Commit Graph

1119 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Korotkov b1484a3f19 Let table AM insertion methods control index insertion
Previously, the executor did index insert unconditionally after calling
table AM interface methods tuple_insert() and multi_insert().  This commit
introduces the new parameter insert_indexes for these two methods.  Setting
'*insert_indexes' to true saves the current logic.  Setting it to false
indicates that table AM cares about index inserts itself and doesn't want the
caller to do that.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Matthias van de Meent, Mark Dilger
2024-03-30 22:53:56 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov c95c25f9af Custom reloptions for table AM
Let table AM define custom reloptions for its tables.  This allows to
specify AM-specific parameters by WITH clause when creating a table.

The code may use some parts from prior work by Hao Wu.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AMUA1wBBBxfc3tKRLLdU64rb.1.1683276279979.Hmail.wuhao%40hashdata.cn
Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Matthias van de Meent
2024-03-30 22:36:25 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov 27bc1772fc Generalize relation analyze in table AM interface
Currently, there is just one algorithm for sampling tuples from a table written
in acquire_sample_rows().  Custom table AM can just redefine the way to get the
next block/tuple by implementing scan_analyze_next_block() and
scan_analyze_next_tuple() API functions.

This approach doesn't seem general enough.  For instance, it's unclear how to
sample this way index-organized tables.  This commit allows table AM to
encapsulate the whole sampling algorithm (currently implemented in
acquire_sample_rows()) into the relation_analyze() API function.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Matthias van de Meent
2024-03-30 22:34:04 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas 427005742b Remove obsolete comment about VACUUM retrying pruning
Commit 1ccc1e05ae removed the retry logic that the comment talked
about.

Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240328015326.x5gnzsohl6j23b42@liskov
2024-03-28 10:18:48 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov 818861eb57 Fix some typos and grammar issues from commit 87985cc925
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
2024-03-27 11:47:41 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov 87985cc925 Allow locking updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Currently, in read committed transaction isolation mode (default), we have the
following sequence of actions when tuple_update()/tuple_delete() finds
the tuple updated by the concurrent transaction.

1. Attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete(), which
   returns TM_Updated.
2. Lock tuple with tuple_lock().
3. Re-evaluate plan qual (recheck if we still need to update/delete and
   calculate the new tuple for update).
4. Second attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete().
   This attempt should be successful, since the tuple was previously locked.

This commit eliminates step 2 by taking the lock during the first
tuple_update()/tuple_delete() call.  The heap table access method saves some
effort by checking the updated tuple once instead of twice.  Future
undo-based table access methods, which will start from the latest row version,
can immediately place a lock there.

Also, this commit makes tuple_update()/tuple_delete() optionally save the old
tuple into the dedicated slot.  That saves efforts on re-fetching tuples in
certain cases.

The code in nodeModifyTable.c is simplified by removing the nested switch/case.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdua-YFw3XTprfutzGp28xXLigFtzNbuFY8yPhqeq6X5kg%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Pavel Borisov, Vignesh C, Mason Sharp
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Chris Travers
2024-03-26 01:27:56 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas f83d709760 Merge prune, freeze and vacuum WAL record formats
The new combined WAL record is now used for pruning, freezing and 2nd
pass of vacuum. This is in preparation for changing VACUUM to write a
combined prune+freeze record per page, instead of separate two
records. The new WAL record format now supports that, but the code
still always writes separate records for pruning and freezing.

This reserves separate XLOG_HEAP2_* info codes for when the pruning
record is emitted for on-access pruning or VACUUM, per Peter
Geoghegan's suggestion. The record format is identical, but having
separate info codes makes it easier analyze pruning and vacuuming with
pg_waldump.

The function to emit the new WAL record, log_heap_prune_and_freeze(),
is in pruneheap.c. The existing heap_log_freeze_plan() and its
subroutines are moved to pruneheap.c without changes, to keep them
together with log_heap_prune_and_freeze().

Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_azf-zH%3DDgVbquZ3tFWjMY1w5pO8m-TXJaMdri8z3933g@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_b2oE4GL%3Dq4g9mcByS9yT7wTQvEH9OLpabj28e%2BWKFi2A@mail.gmail.com
2024-03-25 14:59:58 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov c35a3fb5e0 Allow table AM tuple_insert() method to return the different slot
This allows table AM to return a native tuple slot even if
VirtualTupleTableSlot is given as an input.  Native tuple slots have knowledge
about system attributes, which could be accessed in the future.
table_multi_insert() method already can modify the input 'slots' array.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Mark Dilger, Pavel Borisov
Reviewed-by: Nikita Malakhov, Japin Li
2024-03-21 23:00:40 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov 02eb07ea89 Allow table AM to store complex data structures in rd_amcache
The new table AM method free_rd_amcache is responsible for freeing all the
memory related to rd_amcache and setting free_rd_amcache to NULL.  If the new
method is not specified, we still assume rd_amcache to be a single chunk of
memory, which could be just pfree'd.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Mark Dilger, Pavel Borisov
Reviewed-by: Nikita Malakhov, Japin Li
2024-03-21 23:00:34 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas c9c260decd Remove unused PruneState member rel
PruneState->rel is no longer being used, so just remove it.

Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240320013602.6sypr4cx6sefpemg@liskov
2024-03-20 10:13:42 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas c33084205a Reorganize heap_page_prune() function comment
heap_page_prune()'s function header comment didn't explain the
parameters in the same order they appear in the function. Fix that.

Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240320013602.6sypr4cx6sefpemg@liskov
2024-03-20 10:13:39 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut 97d85be365 Make the order of the header file includes consistent
Similar to commit 7e735035f2.

Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-WhpCFMbXCjtJ%2BFzmjfPrp7Hw1pk4p%2BZpU95Kh3ofZ1A%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-13 15:07:00 +01:00
Heikki Linnakangas 3d8652cd32 Remove unneeded vacuum_delay_point from heap_vac_scan_get_next_block
heap_vac_scan_get_next_block() does relatively little work, so there
is no need to call vacuum_delay_point(). A future commit will call
heap_vac_scan_get_next_block() from a callback, and we would like to
avoid calling vacuum_delay_point() in that callback.

Author: Melanie Plageman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_Yf3gvXGcCnqqfoq0Q8LX8UM-e-qbm_B1LeZh60f8WhWA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-11 20:45:33 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas 4e76f984a7 Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip()
Rename lazy_scan_skip() to heap_vac_scan_next_block() and move more
code into the function, so that the caller doesn't need to know about
ranges or skipping anymore. heap_vac_scan_next_block() returns the
next block to process, and the logic for determining that block is all
within the function. This makes the skipping logic easier to
understand, as it's all in the same function, and makes the calling
code easier to understand as it's less cluttered. The state variables
needed to manage the skipping logic are moved to LVRelState.

heap_vac_scan_next_block() now manages its own VM buffer separately
from the caller's vmbuffer variable. The caller's vmbuffer holds the
VM page for the current block its processing, while
heap_vac_scan_next_block() keeps a pin on the VM page for the next
unskippable block. Most of the time they are the same, so we hold two
pins on the same buffer, but it's more convenient to manage them
separately.

For readability inside heap_vac_scan_next_block(), move the logic of
finding the next unskippable block to separate function, and add some
comments.

This refactoring will also help future patches to switch to using a
streaming read interface, and eventually AIO
(https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJkOiOCa%2Bmag4BF%2BzHo7qo%3Do9CFheB8%3Dg6uT5TUm2gkvA%40mail.gmail.com)

Author: Melanie Plageman, Heikki Linnakangas
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund (older version)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_Yf3gvXGcCnqqfoq0Q8LX8UM-e-qbm_B1LeZh60f8WhWA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-11 20:43:58 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas 674e49c73c Set all_visible_according_to_vm correctly with DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING
It's important for 'all_visible_according_to_vm' to correctly reflect
whether the VM bit is set or not, even when we are not trusting the VM
to skip pages, because contrary to what the comment said,
lazy_scan_prune() relies on it.

