Commit Graph

3683 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Lane efc77cf5f1 Fix intarray's GiST opclasses to not fail for empty arrays with <@.
contrib/intarray considers "arraycol <@ constant-array" to be indexable,
but its GiST opclass code fails to reliably find index entries for empty
array values (which of course should trivially match such queries).
This is because the test condition to see whether we should descend
through a non-leaf node is wrong.

Unfortunately, empty array entries could be anywhere in the index,
as these index opclasses are currently designed.  So there's no way
to fix this except by lobotomizing <@ indexscans to scan the whole
index ... which is what this patch does.  That's pretty unfortunate:
the performance is now actually worse than a seqscan, in most cases.
We'd be better off to remove <@ from the GiST opclasses entirely,
and perhaps a future non-back-patchable patch will do so.

In the meantime, applications whose performance is adversely impacted
have a couple of options.  They could switch to a GIN index, which
doesn't have this bug, or they could replace "arraycol <@ constant-array"
with "arraycol <@ constant-array AND arraycol && constant-array".
That will provide about the same performance as before, and it will find
all non-empty subsets of the given constant-array, which is all that
could reliably be expected of the query before.

While at it, add some more regression test cases to improve code
coverage of contrib/intarray.

In passing, adjust resize_intArrayType so that when it's returning an
empty array, it uses construct_empty_array for that rather than
cowboy hacking on the input array.  While the hack produces an array
that looks valid for most purposes, it isn't bitwise equal to empty
arrays produced by other code paths, which could have subtle odd
effects.  I don't think this code path is performance-critical
enough to justify such shortcuts.  (Back-patch this part only as far
as v11; before commit 01783ac36 we were not careful about this in
other intarray code paths either.)

Back-patch the <@ fixes to all supported versions, since this was
broken from day one.

Patch by me; thanks to Alexander Korotkov for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/458.1565114141@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-08-06 18:04:51 -04:00
Michael Paquier 8548ddc61b Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 9
This addresses more issues with code comments, variable names and
unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7ab243e0-116d-3e44-d120-76b3df7abefd@gmail.com
2019-08-05 12:14:58 +09:00
Tom Lane e0f5048851 Fix handling of "undef" in contrib/jsonb_plperl.
Perl has multiple internal representations of "undef", and just
testing for SvTYPE(x) == SVt_NULL doesn't recognize all of them,
leading to "cannot transform this Perl type to jsonb" errors.
Use the approved test SvOK() instead.

Report and patch by Ivan Panchenko.  Back-patch to v11 where
this module was added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1564783533.324795401@f193.i.mail.ru
2019-08-04 14:05:34 -04:00
Michael Paquier b2a3d706b8 Fix handling of previous password hooks in passwordcheck
When piling up loading of modules using check_password_hook_type,
loading passwordcheck would remove any trace of a previously-loaded
hook.  Unloading the module would also cause previous hooks to be
entirely gone.

Reported-by: Rafael Castro
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15932-78f48f9ef166778c@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-08-01 09:37:28 +09:00
Michael Paquier 652a8947d9 Remove orphaned structure member in pgcrypto
int_name has never been used for digest lookups since its introduction
in e94dd6a.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/386C26CB-628B-4A4C-8879-D8BF190F2C77@yesql.se
2019-07-31 10:18:29 +09:00
Michael Paquier eb43f3d193 Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 8, and addresses again a set of issues with code
comments, variable names and unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b137b5eb-9c95-9c2f-586e-38aba7d59788@gmail.com
2019-07-29 12:28:30 +09:00
Tom Lane f5a4ab23e4 Fix contrib/sepgsql test policy to work with latest SELinux releases.
As of Fedora 30, it seems that the system-provided macros for setting
up user privileges in SELinux policies don't grant the ability to read
/etc/passwd, as they formerly did.  This restriction breaks psql
(which tries to use getpwuid() to obtain the user name it's running
under) and thereby the contrib/sepgsql regression test.  Add explicit
specifications that we need the right to read /etc/passwd.

