Bug #17512 highlighted that a suitably broken data type could cause the
backend to crash if either the hash function or equality function were in
someway non-deterministic based on their input values. Such a data type
could cause a crash of the backend due to some code which assumes that
we'll always find a hash table entry corresponding to an item in the
Memoize LRU list.
Here we remove the assumption that we'll always find the entry
corresponding to the given LRU list item and add run-time checks to verify
we have found the given item in the cache.
This is not a fix for bug #17512, but it will turn the crash reported by
that bug report into an internal ERROR.
Reported-by: Ales Zeleny
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpxFSTwvoYWT7kmFVSZ9zLAeHb=S9vrz=RExMgSkQNWqw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was added.
pg_stat_get_subscription scanned one more LogicalRepWorker array entry
than is really allocated. In the worst case this could lead to SIGSEGV,
if the LogicalRepCtx data structure is near the end of shared memory.
That seems quite unlikely though (thanks to the ordering of calls in
CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores) and we've heard no field reports of it.
A more likely misbehavior is one row of garbage data in the function's
result, but even that is not real likely because of the check that the
pid field matches some live backend.
Report and fix by Kuntal Ghosh. This bug is old, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QCJykEDzW6jQK6Yz7Qh_PMtD=95de_7QoocbVR2Qy8hWZA@mail.gmail.com
Currently, we simply combine the column lists when publishing tables on
multiple publications and that can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior.
Say, if a column is published in any row-filtered publication, then the
values for that column are sent to the subscriber even for rows that don't
match the row filter, as long as the row matches the row filter for any
other publication, even if that other publication doesn't include the
column.
The main purpose of introducing a column list is to have statically
different shapes on publisher and subscriber or hide sensitive column
data. In both cases, it doesn't seem to make sense to combine column
lists.
So, we disallow the cases where the column list is different for the same
table when combining publications. It can be later extended to combine the
column lists for selective cases where required.
Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204251548.mudq7jbqnh7r@alvherre.pgsql
Since a117cebd6, some older gcc versions issue "variable may be used
uninitialized in this function" complaints for brin_summarize_range.
Silence that using the same coding pattern as in bt_index_check_internal;
arguably, a117cebd6 had too narrow a view of which compilers might give
trouble.
Nathan Bossart and Tom Lane. Back-patch as the previous commit was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220601163537.GA2331988@nathanxps13
This reverts commit d9d076222f "VACUUM: ignore indexing operations
with CONCURRENTLY".
These changes caused indexes created with the CONCURRENTLY option to
miss heap tuples that were HOT-updated and HOT-pruned during the index
creation. Before these changes, HOT pruning would have been prevented
by the Xmin of the transaction creating the index, but because this
change was precisely to allow the Xmin to move forward ignoring that
backend, now other backends scanning the table can prune them. This is
not a problem for VACUUM (which requires a lock that conflicts with a
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY operation), but HOT-prune can definitely
occur. In other words, Xmin advancement was sped up, but at the cost of
corrupting the resulting index.
Regrettably, this means that the new feature in PG14 that RIC/CIC on
very large tables no longer force VACUUM to retain very old tuples goes
away. We might try to implement it again in a later release, but for
now the risk of indexes missing tuples is too high and there's no easy
fix.
Backpatch to 14, where this change appeared.
Reported-by: Peter Slavov <pet.slavov@gmail.com>
Diagnosys-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Diagnosys-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Diagnosys-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17485-396609c6925b982d%40postgresql.org
We hadn't noticed this because (a) few people feed invalid
timezone abbreviation files to the server, and (b) in typical
scenarios guc.c would throw ereport(ERROR) and then transaction
abort handling would silently clean up the leaked file reference.
However, it was possible to observe file leakage warnings if one
breaks an already-active abbreviation file, because guc.c does
not throw ERROR when loading supposedly-validated settings during
session start or SIGHUP processing.
Report and fix by Kyotaro Horiguchi (cosmetic adjustments by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220530.173740.748502979257582392.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
With the old logic, when the reciever had not yet attached, we would
never call shm_mq_inc_bytes_written(), even if force_flush = true
was specified. That could result in a situation where data that the
sender believes it has sent is never received.
Along the way, remove a useless function prototype for a nonexistent
function from shm_mq.h.
Commit 46846433a0 introduced these
problems.
Pavan Deolasee, with a few changes by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdPkwtLLCTnzzmpSMXo3QZa2yXq0J7Q61ssdLFAJYrOVvQ@mail.gmail.com
Commit 1a36bc9db (SQL/JSON query functions) introduced STRING as a
type_func_name_keyword, thereby breaking applications that use
"string" as a table name, column name, function parameter name, etc.
That seems like a pretty bad thing, not least because the SQL spec
says that STRING is an unreserved keyword.
This is easy enough to fix so far as the core grammar is concerned.
However, doing so causes some ECPG test cases to fail, specifically
those that use "string" as a typedef name. It turns out this is
because portions of the ECPG grammar allow type_func_name_keywords
but not unreserved_keywords as typedef names. That's pretty horrid,
and it's mildly astonishing that we've not heard complaints about it
before. We can fix two of those uses trivially, but the ones in the
var_type production are less easy. As a stopgap, hard-code STRING as
an allowed alternative in var_type.
Per report from Alastair McKinley.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3661437.1653855582@sss.pgh.pa.us
In the codepath when no encoding conversion is required, the check for
incomplete character at the end of input incorrectly used server
encoding's max character length, instead of the client's. Usually the
server and client encodings are the same when we're not performing
encoding conversion, but SQL_ASCII is an exception.
In the passing, also fix some outdated comments that still talked about
the old COPY protocol. It was removed in v14.
