
matters worse, it didn't test the properties of the random()
function very thoroughly, and it had a test failure rate of
one in every few tens of thousands of runs. Replace the
script altogether with new test cases that prove much more
about random()'s output, run faster, and can be calculated
to have test failure rates on the order of 1e-9.
Having done that, the failure rate of this script should be
negligible in comparison to other causes of test failures,
so remove the "ignore" marker for it in parallel_schedule.
(If it does fail, we'd like to know about that, so "ignore"
was always pretty counterproductive.)
Tom Lane and Dean Rasheed
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4173840.1673290336@sss.pgh.pa.us
This allows left join removals and unique joins to work with partitioned
tables. The planner just lacked sufficient proofs that a given join
would not cause any row duplication. Unique indexes currently serve as
that proof, so have get_relation_info() populate the indexlist for
partitioned tables too.
Author: Arne Roland
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Zhihong Yu, Amit Langote, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c3b2408b7a39433b8230bbcd02e9f302@index.de
Currently, for large transactions, the publisher sends the data in
multiple streams (changes divided into chunks depending upon
logical_decoding_work_mem), and then on the subscriber-side, the apply
worker writes the changes into temporary files and once it receives the
commit, it reads from those files and applies the entire transaction. To
improve the performance of such transactions, we can instead allow them to
be applied via parallel workers.
In this approach, we assign a new parallel apply worker (if available) as
soon as the xact's first stream is received and the leader apply worker
will send changes to this new worker via shared memory. The parallel apply
worker will directly apply the change instead of writing it to temporary
files. However, if the leader apply worker times out while attempting to
send a message to the parallel apply worker, it will switch to
"partial serialize" mode - in this mode, the leader serializes all
remaining changes to a file and notifies the parallel apply workers to
read and apply them at the end of the transaction. We use a non-blocking
way to send the messages from the leader apply worker to the parallel
apply to avoid deadlocks. We keep this parallel apply assigned till the
transaction commit is received and also wait for the worker to finish at
commit. This preserves commit ordering and avoid writing to and reading
from files in most cases. We still need to spill if there is no worker
available.
This patch also extends the SUBSCRIPTION 'streaming' parameter so that the
user can control whether to apply the streaming transaction in a parallel
apply worker or spill the change to disk. The user can set the streaming
parameter to 'on/off', or 'parallel'. The parameter value 'parallel' means
the streaming will be applied via a parallel apply worker, if available.
The parameter value 'on' means the streaming transaction will be spilled
to disk. The default value is 'off' (same as current behaviour).
In addition, the patch extends the logical replication STREAM_ABORT
message so that abort_lsn and abort_time can also be sent which can be
used to update the replication origin in parallel apply worker when the
streaming transaction is aborted. Because this message extension is needed
to support parallel streaming, parallel streaming is not supported for
publications on servers < PG16.
Author: Hou Zhijie, Wang wei, Amit Kapila with design inputs from Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Peter Smith, Dilip Kumar, Shi yu, Kuroda Hayato, Shveta Mallik
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+wyN6zpaHUkCLorEWNx75MG0xhMwcFhvjqm2KURZEAGw@mail.gmail.com
GIN index scans were not taking any descent CPU-based cost into account. That
made them look cheaper than other types of indexes when they shouldn't be.
We use the same heuristic as for btree indexes, but multiply it by the number
of searched entries.
Additionally, the CPU cost for the tree was based largely on a
genericcostestimate. For a GIN index, we should not charge index quals per
tuple, but per entry. On top of this, charge cpu_index_tuple_cost per actual
tuple.
This should fix the cases where a GIN index is preferred over a btree and
the ones where a memoize node is not added on top of the GIN index scan
because it seemed too cheap.
We don't packpatch this to evade unexpected plan changes in stable versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABs3KGQnOkyQ42-zKQqiE7M0Ks9oWDSee%3D%2BJx3-TGq%3D68xqWYw%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3188617.44csPzL39Z%40aivenronan
Author: Ronan Dunklau
Reported-By: Hung Nguyen
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Alexander Korotkov
Check the remote relkind before trying to use TABLESAMPLE to acquire
sample from the remote relation. Even if the remote server version has
TABLESAMPLE support, the foreign table may point to incompatible relkind
(e.g. a view or a sequence).
If the relkind does not support TABLESAMPLE, error out if TABLESAMPLE
was requested specifically (as system/bernoulli), or fallback to random
just like we do for old server versions.
We currently end up disabling sampling for such relkind values anyway,
due to reltuples being -1 or 1, but that seems rather accidental, and
might get broken by improving reltuples estimates, etc. So better to
make the check explicit.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/951485.1672461744%40sss.pgh.pa.us
This allows an optional "S" modifier to be added to \dp and \z, to
have them include system objects in the list.
