calls. This has never actually cached anything, because postgres.c does
each fastpath call as a separate transaction command, and so fastpath.c
would always decide that its cache was outdated. If it had worked, it
would now be failing for calls of oldstyle functions due to dangling
pointers in the FmgrInfo struct. Rip it out for simplicity and bug-
proofing.
report on old-style functions invoked by RI triggers. We had a number of
other places that were being sloppy about which memory context FmgrInfo
subsidiary data will be allocated in. Turns out none of them actually
cause a problem in 7.1, but this is for arcane reasons such as the fact
that old-style triggers aren't supported anyway. To avoid getting burnt
later, I've restructured the trigger support so that we don't keep trigger
FmgrInfo structs in relcache memory. Some other related cleanups too:
it's not really necessary to call fmgr_info at all while setting up
the index support info in relcache entries, because those ScanKeyEntry
structs are never used to invoke the functions. This should speed up
relcache initialization a tiny bit.
because cached fmgr info contained reference to a shorter-lived data
structure. Also guard against possibility that fmgr_info could fail,
leaving an incomplete entry present in the hash table.
database, and often need the latest timestamp, but want to
format it as a date. With 7.0.x, I just
select ts from foo order by ts desc limit 1
and in java: d = res.getDate(1);
but this fails everywhere in my code now :(
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/jdbc/spec/jdbc-spec.frame7.html
says
The ResultSet.getXXX methods will attempt to
convert whatever SQL type was returned by the
database to whatever Java type is returned by
the getXXX method.
Palle Girgensohn
when added by alter table add constraint. The first file
patches backend/commands/command.c and the latter is a patch
to the alter table regression test.
Stephan Szabo
basically want your guys feedback. I have sprinkled some of my q's thru
the text delimited with the @@ symbol. It seems to work perfectly.
[ Removed @@ comments because patch was reviewed. ]
At the moment it does CHECK constraints only, with inheritance. However,
due to the problem mentioned before with the mismatching between inherited
constraints it may be wise to disable the inheritance feature for a while.
it is written in an extensible fashion to support future dropping of other
types of constraint, and is well documented.
Please send me your comments, check my use of locking, updating of
indices, use of ERROR and NOTICE, etc. and I will rework the patch based
on feedback until everyone
is happy with it...
Christopher Kings
7.7. Keys
you have
However, my application requires that each collection will also have a
unique name. Why? So that a human being who wants to modify a collection
will be able to identify it. It's much harder to know, if you have two
collections named "Life Science", the the one tagged 24433 is the one
you
need, and the one tagged 29882 is not
I think 'the the' shouldn't be repeated twice. Although taken from an
email it would be cool to fix.
Cheers,
Maxim Maletsky
from an empty text string. This makes them consistent with the de facto
behavior of type char's I/O conversion functions, and avoids generating
text values with embedded nulls, which confuse many text operators.
which says that PERFORM will execute any SELECT query and discard the
result. The former implementation would in fact raise an error if the
result contained more than one row or more than one column.
Also, change plpgsql's error-logging mechanism to emit the additional
messages about error location at NOTICE rather than DEBUG level. This
allows them to be seen by the client without having to dig into the
postmaster log file (which may be nonexistent or inaccessible by the
client).
Indicies: palm_buy_date_idx
palm_user_date_idx
Primary Key: palm_buyers_pkey
Unique Key: palm_buyers_username
Constraint: "$1" ((sex = 'M'::bpchar) OR (sex = 'F'::bpchar))
Note that check constraint name now shown as well. (Makes it a lot easier
to test inheritance support in ADD/DROP constraint :) )
Attached is a docs change for psql.
Christopher Kings
non-unique: stay as they were
unique and primary: become listed as primary keys
unique and non-primary: become listed as unique keys
I also made it so that it shows the names of check constraints ie:
Check: "$1" (a > 5)
Christopher Kings