Mike Palmiotto, per a report from me.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23856.1563381159@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-07-25 11:02:43 -04:00
David Rowley 1e6a759838 Use appendBinaryStringInfo in more places where the length is known
When we already know the length that we're going to append, then it
makes sense to use appendBinaryStringInfo instead of
appendStringInfoString so that the append can be performed with a simple
memcpy() using a known length rather than having to first perform a
strlen() call to obtain the length.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8+FRAM1s5+mAa3isajeEoAaicJ=4e0WzrH3tAusbbiMQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-07-23 00:14:11 +12:00
Michael Paquier 23bccc823d Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues with code
comments, variable names and unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dff75442-2468-f74f-568c-6006e141062f@gmail.com
2019-07-22 10:01:50 +09:00
Peter Geoghegan 894af78f18 Don't rely on estimates for amcheck Bloom filters.
Solely relying on a relation's reltuples/relpages estimate to size the
Bloom filters used by amcheck verification makes verification less
effective when the estimates are very stale.  In extreme cases,
verification options that use Bloom filters internally could be totally
ineffective, without users receiving any clear indication that certain
types of corruption might easily be missed.

To fix, use RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() instead of relpages to size the
downlink block Bloom filter.  Use the same RelationGetNumberOfBlocks()
value to derive a minimum size for the heapallindexed Bloom filter,
rather than completely trusting reltuples.  Verification will still be
reasonably effective when the projected/estimated number of Bloom filter
elements is at least 1/5 of the final number of elements, which is
assured by the new sizing logic.

Reported-By: Alexander Korotkov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzk0ke2J42KrNYBKu0Xovjy-sU5ub7PWjgpbsKdAQcL4OA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where downlink/heapallindexed verification were added.
2019-07-20 11:11:55 -07:00
Jeff Davis 6f40ee4f83 pg_stat_statements: add missing check for pgss_enabled().
Make pgss_post_parse_analyze() more consistent with the other hooks,
and avoid unnecessary overhead when pg_stat_statements.track=none.

Author: Raymond Martin
Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BN8PR21MB1217B003C4F79DE230AA36B9B1580%40BN8PR21MB1217.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
2019-07-19 13:38:55 -07:00
Tom Lane 82c8a3c52a Fix sepgsql test results for commit d97b714a2.
The aggregate-order difference explained in my previous commit
turns out to also affect the order of log entries emitted in the
contrib/sepgsql regression test.  Per buildfarm.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21272.1563318411@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-07-17 13:04:59 -04:00
Michael Paquier 0896ae561b Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues around:
- Fixes for typos and incorrect reference names.
- Removal of unneeded comments.
- Removal of unreferenced functions and structures.
- Fixes regarding variable name consistency.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10bfd4ac-3e7c-40ab-2b2e-355ed15495e8@gmail.com
2019-07-16 13:23:53 +09:00
Tom Lane 1cff1b95ab Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.
Originally, Postgres Lists were a more or less exact reimplementation of
Lisp lists, which consist of chains of separately-allocated cons cells,
each having a value and a next-cell link.  We'd hacked that once before
(commit d0b4399d8) to add a separate List header, but the data was still
in cons cells.  That makes some operations -- notably list_nth() -- O(N),
and it's bulky because of the next-cell pointers and per-cell palloc
overhead, and it's very cache-unfriendly if the cons cells end up
scattered around rather than being adjacent.

In this rewrite, we still have List headers, but the data is in a
resizable array of values, with no next-cell links.  Now we need at
most two palloc's per List, and often only one, since we can allocate
some values in the same palloc call as the List header.  (Of course,
extending an existing List may require repalloc's to enlarge the array.
But this involves just O(log N) allocations not O(N).)

Of course this is not without downsides.  The key difficulty is that
addition or deletion of a list entry may now cause other entries to
move, which it did not before.

For example, that breaks foreach() and sister macros, which historically
used a pointer to the current cons-cell as loop state.  We can repair
those macros transparently by making their actual loop state be an
integer list index; the exposed "ListCell *" pointer is no longer state
carried across loop iterations, but is just a derived value.  (In
practice, modern compilers can optimize things back to having just one
loop state value, at least for simple cases with inline loop bodies.)
In principle, this is a semantics change for cases where the loop body
inserts or deletes list entries ahead of the current loop index; but
I found no such cases in the Postgres code.

The change is not at all transparent for code that doesn't use foreach()
but chases lists "by hand" using lnext().  The largest share of such
code in the backend is in loops that were maintaining "prev" and "next"
variables in addition to the current-cell pointer, in order to delete
list cells efficiently using list_delete_cell().  However, we no longer
need a previous-cell pointer to delete a list cell efficiently.  Keeping
a next-cell pointer doesn't work, as explained above, but we can improve
matters by changing such code to use a regular foreach() loop and then
using the new macro foreach_delete_current() to delete the current cell.
(This macro knows how to update the associated foreach loop's state so
that no cells will be missed in the traversal.)

There remains a nontrivial risk of code assuming that a ListCell *
pointer will remain good over an operation that could now move the list
contents.  To help catch such errors, list.c can be compiled with a new
define symbol DEBUG_LIST_MEMORY_USAGE that forcibly moves list contents
whenever that could possibly happen.  This makes list operations
significantly more expensive so it's not normally turned on (though it
is on by default if USE_VALGRIND is on).

There are two notable API differences from the previous code:

* lnext() now requires the List's header pointer in addition to the
current cell's address.

* list_delete_cell() no longer requires a previous-cell argument.

These changes are somewhat unfortunate, but on the other hand code using
either function needs inspection to see if it is assuming anything
it shouldn't, so it's not all bad.

Programmers should be aware of these significant performance changes:

* list_nth() and related functions are now O(1); so there's no
major access-speed difference between a list and an array.

* Inserting or deleting a list element now takes time proportional to
the distance to the end of the list, due to moving the array elements.
(However, it typically *doesn't* require palloc or pfree, so except in
long lists it's probably still faster than before.)  Notably, lcons()
used to be about the same cost as lappend(), but that's no longer true
if the list is long.  Code that uses lcons() and list_delete_first()
to maintain a stack might usefully be rewritten to push and pop at the
end of the list rather than the beginning.

* There are now list_insert_nth...() and list_delete_nth...() functions
that add or remove a list cell identified by index.  These have the
data-movement penalty explained above, but there's no search penalty.

* list_concat() and variants now copy the second list's data into
storage belonging to the first list, so there is no longer any
sharing of cells between the input lists.  The second argument is
now declared "const List *" to reflect that it isn't changed.

This patch just does the minimum needed to get the new implementation
in place and fix bugs exposed by the regression tests.  As suggested
by the foregoing, there's a fair amount of followup work remaining to
do.

Also, the ENABLE_LIST_COMPAT macros are finally removed in this
commit.  Code using those should have been gone a dozen years ago.

Patch by me; thanks to David Rowley, Jesper Pedersen, and others
for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11587.1550975080@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-07-15 13:41:58 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut 5925e55498 Add gen_random_uuid function
This adds a built-in function to generate UUIDs.

PostgreSQL hasn't had a built-in function to generate a UUID yet,
relying on external modules such as uuid-ossp and pgcrypto to provide
one.  Now that we have a strong random number generator built-in, we
can easily provide a version 4 (random) UUID generation function.

This patch takes the existing function gen_random_uuid() from pgcrypto
and makes it a built-in function.  The pgcrypto implementation now
internally redirects to the built-in one.

Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6a65610c-46fc-2323-6b78-e8086340a325@2ndquadrant.com
2019-07-14 14:30:27 +02:00
Andrew Gierth 6e74c64bcf Teach pg_stat_statements not to ignore FOR UPDATE clauses
Performance of a SELECT FOR UPDATE may be quite distinct from the
non-UPDATE version of the query, so treat all of the FOR UPDATE clause
as being significant for distinguishing queries.

