The first fixes a warning from gcc about the assignment within the condition.
The extra set of parens should not make a difference, but with -Werror, they
are necessary.
The second fixes an "ln -s" invocation that assumes the current directory is
implicitly the target if not specified. Not true in all cases, and again, it
should not make a difference except to those implementation that it does.
From: "Michael P. Snyder" <msnyder@hawkeye.huntersmoon.com>
nicer. Also, I grabbed my copy of the Informix manual, and
added a couple of variables that make sense (formats for
money, time, a language setting, a timezone).
- New functions SetPGVariable() and GetPGVariable() in tcop/*.
These don't actually do anything for the moment, but should
be enough to implement the SET var_name TO var_val in the
parser?
SetPGVariable() expects just two strings, the var_name and
the var_value from above, and is expected to do the right thing.
Returns TRUE if everything okay.
From: "Martin J. Laubach" <mjl@wwx.vip.at>
of common routines in pqcomprim.c (pq communication primitives).
Not all adapted to it yet, but it's a start.
- Rewritten some of those routines, to write/read bigger chunks of
data, precomputing stuff in buffers instead of sending out byte
by byte.
- As a consequence, I need to know the endianness of the machine.
Currently I rely on getting it from machine/endian.h, but this
may not be available everywhere? (Who the hell thought it was
a good idea to pass integers to the backend the other way around
than the normal network byte order? *argl*)
- Libpq looks in the environment for magic variables, and upon
establishing a connection to the backend, sends it queries
of the form "SET var_name TO 'var_value'". This needs a change
in the backend parser (Mr. Parser, are you there? :)
- Currently it looks for two Env-Vars, namely PG_DATEFORMAT
and PG_FLOATFORMAT. What else makes sense? PG_TIMEFORMAT?
PG_TIMEZONE?
From: "Martin J. Laubach" <mjl@wwx.vip.at>
Subject: [HACKERS] password authentication
This patch adds support for plaintext password authentication. To use
it, you add a line like
host all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 password pg_pwd.conf
to your pg_hba.conf, where 'pg_pwd.conf' is the name of a file containing
the usernames and password hashes in the format of the first two fields
of a Unix /etc/passwd file. (Of course, you can use a specific database
name or IP instead.)
Then, to connect with a password through libpq, you use the PQconnectdb()
function, specifying the "password=" tag in the connect string and also
adding the tag "authtype=password".
I also added a command-line switch '-u' to psql that tells it to prompt
for a username and password and use password authentication.
In particular, no more compiled-in default for PGDATA or LIBDIR. Commands
that need them need either invocation options or environment variables.
PGPORT default is hardcoded as 5432, but overrideable with options or
environment variables.
following is the patch to libpq's large object interface that
removes the requirement to include fmgr.h into fe-lobj.c.
The large object interface now ask's the backend to tell the
OID's of all the required functions in pg_proc.
From: wieck@sapserv.debis.de (Jan Wieck)
When you connect to a database with PQsetdb, as with psql, depending on
how your uninitialized variables are set, you can get a failure with a
"There is no connection to the backend" message.
The fix is to move a call to PQexec() from inside connectDB() to
PQsetdb() after connectDB() returns to PQsetdb(). That way a connection
doesn't have to be already established in order to establish it!
From: bryanh@giraffe.netgate.net (Bryan Henderson)
Here are a few minor fixes to Postgres95. Mostly I have added const
to some of the char pointers. There was also a missing header file
and a place where it looks like "==" was used when "=" was meant.
I also changed some variables from Pfin and Pfout tp pfin and pfout
because the latter shadow global variables and that just seems like
an unsafe practice which I like to avoid.
Submitted by: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.druid.com>
Most of the changes in here look to b epurely cosmetic, and don't
affect anything...
...and some stuff is completely questionable...in that I may have reversed
some of the stuf fwe already had :(