Note that this also changes the behaviour of a bare \dp or \z without
the "S" modifier to include temp objects in the list, and exclude
information_schema objects, making them consistent with other psql
meta-commands.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Maxim Orlov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221206193606.GB3078082@nathanxps13
After restart, we try to stream the changes for large transactions that
were not sent before server crash and restart. However, we forget to send
the abort message for such transactions. This leads to spurious streaming
files on the subscriber which won't be cleaned till the apply worker or
the subscriber server restarts.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716A773F46768A1B75BE24394FB9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
During the development of 728202b63, which was aimed at reducing the
number of sorts required to evaluate multiple window functions with
different WindowClause definitions, the code written sorted the
WindowClauses in reverse tleSortGroupRef order. There appears to be no
discussion in the thread which was opened to discuss the development of
this patch and no comments mentioning the fact that having the
WindowClauses in reverse tleSortGroupRef order makes it more likely that
the final WindowClause to be evaluated will provide presorted input to
the query's DISTINCT or ORDER BY clause. The reason for this is that the
tleSortGroupRef indexes are assigned for the DISTINCT and ORDER BY clauses
before they are for the WindowClauses PARTITION BY and ORDER BY clauses.
Putting the WindowClause with the lowest tleSortGroupRef last means that
it's more likely that no additional sorting is required for the query's
DISTINCT or ORDER BY clause.
All we're doing here is adding some tests and a comment to help ensure
that remains true and that we don't accidentally forget to consider this
again should we ever rewrite that code.
Author: Ankit Kumar Pandey, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq=g2=ny59f1bvwRVvupsgPHK-KjLPBsSL25fVuGZ4idQ@mail.gmail.com
Waken related worker processes immediately at commit of a transaction
that has performed ALTER SUBSCRIPTION (including the RENAME and
OWNER variants). This reduces the response time for such operations.
In the real world that might not be worth much, but it shaves several
seconds off the runtime for the subscription test suite.
In the case of PREPARE, we just throw away this notification state;
it doesn't seem worth the work to preserve it. The workers will
still react after the eventual COMMIT PREPARED, but not as quickly.
Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221122004119.GA132961@nathanxps13
Previously this function checked to see if we were ready to switch
to two_phase mode at its start, but that's silly: we should check
at the end, after we've done the work that might make us ready.
This simple change removes one sleep cycle from the time needed to
switch to two_phase mode. In the real world that might not be
worth much, but it shaves a few seconds off the runtime for the
subscription test suite.
Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221122004119.GA132961@nathanxps13
VACUUM normally ends by running vac_update_datfrozenxid(), which
requires a scan of pg_class. Therefore, if one attempts to vacuum a
database one table at a time --- as vacuumdb has done since v12 ---
we will spend O(N^2) time in vac_update_datfrozenxid(). That causes
serious performance problems in databases with tens of thousands of
tables, and indeed the effect is measurable with only a few hundred.
To add insult to injury, only one process can run
vac_update_datfrozenxid at the same time per DB, so this behavior
largely defeats vacuumdb's -j option.
Hence, invent options SKIP_DATABASE_STATS and ONLY_DATABASE_STATS
to allow applications to postpone vac_update_datfrozenxid() until the
end of a series of VACUUM requests, and teach vacuumdb to use them.
Per bug #17717 from Gunnar L. Sadly, this answer doesn't seem
like something we'd consider back-patching, so the performance
problem will remain in v12-v15.
Tom Lane and Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17717-6c50eb1c7d23a886@postgresql.org
A schema rename should cause reporting the new qualified names of
tables to logical replication subscribers, but that wasn't happening.
Flush the RelationSyncCache to make it happen.
(If you ask me, the new test case shows that the behavior in this area
is still pretty dubious, but apparently it's operating as designed.)
Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm32vLRv5KdrDFeVC-CU+4Wg1daA55hMqOxDGJBzvd76-w@mail.gmail.com
A comment was left behind referencing sample rate adjustment removed
from 8ad51b5f44. So clean that up. While at it also remove the sample
rate clamping which should not be necessary without the clamping, and
just check that with an assert.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/951485.1672461744%40sss.pgh.pa.us
The ALTER DATABASE|FUNCTION|PROCEDURE|ROLE|ROUTINE|USER ... SET <name>
case in psql tab completion failed to exclude <name> = "SCHEMA", which
caused ALTER FUNCTION|PROCEDURE|ROUTINE ... SET SCHEMA to complete
with "FROM CURRENT" and "TO", which won't work.
Fix that, so that those cases now complete with the list of schemas,
like other ALTER ... SET SCHEMA commands.