If it's incorrectly set to 'false', when the VM bit is in fact set,
lazy_scan_prune() will try to set the VM bit again and dirty the page
unnecessarily. As a result, if you used DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING, all
heap pages were dirtied, even if there were no changes. We would also
fail to clear any VM bits that were set incorrectly.

This was broken in commit 980ae17310, so backpatch to v16.

Backpatch-through: 16
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman, Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3df2b582-dc1c-46b6-99b6-38eddd1b2784@iki.fi
2024-03-11 09:28:09 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut dbbca2cf29 Remove unused #include's from backend .c files
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU)

While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its
main purpose), this patch does not do that.  In some cases, a more
specific #include replaces another less specific one.

Some manual adjustments of the automatic result:

- IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global
  variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so
  those includes are being kept manually.

- All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to
  play it safe.

- No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the
  patch from exploding in size.

Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in
header files changes in hidden ways.

As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU
pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
2024-03-04 12:02:20 +01:00
Heikki Linnakangas 393b5599e5 Use MyBackendType in more places to check what process this is
Remove IsBackgroundWorker, IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess(),
IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess(), and IsLogicalSlotSyncWorker() in favor of
new Am*Process() macros that use MyBackendType. For consistency with
the existing Am*Process() macros.

Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f3ecd4cb-85ee-4e54-8278-5fabfb3a4ed0@iki.fi
2024-03-04 10:25:12 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas 8af2565248 Introduce a new smgr bulk loading facility.
The new facility makes it easier to optimize bulk loading, as the
logic for buffering, WAL-logging, and syncing the relation only needs
to be implemented once. It's also less error-prone: We have had a
number of bugs in how a relation is fsync'd - or not - at the end of a
bulk loading operation. By centralizing that logic to one place, we
only need to write it correctly once.

The new facility is faster for small relations: Instead of of calling
smgrimmedsync(), we register the fsync to happen at next checkpoint,
which avoids the fsync latency. That can make a big difference if you
are e.g. restoring a schema-only dump with lots of relations.

It is also slightly more efficient with large relations, as the WAL
logging is performed multiple pages at a time. That avoids some WAL
header overhead. The sorted GiST index build did that already, this
moves the buffering to the new facility.

The changes to pageinspect GiST test needs an explanation: Before this
patch, the sorted GiST index build set the LSN on every page to the
special GistBuildLSN value, not the LSN of the WAL record, even though
they were WAL-logged. There was no particular need for it, it just
happened naturally when we wrote out the pages before WAL-logging
them. Now we WAL-log the pages first, like in B-tree build, so the
pages are stamped with the record's real LSN. When the build is not
WAL-logged, we still use GistBuildLSN. To make the test output
predictable, use an unlogged index.

Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30e8f366-58b3-b239-c521-422122dd5150%40iki.fi
2024-02-23 16:10:51 +02:00
Heikki Linnakangas 9f35e42e7d Remove unnecessary smgropen() calls
Now that RelationCreateStorage() returns the SmgrRelation (since
commit 5c1560606d), use that.

Author: Japin Li
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ME3P282MB316600FA62F6605477F26F6AB6742@ME3P282MB3166.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
2024-02-12 10:59:45 +02:00
Robert Haas 5eafacd279 Combine FSM updates for prune and no-prune cases.
lazy_scan_prune() and lazy_scan_noprune() update the freespace map
with identical conditions; combine them. This consolidation is easier
now that cb970240f1 moved visibility map
updates into lazy_scan_prune().

While combining the FSM updates, simplify the logic for calling
lazy_scan_new_or_empty() and lazy_scan_noprune().

Also update a few comemnts in this part of the code to make them,
hopefully, clearer.

Melanie Plageman and Robert Haas

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoaLTvipm%3Dxx4rJLr07m908PCu%3DQH3uCjD1UOn8YaEuO2g%40mail.gmail.com
2024-01-26 11:40:16 -05:00
Robert Haas e313a61137 Remove LVPagePruneState.
Commit cb970240f1 moved some code from
lazy_scan_heap() to lazy_scan_prune(), and now some things that used to
need to be passed back and forth are completely local to lazy_scan_prune().
Hence, this struct is mostly obsolete.  The only thing that still
needs to be passed back to the caller is has_lpdead_items, and that's
also passed back by lazy_scan_noprune(), so do it the same way in both
cases.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed and slightly revised by me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_aM=OL85AOr-80wBsCr=vLVzhnaavqkVPRkFBtD0zsuLQ@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-18 15:17:09 -05:00
Robert Haas cb970240f1 Move VM update code from lazy_scan_heap() to lazy_scan_prune().
Most of the output parameters of lazy_scan_prune() were being
used to update the VM in lazy_scan_heap(). Moving that code into
lazy_scan_prune() simplifies lazy_scan_heap() and requires less
communication between the two.

This change permits some further code simplification, but that
is left for a separate commit.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed by me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_aM=OL85AOr-80wBsCr=vLVzhnaavqkVPRkFBtD0zsuLQ@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-18 14:44:57 -05:00
Robert Haas c120550edb Optimize vacuuming of relations with no indexes.
If there are no indexes on a relation, items can be marked LP_UNUSED
instead of LP_DEAD when pruning. This significantly reduces WAL
volume, since we no longer need to emit one WAL record for pruning
and a second to change the LP_DEAD line pointers thus created to
LP_UNUSED.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund, Peter Geoghegan, and me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bgvb_k0gKOXWzNKWHt560R0smrGe3E8zewKPs8fiMKkw%40mail.gmail.com
2024-01-18 10:03:42 -05:00
Robert Haas 45d395cd75 Be more consistent about whether to update the FSM while vacuuming.
Previously, when lazy_scan_noprune() was called and returned true, we would
update the FSM immediately if the relation had no indexes or if the page
contained no dead items. On the other hand, when lazy_scan_prune() was
called, we would update the FSM if either of those things was true or
if index vacuuming was disabled. Eliminate that behavioral difference by
considering vacrel->do_index_vacuuming in both cases.

Also, make lazy_scan_heap() responsible for deciding whether to update
the FSM, instead of doing it inside lazy_scan_noprune(). This is
more consistent with the lazy_scan_prune() case. lazy_scan_noprune()
still needs an output parameter for whether there are LP_DEAD items
on the page, but the real decision-making now happens in the caller.

Patch by me, reviewed by Peter Geoghegan and Melanie Plageman.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaOzvN1TcHd9iej=PR3fY40En1USxzOnXSR2CxCLaRM0g@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-16 14:16:57 -05:00
Robert Haas e2d5b3b9b6 Remove hastup from LVPagePruneState.
Instead, just have lazy_scan_prune() and lazy_scan_noprune() update
LVRelState->nonempty_pages directly. This makes the two functions
more similar and also removes makes lazy_scan_noprune need one fewer
output parameters.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund, Michael Paquier, and me

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_btji_wQdg=ok-5E4v_bGVxKYnnFFe7RA6Frc1EcOwtSg@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-11 13:30:12 -05:00
Bruce Momjian 29275b1d17 Update copyright for 2024
Reported-by: Michael Paquier

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz

Backpatch-through: 12
2024-01-03 20:49:05 -05:00
Michael Paquier 8d9978a717 Apply quotes more consistently to GUC names in logs
Quotes are applied to GUCs in a very inconsistent way across the code
base, with a mix of double quotes or no quotes used.  This commit
removes double quotes around all the GUC names that are obviously
referred to as parameters with non-English words (use of underscore,
mixed case, etc).

This is the result of a discussion with Álvaro Herrera, Nathan Bossart,
Laurenz Albe, Peter Eisentraut, Tom Lane and Daniel Gustafsson.

Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w@mail.gmail.com
2023-11-30 14:11:45 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas 60f227316c Fix assertions with RI triggers in heap_update and heap_delete.
If the tuple being updated is not visible to the crosscheck snapshot,
we return TM_Updated but the assertions would not hold in that case.
Move them to before the cross-check.

Fixes bug #17893. Backpatch to all supported versions.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17893-35847009eec517b5%40postgresql.org
2023-11-28 12:00:14 +02:00
Andres Freund b2e237afdd Release lock on heap buffer before vacuuming FSM
When there are no indexes on a table, we vacuum each heap block after
pruning it and then update the freespace map. Periodically, we also
vacuum the freespace map. This was done while unnecessarily holding a
lock on the heap page. Release the lock before calling
FreeSpaceMapVacuumRange() and, while we're at it, ensure the range
includes the heap block we just vacuumed.

There are no known deadlocks or other similar issues, therefore don't
backpatch. It's certainly not good to do all this work under a lock, but it's
not frequently reached, making it not worth the risk of backpatching.

Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_YiL%3D44GvGnt1dpYouDSSoV7wzxVoXs8m3p311rp-TVQQ%40mail.gmail.com
2023-11-17 12:46:55 -08:00
David Rowley 10d34fefc2 Ensure we use the correct spelling of "ensure"
We seem to have accidentally used "insure" in a few places.  Correct
that.

Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0biqrhA3pMhu40aDsj343mTsD75khKnHsLqR8P04f=Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
2023-11-10 00:15:54 +13:00
Peter Eisentraut 611806cd72 Add trailing commas to enum definitions
Since C99, there can be a trailing comma after the last value in an
enum definition.  A lot of new code has been introducing this style on
the fly.  Some new patches are now taking an inconsistent approach to
this.  Some add the last comma on the fly if they add a new last
value, some are trying to preserve the existing style in each place,
some are even dropping the last comma if there was one.  We could
nudge this all in a consistent direction if we just add the trailing
commas everywhere once.

I omitted a few places where there was a fixed "last" value that will
always stay last.  I also skipped the header files of libpq and ecpg,
in case people want to use those with older compilers.  There were
also a small number of cases where the enum type wasn't used anywhere
(but the enum values were), which ended up confusing pgindent a bit,
so I left those alone.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/386f8c45-c8ac-4681-8add-e3b0852c1620%40eisentraut.org
2023-10-26 09:20:54 +02:00
Thomas Munro 01529c7040 Fix comment from commit 22655aa231.
Per automated complaint from BF animal koel this needed to be
re-indented, but there was also a typo.  Back-patch to 16.
2023-10-16 13:32:41 +13:00
Andres Freund 22655aa231 Fix bulk table extension when copying into multiple partitions
When COPYing into a partitioned table that does now permit the use of
table_multi_insert(), we could error out with
  ERROR: could not read block NN in file "base/...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

because BulkInsertState->next_free was not reset between partitions. This
problem occurred only when not able to use table_multi_insert(), as a
dedicated BulkInsertState for each partition is used in that case.

The bug was introduced in 00d1e02be2, but it was hard to hit at that point,
as commonly bulk relation extension is not used when not using
table_multi_insert(). It became more likely after 82a4edabd2, which expanded
the use of bulk extension.

To fix the bug, reset the bulk relation extension state in BulkInsertState in
ReleaseBulkInsertStatePin(). That was added (in b1ecb9b3fc) to tackle a very
similar issue.  Obviously the name is not quite correct, but there might be
external callers, and bulk insert state needs to be reset in precisely in the
situations that ReleaseBulkInsertStatePin() already needed to be called.

Medium term the better fix likely is to disallow reusing BulkInsertState
across relations.

Add a test that, without the fix, reproduces #18130 in most
configurations. The test also catches the problem fixed in b1ecb9b3fc when
run with small shared_buffers.

