Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amit Kapila 6f4bdf8152 Fix assertion during streaming of multi-insert toast changes.
While decoding the multi-insert WAL we can't clean the toast untill we get
the last insert of that WAL record. Now if we stream the changes before we
get the last change, the memory for toast chunks won't be released and we
expect the txn to have streamed all changes after streaming.  This
restriction is mainly to ensure the correctness of streamed transactions
and it doesn't seem worth uplifting such a restriction just to allow this
case because anyway we will stream the transaction once such an insert is
complete.

Previously we were using two different flags (one for toast tuples and
another for speculative inserts) to indicate partial changes. Now instead
we replaced both of them with a single flag to indicate partial changes.

Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Pavan Deolasee, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdN-_858zojYN-2tNcHiVTw-nhxPwoQS4quExeweQfG1Ug@mail.gmail.com
2021-05-27 07:59:43 +05:30
Amit Kapila 0ba5181c00 Skip empty transaction stream in test_decoding.
We were decoding empty transactions via streaming APIs added in commit
45fdc9738b even when the user used the option 'skip-empty-xacts'. The APIs
makes no effort to skip empty xacts under the assumption that we will
never try to stream such transactions. However, that is not true because
we can pick to stream a transaction that has change messages for
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_SNAPSHOT and we don't send such messages to
downstream rather they are just to update the internal state. So, we need
to skip such xacts when plugin uses the option 'skip-empty-xacts'.

Diagnosed-By: Amit Kapila
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+OqgFNZkf7=ETe_y5ntjgDk3T0wcdkd4Sot_u1hySGfw@mail.gmail.com
2020-09-11 10:00:01 +05:30
Amit Kapila 82a0ba7707 Fix the logical streaming test.
Commit 7259736a6e added the capability to stream changes in ReorderBuffer
which has some tests to test the streaming mode. It is quite possible that
while this test is running a parallel transaction could be logged by
autovacuum. Such a transaction won't perform any insert/update/delete to
non-catalog tables so will be shown as an empty transaction. Fix it by
skipping the empty transactions during this test.

Per report by buildfarm.
2020-08-08 12:13:18 +05:30
Amit Kapila 7259736a6e Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.
Instead of serializing the transaction to disk after reaching the
logical_decoding_work_mem limit in memory, we consume the changes we have
in memory and invoke stream API methods added by commit 45fdc9738b.
However, sometimes if we have incomplete toast or speculative insert we
spill to the disk because we can't generate the complete tuple and stream.
And, as soon as we get the complete tuple we stream the transaction
including the serialized changes.

We can do this incremental processing thanks to having assignments
(associating subxact with toplevel xacts) in WAL right away, and
thanks to logging the invalidation messages at each command end. These
features are added by commits 0bead9af48 and c55040ccd0 respectively.

Now that we can stream in-progress transactions, the concurrent aborts
may cause failures when the output plugin consults catalogs (both system
and user-defined).

We handle such failures by returning ERRCODE_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK
sqlerrcode from system table scan APIs to the backend or WALSender
decoding a specific uncommitted transaction. The decoding logic on the
receipt of such a sqlerrcode aborts the decoding of the current
transaction and continue with the decoding of other transactions.

We have ReorderBufferTXN pointer in each ReorderBufferChange by which we
know which xact it belongs to.  The output plugin can use this to decide
which changes to discard in case of stream_abort_cb (e.g. when a subxact
gets discarded).

We also provide a new option via SQL APIs to fetch the changes being
streamed.

Author: Dilip Kumar, Tomas Vondra, Amit Kapila, Nikhil Sontakke
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Kuntal Ghosh, Ajin Cherian
Tested-by: Neha Sharma, Mahendra Singh Thalor and Ajin Cherian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/688b0b7f-2f6c-d827-c27b-216a8e3ea700@2ndquadrant.com
2020-08-08 07:47:06 +05:30