Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bruce Momjian c8e1ba736b Update copyright for 2023
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-02 15:00:37 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut afbfc02983 Refactor ownercheck functions
Instead of dozens of mostly-duplicate pg_foo_ownercheck() functions,
write one common function object_ownercheck() that can handle almost
all of them.  We already have all the information we need, such as
which system catalog corresponds to which catalog table and which
column is the owner column.

Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/95c30f96-4060-2f48-98b5-a4392d3b6066@enterprisedb.com
2022-11-13 08:12:37 +01:00
Tom Lane 0a20ff54f5 Split up guc.c for better build speed and ease of maintenance.
guc.c has grown to be one of our largest .c files, making it
a bottleneck for compilation.  It's also acquired a bunch of
knowledge that'd be better kept elsewhere, because of our not
very good habit of putting variable-specific check hooks here.
Hence, split it up along these lines:

* guc.c itself retains just the core GUC housekeeping mechanisms.
* New file guc_funcs.c contains the SET/SHOW interfaces and some
  SQL-accessible functions for GUC manipulation.
* New file guc_tables.c contains the data arrays that define the
  built-in GUC variables, along with some already-exported constant
  tables.
* GUC check/assign/show hook functions are moved to the variable's
  home module, whenever that's clearly identifiable.  A few hard-
  to-classify hooks ended up in commands/variable.c, which was
  already a home for miscellaneous GUC hook functions.

To avoid cluttering a lot more header files with #include "guc.h",
I also invented a new header file utils/guc_hooks.h and put all
the GUC hook functions' declarations there, regardless of their
originating module.  That allowed removal of #include "guc.h"
from some existing headers.  The fallout from that (hopefully
all caught here) demonstrates clearly why such inclusions are
best minimized: there are a lot of files that, for example,
were getting array.h at two or more levels of remove, despite
not having any connection at all to GUCs in themselves.

There is some very minor code beautification here, such as
renaming a couple of inconsistently-named hook functions
and improving some comments.  But mostly this just moves
code from point A to point B and deals with the ensuing
needs for #include adjustments and exporting a few functions
that previously weren't exported.

Patch by me, per a suggestion from Andres Freund; thanks also
to Michael Paquier for the idea to invent guc_funcs.c.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/587607.1662836699@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-09-13 11:11:45 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera b3d7d6e462
Remove xloginsert.h from xlog.h
xlog.h is directly and indirectly #included in a lot of places.  With
this change, xloginsert.h is no longer unnecessarily included in the
large number of them that don't need it.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACVe-W+WM5P44N7eG9C2_FmaeM8Dq5aCnD3fHt0Ba=WR6w@mail.gmail.com
2022-01-30 12:25:24 -03:00
Bruce Momjian 27b77ecf9f Update copyright for 2022
Backpatch-through: 10
2022-01-07 19:04:57 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut 37b2764593 Some RELKIND macro refactoring
Add more macros to group some RELKIND_* macros:

- RELKIND_HAS_PARTITIONS()
- RELKIND_HAS_TABLESPACE()
- RELKIND_HAS_TABLE_AM()

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a574c8f1-9c84-93ad-a9e5-65233d6fc00f%40enterprisedb.com
2021-12-03 14:08:19 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut 2ed532ee8c Improve error messages about mismatching relkind
Most error messages about a relkind that was not supported or
appropriate for the command was of the pattern

    "relation \"%s\" is not a table, foreign table, or materialized view"

This style can become verbose and tedious to maintain.  Moreover, it's
not very helpful: If I'm trying to create a comment on a TOAST table,
which is not supported, then the information that I could have created
a comment on a materialized view is pointless.

Instead, write the primary error message shorter and saying more
directly that what was attempted is not possible.  Then, in the detail
message, explain that the operation is not supported for the relkind
the object was.  To simplify that, add a new function
errdetail_relkind_not_supported() that does this.

In passing, make use of RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() where appropriate,
instead of listing out the relkinds individually.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dc35a398-37d0-75ce-07ea-1dd71d98f8ec@2ndquadrant.com
2021-07-08 09:44:51 +02:00
Bruce Momjian ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Robert Haas 34a947ca13 New contrib module, pg_surgery, with heap surgery functions.
Sometimes it happens that the visibility information for a tuple
becomes corrupted, either due to bugs in the database software or
external factors. Provide a function heap_force_kill() that can
be used to truncate such dead tuples to dead line pointers, and
a function heap_force_freeze() that can be used to overwrite the
visibility information in such a way that the tuple becomes
all-visible.

These functions are unsafe, in that you can easily use them to
corrupt a database that was not previously corrupted, and you can
use them to further corrupt an already-corrupted database or to
destroy data. The documentation accordingly cautions against
casual use. However, in some cases they permit recovery of data
that would otherwise be very difficult to recover, or to allow a
system to continue to function when it would otherwise be difficult
to do so.

Because we may want to add other functions for performing other
kinds of surgery in the future, the new contrib module is called
pg_surgery rather than something specific to these functions. I
proposed back-patching this so that it could be more easily used
by people running existing releases who are facing these kinds of
problems, but that proposal did not attract enough support, so
no back-patch for now.

Ashutosh Sharma, reviewed and tested by Andrey M. Borodin,
M. Beena Emerson, Masahiko Sawada, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi,
Asim Praveen, and Mark Dilger, and somewhat revised by me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZW1fsU-QUNCRUQMGUygBDPVeOTLCqRdQZch=EYZnctSA@mail.gmail.com
2020-09-10 11:14:07 -04:00