Noticed while testing the recent patch to improve tab completion for
ALTER FUNCTION/PROCEDURE/ROUTINE, but this is not directly related to
that patch. Rather, this is a long-standing bug, so back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0s7GQmkLP_mx5Cvk=UzYMnjhPmXBxU8DsHEunFbC5sTg@mail.gmail.com
Commit 57faaf376 added pg_truncate(const char *path, off_t length), but
"length" was ignored under WIN32 and the file was unconditionally
truncated to 0.
There was no live bug, since the only caller passes 0.
Fix, and back-patch to 14 where the function arrived.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230106031652.GR3109%40telsasoft.com
Testing on CI showed that Cygwin's semctl() can fail with EAGAIN
(possibly due to resource limits in cygserver that could be tuned, not
examined). Switch to so-called POSIX semaphores instead, which don't
seem to fail in that way (possibly due to a more direct implementation
using Windows semaphore primitives instead of talking to cygserver,
based on a cursory glance at the source).
Other known problems still prevent PostgreSQL from running on Cygwin
without random crashes, but this rarer problem was noticed while
testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BQ6DU4Ov9LrvUyDcF3oHS4KMRVSKmVGaeePq-kOyG9gA%40mail.gmail.com
This is just refactoring; there should be no functonal change. It
might have the effect of slightly reducing the number of calls to
GetUserId(), but the real point is to facilitate future work in
this area.
Patch by me, reviewed by Mark Dilger.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobFzTLkLwOquFrAcdsWBsOWDr-_H-jw+qBvfx-wSzMwDA@mail.gmail.com
Instead of having checks in AddRoleMems() and DelRoleMems(), have
the callers perform checks where it's required. In some cases it
isn't, either because the caller has already performed a check for
the same condition, or because the check couldn't possibly fail.
The "Skip permission check if nothing to do" check in each of
AddRoleMems() and DelRoleMems() is pointless. Some call sites
can't pass an empty list. Others can, but in those cases, the role
being modified is one that the current user has just created.
Therefore, they must have permission to modify it, and so no
permission check is required at all.
This patch is intended to have no user-visible consequences. It is
intended to simplify future work in this area.
Patch by me, reviewed by Mark Dilger.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobFzTLkLwOquFrAcdsWBsOWDr-_H-jw+qBvfx-wSzMwDA@mail.gmail.com
We were identifying the updatable generated columns of inheritance
children by transposing the calculation made for their parent.
However, there's nothing that says a traditional-inheritance child
can't have generated columns that aren't there in its parent, or that
have different dependencies than are in the parent's expression.
(At present it seems that we don't enforce that for partitioning
either, which is likely wrong to some degree or other; but the case
clearly needs to be handled with traditional inheritance.)
Hence, drop the very-klugy-anyway "extraUpdatedCols" RTE field
in favor of identifying which generated columns depend on updated
columns during executor startup. In HEAD we can remove
extraUpdatedCols altogether; in back branches, it's still there but
always empty. Another difference between the HEAD and back-branch
versions of this patch is that in HEAD we can add the new bitmap field
to ResultRelInfo, but that would cause an ABI break in back branches.
Like 4b3e37993, add a List field at the end of struct EState instead.
Back-patch to v13. The bogus calculation is also being made in v12,
but it doesn't have the same visible effect because we don't use it
to decide which generated columns to recalculate; as a consequence of
which the patch doesn't apply easily. I think that there might still
be a demonstrable bug associated with trigger firing conditions, but
that's such a weird corner-case usage that I'm content to leave it
unfixed in v12.
Amit Langote and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFshLKNvQUd1DgwJ-7tsTp=dwv7KZqXC4j2wYBV1aCDUA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2793383.1672944799@sss.pgh.pa.us
This fixes a couple of unused variable warnings that could be seen when
compiling with MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING but not USE_ASSERT_CHECKING.
Defining MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING without asserts is a little unusual,
however, we shouldn't be producing any warnings from such a build.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_D-vgLEh7eO47p=73u1jWO78NWf6Qfv1FndY1kG-Q-jA@mail.gmail.com
We cannot rely on TransactionIdDidAbort here, since in general it may
report transactions that were in-progress at the time of an earlier hard
crash as not aborted, effectively behaving as if they were still in
progress even after crash recovery completes. Go back to defensively
verifying that xmax didn't commit instead.
Oversight in commit 79d4bf4e.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230104035636.hy5djyr2as4gbc4q@awork3.anarazel.de
Commit 4f627f89 switched SLRU truncation for multixacts back to being a
task performed during VACUUM, but missed some comments that continued to
reference truncation happening as part of checkpointing. Update those
comments now.
Also update comments that became obsolete when commit c3ffa731 changed
the way that vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age is applied by VACUUM as it
computes its MultiXactCutoff cutoff (which is used by VACUUM to decide
what to freeze). Explain the same issues by referencing how OldestMxact
is the latest valid value that relminmxid can ever be advanced to at the
end of a VACUUM (following the work in commit 0b018fab).
Combine multiple LOCK TABLE commands to reduce the number of
round trips to the server. This is particularly helpful when
dumping from a remote server, but it seems useful even without
that. In particular, shortening the time from seeing a table
in pg_class to acquiring lock on it reduces the window for
trouble from concurrent DDL.
Aleksander Alekseev, reviewed by Fabrízio de Royes Mello,
Gilles Darold, and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TO4z1+OBa-R+fC8FnaUgbEWJUf2Kq=nRngTW5EXtKru2g@mail.gmail.com
In user-manag.sgml, document precisely what privileges are conveyed
by CREATEROLE. Make particular note of the fact that it allows
changing passwords and granting access to high-privilege roles.
Also remove the suggestion of using a user with CREATEROLE and
CREATEDB instead of a superuser, as there is no real security
advantage to this approach.
Elsewhere in the documentation, adjust text that suggests that
<literal>CREATEROLE</literal> only allows for role creation, and
refer to the documentation in user-manag.sgml as appropriate.
Patch by me, reviewed by Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZBsPL8nPhvYecx7iGo5qpDRqa9k_AcaW1SbOjugAY1Ag@mail.gmail.com
pg_xact lookups are relatively expensive. Move the xmin/xmax commit
status checks from the point that freeze plans are prepared to the point
that they're actually executed. Otherwise we'll repeat many commit
status checks whenever multiple successive VACUUM operations scan the
same pages and decide against freezing each time, which is a waste of
cycles.
Oversight in commit 1de58df4, which added page-level freezing.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkZpe4K6qMfEt8H4qYJCKc2R7TPvKsBva7jc9w7iGXQSw@mail.gmail.com
Improve comments added by commit 1de58df4 which describe the
lazy_scan_prune "freeze the page" path. These newly revised comments
are based on suggestions from Jeff Davis.
In passing, remove nearby visibility_cutoff_xid comments left over from
commit 6daeeb1f.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ebc857107fe3edd422ef8a65191ca4a8da568b9b.camel@j-davis.com
Windows can enumerate the locales that are either installed or
supported by calling EnumSystemLocalesEx(), similar to what is already
done in the READ_LOCALE_A_OUTPUT switch. We can refactor some of the
logic already used in that switch into a new function
create_collation_from_locale().
The enumerated locales have BCP 47 shape, that is with a hyphen
between language and territory, instead of POSIX's underscore. The
created collations will retain the BCP 47 shape, but we will also
create a POSIX alias, so xx-YY will have an xx_YY alias.
A new test collate.windows.win1252 is added that is like
collate.linux.utf8.
Author: Juan Jose Santamaria Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0050ec23-34d9-2765-9015-98c04f0e18ac@postgrespro.ru
While on it, newlines are removed from the end of two elog() strings.
The others are simple grammar mistakes. One comment in pg_upgrade
referred incorrectly to sequences since a7e5457.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221230231257.GI1153@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 11
When considering an empty grouping set, we fetched
phasedata->eqfunctions[-1]. Because the eqfunctions array is
palloc'd, that would always be an aset pointer in released versions,
and thus the code accidentally failed to malfunction (since it would
do nothing unless it found a null pointer). Nonetheless this seems
like trouble waiting to happen, so add a check for length == 0.
It's depressing that our valgrind testing did not catch this.
Maybe we should reconsider the choice to not mark that word NOACCESS?
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-vZuuPOZsKOYnSAaPYGKhmacxhki+vpOKk0O7rymccXQ@mail.gmail.com
The term "truncation" has been ambiguous since commit 10a8d13823 added
line pointer array truncation during heap pruning. Clear things up by
specifying that we're talking about rel truncation here, to match nearby
comments that apply to tuples with storage.
Don't allow VACUUM to WAL-log the value FrozenTransactionId as the
snapshotConflictHorizon of freezing or visibility map related WAL
records.
The only special XID value that's an allowable snapshotConflictHorizon
is InvalidTransactionId, which is interpreted as "record definitely
doesn't require a recovery conflict".
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznuNGSzF8v6OsgjaC5aYsb3cZ6HW6MLm30X0d65cmSH6A@mail.gmail.com
This is like the existing bt_page_stats() function, but it can
report on a range of pages rather than just one at a time.
I don't have a huge amount of faith in the portability of the
new test cases, but they do pass in a 32-bit FreeBSD VM here.
Further adjustment may be needed depending on buildfarm results.
Hamid Akhtar, reviewed by Naeem Akhter, Bertrand Drouvot,
Bharath Rupireddy, and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANugjht-=oGMRmNJKMqnBC69y7vr+wHDmm0ZK6-1pJsxoBKBbA@mail.gmail.com