This commit changes the term "WAL receiver" to "WAL receiver (process)"
in the glossary, so that users can easily understand WAL receiver is
obviously a process.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/51b76596-ab4f-c9f0-1005-60ce1bb14b6b@oss.nttdata.com
Mostly in response to Jürgen Purtz critique of previous definitions,
though I added many other changes.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c1e06008-2132-30f4-9b38-877e8683d418@purtz.de
Add some more terms, clarify some definitions, remove redundant terms,
move a couple of terms to keep alphabetical order.
Co-authored-by: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Co-authored-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Co-authored-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7b9b469e804777ac9df4d37716db935e@xs4all.nl
More work is still needed, but this is a good start.
Co-authored-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Co-authored-by: Roger Harkavy <rogerharkavy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM=eP6HOeqDjn0FdXuGRusQu4oWH_LFsKjjafmhvWD=aSpQ@mail.gmail.com