This avoids "tuple concurrently updated" errors when a ALTER or DROP
SUBSCRIPTION writes to pg_subscription_rel at the same time as a worker.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
In commits 2f5c9d9c9 and ab0289651 we invented an abstraction layer
to insulate catalog manipulations from direct heap update calls.
But evidently some patches that hadn't landed in-tree at that point
didn't get the memo completely. Fix a couple of direct calls to
simple_heap_delete to use CatalogTupleDelete instead; these appear
to have been added in commits 7c4f52409 and 7b504eb28. This change is
purely cosmetic ATM, but there's no point in having an abstraction layer
if we allow random code to break it.
Masahiko Sawada and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDOPRSVcwbnCN3Y1n_68ATyTspsU6=ygtHz_uY0VcdZ8A@mail.gmail.com
A logical replication worker should not insert new rows into
pg_subscription_rel, only update existing rows, so that there are no
races if a concurrent refresh removes rows. Adjust the API to be able
to choose that behavior.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
It turned out this approach had problems, because a DROP command should
not have any options other than CASCADE and RESTRICT. Instead, always
attempt to drop the slot if there is one configured, but also add an
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION action to set the slot to NONE.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/29431.1493730652@sss.pgh.pa.us
The previously used ShareRowExclusiveLock, while technically probably
more correct, led to deadlocks during seemingly unrelated operations and
thus a poor experience. Use RowExclusiveLock, like for most similar
catalog operations. In some care cases, the user might see an error
from DDL commands.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/13592.1490851519%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Add functionality for a new subscription to copy the initial data in the
tables and then sync with the ongoing apply process.
For the copying, add a new internal COPY option to have the COPY source
data provided by a callback function. The initial data copy works on
the subscriber by receiving COPY data from the publisher and then
providing it locally into a COPY that writes to the destination table.
A WAL receiver can now execute full SQL commands. This is used here to
obtain information about tables and publications.
Several new options were added to CREATE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION to
control whether and when initial table syncing happens.
Change pg_dump option --no-create-subscription-slots to
--no-subscription-connect and use the new CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
... NOCONNECT option for that.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Tested-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane