Commit Graph

486 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Lane 0cc9932788 Rename the "point is strictly above/below point" comparison operators.
Historically these were called >^ and <^, but that is inconsistent
with the similar box, polygon, and circle operators, which are named
|>> and <<| respectively.  Worse, the >^ and <^ names are used for
*not* strict above/below tests for the box type.

Hence, invent new operators following the more common naming.  The
old operators remain available for now, and are still accepted by
the relevant index opclasses too.  But there's a deprecation notice,
so maybe we can get rid of them someday.

Emre Hasegeli, reviewed by Pavel Borisov

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24348.1587444160@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-11-23 11:38:37 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut 591d282e8d Remove code handling removed deprecated containment operators
This removes the code that was there for handling the operators
removed by 2f70fdb064.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20201027032511.GF9241@telsasoft.com
2020-11-16 11:51:12 +01:00
Heikki Linnakangas 6f0bc5e1da Fix missing validation for the new GiST sortsupport functions.
Because of this, if you tried to create an operator family with the new
sortsupport function, you got an error:

ERROR:  support function number 11 is invalid for access method gist

We missed this in commit 16fa9b2b30 that added the sortsupport function,
because it only added sortsupport to a built-in operator family.

Author: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3520A18A-5C38-4697-A2E3-F3BDE3496CD5%40yandex-team.ru
2020-10-30 19:30:19 +02:00
Tom Lane 371668a838 Fix GiST buffering build to work when there are included columns.
gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit did not get the memo about which
attribute count to use.  This could lead to a crash if there were
included columns and buffering build was chosen.  (Because there
are random page-split decisions elsewhere in GiST index build,
the crashes are not entirely deterministic.)

Back-patch to v12 where GiST gained support for included columns.

Pavel Borisov

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALT9ZEECCV5m7wvxg46PC-7x-EybUmnpupBGhSFMoAAay+r6HQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-10-12 18:01:34 -04:00
Tom Lane 78c0b6ed27 Re-allow testing of GiST buffered builds.
Commit 16fa9b2b3 broke the ability to reliably test GiST buffered builds,
because it caused sorted builds to be done instead if sortsupport is
available, regardless of any attempt to override that.  While a would-be
test case could try to work around that by choosing an opclass that has
no sortsupport function, coverage would be silently lost the moment
someone decides it'd be a good idea to add a sortsupport function.

Hence, rearrange the logic in gistbuild() so that if "buffering = on"
is specified in CREATE INDEX, we will use that method, sortsupport or no.

Also document the interaction between sorting and the buffering
parameter, as 16fa9b2b3 failed to do.

(Note that in fact we still lack any test coverage of buffered builds,
but this is a prerequisite to adding a non-fragile test.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3249980.1602532990@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-10-12 17:09:50 -04:00
Heikki Linnakangas 265ea56785 Set right-links during sorted GiST index build.
This is not strictly necessary, as the right-links are only needed by
scans that are concurrent with page splits, and neither scans or page
splits can happen during sorted index build. But it seems like a good
idea to set them anyway, if we e.g. want to add a check to amcheck in
the future to verify that the chain of right-links is complete.

Author: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4D68C21F-9FB9-41DA-B663-FDFC8D143788%40yandex-team.ru
2020-10-01 11:10:43 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas c47a240fe6 Fix checksum calculation in the new sorting GiST build.
Since we're bypassing the buffer manager, we need to call
PageSetChecksumInplace() directly. As reported by Justin Pryzby.

In the passing, add RelationOpenSmgr() calls before all smgrwrite() and
smgrextend() calls. Tom added one before the first smgrextend() call in
commit c2bb287025, which seems to be enough, but let's play it safe and
do it before each one. That's how it's done in the similar code in
nbtsort.c, too.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200920224446.GF30557@telsasoft.com
2020-09-21 14:50:07 +03:00
Tom Lane c2bb287025 Fix new GIST build code to work under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.
Can't say if this fixes *all* cases, but at least we get through
the "point" regression test now, which hyrax's last run did not.

Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hyrax&dt=2020-09-19%2021%3A27%3A23
2020-09-20 17:08:49 -04:00
Heikki Linnakangas 16fa9b2b30 Add support for building GiST index by sorting.
This adds a new optional support function to the GiST access method:
sortsupport. If it is defined, the GiST index is built by sorting all data
to the order defined by the sortsupport's comparator function, and packing
the tuples in that order to GiST pages. This is similar to how B-tree
index build works, and is much faster than inserting the tuples one by
one. The resulting index is smaller too, because the pages are packed more
tightly, upto 'fillfactor'. The normal build method works by splitting
pages, which tends to lead to more wasted space.

The quality of the resulting index depends on how good the opclass-defined
sort order is. A good order preserves locality of the input data.

As the first user of this facility, add 'sortsupport' function to the
point_ops opclass. It sorts the points in Z-order (aka Morton Code), by
interleaving the bits of the X and Y coordinates.

Author: Andrey Borodin
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1A36620E-CAD8-4267-9067-FB31385E7C0D%40yandex-team.ru
2020-09-17 11:33:40 +03:00
Tom Lane a5cc4dab6d Yet more elimination of dead stores and useless initializations.
I'm not sure what tool Ranier was using, but the ones I contributed
were found by using a newer version of scan-build than I tried before.

Ranier Vilela and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo1+AcGppxDSg8k+zF4+Kv+eJyqzEDdbpDg58-=MQcerQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-09-05 13:17:32 -04:00
Bruce Momjian e36e936e0e remove redundant initializations
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo1+AcGppxDSg8k+zF4+Kv+eJyqzEDdbpDg58-=MQcerQ@mail.gmail.com

Author: Ranier Vilela

Backpatch-through: master
2020-09-03 22:57:35 -04:00
Andres Freund 1f51c17c68 snapshot scalability: Move PGXACT->xmin back to PGPROC.
Now that xmin isn't needed for GetSnapshotData() anymore, it leads to
unnecessary cacheline ping-pong to have it in PGXACT, as it is updated
considerably more frequently than the other PGXACT members.

After the changes in dc7420c2c9, this is a very straight-forward change.

For highly concurrent, snapshot acquisition heavy, workloads this change alone
can significantly increase scalability. E.g. plain pgbench on a smaller 2
socket machine gains 1.07x for read-only pgbench, 1.22x for read-only pgbench
when submitting queries in batches of 100, and 2.85x for batches of 100
'SELECT';.  The latter numbers are obviously not to be expected in the
real-world, but micro-benchmark the snapshot computation
scalability (previously spending ~80% of the time in GetSnapshotData()).

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200301083601.ews6hz5dduc3w2se@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-08-13 16:25:21 -07:00
Andres Freund dc7420c2c9 snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
To make GetSnapshotData() more scalable, it cannot not look at at each proc's
xmin: While snapshot contents do not need to change whenever a read-only
transaction commits or a snapshot is released, a proc's xmin is modified in
those cases. The frequency of xmin modifications leads to, particularly on
higher core count systems, many cache misses inside GetSnapshotData(), despite
the data underlying a snapshot not changing. That is the most
significant source of GetSnapshotData() scaling poorly on larger systems.

Without accessing xmins, GetSnapshotData() cannot calculate accurate horizons /
thresholds as it has so far. But we don't really have to: The horizons don't
actually change that much between GetSnapshotData() calls. Nor are the horizons
actually used every time a snapshot is built.

The trick this commit introduces is to delay computation of accurate horizons
until there use and using horizon boundaries to determine whether accurate
horizons need to be computed.

The use of RecentGlobal[Data]Xmin to decide whether a row version could be
removed has been replaces with new GlobalVisTest* functions.  These use two
thresholds to determine whether a row can be pruned:
1) definitely_needed, indicating that rows deleted by XIDs >= definitely_needed
   are definitely still visible.
2) maybe_needed, indicating that rows deleted by XIDs < maybe_needed can
   definitely be removed
GetSnapshotData() updates definitely_needed to be the xmin of the computed
snapshot.

When testing whether a row can be removed (with GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid())
and the tested XID falls in between the two (i.e. XID >= maybe_needed && XID <
definitely_needed) the boundaries can be recomputed to be more accurate. As it
is not cheap to compute accurate boundaries, we limit the number of times that
happens in short succession.  As the boundaries used by
GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid() are never reset (with maybe_needed updated by
GetSnapshotData()), it is likely that further test can benefit from an earlier
computation of accurate horizons.

To avoid regressing performance when old_snapshot_threshold is set (as that
requires an accurate horizon to be computed), heap_page_prune_opt() doesn't
unconditionally call TransactionIdLimitedForOldSnapshots() anymore. Both the
computation of the limited horizon, and the triggering of errors (with
SetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp()) is now only done when necessary to remove
tuples.

This commit just removes the accesses to PGXACT->xmin from
GetSnapshotData(), but other members of PGXACT residing in the same
cache line are accessed. Therefore this in itself does not result in a
significant improvement. Subsequent commits will take advantage of the
fact that GetSnapshotData() now does not need to access xmins anymore.

Note: This contains a workaround in heap_page_prune_opt() to keep the
snapshot_too_old tests working. While that workaround is ugly, the tests
currently are not meaningful, and it seems best to address them separately.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200301083601.ews6hz5dduc3w2se@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-08-12 16:03:49 -07:00
Andres Freund fea10a6434 Rename VariableCacheData.nextFullXid to nextXid.
Including Full in variable names duplicates the type information and
leads to overly long names. As FullTransactionId cannot accidentally
be casted to TransactionId that does not seem necessary.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200724011143.jccsyvsvymuiqfxu@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-08-11 12:07:14 -07:00
Tom Lane 9f9682783b Invent "amadjustmembers" AM method for validating opclass members.
This allows AM-specific knowledge to be applied during creation of
pg_amop and pg_amproc entries.  Specifically, the AM knows better than
core code which entries to consider as required or optional.  Giving
the latter entries the appropriate sort of dependency allows them to
be dropped without taking out the whole opclass or opfamily; which
is something we'd like to have to correct obsolescent entries in
extensions.

This callback also opens the door to performing AM-specific validity
checks during opclass creation, rather than hoping than an opclass
developer will remember to test with "amvalidate".  For the most part
I've not actually added any such checks yet; that can happen in a
follow-on patch.  (Note that we shouldn't remove any tests from
"amvalidate", as those are still needed to cross-check manually
constructed entries in the initdb data.  So adding tests to
"amadjustmembers" will be somewhat duplicative, but it seems like
a good idea anyway.)

Patch by me, reviewed by Alexander Korotkov, Hamid Akhtar, and
Anastasia Lubennikova.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4578.1565195302@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-08-01 17:12:47 -04:00
Andres Freund 5e7bbb5286 code: replace 'master' with 'primary' where appropriate.
Also changed "in the primary" to "on the primary", and added a few
"the" before "primary".

Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200615182235.x7lch5n6kcjq4aue@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-07-08 12:57:23 -07:00
Thomas Munro 7897e3bb90 Fix buffile.c error handling.
Convert buffile.c error handling to use ereport.  This fixes cases where
I/O errors were indistinguishable from EOF or not reported.  Also remove
"%m" from error messages where errno would be bogus.  While we're
modifying those strings, add block numbers and short read byte counts
where appropriate.

Back-patch to all supported releases.

Reported-by: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJE04G%3D8TLK0DLypT_27D9dR8F1RQgNp0jK6qR0tZGWOw%40mail.gmail.com
2020-06-16 16:59:07 +12:00
Tom Lane 5cbfce562f Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v13.
Includes some manual cleanup of places that pgindent messed up,
most of which weren't per project style anyway.

Notably, it seems some people didn't absorb the style rules of
commit c9d297751, because there were a bunch of new occurrences
of function calls with a newline just after the left paren, all
with faulty expectations about how the rest of the call would get
indented.
2020-05-14 13:06:50 -04:00
Noah Misch c6b92041d3 Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.
Until now, only selected bulk operations (e.g. COPY) did this.  If a
given relfilenode received both a WAL-skipping COPY and a WAL-logged
operation (e.g. INSERT), recovery could lose tuples from the COPY.  See
src/backend/access/transam/README section "Skipping WAL for New
RelFileNode" for the new coding rules.  Maintainers of table access
methods should examine that section.

To maintain data durability, just before commit, we choose between an
fsync of the relfilenode and copying its contents to WAL.  A new GUC,
wal_skip_threshold, guides that choice.  If this change slows a workload
that creates small, permanent relfilenodes under wal_level=minimal, try
adjusting wal_skip_threshold.  Users setting a timeout on COMMIT may
need to adjust that timeout, and log_min_duration_statement analysis
will reflect time consumption moving to COMMIT from commands like COPY.

Internally, this requires a reliable determination of whether
RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction() would unlink a relation's
current relfilenode.  Introduce rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid.  Amend the
specification of rd_createSubid such that the field is zero when a new
rel has an old rd_node.  Make relcache.c retain entries for certain
dropped relations until end of transaction.

Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC, since this introduces XLOG_GIST_ASSIGN_LSN.
Future servers accept older WAL, so this bump is discretionary.

Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed (in earlier, similar versions) by Robert
Haas.  Heikki Linnakangas and Michael Paquier implemented earlier
designs that materially clarified the problem.  Reviewed, in earlier
designs, by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane,
Fujii Masao, and Simon Riggs.  Reported by Martijn van Oosterhout.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20150702220524.GA9392@svana.org
2020-04-04 12:25:34 -07:00
Alexander Korotkov 911e702077 Implement operator class parameters
PostgreSQL provides set of template index access methods, where opclasses have
much freedom in the semantics of indexing.  These index AMs are GiST, GIN,
SP-GiST and BRIN.  There opclasses define representation of keys, operations on
them and supported search strategies.  So, it's natural that opclasses may be
faced some tradeoffs, which require user-side decision.  This commit implements
opclass parameters allowing users to set some values, which tell opclass how to
index the particular dataset.

This commit doesn't introduce new storage in system catalog.  Instead it uses
pg_attribute.attoptions, which is used for table column storage options but
unused for index attributes.

In order to evade changing signature of each opclass support function, we
implement unified way to pass options to opclass support functions.  Options
are set to fn_expr as the constant bytea expression.  It's possible due to the
fact that opclass support functions are executed outside of expressions, so
fn_expr is unused for them.

This commit comes with some examples of opclass options usage.  We parametrize
signature length in GiST.  That applies to multiple opclasses: tsvector_ops,
gist__intbig_ops, gist_ltree_ops, gist__ltree_ops, gist_trgm_ops and
gist_hstore_ops.  Also we parametrize maximum number of integer ranges for
gist__int_ops.  However, the main future usage of this feature is expected
to be json, where users would be able to specify which way to index particular
json parts.

Catversion is bumped.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d22c3a18-31c7-1879-fc11-4c1ce2f5e5af%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Nikita Glukhov, revised by me
Reviwed-by: Nikolay Shaplov, Robert Haas, Tom Lane, Tomas Vondra, Alvaro Herrera
2020-03-30 19:17:23 +03:00
Noah Misch de9396326e Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal."
This reverts commit cb2fd7eac2.  Per
numerous buildfarm members, it was incompatible with parallel query, and
a test case assumed LP64.  Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200321224920.GB1763544@rfd.leadboat.com
2020-03-22 09:24:09 -07:00
Noah Misch cb2fd7eac2 Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.
Until now, only selected bulk operations (e.g. COPY) did this.  If a
given relfilenode received both a WAL-skipping COPY and a WAL-logged
operation (e.g. INSERT), recovery could lose tuples from the COPY.  See
src/backend/access/transam/README section "Skipping WAL for New
RelFileNode" for the new coding rules.  Maintainers of table access
methods should examine that section.

To maintain data durability, just before commit, we choose between an
fsync of the relfilenode and copying its contents to WAL.  A new GUC,
wal_skip_threshold, guides that choice.  If this change slows a workload
that creates small, permanent relfilenodes under wal_level=minimal, try
adjusting wal_skip_threshold.  Users setting a timeout on COMMIT may
need to adjust that timeout, and log_min_duration_statement analysis
will reflect time consumption moving to COMMIT from commands like COPY.

Internally, this requires a reliable determination of whether
RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction() would unlink a relation's
current relfilenode.  Introduce rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid.  Amend the
specification of rd_createSubid such that the field is zero when a new
rel has an old rd_node.  Make relcache.c retain entries for certain
dropped relations until end of transaction.

Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).  This introduces a new WAL
record type, XLOG_GIST_ASSIGN_LSN, without bumping XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC.  As
always, update standby systems before master systems.  This changes
sizeof(RelationData) and sizeof(IndexStmt), breaking binary
compatibility for affected extensions.  (The most recent commit to
affect the same class of extensions was
089e4d405d0f3b94c74a2c6a54357a84a681754b.)

Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed (in earlier, similar versions) by Robert
Haas.  Heikki Linnakangas and Michael Paquier implemented earlier
designs that materially clarified the problem.  Reviewed, in earlier
designs, by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane,
Fujii Masao, and Simon Riggs.  Reported by Martijn van Oosterhout.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20150702220524.GA9392@svana.org
2020-03-21 09:38:26 -07:00
Alvaro Herrera c9d2977519 Clean up newlines following left parentheses
We used to strategically place newlines after some function call left
parentheses to make pgindent move the argument list a few chars to the
left, so that the whole line would fit under 80 chars.  However,
pgindent no longer does that, so the newlines just made the code
vertically longer for no reason.  Remove those newlines, and reflow some
of those lines for some extra naturality.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200129200401.GA6303@alvherre.pgsql
2020-01-30 13:42:14 -03:00
Thomas Munro 6f38d4dac3 Remove dependency on HeapTuple from predicate locking functions.
The following changes make the predicate locking functions more
generic and suitable for use by future access methods:

- PredicateLockTuple() is renamed to PredicateLockTID().  It takes
  ItemPointer and inserting transaction ID instead of HeapTuple.

- CheckForSerializableConflictIn() takes blocknum instead of buffer.

- CheckForSerializableConflictOut() no longer takes HeapTuple or buffer.

Author: Ashwin Agrawal
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Kuntal Ghosh, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeiv0k3hkEb3Oqk%3DziWqtyk2Jys1UOK5hwRBNeANT_yX%2Bng%40mail.gmail.com
2020-01-28 13:13:04 +13:00
Amit Kapila 4d8a8d0c73 Introduce IndexAM fields for parallel vacuum.
Introduce new fields amusemaintenanceworkmem and amparallelvacuumoptions
in IndexAmRoutine for parallel vacuum.  The amusemaintenanceworkmem tells
whether a particular IndexAM uses maintenance_work_mem or not.  This will
help in controlling the memory used by individual workers as otherwise,
each worker can consume memory equal to maintenance_work_mem.  The
amparallelvacuumoptions tell whether a particular IndexAM participates in
a parallel vacuum and if so in which phase (bulkdelete, vacuumcleanup) of
vacuum.

Author: Masahiko Sawada and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila, Tomas Vondra and Robert Haas
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDTPMgzSkV4E3SFo1CH_x50bf5PqZFQf4jmqjk-C03BWg@mail.gmail.com
https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LmcD5aPogzwim5Nn58Ki+74a6Edghx4Wd8hAskvHaq5A@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-15 07:24:14 +05:30
Amit Kapila 4e514c6180 Delete empty pages in each pass during GIST VACUUM.
Earlier, we use to postpone deleting empty pages till the second stage of
vacuum to amortize the cost of scanning internal pages.  However, that can
sometimes (say vacuum is canceled or errored between first and second
stage) delay the pages to be recycled.

Another thing is that to facilitate deleting empty pages in the second
stage, we need to share the information about internal and empty pages
between different stages of vacuum.  It will be quite tricky to share this
information via DSM which is required for the upcoming parallel vacuum
patch.

Also, it will bring the logic to reclaim deleted pages closer to nbtree
where we delete empty pages in each pass.

Overall, the advantages of deleting empty pages in each pass outweigh the
advantages of postponing the same.

Author: Dilip Kumar, with changes by Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LGr+MN0xHZpJ2dfS8QNQ1a_aROKowZB+MPNep8FVtwAA@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-13 07:59:44 +05:30
Bruce Momjian 7559d8ebfa Update copyrights for 2020
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2020-01-01 12:21:45 -05:00
Michael Paquier 7854e07f25 Revert "Rename files and headers related to index AM"
This follows multiple complains from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund and
Alvaro Herrera that this issue ought to be dug more before actually
happening, if it happens.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191226144606.GA5659@alvherre.pgsql
2019-12-27 08:09:00 +09:00
Michael Paquier 8ce3aa9b59 Rename files and headers related to index AM
The following renaming is done so as source files related to index
access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the
original names used for index AMs ware too generic, and could be
confused as including features related to table AMs):
- amapi.h -> indexam.h.
- amapi.c -> indexamapi.c.  Here we have an equivalent with
backend/access/table/tableamapi.c.
- amvalidate.c -> indexamvalidate.c.
- amvalidate.h -> indexamvalidate.h.
- genam.c -> indexgenam.c.
- genam.h -> indexgenam.h.

This has been discussed during the development of v12 when table AM was
worked on, but the renaming never happened.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191223053434.GF34339@paquier.xyz
2019-12-25 10:23:39 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas 741b884353 Fix yet another crash in page split during GiST index creation.
Commit a7ee7c8513 fixed a bug in GiST page split during index creation,
where we failed to re-find the position of a downlink after the page
containing it was split. However, that fix was incomplete; the other call
to gistinserttuples() in the same function needs to also clear
'downlinkoffnum'.

Fixes bug #16134 reported by Alexander Lakhin, for real this time. The
previous fix was enough to fix the crash with the reproducer script for
bug #16162, but the original script for #16134 was still crashing.

Backpatch to v12, like the previous incomplete fix.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d869f537-abe4-d2ea-0510-38cd053f5152%40gmail.com
2019-12-16 13:57:41 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas a7ee7c8513 Fix crash when a page was split during GiST index creation.
The bug was similar to the one that was fixed in commit 22251686f0. When
we split page X and insert the downlink for the new page, the parent page
might also need to be split. When that happens, the downlink offset number
we remembered for X is no longer valid. We correctly called
gistFindCorrectParent() to re-find it, but gistFindCorrectParent() doesn't
do anything if the LSN of the page hasn't changed, and we stopped updating
LSNs during index build in commit 9155580fd5. The buggy codepath was taken
if the page was split into three or more pages, and inserting the downlink
caused the parent page to split. To fix, explicitly mark the downlink
offset number as invalid, to force gistFindCorrectParent() to re-find it.

Fixes bug #16134 reported by Alexander Lakhin, reported again as #16162 by
Andreas Kunert. Thanks to Jeff Janes, Tom Lane and Tomas Vondra for
debugging. Backpatch to v12, where we stopped WAL-logging during index
build.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16134-0423f729671dec64%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16162-45d21b7b6c1a3105%40postgresql.org
2019-12-13 23:58:10 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera 3974c4a724 Remove useless "return;" lines
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191128144653.GA27883@alvherre.pgsql
2019-11-28 16:48:37 -03:00
Amit Kapila 14aec03502 Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules.
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order
of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules.

In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions.

Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-12 08:30:16 +05:30
Andres Freund aae50236e4 Pass ItemPointer not HeapTuple to IndexBuildCallback.
Not all AMs use HeapTuples internally, making it inconvenient to pass
a HeapTuple. As the index callbacks really only need the TID, not the
full tuple, modify callback to only take ItemPointer.

Author: Ashwin Agrawal
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeis6=8ehuR=VNtHvj3z16cYfCwPdTcpaxU+sfSUJ5QgR3g@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-08 11:49:29 -08:00
Andres Freund 01368e5d9d Split all OBJS style lines in makefiles into one-line-per-entry style.
When maintaining or merging patches, one of the most common sources
for conflicts are the list of objects in makefiles. Especially when
the split across lines has been changed on both sides, which is
somewhat common due to attempting to stay below 80 columns, those
conflicts are unnecessarily laborious to resolve.

