Hstore data generated on pg 8.4 and pg_upgraded to current versions
remains in its original on-disk format unless modified. The same goes
for values generated by the addon hstore-new module on pre-9.0
versions. (The hstoreUpgrade function converts old values on the fly
when read in, but the on-disk value is not modified by this.)
Since old-format empty hstores (and hstore-new hstores) have
representations compatible with the new format, hstoreUpgrade thought
it could get away without modifying such values; but this breaks
hstore_hash (and the new hstore_hash_extended) which assumes
bit-perfect matching between semantically identical hstore values.
Only one bit actually differs (the "new version" flag in the count
field) but that of course is enough to break the hash.
Fix by making hstoreUpgrade unconditionally convert all old values to
new format.
Backpatch all the way, even though this changes a hash value in some
cases, because in those cases the hash value is already failing - for
example, a hash join between old- and new-format empty hstores will be
failing to match, or a hash index on an hstore column containing an
old-format empty value will be failing to find the value since it will
be searching for a hash derived from a new-format datum. (There are no
known field reports of this happening, probably because hashing of
hstores has only been useful in limited circumstances and there
probably isn't much upgraded data being used this way.)
Per concerns arising from discussion of commit eb6f29141b. Original
bug is my fault.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/60b1fd3b-7332-40f0-7e7f-f2f04f777747%402ndquadrant.com
Some versions of Perl export a macro named HS_KEY. This creates a
conflict in contrib/hstore_plperl against hstore's macro of the same
name. The most future-proof solution seems to be to rename our macro;
I chose HSTORE_KEY. For consistency, rename HS_VAL and related macros
similarly.
Back-patch to 9.5. contrib/hstore_plperl doesn't exist before that
so there is no need to worry about the conflict in older releases.
Per reports from Marco Atzeri and Mike Blackwell.
Because of gcc -Wmissing-prototypes, all functions in dynamically
loadable modules must have a separate prototype declaration. This is
meant to detect global functions that are not declared in header files,
but in cases where the function is called via dfmgr, this is redundant.
Besides filling up space with boilerplate, this is a frequent source of
compiler warnings in extension modules.
We can fix that by creating the function prototype as part of the
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 macro, which such modules have to use anyway. That
makes the code of modules cleaner, because there is one less place where
the entry points have to be listed, and creates an additional check that
functions have the right prototype.
Remove now redundant prototypes from contrib and other modules.
On reflection (especially after noticing how many buildfarm critters have
__builtin_types_compatible_p but not _Static_assert), it seems like we
ought to try a bit harder to make these macros do something everywhere.
The initial cut at it would have been no help to code that is compiled only
on platforms without _Static_assert, for instance; and in any case not all
our contributors do their initial coding on the latest gcc version.
Some googling about static assertions turns up quite a bit of prior art
for making it work in compilers that lack _Static_assert. The method
that seems closest to our needs involves defining a struct with a bit-field
that has negative width if the assertion condition fails. There seems no
reliable way to get the error message string to be output, but throwing a
compile error with a confusing message is better than missing the problem
altogether.
In the same spirit, if we don't have __builtin_types_compatible_p we can at
least insist that the variable have the same width as the type. This won't
catch errors such as "wrong pointer type", but it's far better than
nothing.
In addition to changing the macro definitions, adjust a
compile-time-constant Assert in contrib/hstore to use StaticAssertStmt,
so we can get some buildfarm coverage on whether that macro behaves sanely
or not. There's surely more places that could be converted, but this is
the first one I came across.
There was an incorrect Assert in hstoreValidOldFormat(), which would cause
immediate core dumps when attempting to work with pre-9.0 hstore data,
but of course only in an assert-enabled build.
Also, ghstore_decompress() incorrectly applied DatumGetHStoreP() to a datum
that wasn't actually an hstore, but rather a ghstore (ie, a gist signature
bitstring). That used to be harmless, but could now result in misbehavior
if the hstore format conversion code happened to trigger. In reality,
since ghstore is not marked toastable (and doesn't need to be), this
function is useless anyway; we can lobotomize it down to returning the
passed-in pointer.
Both bugs found by Andrew Gierth, though this isn't exactly his proposed
patch.
Remove the 64K limit on the lengths of keys and values within an hstore.
(This changes the on-disk format, but the old format can still be read.)
Add support for btree/hash opclasses for hstore --- this is not so much
for actual indexing purposes as to allow use of GROUP BY, DISTINCT, etc.
Add various other new functions and operators.
Andrew Gierth
Peter Eisentraut
Andrew Gierth
Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander