setrefs.c failed to do "rtoffset" adjustment of Vars in RETURNING lists,
which meant they were left with the wrong varnos when the RETURNING list
was in a subquery. That was never possible before writable CTEs, of
course, but now it's broken. The executor fails to notice any problem
because ExecEvalVar just references the ecxt_scantuple for any normal
varno; but EXPLAIN breaks when the varno is wrong, as illustrated in a
recent complaint from Bartosz Dmytrak.
Since the eventual rtoffset of the subquery is not known at the time
we are preparing its plan node, the previous scheme of executing
set_returning_clause_references() at that time cannot handle this
adjustment. Fortunately, it turns out that we don't really need to do it
that way, because all the needed information is available during normal
setrefs.c execution; we just have to dig it out of the ModifyTable node.
So, do that, and get rid of the kluge of early setrefs processing of
RETURNING lists. (This is a little bit of a cheat in the case of inherited
UPDATE/DELETE, because we are not passing a "root" struct that corresponds
exactly to what the subplan was built with. But that doesn't matter, and
anyway this is less ugly than early setrefs processing was.)
Back-patch to 9.1, where the problem became possible to hit.
Due to rather sloppy thinking (on my part, I'm afraid) about the
appropriate behavior for boundary conditions, pg_next_dst_boundary() gave
undefined, platform-dependent results when the input time is exactly the
last recorded DST transition time for the specified time zone, as a result
of fetching values one past the end of its data arrays.
Change its specification to be that it always finds the next DST boundary
*after* the input time, and adjust code to match that. The sole existing
caller, DetermineTimeZoneOffset, doesn't actually care about this
distinction, since it always uses a probe time earlier than the instant
that it does care about. So it seemed best to me to change the API to make
the result=1 and result=0 cases more consistent, specifically to ensure
that the "before" outputs always describe the state at the given time,
rather than hacking the code to obey the previous API comment exactly.
Per bug #6605 from Sergey Burladyan. Back-patch to all supported versions.
Prohibiting this outright would break dumps taken from older versions
that contain such casts, which would create far more pain than is
justified here.
Per report by Jaime Casanova and subsequent discussion.
We must set the visibility map bit before releasing our exclusive lock
on the heap page; otherwise, someone might clear the heap page bit
before we set the visibility map bit, leading to a situation where the
visibility map thinks the page is all-visible but it's really not.
This problem has existed since 8.4, but it wasn't critical before we
had index-only scans, since the worst case scenario was that the page
wouldn't get vacuumed until the next scan_all vacuum.
Along the way, a couple of minor, related improvements: (1) if we
pause the heap scan to do an index vac cycle, release any visibility
map page we're holding, since really long-running pins are not good
for a variety of reasons; and (2) warn if we see a page that's marked
all-visible in the visibility map but not on the page level, since
that should never happen any more (it was allowed in previous
releases, but not in 9.2).
Instead of an exact cost comparison, use a fuzzy comparison with 1e-10
delta after all other path metrics have proved equal. This is to avoid
having platform-specific roundoff behaviors determine the choice when
two paths are really the same to our cost estimators. Adjust the
recently-added test case that made it obvious we had a problem here.
The original syntax wasn't universally loved, and it didn't allow its
usage in CREATE TABLE, only ALTER TABLE. It now works everywhere, and
it also allows using ALTER TABLE ONLY to add an uninherited CHECK
constraint, per discussion.
The pg_constraint column has accordingly been renamed connoinherit.
This commit partly reverts some of the changes in
61d81bd28d, particularly some pg_dump and
psql bits, because now pg_get_constraintdef includes the necessary NO
INHERIT within the constraint definition.
Author: Nikhil Sontakke
Some tweaks by me
For an initial relation that lacks any join clauses (that is, it has to be
cartesian-product-joined to the rest of the query), we considered only
cartesian joins with initial rels appearing later in the initial-relations
list. This creates an undesirable dependency on FROM-list order. We would
never fail to find a plan, but perhaps we might not find the best available
plan. Noted while discussing the logic with Amit Kapila.
Improve the comments a bit in this area, too.
Arguably this is a bug fix, but given the lack of complaints from the
field I'll refrain from back-patching.
This patch adjusts the treatment of parameterized paths so that all paths
with the same parameterization (same set of required outer rels) for the
same relation will have the same rowcount estimate. We cache the rowcount
estimates to ensure that property, and hopefully save a few cycles too.
Doing this makes it practical for add_path_precheck to operate without
a rowcount estimate: it need only assume that paths with different
parameterizations never dominate each other, which is close enough to
true anyway for coarse filtering, because normally a more-parameterized
path should yield fewer rows thanks to having more join clauses to apply.
In add_path, we do the full nine yards of comparing rowcount estimates
along with everything else, so that we can discard parameterized paths that
don't actually have an advantage. This fixes some issues I'd found with
add_path rejecting parameterized paths on the grounds that they were more
expensive than not-parameterized ones, even though they yielded many fewer
rows and hence would be cheaper once subsequent joining was considered.