By splitting, and alphabetically sorting, OBJS style lines into one
object per line, conflicts should be less frequent, and easier to
resolve when they still occur.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191029200901.vww4idgcxv74cwes@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-11-05 14:41:07 -08:00
Michael Paquier 3534fa2233 Refactor code building relation options
Historically, the code to build relation options has been shaped the
same way in multiple code paths by using a set of datums in input with
the options parsed with a static table which is then filled with the
option values.  This introduces a new common routine in reloptions.c to
do most of the legwork for the in-core code paths.

Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGsoSn_uTPPYT19WrtR7oYpYtv4CdS0xuedTKiHHWuk_g@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-05 09:17:05 +09:00
Amit Kapila 70a6c37d52 Fix memory leak introduced in commit 7df159a620.
We memorize all internal and empty leaf pages in the 1st vacuum stage for
gist indexes.  They are used in the 2nd stage, to delete all the empty
pages.  There was a memory context page_set_context for this purpose, but
we never used it.

Reported-by: Amit Kapila
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 12, where it got introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LGr+MN0xHZpJ2dfS8QNQ1a_aROKowZB+MPNep8FVtwAA@mail.gmail.com
2019-10-21 08:57:32 +05:30
Alvaro Herrera 773df883e8 Support reloptions of enum type
All our current in core relation options of type string (not many,
admittedly) behave in reality like enums.  But after seeing an
implementation for enum reloptions, it's clear that strings are messier,
so introduce the new reloption type.  Switch all string options to be
enums instead.

Fortunately we have a recently introduced test module for reloptions, so
we don't lose coverage of string reloptions, which may still be used by
third-party modules.

Authors: Nikolay Shaplov, Álvaro Herrera
Reviewed-by: Nikita Glukhov, Aleksandr Parfenov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43332102.S2V5pIjXRx@x200m
2019-09-25 15:56:52 -03:00
Alexander Korotkov 6cae9d2c10 Improve handling of NULLs in KNN-GiST and KNN-SP-GiST
This commit improves subject in two ways:

 * It removes ugliness of 02f90879e7, which stores distance values and null
   flags in two separate arrays after GISTSearchItem struct.  Instead we pack
   both distance value and null flag in IndexOrderByDistance struct.  Alignment
   overhead should be negligible, because we typically deal with at most few
   "col op const" expressions in ORDER BY clause.
 * It fixes handling of "col op NULL" expression in KNN-SP-GiST.  Now, these
   expression are not passed to support functions, which can't deal with them.
   Instead, NULL result is implicitly assumed.  It future we may decide to
   teach support functions to deal with NULL arguments, but current solution is
   bugfix suitable for backpatch.

Reported-by: Nikita Glukhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/826f57ee-afc7-8977-c44c-6111d18b02ec%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Nikita Glukhov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-09-19 21:48:39 +03:00
Alexander Korotkov 02f90879e7 Fix handling of NULL distances in KNN-GiST
In order to implement NULL LAST semantic GiST previously assumed distance to
the NULL value to be Inf.  However, our distance functions can return Inf and
NaN for non-null values.  In such cases, NULL LAST semantic appears to be
broken.  This commit fixes that by introducing separate array of null flags for
distances.

Backpatch to all supported versions.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-09-08 22:08:12 +03:00
Alexander Korotkov e5d8f35961 Fix handling Inf and Nan values in GiST pairing heap comparator
Previously plain float comparison was used in GiST pairing heap.  Such
comparison doesn't provide proper ordering for value sets containing Inf and Nan
values.  This commit fixes that by usage of float8_cmp_internal().  Note, there
is remaining problem with NULL distances, which are represented as Inf in
pairing heap.  It would be fixes in subsequent commit.

Backpatch to all supported versions.

Reported-by: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-09-08 22:08:12 +03:00
Michael Paquier 66bde49d96 Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 10
This addresses some issues with unnecessary code comments, fixes various
typos in docs and comments, and removes some orphaned structures and
definitions.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9aabc775-5494-b372-8bcb-4dfc0bd37c68@gmail.com
2019-08-13 13:53:41 +09:00
Michael Paquier 8548ddc61b Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 9
This addresses more issues with code comments, variable names and
unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7ab243e0-116d-3e44-d120-76b3df7abefd@gmail.com
2019-08-05 12:14:58 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas 6655a7299d Use full 64-bit XID for checking if a deleted GiST page is old enough.
Otherwise, after a deleted page gets even older, it becomes unrecyclable
again. B-tree has the same problem, and has had since time immemorial,
but let's at least fix this in GiST, where this is new.

