Commit Graph

2810 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marc G. Fournier ae4725295a Fix an Inccorect Error Message...
Submitted by: Dan McGuirk <mcguirk@indirect.com>
1996-08-09 19:06:59 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier bb0bdfd101 Fixes:
I've enclosed two patches.  The first affects Solaris compilability.  The
bug stems from netdb.h (where MAXHOSTNAMELEN is defined on a stock
system).  If the user has installed the header files from BIND 4.9.x,
there will be no definition of MAXHOSTNAMELEN.  The patch will, if all
else fails, try to include <arpa/nameser.h> and set MAXHOSTNAMELEN to
MAXDNAME, which is 256 (just like MAXHOSTNAMELEN on a stock system).

The second patch adds aliases for "ISNULL" to "IS NULL" and likewise for
"NOTNULL" to "IS NOT NULL".  I have not removed the postgres specific
ISNULL and NOTNULL.  I noticed this on the TODO list, and figured it would
be easy to remove.

The full semantics are:
        [ expression IS NULL ]
        [ expression IS NOT NULL ]

--Jason


Submitted by: Jason Wright <jason@oozoo.vnet.net>
1996-08-06 16:43:41 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 6c684b1847 Fixes:
Previously Postgres95 wouldn't accept 'order by' clauses with fields
referred to as '<table>.<field>', e.g.:

        select t1.field1, t2.field2 from table1 t1, table2 t2
                order by t2.field2;

This syntax is required by the ODBC SQL spec.

Submitted by: Dan McGuirk <mcguirk@indirect.com>
1996-08-06 16:38:03 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier ab22b34891 Fixes:
While a normal SELECT statement can contain a GROUP BY clause, a cursor
declaration cannot. This was not the case in PG-1.0. Was there a good
reason why this was changed? Are cursors being phased out? Is there any way
to get data with just a SELECT (and without a DECLARE CURSOR ...)?

The patch below seems to fix things. If anyone can see a problem with it,
please let me know. Thanks.

Submitted by:  David Smith <dasmith@perseus.tufts.edu>
1996-08-06 16:27:59 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 48cde8d83b fix a redeclaration error
submitted by Kurt
1996-07-29 20:49:02 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 18367ced1b Ack, missed two files from the merge...looks like a .11 is goin gto have
to go out after all :(
1996-07-23 05:51:29 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 7344d69898 Finished merging in src/backend from Dr. George's source tree 1996-07-23 02:23:54 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 94215d51c8 Fixes:
The updating of array fields is broken in Postgres95-1.01, An array can
be only replaced with a new array but not have some elements modified.
This is caused by two bugs in the parser and in the array utilities.
Furthermore it is not possible to update array with a base type of
variable length.


- submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
1996-07-20 07:59:41 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier 20288400f3 Fixes:
I have written some patches which add support for NULLs to Postgres95.
In fact support for NULLs was already present in postgres, but it had been
disabled because not completely debugged, I believe. My patches simply add
some checks here and there. To enable the new code you must add -DNULL_PATCH
to CFLAGS in Makefile.global. After recompiling you can do things like:

insert into a (x, y) values (1, NULL);
update a set x = NULL where x = 0;

You can't still use a "where x=NULL" clause, you must use ISNULL instead.
This could probably be an easy fix to do.




Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
1996-07-19 07:24:11 +00:00
Marc G. Fournier d31084e9d1 Postgres95 1.01 Distribution - Virgin Sources 1996-07-09 06:22:35 +00:00