Reported-by: Ivan Kolombet <enderstd@gmail.com>
Analyzed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Analyzed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Bug: #18130
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18130-7a86a7356a75209d%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/257696.1695670946%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 16-
2023-10-13 19:16:44 -07:00
Robert Haas 1ccc1e05ae Remove retry loop in heap_page_prune().
The retry loop is needed because heap_page_prune() calls
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() and then lazy_scan_prune() does the same
thing again, and they might get different answers due to concurrent
clog updates.  But this patch makes heap_page_prune() return the
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() results that it computed back to the
caller, which allows lazy_scan_prune() to avoid needing to recompute
those values in the first place. That's nice both because it eliminates
the need for a retry loop and also because it's cheaper.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed by David Geier, Andres Freund, and me.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_br124qsGJieuYA0nGjywEukhK1dKBfRdby_4yY3E9SXA%40mail.gmail.com
2023-10-02 11:40:07 -04:00
Robert Haas 4e9fc3a976 Return data from heap_page_prune via a struct.
Previously, one of the values in the struct was returned as the return
value, and another was returned via an output parameter. In
preparation for returning more stuff, consolidate both values into a
struct returned via an output parameter.

Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund and by me.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_br124qsGJieuYA0nGjywEukhK1dKBfRdby_4yY3E9SXA%40mail.gmail.com
2023-09-28 10:36:34 -04:00
Heikki Linnakangas 18724af9e8 Remove unnecessary smgrimmedsync() when creating unlogged table.
This became safe after commit 4b4798e138. The smgrcreate() call will
now register the segment for syncing at the next checkpoint, so we
don't need to sync it here. If a checkpoint happens before the
creation is WAL-logged, the records will be replayed when starting
recovery from the checkpoint. If a checkpoint happens after the WAL
logging, the checkpoint will fsync() it.

In the passing, clarify a comment in smgrDoPendingSyncs().

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6e5bbc08-cdfc-b2b3-9e23-1a914b9850a9%40iki.fi
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
2023-09-15 17:29:37 +03:00
Thomas Munro 9f0602539d Remove some more "snapshot too old" vestiges.
Commit f691f5b8 removed the logic, but left behind some now-useless
Snapshot arguments to various AM-internal functions, and missed a couple
of comments.

Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznj9qSNXZ1P1uWTUD_FeaTezbUazb416EPwi4Qr_jR_6A%40mail.gmail.com
2023-09-08 17:12:12 +12:00
Thomas Munro f691f5b80a Remove the "snapshot too old" feature.
Remove the old_snapshot_threshold setting and mechanism for producing
the error "snapshot too old", originally added by commit 848ef42b.
Unfortunately it had a number of known problems in terms of correctness
and performance, mostly reported by Andres in the course of his work on
snapshot scalability.  We agreed to remove it, after a long period
without an active plan to fix it.

This is certainly a desirable feature, and someone might propose a new
or improved implementation in the future.

Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACG%3DezYV%2BEvO135fLRdVn-ZusfVsTY6cH1OZqWtezuEYH6ciQA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200401064008.qob7bfnnbu4w5cw4%40alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoY%3Daqf0zjTD%2B3dUWYkgMiNDegDLFjo%2B6ze%3DWtpik%2B3XqA%40mail.gmail.com
2023-09-05 19:53:43 +12:00
Heikki Linnakangas e8d74ad625 Report syncscan position at end of scan.
The comment in heapgettup_advance_block() says that it reports the
scan position before checking for end of scan, but that didn't match
the code. The code was refactored in commit 7ae0ab0ad9, which
inadvertently changed the order of the check and reporting. Change it
back.

This caused a few regression test failures with a small shared_buffers
setting like 10 MB. The 'portals' and 'cluster' tests perform seqscans
that are large enough that sync seqscans kick in. When the sync scan
position is not updated at end of scan, the next seq scan doesn't
start at the beginning of the table, and the test queries are
sensitive to that.

Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman, David Rowley
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6f991389-ae22-d844-a9d8-9aceb7c01a9a@iki.fi
Backpatch-through: 16
2023-08-31 13:02:15 +03:00
Thomas Munro 7114791158 ExtendBufferedWhat -> BufferManagerRelation.
Commit 31966b15 invented a way for functions dealing with relation
extension to accept a Relation in online code and an SMgrRelation in
recovery code.  It seems highly likely that future bufmgr.c interfaces
will face the same problem, and need to do something similar.
Generalize the names so that each interface doesn't have to re-invent
the wheel.

Back-patch to 16.  Since extension AM authors might start using the
constructor macros once 16 ships, we agreed to do the rename in 16
rather than waiting for 17.

Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B6tLD2BhpRWycEoti6LVLyQq457UL4ticP5xd8LqHySA%40mail.gmail.com
2023-08-23 12:31:23 +12:00
Andres Freund 82a4edabd2 hio: Take number of prior relation extensions into account
The new relation extension logic, introduced in 00d1e02be2, could lead to
slowdowns in some scenarios. E.g., when loading narrow rows into a table using
COPY, the caller of RelationGetBufferForTuple() will only request a small
number of pages. Without concurrency, we just extended using pwritev() in that
case. However, if there is *some* concurrency, we switched between extending
by a small number of pages and a larger number of pages, depending on the
number of waiters for the relation extension logic.  However, some
filesystems, XFS in particular, do not perform well when switching between
extending files using fallocate() and pwritev().

To avoid that issue, remember the number of prior relation extensions in
BulkInsertState and extend more aggressively if there were prior relation
extensions. That not just avoids the aforementioned slowdown, but also leads
to noticeable performance gains in other situations, primarily due to
extending more aggressively when there is no concurrency. I should have done
it this way from the get go.

Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDvDmUQeJtZrau1ovnT_smN940=Kp6mszNGK3bq9yRN6g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 16-, where the new relation extension code was added
2023-08-14 11:33:09 -07:00
Masahiko Sawada 46ebdfe164 Report index vacuum progress.
This commit adds two columns: indexes_total and indexes_processed, to
pg_stat_progress_vacuum system view to show the index vacuum
progress. These numbers are reported in the "vacuuming indexes" and
"cleaning up indexes" phases.

This uses the new parallel message type for progress reporting added
by be06506e7.

Bump catversion because this changes the definition of
pg_stat_progress_vacuum.

Author: Sami Imseih
Reviewed by: Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Nathan Bossart, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5478DFCD-2333-401A-B2F0-0D186AB09228@amazon.com
2023-07-11 12:34:01 +09:00
Tomas Vondra ec99d6e9c8 Document relaxed HOT for summarizing indexes
Commit 19d8e2308b allowed a weaker check for HOT with summarizing
indexes, but it did not update README.HOT. So do that now.

Patch by Matthias van de Meent, minor changes by me. Backpatch to 16,
where the optimization was introduced.

Author: Matthias van de Meent
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 16
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WiEOm8V+c9kUeYp2BPhbEc5s473fUf51xNeqvSFGv44Ew@mail.gmail.com
2023-07-07 19:04:53 +02:00
Thomas Munro bcc93a389c Fix race in SSI interaction with bitmap heap scan.
When performing a bitmap heap scan, we don't want to miss concurrent
writes that occurred after we observed the heap's rs_nblocks, but before
we took predicate locks on index pages.  Therefore, we can't skip
fetching any heap tuples that are referenced by the index, because we
need to test them all with CheckForSerializableConflictOut().  The
old optimization that would ignore any references to blocks >=
rs_nblocks gets in the way of that requirement, because it means that
concurrent writes in that window are ignored.

Removing that optimization shouldn't affect correctness at any isolation
level, because any new tuples shouldn't be visible to an MVCC snapshot.
There also shouldn't be any error-causing references to heap blocks past
the end, because we should have held at least an AccessShareLock on the
table before the index scan.  It can't get smaller while our transaction
is running.  For now, though, we'll keep the optimization at lower
levels to avoid making unnecessary changes in a bug fix.

Back-patch to all supported releases.  In release 11, the code is in a
different place but not fundamentally different.  Fixes one aspect of
bug #17949.

Reported-by: Artem Anisimov <artem.anisimov.255@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17949-a0f17035294a55e2%40postgresql.org
2023-07-04 09:07:31 +12:00
Peter Geoghegan d088ba5a5a nbtree: Allocate new pages in separate function.
Split nbtree's _bt_getbuf function is two: code that read locks or write
locks existing pages remains in _bt_getbuf, while code that deals with
allocating new pages is moved to a new, dedicated function called
_bt_allocbuf.  This simplifies most _bt_getbuf callers, since it is no
longer necessary for them to pass a heaprel argument.  Many of the
changes to nbtree from commit 61b313e4 can be reverted.  This minimizes
the divergence between HEAD/PostgreSQL 16 and earlier release branches.

_bt_allocbuf replaces the previous nbtree idiom of passing P_NEW to
_bt_getbuf.  There are only 3 affected call sites, all of which continue
to pass a heaprel for recovery conflict purposes.  Note that nbtree's
use of P_NEW was superficial; nbtree never actually relied on the P_NEW
code paths in bufmgr.c, so this change is strictly mechanical.

GiST already took the same approach; it has a dedicated function for
allocating new pages called gistNewBuffer().  That factor allowed commit
61b313e4 to make much more targeted changes to GiST.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=8Z9qY58bjm_7TAHgtW6RzZ5Ke62q5emdCEy9BAzwhmg@mail.gmail.com
2023-06-10 14:08:25 -07:00
Tom Lane 0245f8db36 Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.

This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical.  We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop).  We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up.  Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-19 17:24:48 -04:00
Michael Paquier 8961cb9a03 Fix typos in comments
The changes done in this commit impact comments with no direct
user-visible changes, with fixes for incorrect function, variable or
structure names.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e8c38840-596a-83d6-bd8d-cebc51111572@gmail.com
2023-05-02 12:23:08 +09:00
Daniel Gustafsson 4a6603cd46 Fix assertion failure in heap_vacuum_rel
Commit 7d71d3dd08 changed resetting the VacuumFailsafeActive flag to an
assertion since the flag is reset before starting vacuuming a relation.
This however failed to take recursive calls of vacuum_rel() and vacuum
of TOAST tables into consideration. Fix by reverting back to resettting
the flag.

Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reported-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsFz=GqaG5Ens5aNgVYoV2Y+pfMUijX0ku+CCkWfALwiqg@mail.gmail.com
2023-04-28 10:30:05 +02:00
Peter Geoghegan e944063294 Fix xl_heap_lock WAL record field's data type.
Make xl_heap_lock's infobits_set field of type uint8, not int8.  Using
int8 isn't appropriate given that the field just holds status bits.
This fixes an oversight in commit 0ac5ad5134.

In passing rename the nearby TransactionId field to "xmax" to make
things consistency with related records, such as xl_heap_lock_updated.

Deliberately avoid a bump in XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC.  No backpatch, either.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkCd3kOS8b7Rfxw7Mh1_6jvX=Nzo-CWR1VBTiOtVZkWHA@mail.gmail.com
2023-04-11 14:07:54 -07:00
Andres Freund 26669757b6 Handle logical slot conflicts on standby
During WAL replay on the standby, when a conflict with a logical slot is
identified, invalidate such slots. There are two sources of conflicts:
1) Using the information added in 6af1793954, logical slots are invalidated if
   required rows are removed
2) wal_level on the primary server is reduced to below logical

Uses the infrastructure introduced in the prior commit. FIXME: add commit
reference.

Change InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() to use a recovery conflict to
interrupt use of a slot, if called in the startup process. The new recovery
conflict is added to pg_stat_database_conflicts, as confl_active_logicalslot.

See 6af1793954 for an overall design of logical decoding on a standby.

Bumps catversion for the addition of the pg_stat_database_conflicts column.
Bumps PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID for the same reason.

Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> (in an older version)
Reviewed-by: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230407075009.igg7be27ha2htkbt@awork3.anarazel.de
2023-04-08 00:05:44 -07:00