To make the same-rowcounts assumption valid, we have to require that any
parameterized path enforce *all* join clauses that could be obtained from
the particular set of outer rels, even if not all of them are useful for
indexing. This is required at both base scans and joins. It's a good
thing anyway since the net impact is that join quals are checked at the
lowest practical level in the join tree. Hence, discard the original
rather ad-hoc mechanism for choosing parameterization joinquals, and build
a better one that has a more principled rule for when clauses can be moved.
The original rule was actually buggy anyway for lack of knowledge about
which relations are part of an outer join's outer side; getting this right
requires adding an outer_relids field to RestrictInfo.
This has been wrong for a really long time. We don't use two-phase
locking to protect against serialization anomalies.
Per discussion on pgsql-hackers about 2011-03-07; original report
by Dan Ports.
The previous code could cause a backend crash after BEGIN; SAVEPOINT a;
LOCK TABLE foo (interrupted by ^C or statement timeout); ROLLBACK TO
SAVEPOINT a; LOCK TABLE foo, and might have leaked strong-lock counts
in other situations.
Report by Zoltán Böszörményi; patch review by Jeff Davis.
Previously, we used SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave, but that's really
intended for dirty-marks we can theoretically afford to lose, such as
hint bits. As for 9.2, the PD_ALL_VISIBLE mustn't be lost in this
way, since we could then end up with a heap page that isn't
all-visible and a visibility map page that is all visible, causing
index-only scans to return wrong answers.
Mostly, this consists of adding support for fields which exist in the
structure but aren't handled by copy/equal/outfuncs; but the create
foreign table case can actually produce garbage output.
Noah Misch
A number of utility programs were rather careless about paremeters
that can be set via both an option argument and a positional
argument. This leads to results which can violate the Principal
Of Least Astonishment. These changes refuse to use positional
arguments to override settings that have been made via positional
arguments. The changes are backpatched to all live branches.
When using synchronous replication, we waited for the commit record to be
replicated, but if we our transaction didn't write any other WAL records,
that's not required because we don't even flush the WAL locally to disk in
that case. This lead to long waits when committing a transaction that only
modified a temporary table. Bug spotted by Thom Brown.
The header file is needed by any module that wants to use the PL/pgSQL
instrumentation plugin interface. Most notably, the pldebugger plugin needs
this. With this patch, it can be built using pgxs, without having the full
server source tree available.
The result object methods colnames() etc. would crash when called
after a command that did not produce a result set. Now they throw an
exception.
discovery and initial patch by Jean-Baptiste Quenot
The output of the new pg_xlog_location_diff function is of type numeric,
since it could theoretically overflow an int8 due to signedness; this
provides a convenient way to format such values.
Fujii Masao, with some beautification by me.
Remove lots of outdated information that is duplicated by the
better-maintained SGML documentation. In particular, remove the
outdated listing of contrib modules. Update the installation
instructions to mention CREATE EXTENSION, but don't go into too much
detail.
So far as I can tell, it is no longer possible for this heuristic to do
anything useful, because the new weaker definition of
have_relevant_joinclause means that any relation with a joinclause must be
considered joinable to at least one other relation. It would still be
possible for the code block to be entered, for example if there are join
order restrictions that prevent any join of the current level from being
formed; but in that case it's just a waste of cycles to attempt to form
cartesian joins, since the restrictions will still apply.
Furthermore, IMO the existence of this code path can mask bugs elsewhere;
we would have noticed the problem with cartesian joins a lot sooner if
this code hadn't compensated for it in the simplest case.
Accordingly, let's remove it and see what happens. I'm committing this
separately from the prerequisite changes in have_relevant_joinclause,
just to make the question easier to revisit if there is some fault in
my logic.
We should be willing to cross-join two small relations if that allows us
to use an inner indexscan on a large relation (that is, the potential
indexqual for the large table requires both smaller relations). This
worked in simple cases but fell apart as soon as there was a join clause
to a fourth relation, because the existence of any two-relation join clause
caused the planner to not consider clauseless joins between other base
relations. The added regression test shows an example case adapted from
a recent complaint from Benoit Delbosc.
Adjust have_relevant_joinclause, have_relevant_eclass_joinclause, and
has_relevant_eclass_joinclause to consider that a join clause mentioning
three or more relations is sufficient grounds for joining any subset of
those relations, even if we have to do so via a cartesian join. Since such
clauses are relatively uncommon, this shouldn't affect planning speed on
typical queries; in fact it should help a bit, because the latter two
functions in particular get significantly simpler.
Although this is arguably a bug fix, I'm not going to risk back-patching
it, since it might have currently-unforeseen consequences.
Per mailing list discussion, we would like to keep the bytea functions
parallel to the text functions, so rename bytea_agg to string_agg,
which already exists for text.
Also, to satisfy the rule that we don't want aggregate functions of
the same name with a different number of arguments, add a delimiter
argument, just like string_agg for text already has.
Tom Lane
Robert Haas
Peter Eisentraut
Alvaro Herrera
Andrew Dunstan
Heikki Linnakangas
Tatsuo Ishii