Per bug #17501 from Vitaly Voronov. Backpatch to v14 where this was
introduced.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17501-128b1dd039362ae6@postgresql.org
This reverts commit 06f5295 as per issues with this approach, both in
terms of efficiency impact and stability. First, contrary to the
single-item cache for transaction IDs in transam.c, the cache may finish
by not be hit for a long time, and without an invalidation mechanism to
clear it, it would cause inconsistent results on wraparound for
example. Second, the use of SubTransGetTopmostTransaction() for the
caching has a limited impact on performance. SubTransGetParent() could
have more impact, though the benchmarking of the single-item approach
still needs to be proved, particularly under the conditions where SLRU
lookups are stressed in parallel with overflowed snapshots (aka more
than 64 subxids generated, for example).
After discussion with Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220524235250.gtt3uu5zktfkr4hv@alap3.anarazel.de
If a short description is specified as NULL in one of the various
DefineCustomXXXVariable() functions available to external modules to
define a custom parameter, SHOW ALL would crash. This change teaches
SHOW ALL to properly handle NULL short descriptions, as well as any code
paths that manipulate it, to gain in flexibility. Note that
help_config.c was already able to do that, when describing a set of GUCs
for postgres --describe-config.
Author: Steve Chavez
Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart, Andres Freund, Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGRrpzY6hO-Kmykna_XvsTv8P2DshGiU6G3j8yGao4mk0CqjHA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 10
9d9c02ccd added code to allow the executor to take shortcuts when quals
on monotonic window functions guaranteed that once the qual became false
it could never become true again. When possible, baserestrictinfo quals
are converted to become these quals, which we call run conditions.
Unfortunately, in 9d9c02ccd, I forgot to update
remove_unused_subquery_outputs to teach it about these run conditions.
This could cause a WindowFunc column which was unused in the target list
but referenced by an upper-level WHERE clause to be removed from the
subquery when the qual in the WHERE clause was converted into a window run
condition. Because of this, the entire WindowClause would be removed from
the query resulting in additional rows making it into the resultset when
they should have been filtered out by the WHERE clause.
Here we fix this by recording which target list items in the subquery have
run conditions. That gets passed along to remove_unused_subquery_outputs
to tell it not to remove these items from the target list.
Bug: #17495
Reported-by: Jeremy Evans
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17495-7ffe2fa0b261b9fa@postgresql.org
Commits a59c79564 et al. tried to sync libpq's SSL key file
permissions checks with what we've used for years in the backend.
We did not intend to create any new failure cases, but it turns out
we did: restricting the key file's ownership breaks cases where the
client is allowed to read a key file despite not having the identical
UID. In particular a client running as root used to be able to read
someone else's key file; and having seen that I suspect that there are
other, less-dubious use cases that this restriction breaks on some
platforms.
We don't really need an ownership check, since if we can read the key
file despite its having restricted permissions, it must have the right
ownership --- under normal conditions anyway, and the point of this
patch is that any additional corner cases where that works should be
deemed allowable, as they have been historically. Hence, just drop
the ownership check, and rearrange the permissions check to get rid
of its faulty assumption that geteuid() can't be zero. (Note that the
comparable backend-side code doesn't have to cater for geteuid() == 0,
since the server rejects that very early on.)
This does have the end result that the permissions safety check used
for a root user's private key file is weaker than that used for
anyone else's. While odd, root really ought to know what she's doing
with file permissions, so I think this is acceptable.
Per report from Yogendra Suralkar. Like the previous patch,
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MW3PR15MB3931DF96896DC36D21AFD47CA3D39@MW3PR15MB3931.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
repeat() checked for integer overflow during its calculation of the
required output space, but it just passed the resulting integer to
palloc(). This meant that result sizes between 1GB and 2GB led to
ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR, "invalid memory alloc request size" rather
than ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED, "requested length too large".
That seems like a bit of a wart, so add an explicit AllocSizeIsValid
check to make these error cases uniform.
Do likewise in the sibling functions lpad() etc. While we're here,
also modernize their overflow checks to use pg_mul_s32_overflow() etc
instead of expensive divisions.
Per complaint from Japin Li. This is basically cosmetic, so I don't
feel a need to back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ME3P282MB16676ED32167189CB0462173B6D69@ME3P282MB1667.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Mistake in 5891c7a8ed, likely made when switching the default value from none
to fetch during development.
Reported-By: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220524220147.GA1298892@nathanxps13
ruleutils.c was coded to suppress the AS label for a SELECT output
expression if the column name is "?column?", which is the parser's
fallback if it can't think of something better. This is fine, and
avoids ugly clutter, so long as (1) nothing further up in the parse
tree relies on that column name or (2) the same fallback would be
assigned when the rule or view definition is reloaded. Unfortunately
(2) is far from certain, both because ruleutils.c might print the
expression in a different form from how it was originally written
and because FigureColname's rules might change in future releases.
So we shouldn't rely on that.
Detecting exactly whether there is any outer-level use of a SELECT
column name would be rather expensive. This patch takes the simpler
approach of just passing down a flag indicating whether there *could*
be any outer use; for example, the output column names of a SubLink
are not referenceable, and we also do not care about the names exposed
by the right-hand side of a setop. This is sufficient to suppress
unwanted clutter in all but one case in the regression tests. That
seems like reasonable evidence that it won't be too much in users'
faces, while still fixing the cases we need to fix.
Per bug #17486 from Nicolas Lutic. This issue is ancient, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17486-1ad6fd786728b8af@postgresql.org
Several places in the planner tried to clamp a double value to fit
in a "long" by doing
(long) Min(x, (double) LONG_MAX);
This is subtly incorrect, because it casts LONG_MAX to double and
potentially back again. If long is 64 bits then the double value
is inexact, and the platform might round it up to LONG_MAX+1
resulting in an overflow and an undesirably negative output.
While it's not hard to rewrite the expression into a safe form,
let's put it into a common function to reduce the risk of someone
doing it wrong in future.
In principle this is a bug fix, but since the problem could only
manifest with group count estimates exceeding 2^63, it seems unlikely
that anyone has actually hit this or will do so anytime soon. We're
fixing it mainly to satisfy fuzzer-type tools. That being the case,
a HEAD-only fix seems sufficient.
