Another test is constructed on top of regression tests, which does not
work correctly with unlogged tables. For now, cope with that by making
sure no unlogged table is left behind.
Per buildfarm pink after 4fb5c794e5.
Commit ac9099fc1 rearranged the logic in spgGetCache() that determines
the index's attType (nominal input data type) and leafType (actual
type stored in leaf index tuples). Turns out this broke things for
the case where (a) the actual input data type is different from the
nominal type, (b) the opclass's config function leaves leafType
defaulted, and (c) the opclass has no "compress" function. (b) caused
us to assign the actual input data type as leafType, and then since
that's not attType, we complained that a "compress" function is
required. For non-polymorphic opclasses, condition (a) arises in
binary-compatible cases, such as using SP-GiST text_ops for a varchar
column, or using any opclass on a domain over its nominal input type.
To fix, use attType for leafType when the index's declared column type
is different from but binary-compatible with attType. Do this only in
the defaulted-leafType case, to avoid overriding any explicit
selection made by the opclass.
Per bug #17294 from Ilya Anfimov. Back-patch to v14.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17294-8f6c7962ce877edc@postgresql.org
spgrescan would first reset traversalCxt, and then traverse a
potentially non-empty stack containing pointers to traversalValues
which had been allocated in those contexts, freeing them a second
time. This bug originates in commit ccd6eb49a where traversalValue was
introduced.
Repair by traversing the stack before the context reset; this isn't
ideal, since it means doing retail pfree in a context that's about to
be reset, but the freeing of a stack entry is also done in other
places in the code during the scan so it's not worth trying to
refactor it further. Regression test added.
Backpatch to 9.6 where the problem was introduced.
Per bug #15378; analysis and patch by me, originally from a report on
IRC by user velix; see also PostGIS ticket #4174; review by Alexander
Korotkov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153663176628.23136.11901365223750051490@wrigleys.postgresql.org
This is preparation for a future patch to extensively change how
reloptions work.
Author: Nikolay Shaplov
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2615372.orqtEn8VGB@x200m
That includes VACUUM on GIN, GiST and SP-GiST indexes, and B-tree indexes
large enough to cause page deletions in B-tree. Plus some other special
cases.
After this patch, the regression tests generate all different WAL record
types. Not all branches within the redo functions are covered, but it's a
step forward.
Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane
Andrew Gierth
Heikki Linnakangas