Andrew Gierth and Vik Fearing, reviewed by Sergei Kornilov, Thomas
Munro, Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h8e4hfwv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
2019-07-14 12:07:40 +01:00
Michael Paquier 6b8548964b Fix inconsistencies in the code
This addresses a couple of issues in the code:
- Typos and inconsistencies in comments and function declarations.
- Removal of unreferenced function declarations.
- Removal of unnecessary compile flags.
- A cleanup error in regressplans.sh.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c991fdf-2670-1997-c027-772a420c4604@gmail.com
2019-07-08 13:15:09 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut 7e9a4c5c3d Use consistent style for checking return from system calls
Use

    if (something() != 0)
        error ...

instead of just

    if (something)
        error ...

The latter is not incorrect, but it's a bit confusing and not the
common style.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5de61b6b-8be9-7771-0048-860328efe027%402ndquadrant.com
2019-07-07 15:28:49 +02:00
David Rowley 8abc13a889 Use appendStringInfoString and appendPQExpBufferStr where possible
This changes various places where appendPQExpBuffer was used in places
where it was possible to use appendPQExpBufferStr, and likewise for
appendStringInfo and appendStringInfoString.  This is really just a
stylistic improvement, but there are also small performance gains to be
had from doing this.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9P=M-3ULmPvr8iCno8yvfDViHibJjpriHU8+SXUgeZ=w@mail.gmail.com
2019-07-04 13:01:13 +12:00
Etsuro Fujita 2a1612104c postgres_fdw: Remove redundancy in postgresAcquireSampleRowsFunc().
Previously, in the loop in postgresAcquireSampleRowsFunc() to iterate
fetching rows from a given remote table, we redundantly 1) determined the
fetch size by parsing the table's server/table-level options and then 2)
constructed the fetch command; remove that redundancy.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17_urk9qkLV65_iYMFw64z5qhdfhY=tMVV6Jg4KNYx8+w@mail.gmail.com
2019-07-03 17:51:00 +09:00
Tom Lane 9e1c9f9594 pgindent run prior to branching v12.
pgperltidy and reformat-dat-files too, though the latter didn't
find anything to change.
2019-07-01 12:37:52 -04:00
Michael Paquier c74d49d41c Fix many typos and inconsistencies
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/af27d1b3-a128-9d62-46e0-88f424397f44@gmail.com
2019-07-01 10:00:23 +09:00
Tom Lane ca129e58c0 Fix regression tests to use only global names beginning with "regress_".
In commit 18555b132 we tentatively established a rule that regression
tests should use names containing "regression" for databases, and names
starting with "regress_" for all other globally-visible object names, so
as to circumscribe the side-effects that "make installcheck" could have on
an existing installation.  However, no enforcement mechanism was created,
so it's unsurprising that some new violations have crept in since then.

In fact, a whole new *category* of violations has crept in, to wit we now
also have globally-visible subscription and replication origin names, and
"make installcheck" could very easily clobber user-created objects of
those types.  So it's past time to do something about this.

This commit sanitizes the tests enough that they will pass (i.e. not
generate any visible warnings) with the enforcement mechanism I'll add
in the next commit.  There are some TAP tests that still trigger the
warnings, but the warnings do not cause test failure.  Since these tests
do not actually run against a pre-existing installation, there's no need
to worry whether they could conflict with user-created objects.

The problem with rolenames.sql testing special role names like "user"
is still there, and is dealt with only very cosmetically in this patch
(by hiding the warnings :-().  What we actually need to do to be safe is
to take that test script out of "make installcheck" altogether, but that
seems like material for a separate patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16638.1468620817@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-06-29 11:09:03 -04:00
Tom Lane 65e6d42140 Follow the rule that regression-test-created roles are named "regress_xxx".
contrib/amcheck didn't get the memo either.
2019-06-25 23:06:17 -04:00
Peter Geoghegan b00326df7a Correct obsolete amcheck comments.
Oversight in commit dd299df8.
2019-06-24 10:31:58 -07:00
Magnus Hagander 992fe54e77 Replace an occurrence of slave with standby
Commit a1ef920e27 replaced the use of
slave with standby, but overlooked this comment.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
2019-06-19 14:38:23 +02:00
Michael Paquier 3412030205 Fix more typos and inconsistencies in the tree
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a5419ea-1452-a4e6-72ff-545b1a5a8076@gmail.com
2019-06-17 16:13:16 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita 08d2d58a2a postgres_fdw: Fix costing of pre-sorted foreign paths with local stats.
Commit aa09cd242 modified estimate_path_cost_size() so that it reuses
cached costs of a basic foreign path for a given foreign-base/join
relation when costing pre-sorted foreign paths for that relation, but it
incorrectly re-computed retrieved_rows, an estimated number of rows
fetched from the remote side, which is needed for costing both the basic
and pre-sorted foreign paths.  To fix, handle retrieved_rows the same way
as the cached costs: store in that relation's fpinfo the retrieved_rows
estimate computed for costing the basic foreign path, and reuse it when
costing the pre-sorted foreign paths.  Also, reuse the rows/width
estimates stored in that relation's fpinfo when costing the pre-sorted
foreign paths, to make the code consistent.

In commit ffab494a4, to extend the costing mentioned above to the
foreign-grouping case, I made a change to add_foreign_grouping_paths() to
store in a given foreign-grouped relation's RelOptInfo the rows estimate
for that relation for reuse, but this patch makes that change unnecessary
since we already store the row estimate in that relation's fpinfo, which
this patch reuses when costing a foreign path for that relation with the
sortClause ordering; remove that change.

In passing, fix thinko in commit 7012b132d: in estimate_path_cost_size(),
the width estimate for a given foreign-grouped relation to be stored in
that relation's fpinfo was reset incorrectly when costing a basic foreign
path for that relation with local stats.

Apply the patch to HEAD only to avoid destabilizing existing plan choices.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17jaJLPDEkgnP2VmkOg=5wT8YQ1CqssU8JRpZ_NSE+dqQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-06-14 20:49:59 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita 8b6da83d16 postgres_fdw: Account for triggers in non-direct remote UPDATE planning.
Previously, in postgresPlanForeignModify, we planned an UPDATE operation
on a foreign table so that we transmit only columns that were explicitly
targets of the UPDATE, so as to avoid unnecessary data transmission, but
if there were BEFORE ROW UPDATE triggers on the foreign table, those
triggers might change values for non-target columns, in which case we
would miss sending changed values for those columns.  Prevent optimizing
away transmitting all columns if there are BEFORE ROW UPDATE triggers on
the foreign table.

This is an oversight in commit 7cbe57c34 which added triggers on foreign
tables, so apply the patch all the way back to 9.4 where that came in.

Author: Shohei Mochizuki
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/201905270152.x4R1q3qi014550@toshiba.co.jp
2019-06-13 17:59:09 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita 92a88644d2 postgres_fdw: Reorder C includes.
Reorder header files in postgres_fdw.c and connection.c in alphabetical
order.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17ZmNb-EELqu8LmMh2t2uFdbfWNVDEfDO5-bpejHPONMQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-06-11 13:39:31 +09:00
Alexander Korotkov b6987a885b Fix operator naming in pg_trgm GUC option descriptions
Descriptions of pg_trgm GUC options have % replaced with %% like it was
a printf-like format.  But that's not needed since they are just plain strings.
This commit fixed that.  Backpatch to last supported version since this error
present from the beginning.

Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAgPKODUsu9gqUFiNqEOAqedStxJ-a0sapsJXWWAVp%3Dxg%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-06-10 20:14:19 +03:00
Noah Misch f2c71cb71f Stop using spelling "nonexistant".
The documentation used "nonexistent" exclusively, and the source tree
used it three times as often as "nonexistant".
2019-06-08 10:12:26 -07:00
Heikki Linnakangas 77b68e3a4f Fix copy-pasto in freeing memory on error in vacuumlo.
It's harmless to call PQfreemem() with a NULL argument, so the only
consequence was that if allocating 'schema' failed, but allocating 'table'
or 'field' succeeded, we would leak a bit of memory. That's highly
unlikely to happen, so this is just academical, but let's get it right.

Per bug #15838 from Timur Birsh. Backpatch back to 9.5, where the
PQfreemem() calls were introduced.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/15838-3221652c72c5e69d@postgresql.org
2019-06-07 12:42:27 +03:00
Tom Lane 2cd4e83570 Fix contrib/auto_explain to not cause problems in parallel workers.
A parallel worker process should not be making any decisions of its
own about whether to auto-explain.  If the parent session process
passed down flags asking for instrumentation data, do that, otherwise
not.  Trying to enable instrumentation anyway leads to bugs like the
"could not find key N in shm TOC" failure reported in bug #15821
from Christian Hofstaedtler.

We can implement this cheaply by piggybacking on the existing logic
for not doing anything when we've chosen not to sample a statement.

While at it, clean up some tin-eared coding related to the sampling
feature, including an off-by-one error that meant that asking for 1.0
sampling rate didn't actually result in sampling every statement.

Although the specific case reported here only manifested in >= v11,
I believe that related misbehaviors can be demonstrated in any version
that has parallel query; and the off-by-one error is certainly there
back to 9.6 where that feature was added.  So back-patch to 9.6.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15821-5eb422e980594075@postgresql.org
2019-06-03 18:06:04 -04:00
Michael Paquier 1fb6f62a84 Fix typos in various places
Author: Andrea Gelmini
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190528181718.GA39034@glet
2019-06-03 13:44:03 +09:00
Tom Lane 032627ee78 Clean up PL/Perl's handling of the _() macro.
Perl likes to redefine the _() macro:

#ifdef CAN_PROTOTYPE
#define	_(args) args
#else ...

There was lots not to like about the way we dealt with this before:

1. Instead of taking care of the conflict centrally in plperl.h, we
expected every one of its ever-growing number of includers to do so.
This is duplicative and error-prone in itself, plus it means that
plperl.h fails to meet the expectation of being compilable standalone,
resulting in macro-redefinition warnings in cpluspluscheck.

2. We left _() with its Perl definition, meaning that if someone tried
to use it in any Perl-related extension, it would silently fail to
provide run-time translation.  I don't see any live bugs of this ilk,
but it's clearly a hard-to-notice bug waiting to happen.

So fix that by centralizing the cleanup logic, making it match what
we're already doing for other macro conflicts with Perl.  Since we only
expect plperl.h to be included by extensions not core code, we should
redefine _() as dgettext() not gettext().
2019-06-02 12:23:39 -04:00
Michael Paquier af94ea7406 Fix typos in SQL scripts of pgcrypto
Author: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABwTF4U_5kEnH93PXZEuEsZHuoSSuBEOqC6pian8vDfLZSQJNA@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-28 06:33:30 -04:00
Amit Kapila 9679345f3c Fix typos.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7208de98-add8-8537-91c0-f8b089e2928c@gmail.com
2019-05-26 18:28:18 +05:30
Peter Eisentraut 41205719d3 Change Graphviz file extension
Change extension for Graphviz files from .dot to .gv.  The latter
appears to be the generally preferred one nowadays.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/71fe76d2-c7d7-2acc-6762-bbf9e61c566e%402ndquadrant.com
2019-05-26 08:08:05 +02:00
Tom Lane 8255c7a5ee Phase 2 pgindent run for v12.
Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent.  This formats
multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with
additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match
where the first line's left parenthesis is.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-22 13:04:48 -04:00
Tom Lane be76af171c Initial pgindent run for v12.
This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent.
I thought it would be good to commit this separately,
so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-22 12:55:34 -04:00
Michael Paquier 6ba500cae6 Fix regression test outputs
75445c1 has caused various failures in tests across the tree after
updating some error messages, so fix the newly-expected output.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8332.1558048838@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-17 09:40:02 +09:00
Peter Geoghegan ae7291acbc Standardize ItemIdData terminology.
The term "item pointer" should not be used to refer to ItemIdData
variables, since that is needlessly ambiguous.  Only
ItemPointerData/ItemPointer variables should be called item pointers.

To fix, establish the convention that ItemIdData variables should always
be referred to either as "item identifiers" or "line pointers".  The
term "item identifier" already predominates in docs and translatable
messages, and so should be the preferred alternative there.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=c=MZQjUzde3o9+2PLAPuHTpVZPPdYxN=E4ndQ2--8ew@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-13 15:53:39 -07:00
Etsuro Fujita cc866941ad postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment. 2019-05-13 17:30:35 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita edbcbe277d postgres_fdw: Fix cost estimation for aggregate pushdown.
In commit 7012b132d0, which added support for aggregate pushdown in
postgres_fdw, the expense of evaluating the final scan/join target
computed by make_group_input_target() was not accounted for at all in
costing aggregate pushdown paths with local statistics.  The right fix
for this would be to have a separate upper stage to adjust the final
scan/join relation (see comments for apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths());
but for now, fix by adding the tlist eval cost when costing aggregate
pushdown paths with local statistics.

Apply this to HEAD only to avoid destabilizing existing plan choices.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-By: Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5C66A056.60007%40lab.ntt.co.jp
2019-05-09 18:39:23 +09:00
Tom Lane 2d7d946cd3 Clean up the behavior and API of catalog.c's is-catalog-relation tests.
The right way for IsCatalogRelation/Class to behave is to return true
for OIDs less than FirstBootstrapObjectId (not FirstNormalObjectId),
without any of the ad-hoc fooling around with schema membership.

The previous code was wrong because (1) it claimed that
information_schema tables were not catalog relations but their toast
tables were, which is silly; and (2) if you dropped and recreated
information_schema, which is a supported operation, the behavior
changed.  That's even sillier.  With this definition, "catalog
relations" are exactly the ones traceable to the postgres.bki data,
which seems like what we want.

With this simplification, we don't actually need access to the pg_class
tuple to identify a catalog relation; we only need its OID.  Hence,
replace IsCatalogClass with "IsCatalogRelationOid(oid)".  But keep
IsCatalogRelation as a convenience function.

This allows fixing some arguably-wrong semantics in contrib/sepgsql and
ReindexRelationConcurrently, which were using an IsSystemNamespace test
where what they really should be using is IsCatalogRelationOid.  The
previous coding failed to protect toast tables of system catalogs, and
also was not on board with the general principle that user-created tables
do not become catalogs just by virtue of being renamed into pg_catalog.
We can also get rid of a messy hack in ReindexMultipleTables.

While we're at it, also rename IsSystemNamespace to IsCatalogNamespace,
because the previous name invited confusion with the more expansive
semantics used by IsSystemRelation/Class.

Also improve the comments in catalog.c.

There are a few remaining places in replication-related code that are
special-casing OIDs below FirstNormalObjectId.  I'm inclined to think
those are wrong too, and if there should be any special case it should
just extend to FirstBootstrapObjectId.  But first we need to debate
whether a FOR ALL TABLES publication should include information_schema.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21697.1557092753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15150.1557257111@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-08 23:27:38 -04:00
Amit Kapila 7db0cde6b5 Revert "Avoid the creation of the free space map for small heap relations".
This feature was using a process local map to track the first few blocks
in the relation.  The map was reset each time we get the block with enough
freespace.  It was discussed that it would be better to track this map on
a per-relation basis in relcache and then invalidate the same whenever
vacuum frees up some space in the page or when FSM is created.  The new
design would be better both in terms of API design and performance.

List of commits reverted, in reverse chronological order:

06c8a5090e  Improve code comments in b0eaa4c51b.
13e8643bfc  During pg_upgrade, conditionally skip transfer of FSMs.
6f918159a9  Add more tests for FSM.
9c32e4c350  Clear the local map when not used.
29d108cdec  Update the documentation for FSM behavior..
08ecdfe7e5  Make FSM test portable.
b0eaa4c51b  Avoid creation of the free space map for small heap relations.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190416180452.3pm6uegx54iitbt5@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-05-07 09:30:24 +05:30
Noah Misch 726cc4242a Suppress compiler warning in non-SSL, non-assert builds.
Jeff Janes, reviewed by Michael Paquier.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1x8taZfsbPkv_MsWbTtzibW_yQHXoMhF_DTtm=z2hVHDg@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-03 21:56:46 -07:00
Andres Freund 3dbb317d32 Fix potential assertion failure when reindexing a pg_class index.
When reindexing individual indexes on pg_class it was possible to
either trigger an assertion failure:
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!ReindexIsProcessingIndex(((index)->rd_id)))

That's because reindex_index() called SetReindexProcessing() - which
enables an asserts ensuring no index insertions happen into the index
- before calling RelationSetNewRelfilenode(). That not correct for
indexes on pg_class, because RelationSetNewRelfilenode() updates the
relevant pg_class row, which needs to update the indexes.

The are two reasons this wasn't noticed earlier. Firstly the bug
doesn't trigger when reindexing all of pg_class, as reindex_relation
has code "hiding" all yet-to-be-reindexed indexes. Secondly, the bug
only triggers when the the update to pg_class doesn't turn out to be a
HOT update - otherwise there's no index insertion to trigger the
bug. Most of the time there's enough space, making this bug hard to
trigger.

To fix, move RelationSetNewRelfilenode() to before the
SetReindexProcessing() (and, together with some other code, to outside
of the PG_TRY()).

To make sure the error checking intended by SetReindexProcessing() is
more robust, modify CatalogIndexInsert() to check
ReindexIsProcessingIndex() even when the update is a HOT update.

Also add a few regression tests for REINDEXing of system catalogs.

The last two improvements would have prevented some of the issues
fixed in 5c1560606d from being introduced in the first place.

Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Diagnosed-By: Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190418011430.GA19133@paquier.xyz
Backpatch: 9.4-, the bug is present in all branches
2019-04-29 19:42:08 -07:00
Tom Lane 8cad5adb9c Avoid postgres_fdw crash for a targetlist entry that's just a Param.
foreign_grouping_ok() is willing to put fairly arbitrary expressions into
the targetlist of a remote SELECT that's doing grouping or aggregation on
the remote side, including expressions that have no foreign component to
them at all.  This is possibly a bit dubious from an efficiency standpoint;
but it rises to the level of a crash-causing bug if the expression is just
a Param or non-foreign Var.  In that case, the expression will necessarily
also appear in the fdw_exprs list of values we need to send to the remote
server, and then setrefs.c's set_foreignscan_references will mistakenly
replace the fdw_exprs entry with a Var referencing the targetlist result.

The root cause of this problem is bad design in commit e7cb7ee14: it put
logic into set_foreignscan_references that IMV is postgres_fdw-specific,
and yet this bug shows that it isn't postgres_fdw-specific enough.  The
transformation being done on fdw_exprs assumes that fdw_exprs is to be
evaluated with the fdw_scan_tlist as input, which is not how postgres_fdw
uses it; yet it could be the right thing for some other FDW.  (In the
bigger picture, setrefs.c has no business assuming this for the other
expression fields of a ForeignScan either.)

The right fix therefore would be to expand the FDW API so that the
FDW could inform setrefs.c how it intends to evaluate these various
expressions.  We can't change that in the back branches though, and we
also can't just summarily change setrefs.c's behavior there, or we're
likely to break external FDWs.

As a stopgap, therefore, hack up postgres_fdw so that it won't attempt
to send targetlist entries that look exactly like the fdw_exprs entries
they'd produce.  In most cases this actually produces a superior plan,
IMO, with less data needing to be transmitted and returned; so we probably
ought to think harder about whether we should ship tlist expressions at
all when they don't contain any foreign Vars or Aggs.  But that's an
optimization not a bug fix so I left it for later.  One case where this
produces an inferior plan is where the expression in question is actually
a GROUP BY expression: then the restriction prevents us from using remote
grouping.  It might be possible to work around that (since that would
reduce to group-by-a-constant on the remote side); but it seems like a
pretty unlikely corner case, so I'm not sure it's worth expending effort
solely to improve that.  In any case the right long-term answer is to fix
the API as sketched above, and then revert this hack.

Per bug #15781 from Sean Johnston.  Back-patch to v10 where the problem
was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15781-2601b1002bad087c@postgresql.org
2019-04-27 13:15:54 -04:00