Andrey Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ebbc2efb-7ef9-bf2f-1ada-d6ec48f70e58@postgrespro.ru
When an implicit operator family is created, it wasn't getting reported.
Make it do so.
This has always been missing. Backpatch to 10.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Leslie LEMAIRE <leslie.lemaire@developpement-durable.gouv.fr>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f74d69e151b22171e8829551b1159e77@developpement-durable.gouv.fr
This is a slight, convenient semantics change from what commit
0f0cfb4940 ("Fix parallel operations that prevent oldest xmin from
advancing") introduced that lets us simplify the coding in the one place
where it is used.
Backpatch to 13. This is related to commit 6fea65508a ("Tighten
ComputeXidHorizons' handling of walsenders") rewriting the code site
where this is used, which has not yet been backpatched, but it may well
be in the future.
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191637.eldwa2exvguw@alvherre.pgsql
Commit 923def9a53 and 52e4f0cd47 allowed to specify column lists and row
filters for publication tables. This commit extends the
pg_publication_tables view and pg_get_publication_tables function to
display that information.
This information will be useful to users and we also need this for the
later commit that prohibits combining multiple publications with different
column lists for the same table.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed By: Amit Kapila, Alvaro Herrera, Shi Yu, Takamichi Osumi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204251548.mudq7jbqnh7r@alvherre.pgsql
We weren't checking the length of the column list in the alias clause of
an XMLTABLE or JSON_TABLE function (a "tablefunc" RTE), and it was
possible to make the server crash by passing an overly long one. Fix it
by throwing an error in that case, like the other places that deal with
alias lists.
In passing, modify the equivalent test used for join RTEs to look like
the other ones, which was different for no apparent reason.
This bug came in when XMLTABLE was born in version 10; backpatch to all
stable versions.
Reported-by: Wang Ke <krking@zju.edu.cn>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17480-1c9d73565bb28e90@postgresql.org
We can use a single line to print all tuple counts that MERGE processed,
for conciseness, and elide those that are zeroes. Non-text formats
report all numbers, as is typical.
Per comment from Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220511163350.GL19626@telsasoft.com
In order to estimate the cache hit ratio of a Memoize node, one of the
inputs we require is the estimated number of times the Memoize node will
be rescanned. The higher this number, the large the cache hit ratio is
likely to become. Unfortunately, the value being passed as the number of
"calls" to the Memoize was incorrectly using the Nested Loop's
outer_path->parent->rows instead of outer_path->rows. This failed to
account for the fact that the outer_path might be parameterized by some
upper-level Nested Loop.
This problem could lead to Memoize plans appearing more favorable than
they might actually be. It could also lead to extended executor startup
times when work_mem values were large due to the planner setting overly
large MemoizePath->est_entries resulting in the Memoize hash table being
initially made much larger than might be required.
Fix this simply by passing outer_path->rows rather than
outer_path->parent->rows. Also, adjust the expected regression test
output for a plan change.
Reported-by: Pavel Stehule
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRAMp%3DQsMi6sPQJ4W3hczoFJRvyXHJV3AZAZaMyTVM312Q%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was introduced
I started out with the intention to rename value_type to item_type to
avoid a collision with a typedef name that appears on some platforms.
Along the way, I noticed that the adjacent field "format" was not being
correctly handled by the backend/nodes/ infrastructure functions:
copyfuncs.c erroneously treated it as a scalar, while equalfuncs,
outfuncs, and readfuncs omitted handling it at all. This looks like
it might be cosmetic at the moment because the field is always NULL
after parse analysis; but that's likely a bug in itself, and the code's
certainly not very future-proof. Let's fix it while we can still do so
without forcing an initdb on beta testers.
Further study found a few other inconsistencies in the backend/nodes/
infrastructure for the recently-added JSON node types, so fix those too.
catversion bumped because of potential change in stored rules.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/526703.1652385613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Currently, preloaded libraries are expected to request additional
shared memory and LWLocks in _PG_init(). However, it is not unusal
for such requests to depend on MaxBackends, which won't be
initialized at that time. Such requests could also depend on GUCs
that other modules might change. This introduces a new hook where
modules can safely use MaxBackends and GUCs to request additional
shared memory and LWLocks.
Furthermore, this change restricts requests for shared memory and
LWLocks to this hook. Previously, libraries could make requests
until the size of the main shared memory segment was calculated.
Unlike before, we no longer silently ignore requests received at
invalid times. Instead, we FATAL if someone tries to request
additional shared memory or LWLocks outside of the hook.
Nathan Bossart and Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220412210112.GA2065815%40nathanxps13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yn2jE/lmDhKtkUdr@paquier.xyz
pgstat_report_stat() is only supposed to be called outside of transactions. In
5891c7a8ed I added a pgstat_report_stat() call into LogicalRepApplyLoop()'s
timeout branch. While not commonly reached inside a transaction, it is
reachable (e.g. due to network bottlenecks or the sender being stalled / slow
for some reason).
To fix, add a !IsTransactionState() check.
No test added because there's no easy way to reproduce this case without
patching the code.
Reported-By: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3463b8c-2328-dcac-0136-af95715493c1@xs4all.nl
A few places used binary_upgrade_* variables without including the header,
which worked without warnings because the variables are defined in those
places. However that can cause linker complaints with MSVC - except that we
don't see them right now, due to the use of a symbol export file.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220512164513.vaheofqp2q24l65r@alap3.anarazel.de
This follows in the footsteps of commit 2591ee8ec by removing one more
ill-advised shortcut from planning of GroupingFuncs. It's true that
we don't intend to execute the argument expression(s) at runtime, but
we still have to process any Vars appearing within them, or we risk
failure at setrefs.c time (or more fundamentally, in EXPLAIN trying
to print such an expression). Vars in upper plan nodes have to have
referents in the next plan level, whether we ever execute 'em or not.