Backpatch to v12, where GiST page deletion was introduced.

Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/835A15A5-F1B4-4446-A711-BF48357EB602%40yandex-team.ru
2019-07-24 20:24:07 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas 9eb5607e69 Refactor checks for deleted GiST pages.
The explicit check in gistScanPage() isn't currently really necessary, as
a deleted page is always empty, so the loop would fall through without
doing anything, anyway. But it's a marginal optimization, and it gives a
nice place to attach a comment to explain how it works.

Backpatch to v12, where GiST page deletion was introduced.

Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/835A15A5-F1B4-4446-A711-BF48357EB602%40yandex-team.ru
2019-07-24 20:24:05 +03:00
Michael Paquier 23bccc823d Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues with code
comments, variable names and unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dff75442-2468-f74f-568c-6006e141062f@gmail.com
2019-07-22 10:01:50 +09:00
Tom Lane d97b714a21 Avoid using lcons and list_delete_first where it's easy to do so.
Formerly, lcons was about the same speed as lappend, but with the new
List implementation, that's not so; with a long List, data movement
imposes an O(N) cost on lcons and list_delete_first, but not lappend.

Hence, invent list_delete_last with semantics parallel to
list_delete_first (but O(1) cost), and change various places to use
lappend and list_delete_last where this can be done without much
violence to the code logic.

There are quite a few places that construct result lists using lcons not
lappend.  Some have semantic rationales for that; I added comments about
it to a couple that didn't have them already.  In many such places though,
I think the coding is that way only because back in the dark ages lcons
was faster than lappend.  Hence, switch to lappend where this can be done
without causing semantic changes.

In ExecInitExprRec(), this results in aggregates and window functions that
are in the same plan node being executed in a different order than before.
Generally, the executions of such functions ought to be independent of
each other, so this shouldn't result in visibly different query results.
But if you push it, as one regression test case does, you can show that
the order is different.  The new order seems saner; it's closer to
the order of the functions in the query text.  And we never documented
or promised anything about this, anyway.

Also, in gistfinishsplit(), don't bother building a reverse-order list;
it's easy now to iterate backwards through the original list.

It'd be possible to go further towards removing uses of lcons and
list_delete_first, but it'd require more extensive logic changes,
and I'm not convinced it's worth it.  Most of the remaining uses
deal with queues that probably never get long enough to be worth
sweating over.  (Actually, I doubt that any of the changes in this
patch will have measurable performance effects either.  But better
to have good examples than bad ones in the code base.)

Patch by me, thanks to David Rowley and Daniel Gustafsson for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21272.1563318411@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-07-17 11:15:34 -04:00
Michael Paquier 0896ae561b Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues around:
- Fixes for typos and incorrect reference names.
- Removal of unneeded comments.
- Removal of unreferenced functions and structures.
- Fixes regarding variable name consistency.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10bfd4ac-3e7c-40ab-2b2e-355ed15495e8@gmail.com
2019-07-16 13:23:53 +09:00
Alexander Korotkov c085e1c1cb Add support for <-> (box, point) operator to GiST box_ops
Index-based calculation of this operator is exact.  So, signature of
gist_bbox_distance() function is changes so that caller is responsible for
setting *recheck flag.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f71ba19d-d989-63b6-f04a-abf02ad9345d%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Nikita Glukhov
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Alexander Korotkov
2019-07-14 15:09:15 +03:00
Michael Paquier fa19a08d71 Fix variable initialization when using buffering build with GiST
This can cause valgrind to complain, as the flag marking a buffer as a
temporary copy was not getting initialized.

While on it, fill in with zeros newly-created buffer pages.  This does
not matter when loading a block from a temporary file, but it makes the
push of an index tuple into a new buffer page safer.

This has been introduced by 1d27dcf, so backpatch all the way down to
9.4.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15899-0d24fb273b3dd90c@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-07-10 15:14:54 +09:00