Per bug #17479 from Michael J. Sullivan. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17479-6260deceaf0ad304@postgresql.org
The code for unloading a library has been commented-out for over 12
years, ever since commit 602a9ef5a7, and we're
no closer to supporting it now than we were back then.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/Ynsc9bRL1caUSBSE@paquier.xyz
To enable diagnosis of systems that are not processing ProcSignalBarrier
requests promptly, add a LOG message every 5 seconds if we seem to be
wedged. Although you could already see this state as a wait event in
pg_stat_activity, the log message also shows the PID of the process that
is preventing progress.
Also add DEBUG1 logging around the whole wait loop.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoYJ03r5359gQutRGP9BtigYCg3_UskcmnVjBf-QO3-0pQ%40mail.gmail.com
The problem is that we don't send keep-alive messages for a long time
while processing large transactions during logical replication where we
don't send any data of such transactions. This can happen when the table
modified in the transaction is not published or because all the changes
got filtered. We do try to send the keep_alive if necessary at the end of
the transaction (via WalSndWriteData()) but by that time the
subscriber-side can timeout and exit.
To fix this we try to send the keepalive message if required after
processing certain threshold of changes.
Reported-by: Fabrice Chapuis
Author: Wang wei and Amit Kapila
Reviewed By: Masahiko Sawada, Euler Taveira, Hou Zhijie, Hayato Kuroda
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5-nLARN7-3SLU_QUxfy510pmrYK6JJb=bk3hcgemAM_pAv+w@mail.gmail.com
Presently, the server may emit a variety of log messages when inspecting
a runtime-computed GUC, mostly in the shape of one LOG message with the
default configuration, related to the startup sequence launched as such
GUCs require a load of the control file and of external shared
libraries.
For example, the server will always emit a "database system is shut
down" LOG (unless the user has set log_min_messages higher than LOG),
which is an annoying behavior as "postgres -C" is expected to only emit
in its output the parameter value we are looking for. The parameter
value is sent to stdout, while the logs are sent to stderr so we could
recommend to use a redirection, but there was not much love for this
workaround either.
To avoid such extra log messages, per discussion, this change sets
log_min_messages to FATAL internally when -C is used on a
runtime-computed GUC (even if set to PANIC in postgresql.conf). At
FATAL, the user will still receive messages explaining why a GUC value
cannot be inspected, and will know if the command is attempted on a
server already running, something not supported yet for a
runtime-computed GUC.
Reported-by: Magnus Hagander, Bruce Momjian
Author: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yni6ZHkGotUU+RSf@paquier.xyz
697492434 added 3 new quicksort specialization functions for common
datatypes.
That commit was not very consistent in how it would determine if we're
compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit machines. It would sometimes use
USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL and at other times check if SIZEOF_DATUM == 8. This
could cause theoretical problems due to the way USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL is now
defined based on SIZEOF_VOID_P >= 8. If pointers for some reason were
ever larger than 8-bytes then we'd end up doing 32-bit comparisons
mistakenly. Let's just always check SIZEOF_DATUM >= 8.
It also seems that ssup_datum_signed_cmp is just never used on 32-bit
builds, so let's just ifdef that out to make sure we never accidentally
use that comparison function on such machines. This also allows us to
ifdef out 1 of the 3 new specialization quicksort functions in 32-bit
builds which seems to shrink down the binary by over 4KB on my machine.
In passing, also add the missing DatumGetInt32() / DatumGetInt64() macros
in the comparison functions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqcQExRhtRa9hJrJB_5egs3SUfOcutP3m+3HO8A+fZTPA@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: John Naylor
The parser code that transformed VALUES from row-oriented to
column-oriented lists failed if there were zero columns.
You can't write that straightforwardly (though probably you
should be able to), but the case can be reached by expanding
a "tab.*" reference to a zero-column table.
Per bug #17477 from Wang Ke. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17477-0af3c6ac6b0a6ae0@postgresql.org
This reverts commit eafdf9de06
and its back-branch counterparts. Corey Huinker pointed out that
we'd discussed this exact change back in 2016 and rejected it,
on the grounds that there's at least one usage pattern with LIMIT
where an infinite endpoint can usefully be used. Perhaps that
argument needs to be re-litigated, but there's no time left before
our back-branch releases. To keep our options open, restore the
status quo ante; if we do end up deciding to change things, waiting
one more quarter won't hurt anything.
Rather than just doing a straight revert, I added a new test case
demonstrating the usage with LIMIT. That'll at least remind us of
the issue if we forget again.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603504.1652068977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM=dzw0Pvdqp5yWKxMd+VmNkAMhG=4ku7GnCZxebWnzmz3Q@mail.gmail.com
It intended to, but did not, achieve this. Adopt the new standard of
setting user ID just after locking the relation. Back-patch to v10 (all
supported versions).
Reviewed by Simon Riggs. Reported by Alvaro Herrera.
Security: CVE-2022-1552
When a feature enumerates relations and runs functions associated with
all found relations, the feature's user shall not need to trust every
user having permission to create objects. BRIN-specific functionality
in autovacuum neglected to account for this, as did pg_amcheck and
CLUSTER. An attacker having permission to create non-temp objects in at
least one schema could execute arbitrary SQL functions under the
identity of the bootstrap superuser. CREATE INDEX (not a
relation-enumerating operation) and REINDEX protected themselves too
late. This change extends to the non-enumerating amcheck interface.
Back-patch to v10 (all supported versions).
Sergey Shinderuk, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Alexander Lakhin.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Security: CVE-2022-1552
If a cluster is promoted (aka the control file shows a state different
than DB_IN_ARCHIVE_RECOVERY) while CreateRestartPoint() is still
processing, this function could miss an update of the control file for
"checkPoint" and "checkPointCopy" but still do the recycling and/or
removal of the past WAL segments, assuming that the to-be-updated LSN
values should be used as reference points for the cleanup. This causes
a follow-up restart attempting crash recovery to fail with a PANIC on a
missing checkpoint record if the end-of-recovery checkpoint triggered by
the promotion did not complete while the cluster abruptly stopped or
crashed before the completion of this checkpoint. The PANIC would be
caused by the redo LSN referred in the control file as located in a
segment already gone, recycled by the previous restartpoint with
"checkPoint" out-of-sync in the control file.
This commit fixes the update of the control file during restartpoints so
as "checkPoint" and "checkPointCopy" are updated even if the cluster has
been promoted while a restartpoint is running, to be on par with the set
of WAL segments actually recycled in the end of CreateRestartPoint().
This problem exists in all the stable branches. However, commit
7ff23c6, by removing the last call of CreateCheckPoint() from the
startup process, has made this bug much easier to reason about as
concurrent checkpoints are not possible anymore. No backpatch is done
yet, mostly out of caution from me as a point release is close by, but
we need to think harder about the case of concurrent checkpoints at
promotion if the bgwriter is not considered as running by the startup
process in ~v14, so this change is done only on HEAD for the moment.
Reported-by: Fujii Masao, Rui Zhao
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220316.102444.2193181487576617583.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Commits 4eb21763 and b74e94dc introduced a way to force every backend to
close all relation files, to fix an ancient Windows-only bug.
This commit extends that behavior to all operating systems and adds
a couple of extra barrier points, to fix a totally different class of
bug: the reuse of relfilenodes in scenarios that have no other kind of
cache invalidation to prevent file descriptor mix-ups.
In all releases, data corruption could occur when you moved a database
to another tablespace and then back again. Despite that, no back-patch
for now as the infrastructure required is too new and invasive. In
master only, since commit aa010514, it could also happen when using
CREATE DATABASE with a user-supplied OID or via pg_upgrade.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220209220004.kb3dgtn2x2k2gtdm%40alap3.anarazel.de
With sufficiently bad luck, it was possible for IssuePendingWritebacks()
to reopen a file after we'd processed PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE and
before the file was unlinked by some other backend. That left a small
hole in commit 4eb21763's plan to fix all spurious errors from DROP
TABLESPACE and similar on Windows.
Fix by closing md.c's segments, instead of just closing fd.c's
descriptors, and then teaching smgrwriteback() not to open files that
aren't already open.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220209220004.kb3dgtn2x2k2gtdm%40alap3.anarazel.de
Since 6bc8ef0b7f, the maximum number
of backends can't change as background workers are registered, but
these comments still reflect the way things worked prior to that.
Also, per recent discussion, some modules call SetConfigOption()
from _PG_init(). It's not entirely clear to me whether we want to
regard that as a fully supported operation, but since we know it's
a thing that happens, it at least deserves a mention in the comments,
so add that.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Anton A. Melnikov
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20220419154658.GA2487941@nathanxps13
SubqueryScan was always getting labeled with a rowcount estimate
appropriate for non-parallel cases. However, nodes that are
underneath a Gather should be treated as processing only one
worker's share of the rows, whether the particular node is explicitly
parallel-aware or not. Most non-scan-level node types get this
right automatically because they base their rowcount estimate on
that of their input sub-Path(s). But SubqueryScan didn't do that,
instead using the whole-relation rowcount estimate as if it were
a non-parallel-aware scan node. If there is a parallel-aware node
below the SubqueryScan, this is wrong, and it results in inflating
the cost estimates for nodes above the SubqueryScan, which can cause
us to not choose a parallel plan, or choose a silly one --- as indeed
is visible in the one regression test whose results change with this
patch. (Although that plan tree appears to contain no SubqueryScans,
there were some in it before setrefs.c deleted them.)
To fix, use path->subpath->rows not baserel->tuples as the number
of input tuples we'll process. This requires estimating the quals'
selectivity afresh, which is slightly annoying; but it shouldn't
really add much cost thanks to the caching done in RestrictInfo.
This is pretty clearly a bug fix, but I'll refrain from back-patching
as people might not appreciate plan choices changing in stable branches.
The fact that it took us this long to identify the bug suggests that
it's not a major problem.
Per report from bucoo, though this is not his proposed patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204121457159307248@sohu.com
The tests added in 9f8a050f68 failed nearly reliably on FreeBSD in CI, and
occasionally on the buildfarm. That turns out to be caused not by a bug in the
test, but by a longstanding bug in recovery conflict handling.
The standby timeout handler, used by ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin(),
executed SendRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin() inside a signal handler. A bad
idea, because the deadlock timeout handler (or a spurious latch set) could
have interrupted ProcWaitForSignal(). If unlucky that could cause a
self-deadlock on ProcArrayLock, if the deadlock check is in
SendRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin()->CancelDBBackends().
To fix, set a flag in StandbyTimeoutHandler(), and check the flag in
ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin().
Subsequently the recovery conflict tests will be backpatched.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220413002626.udl7lll7f3o7nre7@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 10-
Instability in the test for pg_walinspect revealed that
pg_get_wal_records_info_till_end_of_wal(x) would try to decode all the
records with a start LSN earlier than the flush LSN, even though that
might include a partial record at the end of the range. In that case,
read_local_xlog_page_no_wait() would return NULL when it tried to read
past the flush LSN, which would be interpreted as an error by the
caller. That caused a test failure only on a BF animal that had been
restarted recently, but could be expected to happen in the wild quite
easily depending on the alignment of various parameters.
Fix by using private data in read_local_xlog_page_no_wait() to signal
end-of-wal to the caller, so that it can be properly distinguished
from a real error.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Ymd/e5eeZMNAkrXo%40paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/111657.1650910309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Authors: Thomas Munro, Bharath Rupireddy.
mark_async_capable_plan(), which is called from create_append_plan() to
determine whether subplans are async-capable, failed to take into
account that the given subplan created from a given subpath might
include a gating Result node if the subpath is a SubqueryScanPath or
ForeignPath, causing a segmentation fault there when the subplan created
from a SubqueryScanPath includes the Result node, or causing
ExecAsyncRequest() to throw an error about an unrecognized node type
when the subplan created from a ForeignPath includes the Result node,
because in the latter case the Result node was unintentionally
considered as async-capable, but we don't currently support executing
Result nodes asynchronously. Fix by modifying mark_async_capable_plan()
to disable asynchronous execution in such cases. Also, adjust code in
the ProjectionPath case in mark_async_capable_plan(), for consistency
with other cases, and adjust/improve comments there.
is_async_capable_path() added in commit 27e1f1456, which was rewritten
to mark_async_capable_plan() in a later commit, has the same issue,
causing the error at execution mentioned above, so back-patch to v14
where the aforesaid commit went in.
Per report from Justin Pryzby.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Zhihong Yu and Justin Pryzby.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220408124338.GK24419%40telsasoft.com
This reverts commits 2c902bb and ccfbd92. Per buildfarm members
kestrel, rorqual and calliphoridae, the assertions checking that a TLI
history file should not exist when created by a WAL receiver have been
failing, and switching to durable_rename() over durable_rename_excl()
would cause the newest TLI history file to overwrite the existing one.
We need to think harder about such cases, so revert the new logic for
now.
Note that all the failures have been reported in the test
025_stuck_on_old_timeline.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/511362.1651116498@sss.pgh.pa.us
ccfbd92 has replaced all existing in-core callers of this function in
favor of durable_rename(). durable_rename_excl() is by nature unsafe on
crashes happening at the wrong time, so just remove it.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220407182954.GA1231544@nathanxps13
durable_rename_excl() attempts to avoid overwriting any existing files
by using link() and unlink(), falling back to rename() on some platforms
(e.g., Windows where link() followed by unlink() is not concurrent-safe,
see 909b449). Most callers of durable_rename_excl() use it just in case
there is an existing file, but it happens that for all of them we never
expect a target file to exist (WAL segment recycling, creation of
timeline history file and basic_archive).
basic_archive used durable_rename_excl() to avoid overwriting an archive
concurrently created by another server. Now, there is a stat() call to
avoid overwriting an existing archive a couple of lines above, so note
that this change opens a small TOCTOU window in this module between the
stat() call and durable_rename().
Furthermore, as mentioned in the top comment of durable_rename_excl(),
this routine can result in multiple hard links to the same file and data
corruption, with two or more links to the same file in pg_wal/ if a
crash happens before the unlink() call during WAL recycling.
Specifically, this would produce links to the same file for the current
WAL file and the next one because the half-recycled WAL file was
re-recycled during crash recovery of a follow-up cluster restart.
This change replaces all calls to durable_rename_excl() with
durable_rename(). This removes the protection against accidentally
overwriting an existing file, but some platforms are already living
without it, and all those code paths never expect an existing file (a
couple of assertions are added to check after that, in case).
This is a bug fix, but knowing the unlikeliness of the problem involving
one of more crashes at an exceptionally bad moment, no backpatch is
done. This could be revisited in the future.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220407182954.GA1231544@nathanxps13
Unlike existing WRITE_*_ARRAY macros, WRITE_INDEX_ARRAY needs to
handle the case that the field is NULL. We already have the
convention to print NULL fields as "<>", so we do that here as well.
There is currently no corresponding read function for this, so reading
this back in is not implemented, but it could be if needed.
Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-LN%3DbF8f9eU2R94dJtF54DfDvBq%2BovqHnOQqbinYDrUw%40mail.gmail.com
Several places didn't do it, and in many cases it didn't matter because
it would be a small allocation in a short-lived context; but other
places may accumulate a few (for example, in CreateDatabaseUsingFileCopy,
one per tablespace). In most databases this is highly unlikely to be
very serious either, but it seems better to make the code consistent in
case there's future copy-and-paste.
The only case of actual concern seems to be the aforementioned routine,
which is new with commit 9c08aea6a3, so there's no need to backpatch.
As pointed out by Coverity.
This function looks for a reference to the recursive WITH CTE,
but it checked only the CTE name not ctelevelsup, so that it could
seize on a lower CTE that happened to have the same name. This
would result in planner failures later, either weird errors such as
"could not find attribute 2 in subquery targetlist", or crashes
or assertion failures. The code also merely Assert'ed that it found
a matching entry, which is not guaranteed at all by the parser.
Per bugs #17320 and #17318 from Zhiyong Wu.
Thanks to Kyotaro Horiguchi for investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17320-70e37868182512ab@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17318-2eb65a3a611d2368@postgresql.org
697492434 added 3 new qsort specialization functions aimed to improve the
performance of sorting many of the common pass-by-value data types when
they're the leading or only sort key.
Unfortunately, that has caused a performance regression when sorting
datasets where many of the values being compared were equal. What was
happening here was that we were falling back to the standard sort
comparison function to handle tiebreaks. When the two given Datums
compared equally we would incur both the overhead of an indirect function
call to the standard comparer to perform the tiebreak and also the
standard comparer function would go and compare the leading key needlessly
all over again.
Here improve the situation in the 3 new comparison functions. We now
return 0 directly when the two Datums compare equally and we're performing
a 1-key sort.
Here we don't do anything to help the multi-key sort case where the
leading key uses one of the sort specializations functions. On testing
this case, even when the leading key's values are all equal, there
appeared to be no performance regression. Let's leave it up to future
work to optimize that case so that the tiebreak function no longer
re-compares the leading key over again.
Another possible fix for this would have been to add 3 additional sort
specialization functions to handle single-key sorts for these
pass-by-value types. The reason we didn't do that here is that we may
deem some other sort specialization to be more useful than single-key
sorts. It may be impractical to have sort specialization functions for
every single combination of what may be useful and it was already decided
that further analysis into which ones are the most useful would be delayed
until the v16 cycle. Let's not let this regression force our hand into
trying to make that decision for v15.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: John Naylor
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJRbzaAOUtBUcjF5hLtaSHnJUqXmtiaLEoi53zeWSizeA@mail.gmail.com
inline_cte() expected to find exactly as many references to the
target CTE as its cterefcount indicates. While that should be
accurate for the tree as emitted by the parser, there are some
optimizations that occur upstream of here that could falsify it,
notably removal of unused subquery output expressions.
Trying to make the accounting 100% accurate seems expensive and
doomed to future breakage. It's not really worth it, because
all this code is protecting is downstream assumptions that every
referenced CTE has a plan. Let's convert those assertions to
regular test-and-elog just in case there's some actual problem,
and then drop the failing assertion.
Per report from Tomas Vondra (thanks also to Richard Guo for
analysis). Back-patch to v12 where the faulty code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29196a1e-ed47-c7ca-9be2-b1c636816183@enterprisedb.com
Commit aa0105141 assigned fixed OIDs to template0 and postgres
in a very ad-hoc way. Notably, instead of teaching Catalog.pm
about these OIDs, the unused_oids script was just hacked to
not show them as unused. That's problematic since, for example,
duplicate_oids wouldn't report any future conflict. Hence,
invent a macro DECLARE_OID_DEFINING_MACRO() that can be used to
define an OID that is known to Catalog.pm and will participate
in duplicate-detection as well as renumbering by renumber_oids.pl.
(We don't anticipate renumbering these particular OIDs, but we
might as well build out all the Catalog.pm infrastructure while
we're here.)
Another issue is that aa0105141 neglected to touch IsPinnedObject,
with the result that it now claimed template0 and postgres are
pinned. The right thing to do there seems to be to teach it that
no database is pinned, since in fact DROP DATABASE doesn't check
for pinned-ness (and at least for these cases, that is an
intentional choice). It's not clear whether this wrong answer
had any visible effect, but perhaps it could have resulted in
erroneous management of dependency entries.
In passing, rename the TemplateDbOid macro to Template1DbOid
to reduce confusion (likely we should have done that way back
when we invented template0, but we didn't), and rename the
OID macros for template0 and postgres to have a similar style.
There are no changes to postgres.bki here, so no need for a
catversion bump.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2935358.1650479692@sss.pgh.pa.us
This is needed so that renumber_oids.pl can handle renumbering
shared catalog declarations, which need to provide C macros for
the OIDs of the shared toast table and index. The previous
method of writing a C macro separately was error-prone anyway.
Also teach renumber_oids.pl about DECLARE_UNIQUE_INDEX_PKEY,
as we missed doing when inventing that macro.
There are no changes to postgres.bki here, so no need for a
catversion bump.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2995325.1650487527@sss.pgh.pa.us
CLUSTER sort won't use the datum1 SortTuple field when clustering
against an index whose leading key is an expression. This makes it
unsafe to use the abbreviated keys optimization, which was missed by the
logic that sets up SortSupport state. Affected tuplesorts output tuples
in a completely bogus order as a result (the wrong SortSupport based
comparator was used for the leading attribute).
This issue is similar to the bug fixed on the master branch by recent
commit cc58eecc5d. But it's a far older issue, that dates back to the
introduction of the abbreviated keys optimization by commit 4ea51cdfe8.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+bA+bmwD36_oDxAoLrCwZjVtST2fqe=b4=qZcmU7u89A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 10-
Such cases will lead to infinite loops, so they're of no practical
value. The numeric variant of generate_series() already threw error
for this, so borrow its message wording.
Per report from Richard Wesley. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91B44E7B-68D5-448F-95C8-B4B3B0F5DEAF@duckdblabs.com
Coverity complains that dpns->outer_plan is deferenced (to obtain
->targetlist) when possibly NULL. We can avoid this by using
dpns->outer_tlist instead, which was already obtained a few lines up.
The fact that we end up with
dpns->inner_tlist = dpns->outer_tlist
is a bit suspicious-looking and maybe worthy of more investigation, but
I'll leave that for another day.
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191345.qerjy3kxi3eb@alvherre.pgsql
Should have been done this way to start with, but I failed to notice
This way we avoid some pointless initialization, and better contains the
variable to exist in the scope where it is really used.
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191345.qerjy3kxi3eb@alvherre.pgsql
There's no reason to keep a separate local variable when we have a place
for it elsewhere. This allows to simplify some code.
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191345.qerjy3kxi3eb@alvherre.pgsql
An ALTER FUNCTION command that tried to update both the function's
proparallel property and its proconfig list failed to do the former,
because it stored the new proparallel value into a tuple that was
no longer the interesting one. Carelessness in 7aea8e4f2.
(I did not bother with a regression test, because the only likely
future breakage would be for someone to ignore the comment I added
and add some other field update after the heap_modify_tuple step.
A test using existing function properties could not catch that.)
Per report from Bryn Llewellyn. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8AC9A37F-99BD-446F-A2F7-B89AD0022774@yugabyte.com
The new numeric code for extract epoch from interval accidentally
truncated the DAYS_PER_YEAR value to an integer, leading to results
that mismatched the floating-point interval_part calculations.
The commit a2da77cdb4 that introduced
this actually contains the regression test change that this reverts.
I suppose this was missed at the time.
Reported-by: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAvxfHd5n%3D13NYA2q_tUq%3D3%3DSuWU-CufmTf-Ozj%3DfrEgt7pXwQ%40mail.gmail.com
Don't try to look at the attidentity field of system attributes,
because they're not there in the TupleDescAttr array. Sometimes
this is harmless because we accidentally pick up a zero, but
otherwise we'll report "no owned sequence found" from an attempt
to alter a system attribute. (It seems possible that a SIGSEGV
could occur, too, though I've not seen it in testing.)
It's not in this function's charter to complain that you can't
alter a system column, so instead just hard-wire an assumption
that system attributes aren't identities. I didn't bother with
a regression test because the appearance of the bug is very
erratic.
Per bug #17465 from Roman Zharkov. Back-patch to all supported
branches. (There's not actually a live bug before v12, because
before that get_attidentity() did the right thing anyway.
But for consistency I changed the test in the older branches too.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17465-f2a554a6cb5740d3@postgresql.org
Suppress further attempts to read ahead in the WAL if we run out of
data, until the records already decoded have been replayed. This
restores the traditional behavior for continuous archive recovery, which
is to retry the failing restore_command only every 5 seconds. With the
coding in 5dc0418f, we would start retrying every time through the
recovery loop when our WAL decoding window hit the end of the current
segment and we tried to look ahead into a not-yet-available next file.
That was very slow.
Also change the no_readahead_until mechanism to use <= rather than <,
which seems more useful. Otherwise we'd either get one extra unwanted
retry of restore_command, or we'd need to add 1 to an LSN.
No change in behavior for regular streaming. That was already limited
by the flushedUpto variable, which won't be updated until we replay what
we have already.
Reported by Andres Freund while analyzing the failure of a TAP test on
build farm animal skink (investigation ongoing but probably due to
otherwise unrelated timing bugs triggered by this slowness magnified by
valgrind).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220409005910.alw46xqmmgny2sgr%40alap3.anarazel.de
Previously we didn't, which lead to an assertion failure when resetting
partially loaded statistics. This was encountered on the buildfarm, for
as-of-yet unknown reasons.
Ttighten up a validity check when reading the stats file, verifying 'E'
signals the end of the file (rather than just stopping reading). That's then
used in a test appending to the stats file that crashed before the fix in
pgstat_drop_all_entries().
Reported by buildfarm animals mylodon and kestrel, via Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1656446.1650043715@sss.pgh.pa.us
This function gave the wrong answer when there's more than one
RegisteredSnapshots entry, whether or not any of them is the
CatalogSnapshot. This leads to assertion failure in some scenarios
involving fetching toasted data using a cursor. (As per discussion,
I'm dubious that this is the right contract to be enforcing at all;
but it surely doesn't help to be enforcing it incorrectly.)
Fetching toasted data using a cursor is evidently under-tested,
so add a test case too.
Per report from Erik Rijkers. This is new code, so no need for
back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dc9dd229-ed30-6c62-4c41-d733ffff776b@xs4all.nl
Per-backend global variables like VacuumPageHit are initialized once per
VACUUM command. This was missed by commit 49c9d9fc, which unified
VACUUM VERBOSE and autovacuum logging. As a result of that oversight,
incorrect values were shown when multiple relations were processed by a
single VACUUM VERBOSE command.
Relations that happened to be processed later on would show "buffer
usage:" values that incorrectly included buffer accesses made while
processing earlier unrelated relations. The same accesses were counted
multiple times.
To fix, take initial values for the tracker variables at the start of
heap_vacuum_rel(), and report delta values later on.
ComputeXidHorizons (nee GetOldestXmin) thought that it could identify
walsenders by checking for proc->databaseId == 0. Perhaps that was
safe when the code was written, but it's been wrong at least since
autovacuum was invented. Background processes that aren't connected
to any particular database, such as the autovacuum launcher and
logical replication launcher, look like that too.
This imprecision is harmful because when such a process advertises an
xmin, the result is to hold back dead-tuple cleanup in all databases,
though it'd be sufficient to hold it back in shared catalogs (which
are the only relations such a process can access). Aside from being
generally inefficient, this has recently been seen to cause regression
test failures in the buildfarm, as a consequence of the logical
replication launcher's startup transaction preventing VACUUM from
marking pages of a user table as all-visible.
We only want that global hold-back effect for the case where a
walsender is advertising a hot standby feedback xmin. Therefore,
invent a new PGPROC flag that says that a process' xmin should be
considered globally, and check that instead of using the incorrect
databaseId == 0 test. Currently only a walsender sets that flag,
and only if it is not connected to any particular database. (This is
for bug-compatibility with the undocumented behavior of the existing
code, namely that feedback sent by a client who has connected to a
particular database would not be applied globally. I'm not sure this
is a great definition; however, such a client is capable of issuing
plain SQL commands, and I don't think we want xmins advertised for
such commands to be applied globally. Perhaps this could do with
refinement later.)
While at it, I rewrote the comment in ComputeXidHorizons, and
re-ordered the commented-upon if-tests, to make them match up
for intelligibility's sake.
This is arguably a back-patchable bug fix, but given the lack of
complaints I think it prudent to let it age awhile in HEAD first.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1346227.1649887693@sss.pgh.pa.us
Be consistent about the lines that VACUUM VERBOSE outputs by including
an "index scan not needed: " line for completely empty tables. This
makes the output more readable, especially with multiple distinct VACUUM
operations processed by the same VACUUM command. It's also more
consistent; even empty tables can use the failsafe, which wasn't
reported in the standard way until now.
Follow-up to commit 6e20f460, which taught VACUUM VERBOSE to be more
consistent about reporting on scanned pages with empty tables.
The age of OldestXmin (a.k.a. "removable cutoff") when VACUUM ends often
indicates the approximate number of XIDs consumed while VACUUM ran.
However, there is at least one important exception: the cutoff could be
held back by a snapshot that was acquired before our VACUUM even began.
Successive VACUUM operations may even use exactly the same old cutoff in
extreme cases involving long held snapshots.
The log messages that described how removable cutoff aged (which were
added by commit 872770fd) created the impression that we were reporting
on how VACUUM's usable cutoff advanced while VACUUM ran, which was
misleading in these extreme cases. Fix by using a more general wording.
Per gripe from Tom Lane.
In passing, relocate related instrumentation code for clarity.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1643035.1650035653@sss.pgh.pa.us
David Rowley
Tom Lane
Amit Kapila
Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas
Thomas Munro
Heikki Linnakangas
Andres Freund
Michael Paquier
John Naylor
Peter Eisentraut
Noah Misch
Etsuro Fujita
Jeff Davis
Andrew Dunstan
Peter Geoghegan